iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Genetically Modified Papayas Attacked In Hawaii

Genetically Engineered Papayas

JENNIFER SINCO KELLEHER   08/20/11 02:31 PM ET   AP

HONOLULU — Thousands of papaya trees were chopped down on 10 acres of Big Island farmland under the cover of night last month. Hawaii County police said the destruction appeared to be done with a machete, but there are no leads and few clues beyond the tree stumps and all the fruit left to rot.

"It's hard to imagine anybody putting that much effort into doing something like that," said Delan Perry, vice president of the Hawaii Papaya Industry Association. "It means somebody has to have passionate reason."

A growing theory among farmers is that the attack was an act of eco-terrorism, a violent protest against the biotechnology used in growing papayas here. Police did not respond to calls seeking comment.

The majority of papayas grown on 170 farms on Oahu and the Big Island are genetically modified.

University of Hawaii scientists developed the genetically modified fruit that's resistant to a ring spot virus that wiped out production on Oahu in the 1950s and was detected in the Puna district on the Big Island in the 1990s. Genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, are crops whose genetic makeup has been altered to give the plant a desirable trait. The genetically modified fruit is credited with saving Hawaii's $11 million papaya production industry.

"We wouldn't have a papaya industry today if it weren't for the transgenic papaya," said Alicia Maluafiti, executive director of the Hawaii Crop Improvement Association, which represents the seed industry and protects biotech crop growers. "Without a transgenic papaya restricting the expansion of the virus, that virus would be prevalent today."

Restricting the virus has also allowed for organic papayas to be grown, she said.

Without the transgenic papaya, the Vitamin C-laden fruit would cost a lot more to enjoy, said Richard Manshardt, a tropical fruit breeder and geneticist at the University of Hawaii who was on the team that developed the genetically modified fruit.

Kevin Richards, director of regulatory relations for the American Farm Bureau Federation, said he knows of no other crop that relies on biotechnology to save it from disease. Commodity crops such as cotton, soy and corn commonly use genetic engineering in order to make them easier and cheaper to grow.

"Papaya would be unique in the sense where the industry in Hawaii is dependent on biotech," said Richards. "What you have in Hawaii is a very contained, isolated agro-eco system, which is vulnerable to diseases."

He cited international examples of eco-terrorism: activists who took weed-whackers to test crops of drought-resistant wheat in Australia and test plots of biotech eggplants destroyed in the Philippines.

Hawaii's papayas are held up as an example of how biotechnology can improve access to crops, Richards said.

That's especially important in parts of the world with a limited food supply, Manshardt said, adding that genetic engineering could be used to protect cassava crops with severe virus problems in Africa and Latin America.

Hawaii farmers had no choice but to grow GMO papayas in order to survive, said Perry, whose organization has raised a $10,000 reward for information on the crop destruction. "Papaya is the No. 1 fruit eaten in Hawaii," he said.

One of the affected farmers, Erlinda Bernardo, said fellow papaya growers often worry about retaliation from those who are against GMOs. "Most of the product on the island is genetically modified," she said. "If not, most of the farmers would suffer, there would be more unemployment."

Bernardo, her husband and four children are preparing to plant again in another area after 3,000 trees worth $15,000 on five leased acres were destroyed. "We're afraid to plant in that area, so we're giving up the lease there," she said. "When you start all over again, you have to wait a year for the papaya to bear fruit."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Filed by Dean Praetorius  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 244
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
12:29 PM on 08/25/2011
Anyone who agrees with my previous statement please look at my link below

I recently created a petition entitled "It is time Americans take back the
constitutional rights that our founding fathers work so hard for",
because I care deeply about this very important issue.

I'm trying to collect 100 signatures, and I could really use your help.

To read more about what I'm trying to do and to sign my petition, click
here:
http://www.change.org/petitions/it-is-time-americans-take-back-the-constitutional-rights-that-our-founding-fathers-work-so-hard-for?share_id=MJAwrtgcWb&pe=d2e
12:22 PM on 08/25/2011
Independent studies are blocked by companies like Monsanto who own the seeds and the reference materials. I supposed this is not biased. As for the efficiency of GMO this is a farce. Thousands of Indian farmers have committed suicide after being sold GMO seeds from Monsanto. Farmers were told seeds were pest proof. This was not the case. Monsanto neglected to tell them that the seeds required double the amount of water, which was not possible since there was a decline in rain for 2 years. As a result their entire crops failed.

Requiring more water, needing to use much more pesticides on plants and not being able to save seeds for the following year does not sound more efficient. Furthermore, the soil is often plague with fungi and microorganisms colonizing the roots after using Monsanto Roundup. The FDA does not want to publicize these studies,which is no surprise considering that Michael Taylor who is senior advisor to the commissioner of the FDA was a lawyer for Monsanto then became part of Monsanto and headed up the GMO movement.

