iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Missouri judge blocks Facebook limits for teachers

Facebook

DAVID A. LIEB   08/26/11 04:31 PM ET   AP

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — A new Missouri law prohibiting teachers from having private online conversations with students suffered a double setback Friday. First, a judge blocked it from taking effect because of free speech concerns. Then the governor called for its repeal.

The law limiting teacher-student conversations through social networking sites such as Facebook had been scheduled to take effect Sunday. But Cole County Circuit Judge Jon Beetem issued a preliminary injunction blocking it until at least February, saying the restrictions "would have a chilling effect" on free speech rights.

A couple of hours later, Gov. Jay Nixon said he would ask lawmakers to repeal the restrictions during a previously scheduled special session that starts Sept. 6. Nixon's request goes even further than the judge's order, which was confined to private conversations on non-work-related websites. The governor also wants lawmakers to reverse new restrictions on work-related websites and abolish a requirement for schools to develop written policies by January on teacher-student communications.

Nixon, who signed the legislation last month, said Friday that the provisions about online communication are "causing substantial confusion and concern among teachers, students and families" and thus should be stricken.

"In a digital world, we must recognize that social media can be an important tool for teaching and learning," said Nixon, a Democrat.

Republican state Sen. Jane Cunningham, who sponsored the measure, said she already has been working with education groups on a potential compromise that would repeal the existing law and replace it with a less-specific requirement for local school districts to develop policies about teacher-student communications. Cunningham said it's important to make the change as soon as possible.

"There's no reason for us to punt on this thing and let it continue to simmer and draw attention from all over the world," said Cunningham, who represents a suburban St. Louis district.

The Missouri law would have barred teachers from using websites that give "exclusive access" to current students or former students who are 18 or younger. That would have meant that communication through Facebook or other social networking sites had to be done in public, rather than through private messages.

The limits on Internet communications were included in a broader education bill passed earlier this year with the overwhelming support of the Legislature and various schools groups, including the Missouri State Teachers Association, which later filed suit over the social networking provisions.

One of its main provisions, which was not challenged, requires schools to share information with other districts about teachers who have sexually abused students and allows lawsuits in cases where districts fail to disclose such information and teachers later abuse someone else. Nixon said he still supports those provisions and is not asking for them to be repealed.

A public backlash began to build against the social networking provisions over the summer, as some teachers preparing for the new school year began complaining that the law could hamper both their classroom activities and school-related conversations that occur afterhours.

"This particular issue took a national tone, and we started to hear from teachers not just in Missouri but from throughout the United States," said Todd Fuller, a spokesman for the Missouri State Teachers Association.

One third-grade teacher, for example, feared the law could prevent her class from communicating with one in Australia through a closed website. Others raised concerns about virtual classrooms in which students communicate with direct messages, Fuller said.

In its lawsuit, the teachers association said websites such as Facebook and Twitter have become a common part of modern interaction between teachers and students and argued that restricting them would violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The judge said the teachers' lawsuit had a good likelihood of success. His order noted that social networking sites are used extensively by teachers and that the law would have restricted online communications even between family members in which teachers are parents.

"The breadth of the prohibition is staggering," Beetem wrote in his order, which blocks the law until Feb. 20 so that a hearing on a permanent injunction can be held.

The judge's order specifically assures teachers that they cannot be disciplined for engaging in private online communications with students while the injunction is in effect – even if it is later overturned.

The attorney general's office, which defended the law in court, declined to comment Friday.

Fuller said that if lawmakers repeal the law, then the group's lawsuit would become moot. "But until that happens we wouldn't drop the suit," he added.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — A new Missouri law prohibiting teachers from having private online conversations with students suffered a double setback Friday. First, a judge blocked it from taking effec...
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — A new Missouri law prohibiting teachers from having private online conversations with students suffered a double setback Friday. First, a judge blocked it from taking effec...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 177
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ironicisntit
07:38 PM on 08/28/2011
I agree with drmindhealer that teachers must protect themselves. I personally do not have a facebook account that is public, nor would I ever friend a student or their parents. There have been too many instances where one or the other has stepped over the line, or judged someone for what they posted. I know for a fact our district monitors facebook accounts to see if people are calling in sick and then posting photos of themselves obviously on a vacation or not in town. Too many ways to get in trouble.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drmindhealer
Clinician, Educator, Artist, Healer
12:39 PM on 08/28/2011
Teachers on all levels have to protect themselves. The line between personal and professional lives is fragmenting thanks to social media. It is indeed a powerful tool but comes with potential liabilities as Jerry Buell has learned. In a society that is so litigious teachers cannot afford to expose themselves. It is sad, but true. Because of what we do, no matter on what level, we are held to higher standards of conduct. No, it isn't fair, but it comes with the job description. Don't friend your students on Facebook. Don't give them your personal e-mail or your phone number. Doctors shouldn't do it, therapists shouldn't do it and neither should teachers. All it takes is one misstep ,no matter how innocent, to damage reputations and jeopardize a career.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cheri Quinn
Engaged citizen, professor, author, left of Jesus
12:56 AM on 08/28/2011
When this law was first reported on the Huffinton Post I questioned the Constitutionality and the wisdom of the law. Several people thought is odd that I advocated for communication with students and their parents through social networking sites. I reiterate; any means of keeping communications open is a good thing. Facebook allows teachers to set up dedicated sites for teachers and classroom, used only for school related issues. How can this be a bad thing?
03:14 PM on 08/27/2011
I've taught 17 years and I make it a strict policy not to friend a student. I do, however, get messages from time to time about school stuff. Before social media, they called me at home. Part of teaching is keeping professional boundaries, and that is not something the state should govern. I itaught my nieces and currently teach my own kids....where do you draw a line with a law? Can we not have an account on HuffPo or the local paper if a student might message us? It is impossible to enforce and a huge waste of effort to try.

