iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Canadian Tar Sands And The True Cost Of Oil (PHOTOS)

First Posted: 08/20/11 07:09 PM ET   Updated: 10/20/11 06:12 AM ET

From Garth Lenz:

Ten years ago, my wife and I sat huddled together, watching in horror the images from New York. We had just learned that my wife was pregnant, and as we sat there in disbelief, we feared for the future World our children would inherit. It never occurred to us that those terrible events would lead to the development of what would soon become known as the World’s largest and perhaps most environmentally damaging mega project, and that it would lie in the heart of Canada’s vast boreal forest wilderness.

Thousands of miles north from the horror of 9/11 lay the World’s second largest oil reserves, their development soon to be spurred on by the realities and fears arising from that fateful day. The ensuing search by America for a friendlier source for its energy needs, and the rapidly rising cost of oil propelled the development of Alberta’s Tar Sands to the point where they are now the United States' largest single source of oil and America is the market for the vast majority of the approximately 1.5 million barrels of oil produced there each day.

A few years later I had my first glimpse of Canada’s Tar Sands. Hovering over them in a helicopter, below me lay devastation on a scale that could be only described as biblical. Vast tar mines, refineries fouling the air, and the leaching and unlined tailings “ponds” which lie along the Athabasca River are the world’s largest toxic impoundments. Toxic lakes of industrial waste that can be seen from space.

A scant 70 miles downstream from the Tar Sands, the scene is replaced by one which is its polar opposite. The Peace Athabasca Delta, the world’s largest freshwater delta, set amidst the surrounding boreal forest ecosystem whose wetlands and forests store the greatest concentration of carbon of any ecosystem, and are being systematically destroyed to mine the tar that lies underneath. It is a terrible juxtaposition that earth’s most carbon rich forests and wetlands are being cleared, dredged, and dug up, all to be replaced with mines, tailings ponds, and pipelines, in order to produce oil whose production produces almost twice the carbon of conventional sources. [Text Continues Below Photos.]

Images and captions courtesy of Garth Lenz.

Syncrude Upgrader and Tar Sands
1 of 13
The refining or upgrading of the tarry bitumen which lies under the Tar Sands consumes far more oil and energy than conventional oil and produces almost twice as much carbon. Each barrel of oil requires 3-5 barrels of fresh water from the neighboring Athabasca River. About 90% of this is returned as toxic tailings into the vast unlined tailings ponds that dot the landscape. Syncrude alone dumps 500,000 tons of toxic tailings into just one of their tailings ponds everyday.
Total comments: 303 | Post a Comment
1 of 13
Rate This Slide
Uninteresting
Unreal

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Current Top 5 Slides
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

Development plans are to increase the production of the Tar Sands up to five million barrels of oil within the next 20 years and industrialize an area of land the size of Florida in the process. While we still need oil to meet our energy needs, true energy security will not be achieved through the expansion of the tar sands and further entrenching our dependency on fossil fuels, but through the development of alternate sustainable energy sources and through all of us reducing our consumption.

This will be difficult but we need to do it for our children. Recently, on a rainy Friday evening as we prepared to pick up a video for our weekly family video night, I suggested we drive to the store as the weather was bad and my children were fighting the flu, it was my youngest child’s turn to choose and there is no way she was going to miss the trip. She looked at me with the shock and disgust only a four year old can really muster and implored, “Dad, don’t you know, under a mile, bike in style!”

In order for that to happen, projects like the proposed Keystone XL pipeline to bring tar sands crude to the gulf coast for processing, and the proposed Gateway pipeline to facilitate shipping it to Asia, will need to be approved.

While we still need oil to meet our energy needs, true energy security will not be achieved through the expansion of the tar sands but through the development of alternate sustainable energy sources and through all of us reducing our consumption. This will be difficult but we need to do it for our children. Recently, on a rainy Friday evening as we prepared to pick up a video for our weekly family video night, I suggested we drive to the store as the weather was bad and my children were fighting the flu, it was my youngest child’s turn to choose and there is no way she was going to miss the trip. She looked at me with the shock and disgust only a four year old can really muster and implored, “Dad, don’t you know, under a mile, bike in style!”

The Tar Sands, also known as Oil Sands, - if you prefer the public relations created term – are now Canada’s largest, and fastest growing, single source of carbon. At the same time, Canada has gone from being one of the first signatories to the Kyoto Protocol to now becoming an obstacle to international efforts to reduce carbon and our dependency on fossil fuel.

