More

Rural Broadband Plan Gets $103 Million Expansion

Rural Broadband

First Posted: 08/22/11 05:50 PM ET Updated: 10/22/11 06:12 AM ET

MICHAEL FELBERBAUM, AP/THE HUFFINGTON POST (RICHMOND, Va.) -- Telecommunications companies in 16 states will share more than $103 million in federal funding to help expand broadband Internet access to those areas of rural America that haven't been reached by the high-speed service or are underserved, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced Monday.

Policymakers, public interest groups and telecom companies are seeking to bridge the digital divide by reaching even the most remote pockets of the U.S. with broadband internet, hoping to improve economic and educational opportunities there.

"There's a big gap that remains between rural and urban areas because it's just hard to make a business case in rural areas," said Jonathan Adelstein, the agriculture department's rural utilities service administrator, in a conference call with reporters. "Rural areas' future depends upon access to broadband and we're not where we need to be today."

The states that will benefit from the funding are: Alabama, Arkansas, California, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

As many as one in 10 Americans can't get Internet connections fast enough to engage in such common online activities as watching video or teleconferencing, and two thirds of schools have broadband connections that are too slow to meet their needs, the Commerce Department reported earlier this year.

Last year, the Federal Communications Commission released a national broadband plan that set a goal of hooking up 100 million U.S. households to broadband connections of 100 megabits per second by 2020. That's at least 20 times faster than many existing home connections.

About 28 percent of rural America, or nearly 19 million people, lack access to Internet with speeds of three megabits per second or faster, compared with only 3 percent, or 7.2 million people, in non-rural areas, according to an FCC report titled "Bringing Broadband to Rural America."

Adelstein said rural areas lag behind the urban areas of the country when it comes to broadband Internet access because the more remote areas don't have enough people, have rugged terrain, or it's too costly for companies to serve them.

One of the grants announced Monday will help provide Internet services to about 570 members of the Karuk Native American Tribe in a mountainous region of Orleans, in northern California.

"It is a remarkably remote place. It's one of the darkest places from space in the lower 48" states, said Craig Tucker, a spokesman for the tribe.

Tucker said lack of reliable Internet services is a "limiting factor for economic development" for the tribe and the non-Native community that lives in the area as well.

"There's not really good cell phone service, or Internet service. Even electricity is a struggle/ A lot of people are off the grid entirely," he said.

Another grant will help rebuild the broadband infrastructure in Tushka, Okla., which was hit by a tornado in April that killed two people and destroyed or damaged numerous buildings in the community.

Adlestein said there's still a "long way to go" in terms of bringing rural America in line with the rest of the country, and he added that one of the challenges is that young people won't stay in communities without broadband Internet access.

"There's not a future there for them," he said. "Not only do they expect it, but they need it ... if young people want to stay rural areas where they grew up."

The majority of the funding comes in the form of infrastructure loans of totaling about $90 million for five broadband projects. These projects join others across the countries that are sharing $192 million in loans announced by the Agriculture Department in late July.

About $13 million of the funding is through the USDA's Community Connect program, which provides grants to rural, economically challenged communities. The funds can be used to build, buy or lease facilities to bring broadband access to community facilities such as schools and government offices, as well as residents and businesses.

The USDA funding is just one of several federal, state and local programs working to expand Internet access to rural parts of the country.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Cooper Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:09 PM on 08/23/2011
Where's the private sector putting their money up in these mostly red states?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FabulousTahoe
Opinions from Lake Tahoe
01:22 PM on 08/23/2011
We need to develop a set of local fiber companies to compete with the crappy cable and DSL based broadband. Google has the right idea: 100Mbps or bust!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
05:22 PM on 08/23/2011
My local utility is doing just that.

It's been a slow process though. The contractors they hire keep going bust.

Hopefully, I'll have 100Mbps available within the year.