My bigger concern, though, and the part that was swept out of the conversation, is the FORMER student inclusion. I have former students in ther 30s, hell, I teach THEIR children now. Obviously, the concern is for minors, but the furor has made things quite confusing.

Pervert sex offenders...NOT education professionals..in any job are going to find ways to be inappropriate with students. Frankly, I think the fact that there is now an indelible trail to track these criminals is a plus. Trust me, not being able to FB chat is NOT going to stop this...educating kids abouttheir rights and screening and mentoring teachers WILL. The relationships do not happen in a vacuum. Chrges should be investigated, facts should be gathered and swift action taken.
11:42 AM on 08/31/2011
I'm going for a credential now, and when I become a teacher I'll do what my veteran teacher fiancee has been doing -- I will keep my personal Facebook page private, but create another page that is for students. The private one is where I will post all of my status updates and pictures of me out at a bar drinking with friends, and my school one is where I will post school-related information.

Like anything else, Facebook is a tool. How a person uses the tool is up to them.
photo
outasite
ipsa scientia potestas est
11:01 AM on 08/27/2011
As a teacher, I completely disagree Facebook is the miracle learning tool some would have you believe. My students are given clear assignments, and if they have a question they can email me.
photo
cmbg78
I am the ~0.00000032%
12:24 PM on 08/27/2011
Facebook has email and is an alternative way to communicate. Please let me know where you teach so I can make sure my child never has to deal with you as his/her teacher.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ironicisntit
07:41 PM on 08/28/2011
Really? You would base your assessment of a teacher's ability on whether or not they use Facebook?
02:06 PM on 08/27/2011
So, you use one of the central functions that Facebook offers, only without Facebook, and with different network protocols, which, in fact, makes the communication harder to trace. That's pretty irrelevant, unless you're trying to say that they should've outlawed email as well...
07:12 PM on 08/27/2011
School email I think they meant.
09:27 AM on 08/28/2011
Not all email is through Facebook. Most teachers have a school email address and you need to have another email account before you can even create a Facebook.
10:10 AM on 08/27/2011
It's truly difficult to be a teacher. On one hand, your school gets funding based on how well you teach your students to take tests. On the other hand, you're limited in the amount you're actually allowed to talk to your students.
photo
cmbg78
I am the ~0.00000032%
12:27 PM on 08/27/2011
You aren't even factoring in how teachers are being painted as overpaid moochers of the state.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
09:25 AM on 08/27/2011
Strike another blow against repression in the US! Sensibility wins out over fear-based politics...how wonderful.
09:09 AM on 08/27/2011
Internet messaging and social media communication is more easily traced and exact content and context can be verified. Its actually a lot "safer" for both parties because you can't lie or deny what you said and to who. Predators who really want to get caught use the Internet. Just watch Chris Hanson.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
istvan13
The world needs more thinkers.
09:08 AM on 08/27/2011
It seems that Republican passed social laws are being repealed or sued across the country. It's time people took a good long look at what the theocratic Republicans are doing and where they want to take America.
08:58 AM on 08/27/2011
The only law and the only monitoring we need relates to improper adult/child communications. I'm pretty sure there are already such laws and school districts can make their own local rules as they determine regarding employees contact with students.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zooperman
08:53 AM on 08/27/2011
Why is it that lawmakers are so willing to pass laws that will obviously be challenged in court proceedings, costing state taxpayers tens of thousands of tax dollars - and then - DUH! LOSE THEIR CASE! What a bunch of legislative morons. Nothing new, I guess.
11:46 AM on 08/31/2011
Because then they can go to the voters in the next election and say, "well, we TRIED to do what you want us to do, but those nasty, evil, libruls are all pedophiles who want to use Facebook to rape your children!"
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
08:47 AM on 08/27/2011
Something creepy about a teacher that needs to be 'friends' with their jr high or high school students
09:01 AM on 08/27/2011
welcome to the 21st century. I know its difficult. But it's really no different than when you went from having to talk to a person face:face to using that new fangle telephone thing (I mean there's something creepy about talking to people through wires)...

but a serious note: i have friends that use it as a means to answer questions about homework after school hours. It's just a 21st century tool, like the telephone.
02:01 PM on 08/27/2011
Very creepy. Unless you know that "Friend" is just the name on a button that extends the communication possibilities on a site for electronic communication. In that case, it's about as creepy as talking to a student over the phone.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
02:39 PM on 08/27/2011
Amazing, I managed to go to school 16 years and never once needed to call my teacher, nor them to call me.
Paulo1
Thanks for reading, (even if you disagree)
08:27 AM on 08/27/2011
If you don't trust your kids teacher enough to have a conversati­on with your kid why the heck are you sending them into that classroom to begin with? If your a good parent you know every one of your kids teachers on a first name basis and are talking with them yourself about classroom performanc­e. If my kids teacher was on the phone mentoring my kid I would be thrilled not upset.
Paulo1
Thanks for reading, (even if you disagree)
08:22 AM on 08/27/2011
"Republican state Sen. Jane Cunningham, who sponsored the measure........"

Note to Anonymous and LuLz Security: Target acquisition opportunity.
mikiao
Empty my micro-bio is.
07:00 AM on 08/27/2011
"New law everyone...teachers, don't talk to your students on Facebook, because you could sexually harass them. Also, don't talk to them on the telephone because of the same reason. Texting is out, you'd probably send them nude photos of yourself. No talking to them before/after school because we're not paying you for that. Keep quiet in the hallways, we don't want the students claiming they were bullied by you."

"And about the whole 'talking to your students in class' thing...I think we're going to have to stop that too. Some parents are worried you're teaching their kids the wrong stuff, so lets stop that too"