In terms of global warming, the impacts of the Tar Sands are multiple. The vast forests and wetlands of the boreal forest which they lie under, are considered the most carbon rich forest ecosystem on the planet. Storing almost twice as much carbon per hectare as tropical rainforests, the boreal forest is the planet’s greatest terrestrial carbon storehouse. To the industry, these diverse and ecologically significant forests and wetlands are referred to as overburden, the forest to be stripped and the wetlands dredged and replaced by mines and tailings ponds so vast they can be seen from outer space. So, as the expansion of the tar sands consumes more boreal forest and wetlands, it is releasing to the atmosphere all the carbon stored in this ecosystem. At the same time, we also lose the long term future carbon sequestration of these forests and wetlands. In turn, they are replaced by an industrial operation which produces almost twice as much carbon as conventional oil production.

However the global reach of the tar sands is even greater than that. Pipelines to the American Midwest and Texas pump this bitumen for refining there. In the process, these areas are will also be importing many of the toxic impacts of the Tar Sands to their jurisdiction. The building of the proposed Alberta Clipper and Keystone pipelines, will only increase this trend and the impacts.

From iLCP:

Born and raised in Vancouver, British Columbia, and originally trained as a classical pianist, Garth Lenz left his music career in 1992 to dedicate his photography towards conservation. He is a Fellow of the International League of Conservation Photographers. He has photographed environmental, wilderness, and indigenous peoples issues throughout Canada, the U.S., Chile, Ecuador, Borneo, and China.

Garth recently was awarded the First place award for the Social Documentary.net photo competition, Ten Years After Nine/Eleven: Searching for a 21st Century Landscape. Garth's work on the environmental degradation caused by the Alberta Tar Sands, one of the United States' largest sources of oil will be exhibited at powerHouse Arena in Brooklyn, NY from August 20, 2011 through September 16, 2011. An opening reception is scheduled for September 10 from 7 to 9 pm.

---

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

From Garth Lenz: Ten years ago, my wife and I sat huddled together, watching in horror the images from New York. We had just learned that my wife was pregnant, and as we sat there in disbelief, we ...
From Garth Lenz: Ten years ago, my wife and I sat huddled together, watching in horror the images from New York. We had just learned that my wife was pregnant, and as we sat there in disbelief, we ...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 303
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
10:36 PM on 08/29/2011
Extracting raw materials isn't a pretty sight. The environment is exploited everyday and in many different ways. Its done to fill the store shelves with goods to feed the insatiable appetite of the restless consumer. Almost every product we buy contain embedded petroleum. Next time we purchase that shiny trinket or hop into our glitzy new car, we are feeding the industrial machine. All oil is dirty, whether it comes from Northern Alberta, the Gulf of Mexico, Alaska or Nigeria. If we really want to make a difference, we would choose and support alternative energy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Viable Way
Common sense is so unusual.
03:12 PM on 09/02/2011
Supporting alternative energy isn't enough. Unless we bring our personal energy expenditure in line with our share of the resources, we are only delaying disaster. All the tchatchkes we buy and all the clothes and toys and books that we consume show that we have become the good little consumers that we thought we were supposed to be.

I maintain that the TRUE COST of everything should be put on the labels! Did you know that for every Calorie of food we consume, close to two Calories of OIL went into the production? It is much worse for MEAT than PRODUCE. We are literally pouring oil down our throats and only paying the CHEAP OIL PRICE. What happens to the price of food when gasoline is $15.00 per gallon?

How can people commit to living close to work when we aren't paying the TRUE COST of the transportation? at $3.50 a gallon, we are paying 15 to 20 cents a MILE for as much energy as would be produced by 10 horses. (I am borrowing this analogy, and may be off, but not by enough to eliminate the point) Can you imagine feeding 10 horses in order to get to work a mile away? THAT IS HOW CHEAP oil is today, but it won't stay that way when China and India want their share. If we don't help people with incentives to make better choices they WON'T change!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sstevens37
I have the right to hate you
01:27 AM on 08/28/2011
this is insanity...I'm ashamed to be human
02:52 PM on 08/27/2011
The Tar Sands of Canada where producing a profit at $50 a barrel. If there be danger to the Environment, there is certainly enough money to clean it up!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tresluv
08:18 PM on 08/27/2011
"If" there be danger to the environment?? Did you even look at the slides or read the article? This is man made destruction of the earth on an unprecedented level, in the western world. There isn't enough money on the planet to "clean it up".