Currently have blazing 3Mbps DSL :(
photo
knewsreply
PhD: International Educator and Marketer
09:02 AM on 08/23/2011
This is a great action, because all Americans will be able to know why Congress has such a poor public rating and where their tax dollars are "really" being spent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
01:51 AM on 08/23/2011
But aren't the people in these rural areas all the "rugged individualists", and the hardcore "boostrap puller uppers"? Why are they once again taking huge Big Gubment handouts? Shouldn't they be "doin fer theyselfs"?
11:59 PM on 08/22/2011
We'll be a lot safer when everyone is reliant on the internet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Enzo Ferrari
11:39 PM on 08/22/2011
This is a good idea. I need a faster connection to watch porn clips
09:41 PM on 08/22/2011
Access to high speed porn is a basic human right. Why did it take so long for people to figure out?
09:30 PM on 08/22/2011
Let me guess, I get to buy the computers too. Oh well, short lived, GOP will crush this boondoggle
photo
MissWrite
Rep. Diane Russell, Populist Maine Politicka
08:16 PM on 08/22/2011
It's great to see the investment in rural America, and we need it. That said, LightSquared is currently building out a 4G wireless broadband infrastructure that would reach nearly 95% of rural America by 2015 with all private resources ($25 billion). It would be a wholesale network creating serious competition in the telecommunications industry for the first time in a long time. We should be exploring all our options so that we can transform rural economies and truly bridge the digital divide.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edna Crabapple
Who watches the watchers?
09:13 PM on 08/22/2011
With ridiculously low caps, and high per megabyte overage fees- wireless internet is practically useless.
It's suitable for Grandma to email the grandkids, that's about it.
Anyone who wants a fast connection to do the things you should be able to do with a fast connection- like streaming video from Netflix- could wind up with a bill costing hundreds of dollars.
Unless the telecoms are planning on selling a fast, unlimited tier of service that most people are seeking, they shouldn't be getting one single dime of taxpayer money.
These SOB's are rich enough already, and they've already gotten billions in taxpayer dollars a decade ago and they pocketed the money without improving their networks.
Pigs can only go to the trough so many times....
09:31 PM on 08/22/2011
you should know who's behind LightSquared, funny how the wall street types are OK. They are going to suck this program dry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zachary Edwards
This micro-blog is empty
08:01 PM on 08/22/2011
Wait, WI is getting money from the government? Shenanigans!
07:09 PM on 08/22/2011
Too bad absolutely nobody in those rural areas will actually GET high-speed internet service. The US telecommunications network is entirely made up of local monopolies (AT&T, Comcast, Verizon) who get to claim ownership of those lines that WE PAY THEM to set up. No competition is why we're paying $60+ for internet service speeds that don't even qualify as broadband, even when we pay for it. These companies will undoubtedly own the lines within entire rural areas and gain all the customers, making it financially irresponsible for the others to attempt laying their own lines to convert customers. Capitalism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edna Crabapple
Who watches the watchers?
09:31 PM on 08/22/2011
Exactly.
Most people have a choice of a duopoly- overpriced capped internet from the local cableco, or pokey slooooow overpriced DSL from the local telecom. Neither one are good options if you want to use your connection for uploading data or for watching streaming video.
You can get a symmetrical, uncapped 100/100 Mbps connection in most of Asia for less than $30 a month.
We've become the technological joke of the western world.
ISP's ought to be regulated like any other utility. What these companies get away with is a disgrace.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ted Bouklos
U can have ur own opinions but not ur own facts
12:47 AM on 08/23/2011
i don't know where you live but most people have multiplr broadband choices. you can get it from your cable company, or verizon or AT&T, or Windstream, for 30 bucks a month you can even turn most new smartphones into wifi hotspots and drop wired systems all together
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jsern
Green Party 2012
07:07 PM on 08/22/2011
More money for ATT and comcast to pocket
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
jimme
They're Right, but never correct.
06:41 PM on 08/22/2011
Now maybe the rural folk will learn some truths and not just the B******t from Fox.
copterdude118
Keep up the fire!
06:11 PM on 08/22/2011
I realize $103 million isn't much money to those guys in DC, but keep in mind 40 cents on the dollar will be added to our debt that we pass to our kids and grandkids. I'm old enough to remember the days before even slow speed internet, and we got by just fine. When are we going to start tightening our belts?
08:21 PM on 08/22/2011
when we vote these idiots out, cut their salaries, their medical and their retirement they are overpaid and anti-americans who work for corporations and lobbyists
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ted Bouklos
U can have ur own opinions but not ur own facts
12:50 AM on 08/23/2011
when we tried "tightening our belts" in 1937 it dropped us back into the depression. or are you not old enough to remember THAT?
copterdude118
Keep up the fire!
08:10 AM on 08/23/2011
I do remember FDR's entitlement programs prolonged the great depression about 10 years. Just remember that every dollar the govt spends has to be taken from someone, or borrowed, or printed. Blowing through money, spending recklessly, unwisely, or even on things that are not necessary is no way to prosperity.