iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Plants And Animals Moving As Climate Changes, Study Finds


First Posted: 08/18/11 08:21 PM ET Updated: 10/18/11 06:12 AM ET

A new study suggests that plants and animals are moving as the climate changes.

Red Orbit reports on research published in the journal Science, showing that as temperatures rise, plants and animals are moving away from the equator and to higher elevations. As the Associated Press writes, they are "fleeing global warming."

2010 tied 2005 as the warmest year on record, according to government climate experts. According to the Associated Press, National Climatic Data Center's David Easterling noted that since 2000, we have experienced nine of the 10 warmest years on record.

In response to a changing climate, the study finds that species are moving away from the equator at an average rate of more than 15 feet per day, or about a mile per year.

The article also asserts that the plants moving the most are in the areas with the highest levels of warming.

In a phone interview with the Associated Press, Chris D. Thomas, a conservation biologist who lead the work, said, "It's not a matter that might happen in the lifetime of our children and our grandchildren. If you look in your garden you can see the effects of climate change already."

The findings are based on the largest analysis to date of the shifting ranges of species in certain areas of the world, according to the Washington Post.

"The more warming there’s been in an area, the more you would expect a species to move, and the more they have moved,” Thomas, told the Post. "This more or less puts to bed the issue of whether these shifts are related to climate change."


FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

A new study suggests that plants and animals are moving as the climate changes. Red Orbit reports on research published in the journal Science, showing that as temperatures rise, plants and animals...
A new study suggests that plants and animals are moving as the climate changes. Red Orbit reports on research published in the journal Science, showing that as temperatures rise, plants and animals...
A new study suggests that plants and animals are moving as the climate changes. Red Orbit reports on research published in the journal Science, showing that as temperatures rise, plants and animals...
A new study suggests that plants and animals are moving as the climate changes. Red Orbit reports on research published in the journal Science, showing that as temperatures rise, plants and animals...
Filed by Simon McCormack  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 389
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
09:26 PM on 09/06/2011
good thing they are taking care of this problem
07:45 PM on 09/06/2011
This article must have been a wake up call for a lot of people. When it mentions how fast climate is affecting our community, it really make you think. The part that made me think the most is when it said that it's not just making sure that there is a healthy environment for the future of the children or grandchildren of today but it is happening so quickly that everyone living now should be worried. A lot of people thought it would become an issue when they weren't living anymore and didn't take global warming seriously enough, but I think this article will have a huge impact on them.
07:43 PM on 09/01/2011
That must be one hell of a fast growing weed to move 15 feet a day. I guess google earth should show a 20 mile wide baring strip where the equator is. No plants, no trees, no cute fuzzy critters.

"Nobody is interested in solutions if they don't think there's a problem. Given that starting point, I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis." -- AL Gore
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SFTor
09:05 PM on 08/23/2011
As I have not read the behind-the-paywall article I hope someone can clear up some things.

We know that the plants and animals in an area constitute a biotope. All the organisms are linked and interdependent, more or less. Let's for instance consider lions and hoofed animals living on the grassy plains of the Serengeti, which lies on the equator. The grazers feed on the grass, the lions hunt the grazers. The elephants uproot acacia trees and eat the crowns, and so on. You get the picture.

As these animals are interdependent with each other and the local plants, we would have to assume that they would all have to move together. If the wildebeest stay behind, the lions have to hold up too, if you see what I'm getting at.

So are these guys saying they have observed that there is a belt around the equator where there are no more lions and grazers, sort of a dead zone? No more elephants, baboons, and whatnot?

If they have I would say that they are on to something.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:02 AM on 09/03/2011
"latitude/latitudinal" is used thrice in the abstract, but "equator" isn't. So, what are you basing your remark on?

"Abstract

The distributions of many terrestrial organisms are currently shifting in latitude or elevation in response to changing climate. Using a meta-analysis, we estimated that the distributions of species have recently shifted to higher elevations at a median rate of 11.0 meters per decade, and to higher latitudes at a median rate of 16.9 kilometers per decade. These rates are approximately two and three times faster than previously reported. The distances moved by species are greatest in studies showing the highest levels of warming, with average latitudinal shifts being generally sufficient to track temperature changes. However, individual species vary greatly in their rates of change, suggesting that the range shift of each species depends on multiple internal species traits and external drivers of change. Rapid average shifts derive from a wide diversity of responses by individual species."

Yet, to complicate the picture, the subtropics are hotter and drier than the equator.

Why?

Equatorial sun heats air, making it rise to form towering cumulus, which rains out. Latent heat released from condensation further heats and raises the air, which cools as it rises, until hitting the tropospheric inversion, which then spreads it north/south a thousand miles before subsiding to complete the Hadley loop. However, subsiding air gets hotter via compression, as in internal combustion engine pistons. Ergo, the subtropics are where most deserts are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
In Financial Theocracy we Trust
11:02 AM on 08/21/2011
These plants and animals are obviously doing this for the money. Don't let them fool you into thinking it is anything else. Follow the money!
12:46 AM on 08/21/2011
Everybody knows that trees and butterflies are "liberals"... obviously, they're in on the "hoax"!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
When in Rome.......
02:43 AM on 08/21/2011
lol
12:44 AM on 08/21/2011
"...plants and animals are moving away from the equator and to higher elevations."

That makes absolutely no sense. Are the plants and animals moving to higher LATITUDES or are they not moving away from the equator? Elevation has nothing to do with distance from the equator. And they wonder why us "skeptics" doubt the "scientists"...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:31 AM on 08/21/2011
Dosen't anyone in your crowd ever read anything???

