iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Keystone XL Oil Pipeline Arrests Mount As Climate Activists Push Obama

First Posted: 08/23/11 09:21 AM ET Updated: 10/24/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Waving signs and chanting "Yes we can," scores of protesters were arrested outside the White House Monday as they called on the Obama administration to block approval of TransCanada's Keystone XL oil pipeline.

As of Monday night, 162 people had been arrested, detained and released. Organizers say more than 2,000 volunteers have signed up to participate in the sit-ins in shifts, which began over the weekend and are slated to run through Sep. 3. Dozens more are expected to be arrested Tuesday.

Frustrated by the president’s inability to get comprehensive energy and climate legislation through Congress, climate activists are pressuring Obama to take action on the proposed $7 billion pipeline project by refusing to sign-off on a permit for its construction.

If approved, the Keystone XL pipeline would pump 700,000 barrels of heavy crude per day from Canada's tar sands to refineries along the U.S. Gulf Coast. For perspective: Obama recently released 30 million barrels of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve over a 30-day period.

Advocates of the pipeline say its construction will create jobs, while critics cite concerns over greenhouse gas emissions, as well as a history of leaks at an existing TransCanada oil pipeline known as Keystone 1.

The White House has emphasized that the decision to issue the permit rests with the State Department, which is expected to complete its review of the pipeline by the end of the year.

"The State Department is assessing the project on behalf of the federal government," said White House spokesman Clark Stevens. "That process is ongoing, including receiving important input from the public and stakeholders."

But author and environmentalist Bill McKibben said activists are holding Obama -- not Secretary of State Hillary Clinton -- accountable.

McKibben said protesters "spent a lot of time talking about how one of the last times many of us had been sleeping on the floor was when we'd been out campaigning for Obama and how much we hoped that he would do something to remind us why we were so enthusiastic." McKibben spent two nights in jail after being arrested for civil disobedience on Saturday. "This time [Obama] has a clear shot to do it; we'll see."

The jail time came as a surprise to McKibben and others who expected to be fined $100, not detained for two nights in a cell.

Another protester released Monday was former Army Lt. Daniel Choi, who was previously detained after protesting the U.S. military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.

"It's a small price to pay now rather than a larger consequence in the future," Choi told HuffPost. "We're fighting just as we did with 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.'"

With Obama on vacation and the media focused on developments in Libya, some fear the demonstrations won't command much national attention. But McKibben insists the message will be heard.

"The people who've carried this fight for three years are indigenous people on both sides of the border who have a huge stake in it because it's on their land, and farmers and ranchers from places like Nebraska," he said. He called some of the protesters "Johnny-come-latelys," adding, "It wasn’t until I sat down and read Jim Hansen’s analysis of how much carbon was in those things that I understood that this was not just a national issue, it's a global issue of the first order."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON -- Waving signs and chanting "Yes we can," scores of protesters were arrested outside the White House Monday as they called on the Obama administration to block approval of TransCanada's Ke...
WASHINGTON -- Waving signs and chanting "Yes we can," scores of protesters were arrested outside the White House Monday as they called on the Obama administration to block approval of TransCanada's Ke...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,199
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (100 total)
01:10 AM on 08/31/2011
We have one planet and if we as a species really wish to leave a livable place for our descendants we had better start being more responsible for how we interact with the ecology. I commend all those who are taking a stand to help restrain the energy companies who care not for the people or the planet. I am not at this protest however I am at many actions for peace and some for the environment. October2011.org tells of a new effort to inspire a change in DC. for peace, social justice, and human needs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Lachman
I am a freelance feature writer, news reporter and
03:46 PM on 08/30/2011
Ah, 21st century America. Where big oil is concerned you bertter keep your mouth shut, stay passive and be glad gas is only $4. Buy a few more Apps for your smart phone, and don't rock the boat, even though water is coming through the hull faster than the rivers in Vermont.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:19 AM on 08/28/2011
Ah yes the old party of no...wonder what does their cars run on? And let's see who pays these fines...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Coyote1177
11:38 PM on 08/25/2011
Absolute power corrupts, the oil moguls have been given too much power and they are dark, dark, dark, just like the slippery crude stuff, they only have power due to all the money because people all drive and cowtow to them, its the same in the mideast, all the wars and troubles because of oil $$$, environemental disatrers? Mostly due to oil $$$? Poltical crisis--stems from oil moguls in a power struggle to maintian economic dominance$$$. No jobs or clean energy for you! who will stand up to these dictators? Oil is not the problem, the people who own and sell it are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mcq721
The Common Man
05:32 PM on 08/25/2011
This is the only decent story Ive seen on this site in weeks, starting to think this is turning into CNN, garbage media topics...total sellout!!!
photo
Razpooten
Nil homini certum est
12:41 AM on 08/26/2011
"Decent"? hardly. It is pure speculatina at best and poor editorializing at worst: "Frustrated by the president’s inability to get comprehensive energy and climate legislation through Congress, climate activists are pressuring Obama to take action on the proposed $7 billion pipeline project by refusing to sign-off on a permit for its construction.
Is the president unable to get this legislation through congress - and who is refusing to sign-off?
03:14 PM on 08/25/2011
Sad the level of education that is exhibited in many of the posts. Oil refineries take a long time to build and no permits have been allowed to build new facilities. No companies want to take the risky investment of building a refinery in the current climate.
Many new technologies have emerged in the last 50 years since these refineries were designed but government has virtually eliminated the incentive to research and implement.
A new refinery could be designed and built that was far more economically efficient. Even worse is the money wasted on the ballooning welfare state that sucks even more every year so that deadbeats can drive their kids in new cars to get free lunches.
Yet not a cent could be used to promote a clean and efficient refinery(or even better portable refineries).
Then there is the mindless drivel about the evils of carbon by someone who obviously failed science (or should have except some fed worker wrote the curriculum). For those who were not aware our very existence as well as nearly all life forms on earth are based on carbon. CO2 is one of the most beneficial compounds and still represents only the tiniest fraction of a percent of our atmosphere (1/2 of 1/2 of 1/2 of 1/2 of 1/2 of 1%). But we should never put that into perspective or we could not portray energy companies as evil or fund expensive wind generators or inefficient solar panels.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
03:58 PM on 08/25/2011
it is amazing at the small percentage co2 that makes all the fuss.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
05:36 PM on 08/25/2011
I know.