And you really believe that those (the oil companies) reaping these profits would let go of a dime toward clean up, even if it was possible? When has that *ever* happened? It's this kind of mentality that makes me think that we human beings don't even deserve to survive, as a species.
And if we continue to destroy the planet we depend on for life at the rate we're going, we will not survive. We in the U.S. use approximately five times the amount of energy per capita as civilized, developed Western European countries, yet energy conservation and reduction of the amount we use, hardly ever enters the conversation.
What is wrong with this picture? Pretty much everything.
12:39 PM on 08/27/2011
"...below me lay devastation on a scale that could be only described as biblical. Vast tar mines, refineries fouling the air, and the leaching and unlined tailings “ponds” which lie along the Athabasca River are the world’s largest toxic impoundments. Toxic lakes of industrial waste that can be seen from space."

See, it's BIBLICAL!! That's a GOOD thing folks!! Ignore the [false profits] of science!! They are the minions of Satan!!
God has bestowed among the blessed and beloved job givers the righteous knowledge and power to guide our people (OK, and the Canadians too) to the promised land!!
Of course we'll need a HazMat suit when we get there, but I'm confident that the lord will provide the beloved and blessed job creators the wisdom to sell us one at a reasonable price with limited mark-up and easy payment plans!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
04:02 PM on 08/26/2011
Here's your clean wind energy alternative, without the greenwashing:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1350811/In-China-true-cost-Britains-clean-green-wind-power-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html

"The reality is that, as Britain flaunts its environmental credentials by speckling its coastlines and unspoiled moors and mountains with thousands of wind turbines, it is contributing to a vast man-made lake of poison in northern China. This is the deadly and sinister side of the massively profitable rare-earths industry that the ‘green’ companies profiting from the demand for wind turbines would prefer you knew nothing about.
Hidden out of sight behind smoke-shrouded factory complexes in the city of Baotou, and patrolled by platoons of security guards, lies a five-mile wide ‘tailing’ lake. It has killed farmland for miles around, made thousands of people ill and put one of China’s key waterways in jeopardy.
This vast, hissing cauldron of chemicals is the dumping ground for seven million tons a year of mined rare earth after it has been doused in acid and chemicals and processed through red-hot furnaces to extract its components.

snip.

The lake instantly assaults your senses. Stand on the black crust for just seconds and your eyes water and a powerful, acrid stench fills your lungs.
For hours after our visit, my stomach lurched and my head throbbed. We were there for only one hour, "
10:24 PM on 08/26/2011
why is this story not on the front pages of newspapers every day? we are certainly whistling through the graveyard!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tresluv
08:24 PM on 08/27/2011
You present important and disturbing information, but it doesn't lessen the impact of tar sands. One form of toxic pollution and environmental destruction in one country does not make the same thing, albeit for a different energy source, alright in a different country.