----------------------------------------------------------------------

trumphent
Commented 2 days ago in Green

“The article correctly describes the movement as "away from the equator and to higher elevations­." It's meant to describe a direction more than anything else. Climate zones are moving poleward and or upslope. You might want to visit Dr. Terry Root's profession­al homepage. You might actually learn about this subject. I'm sure you will. You exude a natural intellectu­al curiosty that is the envy of many.” ...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:07 AM on 08/21/2011
JFTR--
the last three sentences above obviously do not refer to the sawdustthing...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/trumphent/plants-move-upward-climate-change_n_930724_103623972.html
11:14 AM on 08/21/2011
No I didn't continue reading once the author lost all credibility by confusing elevation with latitude. If you're standing on the equator and you walk uphill straight east or straight west it doesn't matter how high in elevation you go, you are still standing on the equator. If he meant that plants and animals are following the climate zones he should have just said so. Bad journalism or bad science, one or the other.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
09:05 AM on 08/21/2011
No, your tortured attempt to ram the article and the idea through your distorted ideological prism is what makes no sense.
11:57 PM on 08/20/2011
I've been reading this thread and am struck once again by the breathtaking inanity of the climate-denier crowd. Every argument they make has been repeatedly refuted by qualified experts -- you know, the ones who've looked into the subject in depth -- but they just keep on a-comin'.

The PR shills who "sow doubt" have done their job all too well. Scientists all have hidden agendas (Have a clue -- their intellectual integrity is their most precious asset). Al Gore is out to get rich (clue: He already was rich, and he invested in Google and Apple.) Meanwhile, the CO2 goes up, up, up, the species creep poleward, the glaciers melt, and Texas fries.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
12:02 PM on 08/21/2011
Global warming "skepticism" - aka the Bonfire Of The Inanities.

(your check's in the mail, Jim.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whirlpool
founder walnut tree congregation
10:14 PM on 09/01/2011
Yes science is so evil one wonders why they go to doctors or use computers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GV97
Song Bird
07:47 PM on 08/20/2011
You can't fool Mother Nature and animals in many respects are smarter than humans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whirlpool
founder walnut tree congregation
10:08 PM on 09/01/2011
That is for darn sure. F and F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
06:47 PM on 08/20/2011
Many climate change deniers will not be moved no matter what. I've realized it's a waste of time engaging many of them. Sometimes the best you can do is work around them and carry on. They won't become part of the solution, so we'll need to carry their share of the load as well.
09:09 PM on 08/23/2011
Unfortunately, they're doing their best to derail any rational action to alleviate this problem.

For them, the solution to the all world's problems appears to be letting the free market do whatever it wants -- even if the "free" market is, in reality, largely controlled by a small number of extremely powerful corporations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whirlpool
founder walnut tree congregation
10:10 PM on 09/01/2011
It has always been true throughout history that the more enlightened among us must drag the degenerates along like an anchor.
photo
darkmark
religion, the veil of evil.
11:19 AM on 08/20/2011
good video, carbon capture by no till farming sounds right and good to hear of a real problem solver.
photo
darkmark
religion, the veil of evil.
07:56 PM on 08/21/2011
thank you Cindy.
12:02 AM on 08/20/2011
Is this saying that people like:
fumes
richard2
tygartman
orkneygal
agwscam
sarahcuda2
junksciencecutecritters
and all those other deniers

aren't as smart as turnips?
11:46 PM on 08/20/2011
You forgot givethemtheirwish!

As far as I can tell, he has never once even tried to engage the science -- it's all name calling, all the time.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
05:41 PM on 08/21/2011
And he who shall not be named, for he shall appear magically, hcetpop.
12:19 AM on 08/21/2011
And perhaps Senator Inhofe should subpoena a few butterflies, bees and turnips. They certainly are more expert than THE Viscount Lord Monckton of Brenchley.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conservative666
09:28 PM on 08/19/2011
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36556083/ns/us_news-environment/t/volcano-could-mean-cooling-acid-rain/#.Tk8L3qioZBk

Here is an interesting solution: Instead of wasting trillions on C02 emission decrease, just inject S02 into the stratosphere .
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
12:55 PM on 08/20/2011
Here's a suggestion for you, Conservative: try to make an effort to understand what you are talking about before commenting on it.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/10/why-levitt-and-dubner-like-geo-engineering-and-why-they-are-wrong/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conservative666
08:21 PM on 08/20/2011
so you don't believe in MSNBC?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
07:24 PM on 08/20/2011
Hello acid rain!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_rain
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conservative666
08:21 PM on 08/20/2011
What is worse? A little acid rain or global warming?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RoughCollie
Destination: A new way of seeing things.
08:50 PM on 08/19/2011
Any avid gardener can tell you things are changing...mostly to our benefit if you like more variety and live in a chilly New England state. We can now grow species of plants that not long ago were considered rare and exotic or tender perennials.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
07:25 PM on 08/20/2011
And bedbugs, and pine beetle, and ash borer, and asian carp, etc, etc, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cindy M Brito
Veritas
06:42 PM on 08/21/2011
In the midwest, on our street, there are 10 dead pine trees due to this pest. Horrible. And yes, I love trees. Couldn't live without them. Lol.
MGhamma
Reality is 100% biased!
08:46 PM on 08/19/2011
What this means is that even bugs are smarter than GW deniers.