And it's just tiny little molecules.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mcq721
The Common Man
05:35 PM on 08/25/2011
What a load of crap!! Oil companies are on welfare Dude!! Socialism now!! So do you live near a refinery?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftalwaysright
don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining!
07:05 AM on 08/25/2011
My question is: Why pipe this oil at all? Why not build a refinery in say, Wyoming or wherever the oil is being pumped? I think I know the answer, because they(whoever they are) want to load it on tankers and ship it to the highest bidder like China?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RealTimeHistory
01:44 AM on 08/25/2011
I can't stand to read any more of this--It's just too sad to see my planet being raped & pillaged for a flocking pool of oil. Stupid pigs.
12:22 AM on 08/25/2011
To the people against this importation:
Reportedly there is more then sufficient oil under North Dakota and Colorado, along with the other States that have oil wells to meet all our energy needs until alternates have became available.
Pipelines in the US seem less environmentally dangerous then shipping oil from the Middle East.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sherlockhemlock
One world is enough.
05:11 AM on 08/25/2011
"Alternates" ARE available. Now. Have been for decades. What has been missing is a willingness on the part of government to take this country in that direction.
07:41 AM on 08/25/2011
There are alternates but they all have problems. Some governments would force its population to make changes, some would not. People do not react well to being forced when they disagree.
Eventually they probably can handle our needs as costs come down or other kinds of alternates become available.
Solar power only works during days that are not cloudy, Wind power depends on the wind blowing and take a lot of space. etc, etc
Using corn or biofuels takes that food away from people who may be suffering from hunger.
Costs are a factor also.
Within 50 years hopefully oil will only be needed as a lubricant.
In the meantime we are helping prop up countries that hate the US.
12:16 AM on 08/25/2011
There are refineries in most of the States along the Canadian Border. Minnesota and Washington have large refineries and it seems likely that established refineries that are smaller could be enlarged.
It seems to me that we could become independent of oil from the Middle East.
Does anyone know why the plan is to send it to the Gulf Coast ?
TimeisTicking
So, you're a liberal. Isn't that special.
12:11 AM on 08/25/2011
We've had that other pipeline for decades so what is the big deal with this one being constructed?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sherlockhemlock
One world is enough.
05:15 AM on 08/25/2011
That other pipeline has been plagued with problems--including leaks--some reportedly quite spectacular--on a weekly basis, on average. Democracy Now! has had some good coverage over the last week.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
altheschrod
I'm pedaling hard.
11:38 PM on 08/24/2011
What's wrong with a refinery in the midwest somewhere around Omaha, Nebraska? Once crossing the Canadian border, the oil will not have to travel nearly as far, and the planned right-of-way remains as it is. The products refined are to be used in the U.S., so tanker transport down in texas becomes a moot topic. C'mon people--use a little common sense!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RealTimeHistory
01:02 AM on 08/25/2011
Canadians seem hell-bent on destroying North America's equivalent to the Amazon rain forest. Do you KNOW how they are intending to get at those tar sands? It's the same methods as mountaintop removal in West Virginia, except they remove the Arboreal forests, lock, stock & barrel. Then they use millions (if not billions) of fresh water to boil the thick tar out of the sand, leaving total destruction for millions of square miles of space. SHAME ON YOU, CANADA! I thought you people were more civilized, but I guess your politicians have been bought off, too.

