More

James Murdoch Expected To Face Parliament Again Over Phone Hacking (VIDEO)

James Murdoch

First Posted: 08/16/11 04:59 PM ET Updated: 10/16/11 06:12 AM ET

NEW YORK – James Murdoch will likely be grilled once again by members of Parliament following "devastating revelations" related to the ongoing phone hacking scandal that’s shaken his family’s media empire.

John Whittingdale and Tom Watson, members of Parliament’s Culture, Media and Sport Committee, spoke Tuesday about possibly recalling Murdoch following the release of several bombshell letters that cast doubt on previous claims about investigating phone hacking at the now-shuttered News of the World and suggest a possible cover-up.

“We are simply trying to find out whether Parliament was misled and where,” Watson said, noting that it's “likely we’ll take Murdoch back” for additional questions.


Watch Whittingdale and Watson below (via The Telegraph):



Before the long-simmering scandal exploded in July, James Murdoch was considered heir apparent at News Corp. and was leading the company $12 billion takeover of British Sky Broadcasting -- a deal that fell apart amid shocking revelations last month. Although the BSkyB board recently expressed confidence in James' stewardship, his father appears to have lost some. Last week, Rupert Murdoch told investors that chief operating officer Chase Carey would succeed him in the short term if needed, rather than James.

It'll still be a few weeks before the DCMS committee decides whether or not to call back James Murdoch. That'll depend on a Sept. 6 hearing featuring several former News Corp. executives that's likely to be the most closely watched since Rupert, James and former chief executive Rebekah Brooks testified last month. The committee is asking former News of the World editor Colin Myler and ex-legal chief Tom Crone, among others, to appear and answer questions relating to the just-released documents.

In a March 2007 letter, Clive Goodman -- the royal reporter convicted of phone hacking just over a month earlier -- claimed that the practice of illegally intercepting phone messages was “widely discussed” in editorial meetings under then-editor (and later David Cameron's media chief) Andy Coulson. He also claimed that Crone and Coulson promised to reinstate him if he didn't implicate higher-ups.

On Tuesday, Whittingdale mentioned that the committee will need to look deeper into the “continuing difference in the accounts” of James Murdoch, Myler and Crone. Two days after Murdoch's testimony, Myler and Crone said he misled Parliament by claiming not to have known that phone hacking went beyond one reporter in 2008 when they discussed an out-of-court settlement. In separate letters, the two men reiterated the claim that Murdoch was made aware of an email showing that at least one other reporter, Neville Thurlbeck, was involved in phone hacking. Murdoch, in a letter, said he has no recollection of such an email being discussed.

In another revealing letter to the committee, Harbottle & Lewis -- an outside law firm brought in to review a set of News of the World staff emails in May 2007 -- refutes James Murdoch’s claim they determined Goodman was just a “rogue reporter” and phone hacking hadn't been widespread. (Murdoch may also be asked why News Corp. provided a more heavily redacted version of the Goodman letter to Parliament that not only removes names but also the allegations of superiors knowing about the hacking.)

The committee is also requesting the appearance of former News International director of legal affairs Jon Chapman and former human resources director Daniel Cloke. Chapman and Cloke conducted an email review that’s been characterized by Murdoch as a substantive investigation into widespread hacking; however, Chapman said in a letter that the review was actually “relatively limited in its scope and terms of reference” and “was never intended to be a general internal inquiry or investigation into the issue of voicemail interception at the News of the World.”

“News Corporation's board has set up a Management and Standards Committee, chaired by independent Chairman Lord Grabiner, which is co-operating fully with the Metropolitan Police and is facilitating their investigation into illegal voicemail interception at the News of the World and related issues," the company said in a statement. "We recognise the seriousness of materials disclosed to the Police and Parliament and are committed to working in a constructive and open way with all the relevant authorities.”

The committee also plans to contact Coulson, Brooks, ex-managing editor Stuart Kuttner and former Dow Jones chief Les Hinton to “ask them whether they wish to add anything to or amend any of the evidence they have previously given to the committee.”

