More

Condoms In Porn Petition Being Brought To LA Voters

By SHAYA TAYEFE MOHAJER   08/16/11 09:10 PM ET   AP

Condoms In Porn

LOS ANGELES -- If a health advocacy group gets enough petition signatures, Los Angeles residents could be asked to vote on whether porn producers must require performers to use condoms on shoots as a condition of getting a filming permit.

AIDS Healthcare Foundation President Michael Weinstein announced Tuesday that his group needs 41,138 valid city voter signatures in the next four months to get the issue on the June 2012 ballot.

"As a citizen of Los Angeles, I have a responsibility in my own hometown to make sure we limit the spread of disease, but also to ensure the safety of performers in this industry," said Weinstein, who says his group has hired a firm to gather the signatures.

The proposed ordinance would apply to commercial filming of adult films, and would call on the city to charge adult film producers a "fee sufficient to pay for periodic inspections" for enforcement.

In an interview Tuesday, city AIDS Coordinator Stephen David Simon said while he values AHF's advocacy work and their massive billboard campaign encouraging HIV testing, this latest campaign won't work for LA.

For starters, by going through the city permit process, condom use enforcement would not fall to county health inspectors, but rather Los Angeles police officers would need to patrol porn shoots to ensure compliance, said Simon.

"With all the budget cuts, do we want to make this a priority and focus of LAPD?" asked Simon. "I don't know if that's in a taxpayer's best interest."

Simon said the city supports efforts already under way to tighten statewide workplace safety rules through the Division of Occupational Safety and Health, better known as Cal/OSHA.

The ballot box query is the latest move in the AIDS Healthcare Foundation's longstanding campaign to require safe sex in pornography.

The group has had three unsuccessful attempts to find a lawmaker to back statewide legislation to mandate condoms in porn. A lawsuit asking a judge to mandate local health officials to crack down on unprotected sex was also unsuccessful.

Acting in response to an AHF complaint, state workplace safety officials are already working to clarify an existing regulation, which directs nurses and medical professionals to wear gloves at work, to specify condom use in porn, too.

The majority of American commercial porn films are shot in the city's San Fernando Valley, where the multi-billion dollar industry has long resisted the AIDS Healthcare Foundation's attempts to require safe sex for its performers.

The exact number of productions that occur without permits is subject to speculation, but about 200 permits a month are issued to the adult film industry, according to Weinstein.

FilmLA spokesman Todd Lindgren said that number sounds too high, and the most recent number he recalls is about 40 adult film permits a month. The not-for-profit agency coordinates and processes film permits for Los Angeles, which typically run about $625 for any shoot – adult or otherwise – for a 2-week, 10-location permit.

Last year, AHF asked FilmLA to stop issuing permits to porn shoots, to no avail.

In Los Angeles, county and city officials have largely resisted enforcing or strengthening any safe sex mandates on the porn industry.

Last year, Los Angeles County public health director Dr. Jonathan Fielding said regulating condom use on porn sets is nearly impossible, saying porn shoots are typically clandestine operations that require little more than a bed and a camera.

Any success with the ballot initiative would likely drive more of the industry underground, said Christian Mann, general manager of porn production company Evil Angel and a board member of the Free Speech Coalition, the industry's trade association.

"AHF's end-run around Los Angeles County's previously stated position that they won't put themselves in a enforcement capacity, to do it as a ballot initiative system, will probably do what so many regulatory schemes do: fail to achieve the ambition but instead create a new problem," said Mann.

About a third of Evil Angel's productions are shot in Europe, and Mann, an industry veteran, says the initiative would make Los Angeles the only city he knows of in the world to require condoms in porn.

Consumers demand porn without condoms, and the market would force Los Angeles producers to respond, Mann said.

Mann believes porn producers who stay in Los Angeles will be less likely to draw permits, forcing them to go underground and shoot scenes without condoms.

"At the end of the day, it winds up hurting business and driving business out of Los Angeles," said Mann. That makes it "more difficult for us to maintain an environment that we think is the safest possible environment for these performers that still makes it possible for saleable productions to be created."

Simon says what he's concerned about now is the spread of illness in the wake of the closure of the Adult Industry Medical Healthcare Foundation in Dec. 2010, known as AIM.

Since its opening in 1998, the San Fernando Valley clinic catered to porn stars with frequent HIV testing and was frequently criticized by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation before it was forced to close for inadequate licensing.

AIM operated a database for porn producers to check the most recent test results for actors, and though the system was imperfect because it didn't track non-HIV sexually transmitted diseases, it was better than nothing, said Simon.