I will not be part of the GMO zombie movement when I see such conflict of interest going in agencies that are supposed to protect the health of people. Money, money, money is behind this evil in our country.
10:01 PM on 08/26/2011
I live and breath the efficiency aspect year in and year out. I see it, it adds to our bottomline. You can still want to campaign against GMOs but at some point I would recommend avoiding studying them from the biased sources who misrepresent the data in order to keep support up. If you did that, you might be able to understand why GMO usage keeps expanding which would make no sense if the efficiency argument was indeed a "farce".
10:54 PM on 08/22/2011
I'm astounded by the level of ignorance expressed by some commenters here. No one is forcing you to eat anything! Almost all of the papayas consumed in the US are grown in Mexico and Central America. They may have pesticide residue or salmonella but they are not the “dreaded GMO”. I'm still asking: Show me one legitimate study that demonstrates GMOs have actually harmed anyone. This might be especially difficult because almost everyone in the US has been eating foods that contain the “dreaded GMOs” for decades now. Oh, and please don't waste our time with the “might be allergenic” nonsense. Show me some real proof or shut up.

http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Hawaii/Publications/Fruits_and_Nuts/annpapFF.pdf

http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2011/07/mexican-papayas-blamed-for-salmonella-outbreak/
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
11:31 PM on 08/22/2011
Yes...you completely correct. The level of ignorance on this website is sad. As you can tell by my other posts, I use some harsh language against these people. I tried to be reasonable in the past calmly posting my facts and figures. The called me "eeevil" and a "s hill" So be it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Fanney
Scribbler
09:36 PM on 08/22/2011
In a world that is already short on food, I'm not certain if this is such a great idea. I understand the fear of GMO, but is destruction of crops really an appropriate response?
roscoewpa
Dont Hate, Appreciate
08:53 PM on 08/22/2011
"If people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as a sorry state as the souls who live under tyranny."
— Thomas Jefferson well said
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Shaw
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
02:17 PM on 08/22/2011
Or maybe the work of the Pineapple Coaltion..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rocksage7
sustainability rocks
01:35 PM on 08/22/2011
Good job.....we need more green activists helping out in the fields where the real work is done...great way to fight Genetically Modified stuff...since they will not label it..and the courts have all been bought off...maybe we can save the world!
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
10:47 PM on 08/22/2011
You use the word "we." Are you part of this?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rocksage7
sustainability rocks
10:44 AM on 08/23/2011
I have been trying to get labeling on food to show if it is or has been Genetically Modified.for a long time...I am green...I do not live or have never been to the islands...I do talk to farmers about crops and have 3 green houses......I believe in civil actions when I know people need to hear the truth....so yes and no......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nevernot
I like paying taxes, they buy me civilization.
11:48 AM on 08/22/2011
Why not simply switch to a diverse crop of papaya instead of resorting to franken-fruit and hiding it's genetically modified heritage? Any time a group gets rid of crop diversity and relies on monoculture catastrophe is soon to follow, just ask the Irish, their entire country nearly collapsed due to the potato famine which only took hold due to monoculturing of the potato crop. GMO or not, monoculture is a recipe for disaster.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DAE
10:39 PM on 08/21/2011
Whew! I was scared there for a moment. I thought it read Attack of the Genetically Modified Papayas!
YOKEL13
Gimme more! - unofficial GOP motto
10:39 PM on 08/21/2011
This is a hate crime!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
turnleft4progress
What value is generosity through God's coercion.
10:10 PM on 08/21/2011
"Papaya farmers are asking if they are targets of eco-terrorism" I don't know but how could the farmers be the victims eco-terrorism isn't the genetic-modification of life forms eco-terrorism.
09:58 PM on 08/21/2011
The inferior quality of produce in grocery stores doesn't have anything to due with genetic engineering. Much of the produce that America consumes must be shipped vast distances. Varieties are selected that ship well and they often taste like cardboard. Ripe fruit bruises easily so much it is picked green.

If you would like to really do your part, consume locally grown produce. Plant some fruit trees and start a vegetable garden. Growing your own will insure that you aren't eating pesticides you didn't apply. Imported foods can have pesticides that aren't even permitted in the US. Buying locally also helps reduce our carbon foot print because the shipping distance is far shorter = less fuel. Further, buying locally resists globalization that is the root cause of America's current economic mess.

Genetic transformation must be done with deliberation and care. Like all technologies genetic transformation if used irresponsibly could potentially damage our environment. However, the threat of global warming is orders of magnitude greater that genetic technology.

Oh, and please don't hack down you neighbors papayas cause you're having a bout of hysteria.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:04 PM on 08/21/2011
You seem to be one of the few voices of reason on this particular topic. F&F!
08:38 AM on 08/30/2011
These are great suggestions. Buying from farmers markets is not only way more delicious but also great for the community. Plus, eating seasonally is really enjoyable and natural. Buy everything you can from local, organic farms and if you have the time and space (and you probably do) grow your own garden. If the soil in your area is unhealthy use compost to bring it back to life or try different methods (raised bed, hydroponic, etc.) Another idea, which sounds ridiculous at first, is to have a goat for milk. It seems quite silly but it is really quite plausible. They require less work than a dog.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dallas D Snell
05:42 PM on 08/21/2011
Hawaii seems to be a great place where they can work on the Swine and Bird flu also. I got my first swine flu shot in 1975 before i went to the big island for army training. While up there at PTA there were two types of wild animals that were prevalent . They were the wild pig and believe it or not the wild turkey. 1 + 1 = 2
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dallas D Snell
05:33 PM on 08/21/2011
Save our fruit from these Frankenstein's ! Hey fruit looks real good these days cloned but it all tastes the same. I remember when fruit was juicy and sweet. Now it seems hard and dull. I used to suck on juicy peach's , now they just plain SUCK! You know if the bugs dont eat it , its not any good. Wake up and grow local as much as you can.
04:19 PM on 08/21/2011
BTW, if people are allergic to the PRSV coat protein, they would ALSO have reactions to non-GMO papayas infected with PRSV. The fact that this has not been observed is a very strong argument against the allergenicity of the transgenic variety.