While Hinton received the Goodman letter in February 2007, he did not acknowledge it when testifying before Parliament the following month. At the time, Hinton confirmed to Whittingdale that the company had conducted a full investigation and he was convinced Goodman was the only reporter involved. The latest revelations show that the internal email review, along with the subsequent review by Harbottle & Lewis, weren't completed for months after Hinton's testimony.

In an ITV News interview, Watson questioned why Hinton didn't mention the letter before Parliament or notify the police. "After all there had been an allegation of widespread criminality in the organization in 2007 and he didn't want to clear it up," Watson said. "That contradicts what Rupert Murdoch told us, which is he takes a zero tolerance policy to wrongdoing in News Corp."


FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

NEW YORK – James Murdoch will likely be grilled once again by members of Parliament following "devastating revelations" related to the ongoing phone hacking scandal that’s shaken his family’s me...
NEW YORK – James Murdoch will likely be grilled once again by members of Parliament following "devastating revelations" related to the ongoing phone hacking scandal that’s shaken his family’s me...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 247
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
05:04 PM on 08/20/2011
Contempt of Parliment!

So, young Master Jimmy will be called to "Task" for his Lies to the Government Leaders.

Off to: HM Wandsworth!
04:40 PM on 08/17/2011
So the reason Murdock decided to withdraw his bid for the Sky T V station was really just a hope and a prayer that getting out of the spot light would maybe deflect attention from the broader scandal.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:22 PM on 08/17/2011
These people are doing more hacking than Bill the Cat.
ACK!!!
THBBFT!!!
12:56 PM on 08/17/2011
Looks like daddy is preparing for jail time for his boy. I bet James will have plenty of company in prison. Do they have family units over there?
12:24 PM on 08/17/2011
"Murdoch may also be asked why News Corp. provided a more heavily redacted version of the Goodman letter to Parliament that not only removes names but also the allegations of superiors knowing about the hacking.)" Indicates the lack of investigative authority of the Select Committee. That will change when they refer it to a Judicial setting and Judge where a Subpoena and discovery interrogatories under a numbered docket will "unredact" all communications. James is slowly becoming toast as he hangs there "twisting in the wind".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
05:00 PM on 08/17/2011
They don't have to refer anything, since Scotland Yard is already investigating the actions taken by 'News of the World'
06:49 PM on 08/17/2011
Sigh- Rebak Brooks"released on bail" meaning she was charged -http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14178051
R Brooks - "not aware she was going to be arrested." She, Coulson and up to 12 others were arrested for "indictable offenses".http://abcnews.go.com/International/rebekah-brooks-rupert-murdoch-executive-arrested/story?id=14091082

The fact that she had to post bail indicates she has been formally charged and awaits further judicial action. On posting bail she had to give up her passport. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/07/17/995562/-Senior-Scotland-Yard-Officer:-Hacking-Scandal-a-Conspiracy-to-Pervert-the-Course-of-Justice
photo
CalDemo
Watch Where You Step
12:13 PM on 08/17/2011
Just one question of James and Rupert: Did you ever ask a reporter, a publisher, anyone involved in a sensational leak, 'how did you get that information?' Considering their exposure to financial damages, they'd be irresponsible to not at least ask for the source of the leak, or just feeling too secure and insulated because of their ties to influential politicians.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftyandproudofit
Jesus was a liberal
01:45 PM on 08/17/2011
Of course not. They're employing the Ken Lay line of defense: I took home millions of dollars in compensation, but had absolutely no idea about what was going on.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
05:07 PM on 08/17/2011
Just one question of James and Rupert: Did you ever ask a reporter, a publisher, anyone involved in a sensational leak, 'how did you get that informatio­n?' Considerin­g their exposure to financial damages, they'd be irresponsi­ble to not at least ask for the source of the leak, or just feeling too secure and insulated because of their ties to influentia­l politician­s.

