Kate Moss' Daughter Loses Fingers To Vogue Photoshop (PHOTO)

We love us a good Photoshop fail, but sometimes we feel a bit bad for the victim (not you, Victoria's Secret models -- you looked too perfect to begin with).

We almost didn't notice, but Jezebel so kindly pointed out that Kate Moss' intimate mother-daughter portrait in the September issue of Vogue received a little too much airbrushing.

Lila Grace, Moss' daughter, seems to have lost the tips of her fingers.

It's not only a dumb mistake, but also sort of silly: how many rolls of fat or excessive wrinkles did 8-year-old Lila Grace have on her hands? Just how unkempt were her fingernails to warrant such a clumsy Photoshop fail?

Oh well, at least they didn't cut off her arm entirely.

Check it out below in the bottom righthand corner of the pic and click here to see more Kate Moss wedding day portraits from Vogue's September issue.

(Via Jezebel)

Comments

[bobnglenwood]

08:03 PM on 10/10/2011

If this were Miley Cyrus, the world would be decrying the pornographic nature of the picture. Why is ok for a 9 year old to be nude for a photo shoot with her famous mom. Equality for all. Make every picture nude. Can't wait for the next picture of Congress. Where would they hide the illegal payoff money?

[MMMMarilyn]

05:03 PM on 08/25/2011

The transplant took!
Your daughter is now connected to you by 2 fingers on her right hand.

[TRene11]

03:41 PM on 08/18/2011

It's the new planking!

I've seen that phrase on this website too much. Forgive me.

[KDMac]

03:13 PM on 08/18/2011

Creepy on many levels.

[maruski]

05:51 PM on 08/18/2011

pedo-porn fantasy not art.

[angeltel27]

09:27 AM on 08/18/2011

Actually, I have to say, this is the best I've seen Kate Moss look. And while I agree that models are made to be too thin, I think bashing the models is a bad idea. I've been around this industry quite a lot and the girls go through some deep personal bashing from agents. It's "the industry" pressuring these weights, not the models. It's not like Kate Moss made the executive desicion that models were supposed to be crazy thin.

[blizzard man robot voice]

05:22 PM on 08/17/2011

Look at that photo. Now picture it as a man and his son. See how that photo is a bit weird now?

[angeltel27]

09:21 AM on 08/18/2011

Yea...I was kinda thinking the same thing.

[Highball]

03:34 PM on 08/18/2011

It's only creepy if you go into it with that mind-set to begin with.

[blizzard man robot voice]

04:23 PM on 08/18/2011

I always try and picture the opposite sex on everything at all times. Who doesn't?

[jnzcram]

03:59 PM on 08/17/2011

What a cute child she no doubt inherited her mother's fine appearance.

[PCMinistry]

03:49 PM on 08/17/2011

Could've been worse. Could've been a badger.

[valsavo]

02:54 PM on 08/17/2011

Your mistake is in not understanding this is an artistic photograph, purposeful in its appearance, the long themed image of a mother and child intertwined. You may not like this artistic take on the symbiotic nature of a child as continuous and then unfolding from the mother/ parents. Maybe I don't either, but "stupid?" I may wish it to have been a more sophisticated effort, and, there is no photoshop mistake here. The manner in which children from conception onward are on multiple levels attached to the parent while in the process of navigating separation has been a focal point of artists for centuries. (Separation from fathers, emotionally.) This concept, the mother child matrix, is a well documented topic in the literature addressing the mother child as intertwined. The stages of optimally achieving ego autonomy while maintaining healthy emotional attachment is a sweet, difficult, long and arduous process. It is written in our DNA, if not in your understanding of an aesthic shortcoming despite a cognitively clear attempt. We all open ourselves up to critique in our work. Your are an artist as a writer. Attacking this artist because you don't understand his/her concept as practiced through the ages is your mistake. Your mistake may qualify as litmus of a failure to separate somewhere along the way; perhaps in the latent phase when children are cruel and bully one another. Be kind to artists in their sucess, and in their shortcomings. I wish the same for you.

[ycplum]

03:03 PM on 08/17/2011

Wow. It reminds me of the art critique of "Death of a Bat".

My theory is that Lila's fingers were erased because they broke the artistic continuity of Kate's back. Kate's back may or may not have been photoshopped back in.

[remyd]

04:22 PM on 08/17/2011

WOOOW...i think you're missing the point of the article. the child's fingers have been cut off. that's the point. and what on earth are you rambling about?

[joanmalt914]

01:39 PM on 08/17/2011

Beautiful Mom and Child....air brushing, of little consequence when it comes to true beauty. Lovely picture.

[Mia Nodecker]

01:26 PM on 08/17/2011

Quick, give Kate hamburger, she looks ill.
They both look like refugees in some camp in the Balkans

[v16g]

01:53 PM on 08/17/2011

Nice! Drink your milk...

[doublecx3]

02:13 PM on 08/17/2011

You can comment on Kate's weight but leave her daughter alone. She looks perfectly healthy for a kid.

[Mia Nodecker]

02:21 PM on 08/17/2011

Ok, but the child looks sad

[amber2022]

12:23 PM on 08/17/2011

Not sure what I'm supposed to be looking at here..I see no difference..and for Gods sake Kate can you smile just for once....dreary looking thing you are...

[v16g]

01:19 PM on 08/17/2011

Look at the last two fingers of the daughters hand on her moms back--
I think the no smile thing is a trait of models--she is very beautiful in this picture!

[amber2022]

06:01 PM on 08/17/2011

ty for responding

[MrWampler]

09:51 PM on 08/17/2011

I've heard models don't smile because doing so regularly causes smile lines (wrinkles) around the face. In an career where your face is your "product" that's kinda important.

[kae521]

12:12 PM on 08/17/2011

People...nudity and sexuality...really?! The little girl is probably wearing a top that we just can see, for one. This is a mother/daughter portrait that is very well/tastefully done. Get your minds out of the gutter.

[Robert Brooks]

12:15 PM on 08/17/2011

I basically said the same thing, and yet I've been in the pending column for an hour.

[kae521]

12:30 PM on 08/17/2011

Which means my comment will probably be pending for another hour, ha ha ha.

[Ileen P McErlean]

12:07 PM on 08/17/2011

I see nothing wrong with the photo..I think the comfort of mother and daughter posing this way is beautiful, With all the garbage we are inundated with on the screen and in print, this is a pleasure to see...After all it is "HER" Mother!

[remyd]

04:21 PM on 08/17/2011

i think you're missing the point of the article. the child's fingers have been cut off. that's the point.

[Robert Brooks]

12:03 PM on 08/17/2011

Wake up moderators....My comment isn't offensive. Post it.

[Robert Brooks]

12:13 PM on 08/17/2011

Funny..