We need to think outside the box and before we consider anything else, look at consumption and the need to reduce it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
03:55 PM on 08/26/2011
Strange, no pictures of the reclaimed land.
Does the HP consider ittself a serious news provider?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tresluv
08:27 PM on 08/27/2011
If "reclaimed" land existed, I'm sure the oil companies would make certain that all media was saturated with that news, complete with photos and independent scientific studies (*not* done by oil companies) proving that the land had been restored to it's original pristine condition.
Link?
10:27 AM on 08/29/2011
Just check the Syncrude website for photos of reclaimed lands. Great efforts are put into this work.
12:09 PM on 08/26/2011
stop the madness, before it's too late.
10:05 AM on 08/26/2011
i'm reading this with my two young children ages 21 mo, and 4 yrs sittin g right here next to me and i want to just cry at the MESS they are going to have to clean up, if they even have the chance to. It really is sad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
03:56 PM on 08/26/2011
The mines are cleaning it up as they go.
The facts are out there, if you're interested in facts....
04:55 PM on 08/26/2011
You know they are not intrested in facts, all they want is to spread the same old talking points. I would be willin to bet they would be the first to complain if they had to stand in line to get $10.00 a gallon gas. That day is not far off if something is not done now, but they can not see tomorrow and will be sorry.
Have they ever looked down on a large city like New York and not seen the devastation that city caused on nature. It was a beautiful before man took over but they don't complain about that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tresluv
08:29 PM on 08/27/2011
Again I ask .... Link? (Independent studies, not oil company propaganda).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ashabot
Environmentalists are the true Conservatives.
07:58 AM on 08/26/2011
Disaster upon disaster. The people who do these things are killing our planet and if we remain silent about it we support their efforts.
liltrix
My micro-bio has a mind of it's own.
01:29 AM on 08/26/2011
I am so disgusted by this. Not only must this be stopped but it is time people in the U.S and Canada stand up for their rights to have alternative fuels and energy. We cannot simply say don't want this. We must say what it is we want are are willing to spend money on. The natural legacy of both countries are at serious risk of being completely lost for the sake of a very small number of people getting rich on this horrible crud. We need to be creative as a people and we need to do it for the sake of our children and grand children if there is going to be any planet for them to inherit. Vote not only at the ballet box but with your wallet and making your car either a plug in hybrid, all electric or converted to bio fuel. We're dead if we don't take this into our own hands.
photo
Blodo
Time to build a better world
12:39 AM on 08/26/2011
I'm Canadian. Unfortunately we have a political system that allows a government to be elected with less than a majority of the popular vote and then assume complete legislative and executive power. The lust for oil money was just too great for the greedheads in power to resist. Those of us who care about the land are working to bring pressure on our elected representatives and to raise public awareness, but as in the US, there are powerful corporate forces telling people that everything is hunky dory.
photo
disporting
Weapons not food, not homes, not shoes
06:43 PM on 08/25/2011
And all these Candians complaining about what goes on in the United States on here and say that this stuff never happens in Canada. Now you see. Hopefully your government will listen to you more than ours does.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nerdiac
11:06 AM on 08/25/2011
They should just bring in the Bagger 288 and finish the whole area off. Why take so long? Why stop there? Move on downward and eat away Washington and Montana, then Cali, and Mexico. I hear South America has a giant carbon rich forest, something called an Amazon?? Yeah.
09:34 PM on 08/25/2011
You are so smart. Where did you get your science degree?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mapaiko
nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile
09:21 AM on 08/25/2011
I am the Lorax and I speak for the trees...never see that on our corporate owned tee vee anymore do we?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:30 AM on 08/26/2011
We are such Oncelers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pasapphire
08:06 AM on 08/25/2011
In 1998 my husband and I walked on the Athabasca glacier as part of a trip through the Candian Rockies. I'd never been somewhere so beautiful and undisturbed, and ever since I've encouraged people to go to Canada. I couldn't believe the word "Athabasca" could be related to that picture in the article. What have you done to your beautiful country? A landscape from the movie Wall-E is not what I want for my kids' future... Poisoning the land and water upstream of the U.S. is good for national security? Did anyone read last week about the guy in New Jersey who figured out how to store sunlight in hydrogen tanks and run his house AND HIS CAR year-round on no fossil fuels? The "by-product" left was pure drinking water. He's the guy the world should be listening to, but he gets death threats instead. We drove through central Indiana the other day and there were windmills as far as the eye could see, but all but 2 were shut off. Why?!? Support those companies, where the land is still usable, not on tar sands. Yesterday I heard about a university in Florida with a project to be able to harness the power of the Gulf Stream currents for electricity within 10 years. We have so many other options. We just don't need oil this badly. Our grandkids do need a planet with clean air and water, though. Just stop already with fossil fuels.
11:55 AM on 08/25/2011
Do you have a link to the story about this man in New Jersey? I am interested to read more about him
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pasapphire
06:44 AM on 09/03/2011
Sorry. I don't check comments section often. My husband does. I will send you the link later today...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prettyfnliberal
and not a single frack was given that day.
01:03 AM on 08/26/2011
watch GasHole Shell literally had a man killed because the man wouldn't sell his patent on a car he built that could do 200 miles on a gallon of gas. It makes me cry to know that we have the power to do more for the planet and our children but they refuse to let progess prevail. they refuse because of their greed. their need for money. they don't care about making a product to help us, they care about taking what's in our pockets. it's a sad world and it will never change.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
04:25 PM on 08/26/2011
The mother ship went thataway......
05:02 PM on 08/26/2011
I am 76 years old and I heard that old tale when I was a kid, it is one of the oldest urban legions around along with the one where someone says a friend of mine got a new car and it got xxx miles per gallon but the car company took it in for repairs and it never got that millage again. Old wifes tales or BS one or the other.