Naivete is rampant in these parts, isn't it.

This is like asking Donald Rumsfeld, 'Did you query anyone in the chain of command about the treatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay?

Politicians are not going to ask that because not only do they already know the answer, they know the institutional imperatives behind it. In any set-up of this sort, the less anyone in charge knows about the gory details, the longer it can continue. Believe me, anyone inclined to tell a News Corp. executive about what was going on at 'News of the World' wasn't going to get within ten miles of said executive.

It's all about Deniability and the universally-held, unprincipled principle that What You Know and What You Can Prove are two, vastly different things.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:06 PM on 08/17/2011
send lawyers, guns and money.
dad, get me out of this...

sir warren zevon
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amanda Matthews
03:49 PM on 08/18/2011
Or bloodsucking 'Werewolves of London'.

I really miss Warren Zevon. He was a Genius for sure.

Things to do in Denver When You're Dead, Boom Boom Mancini, Vera Cruz. There was so much more to the man! If only he were here to write a song about these guys.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ConsensusReality
RootenTootenZooten
12:06 PM on 08/17/2011
looks like choppy seas ahead for the murcoch crime syndicate
VA Jill
Retired RN, Army mom. Bring the troops home!
11:53 AM on 08/17/2011
The mistake Parliament made was in not putting James and Daddy under oath the first time. Hopefully they rectify this mistake. Of course a lot of members could be in the pay of these giant sleazeballs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
05:08 PM on 08/17/2011
Could be??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
11:48 AM on 08/17/2011
FTA:

'Although the BSkyB board recently expressed confidence in James' stewardship, his father appears to have lost some. Last week, Rupert Murdoch told investors that chief operating officer Chase Carey would succeed him in the short term if needed, rather than James.'

See, I told yo that Rupert would throw anybody under the bus, even his son, if need be.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
05:15 PM on 08/17/2011
I don't think this qualifies as prescience, since we've known Murdoch was that sort of at least four decades.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
08:12 PM on 08/17/2011
Too true.
11:04 AM on 08/17/2011
Please, James, put this whole scandal to rest. You KNOW who to send the checks to.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dax49
10:29 AM on 08/17/2011
Some of these MP's dance better than republicans- but then, their money all comes from the same source!
09:47 AM on 08/17/2011
"News Corporation's board has set up a Management and Standards Committee"...

...headed by myself and Miss Betty Childs...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sinister Minister
There's no way out of here alive.
09:34 AM on 08/17/2011
"(Murdoch may also be asked why News Corp. provided a more heavily redacted version of the Goodman letter to Parliament that not only removes names but also the allegations of superiors knowing about the hacking.) "

Really? If they feel a need to ask then there is little chance justice will be done.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Klos
10:51 AM on 08/17/2011
Remember, this is UK not USA.

They want him to lie on record.
So they can call him on that.

I love the ending of previous hearing -- you cannot use Exxon defense: No, I have no recollection of that. If you say that, you are considered to be most likely lying and subject to further investigation (like data-analysis and many many more.)
12:30 PM on 08/17/2011
I suspect on Sept 6th: Mylers, Chapman, Crone, Goodman or somebody else, while before the Select Committee, will produce "unredacted' dynamite letters, memos and communications documenting that James read them, initialed them (Probably Crone's copy or original) and was on the unredacted "routing list" indicating he got a copy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:27 AM on 08/17/2011
Gets down to what he knew and when he knew it and why he was signing big checks for hacking victims without asking what they were for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Klos
10:47 AM on 08/17/2011
These questions were asked. Murdoch repeatedly told Comitee that he has no recollection of that.
Thankfully in Europe this is not viable defence. (It is called Exxon defense, and it is irelevant to hearings.) As opposed to USA.
Now they have prove of that. Correspondence.

When UK is angry, they do stuff. Like when people are angry, they riot. This is actually (even though it is broken) healthy society - self-aware, self-respecting. And not personally, but collectively. As in society.