Over the long term, the industry seemed to be regulating itself adequately through the clinic's work, he added.

"A dozen infections is a bad thing, we certainly empathize," said Simon. "...but a dozen infections from hundreds of thousands of possible exposures is quite successful from a health perspective."

A new database is in the "beta phase" of testing, with performers and testing facilities just beginning to log on and share information, said Mann.

___

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

LOS ANGELES -- If a health advocacy group gets enough petition signatures, Los Angeles residents could be asked to vote on whether porn producers must require performers to use condoms on shoots as a ...
LOS ANGELES -- If a health advocacy group gets enough petition signatures, Los Angeles residents could be asked to vote on whether porn producers must require performers to use condoms on shoots as a ...
Filed by Lucy Blodgett  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 76
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
03:15 PM on 08/31/2011
All actors and actresses have the choice to work exclusively using condoms, it is there choice to take that risk. We proudly carry movies both with and without condoms, because its the actors right to make that choice for themselves. Besides, if this were to become law, you would see the entire industry move to a different city or state without such requirements. Wonder how much revenue Los Angels and/or California would loose form the multi-billion dollar industry leaving the area....

www.boudoirnoir.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Catherine Lynch Monks
If you don't vote don't complain
11:26 AM on 08/18/2011
Does anyone else wonder why anyone doing a porn movie WOULDN'T wear a condom? Not that AIDs is the big worry, seems that a lot of them decide to end their own lives.

http://thepinkcross.org/gallery/?g2_itemId=84&g2_page=10
11:01 PM on 08/17/2011
i dont even have to read this to know that if its called to law that the porn industry there will move...most states have film boards nothing saying they have to do it there
08:07 PM on 08/17/2011
I have seen a number of porn movies where they use condoms. I'm not quite sure why they do though. They perform oral on each other with no protection, then chuck on a rubber, have sex and then at the end the guy pulls off the condom and ejacultates on the woman. Brilliant!
06:07 PM on 08/17/2011
How bout we have a really and petition for coal minors, or mechanics who work around very toxic chemicals all day long? We don't and maybe we should. But most chop it up to "the nature of the job". Be keepers get stung and yes porn stars get STD's. Sad, unfortunate but again, its the nature of the job. Porn sells because its raw and uninhibited fantasy for most, it will not have the same profits if they put on condoms, these companies know that. This lady wasn't complaining while she was collecting big checks (yes they are paid well) for her work, but why now? Is it because shes a born again on a different crusade and using this as a red-hearing??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blizzard man robot voice
Mark 13:13
05:20 PM on 08/17/2011
Her former porn name is Elizabeth Rollings. I googled her pics. Gross!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blizzard man robot voice
Mark 13:13
04:36 PM on 08/17/2011
This is one of the articles where I don't have to disguise the word "porn" by transposing letters.
04:33 PM on 08/17/2011
Superficial problems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robdaemon
04:07 PM on 08/17/2011
This is ridiculous.

"I can't be responsible for making my own safe sex choices. Please force them on me."
photo
Js420
Another beautiful sunny day!
03:51 PM on 08/17/2011
How about we vote on legalizing prostitution already!? And redirect those funds spent on entrapment, to looking for the thousands of missing people in our country!
photo
Js420
Another beautiful sunny day!
03:45 PM on 08/17/2011
Actors should have the right to use a condom. And they should be protected from discrimination for requesting to do so. It should be up to the porn stars, not LA residence nor porn producers.
photo
Aabby
"Facts have a liberal bias."-Ste­ven Colbert
03:38 PM on 08/17/2011
I disagree with those saying this is none of the state’s business. Workplace safety is something that is in the jurisdiction/responsibility of the state. If they require you to wear a helmet during construction, they can require a “helmet” in his case also.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alice Radley
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
03:24 PM on 08/17/2011
It's pathetic that consumers of porn are so hung up about condoms. They're putting these people in danger and they don't care. Sad sad sad.
05:24 PM on 08/17/2011
These are porn stars who are putting themselves in danger not consumers. No one is telling them to go out and do porn.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nmeemn
Sum, ergo cogito.
03:19 PM on 08/17/2011
Has anyone considered that maybe people who get into this profession don't LIKE to use condoms?

And if people in this profession are so worried about STDs, maybe they should do something else for a living?

If porn producers have to force workers to use condoms, they will go out of business. People who watch porn generally don't want to see close-up shots that involve condoms... just sayin'.
photo
Aabby
"Facts have a liberal bias."-Ste­ven Colbert
03:19 PM on 08/17/2011
Cant believe that’s not an industry standard already!