If Obama caves on this one, we REALLY, REALLY, REALLY need to coalesce behind a candidate that can beat him AND any GOP nominee in 2012. Otherwise, it's good bye climate as we know it. Almost glad I'm probably not going to live another 50 years. It's disgusting!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jean Bastien
Fear is the game of the Powerslave
11:30 AM on 08/25/2011
Pipe dreams, anyone?
You're in the minority on this.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
altheschrod
I'm pedaling hard.
04:14 PM on 08/25/2011
You are basing support for a new American president on how he feels about a CANADIAN enterprise? As others have pointed out, the people involved have been successful at this in the past with no repercussions, and furthermore, their national record of environmental care is arguably superior to ours, so how seriously should I take what you're saying? Right now, our nation needs cheap gas, and if our northern neighbor can provide it, let them.
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
04:47 PM on 08/24/2011
For every barrel of oil produced from tar sands, 2 to 4.5 barrels of fresh water will be wasted.

We need to convert buses and long haul trucks to run on natural gas until we can ramp up another technology. That's something that can be done right now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Jenkins
Virtual Ferroequinologist
07:02 PM on 08/24/2011
Great. And the savings to all concerned is well demonstrated, but it is not the job of government to order us to comply.

Keystone I is a success, no long-lasting damage to the environment has occurred...remember the majority of that line is built upon permafrost, and has not destroyed it.

It's funny to think that these protesters drove to the D. C., complaining about the high cost of fuel! LOL!
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
08:55 PM on 08/24/2011
Governments traditionally provide incentives for R & D associated with socially and environmentally beneficial technologies;

Likewise, technologies generating environmentally damaging results are traditionally discouraged through taxation. Let those who contaminate foot the bill, rather than the public at large.

Look, those directly affected by this project don't want it. If you do, put it in your OWN backyard.
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
08:59 PM on 08/24/2011
The protesters made the trip to put themselves on record and show where they stand.

You could begin to do the same by telling us how you make a living.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
10:16 PM on 08/24/2011
wasting water..until it evaporates and falls back to earth...but i agree.....natural gas is our future.
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
03:48 PM on 08/24/2011
Too many here prefer to sacrifice the health, quality of life and future of those that will be directly affected by this large investment to uphold a contaminating technology, rather than consider modifying their wasteful and unsustainable consumerist lifestyles.

Investing in a solution that won't destroy the local population's legitimate interests merits an expenditure and would be put to far better use.

This projects attempts to sustain a dying way of life. Forget it and move on, rather than compound what are now recognizable as monstrous mistakes based on ignorance we no long have and greed many still do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Jenkins
Virtual Ferroequinologist
07:04 PM on 08/24/2011
So where is the evidence of significant damage to the environment?
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
08:45 PM on 08/24/2011
In 2007, Environment Canada completed a study that shows high deformity rates in fish embryos exposed to the oil sands. David W. Schindler, a limnologist from the University of Alberta, published a study on Alberta's oil sands' contribution of aromatic polycyclic compounds, some of which are known carcinogens, to the Athabasca River and its tributaries. Scientists, local doctors, and residents supported a letter sent to the Prime Minister in September 2010 calling for an independent study of Lake Athabasca (which is downstream of the oil sands) to be initiated due to the rise of deformities and tumors found in fish caught there. The bulk of the research that defends the oil sands development is done by the Regional Aquatics Monitoring Program, RAMP. RAMP studies show that deformity rates are normal compared to historical data and the deformity rates in rivers upstream of the oil sands. It should be noted that RAMP is affiliated with the oil industry and its research data is submitted to environmental government agencies but unlike academia where peer review happens on a per study basis, RAMP does a peer review of the entire organization only once every five years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RealTimeHistory
03:01 PM on 08/25/2011
Agreed. My preceding comment was meant to be sarcastic, and does not reflect my true sentiments, that this tar sands pipeline is absurd.
01:53 PM on 08/24/2011
Now, I'm generally a "drill here while converting to something else" kind of guy, but the only reason to pipe this stuff all the way to the Gulf is to sell somewhere other than North America. Am I wrong? Don't claim to be an expert on this project.
02:38 PM on 08/24/2011
With all due respect, yes you are wrong. There are refineries down on our gulf coast to refine the oil into gasoline, and every gallon we produce is one less we buy from the Middle East. Go back and look at the article. It says, "If approved, the Keystone XL pipeline would pump 700,000 barrels of heavy crude per day from Canada's tar sands to refineries along the U.S. Gulf Coast." It doesn't say "to other countries". My spouse works at one of those refineries and this pipeline has to happen to be energy-independent to any greater extent.
03:17 PM on 08/24/2011
Don't mind being wrong. Is there a link you can direct me to with the info? As I said, I am not anti oil.
photo
dhinds
A Collection of Quotable Gems
04:50 PM on 08/24/2011
Energy independence requires renewable sources and tar-sands are not one, aside from it's seriously destructive, environmentally degrading aspects.