More

International Space Station May Be Evacuated By Late November, NASA Says (VIDEO)

First Posted: 08/29/11 02:02 PM ET Updated: 10/29/11 06:12 AM ET

By Marcia Dunn, Associated Press

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- Astronauts may need to temporarily abandon the International Space Station this fall if last week's Russian launch accident prevents new crews from flying, a NASA official said Monday.

If Russia's essential Soyuz rockets remain grounded beyond mid-November, there will be no way to launch any more astronauts before the current residents are supposed to leave, said NASA's space station program manager, Mike Suffredini.

A space station supply ship was destroyed last week following liftoff from Kazakhstan. The failed upper stage of the Soyuz rocket is similar to what's used to launch astronauts.

The launch of the very next crew already has been delayed. It had been scheduled for Sept. 22.

To keep the orbiting outpost with a full staff of six for as long as possible, three of the current residents will remain in orbit for at least an extra week. They were supposed to return to Earth on Sept. 8.

Suffredini said flight controllers could keep a deserted space station operating indefinitely, as long as all major systems are working properly.

But that's always the last resort: The risk to the space station goes up if no one's on board to fix potential equipment breakdowns.

"We have plenty of options," Suffredini said. "We'll focus on crew safety as we always do."

Astronauts have been living continuously aboard the space station ever since the first crew was launched in 2000.

NASA considered vacating the space station following the space shuttle Columbia disaster in 2003. Back then, shuttles were still being used to ferry some station residents back and forth. Instead, the station got by with two-man crews for a few years because of the significant cutback in supplies.

Even if the space shuttles still were flying - the program ended last month - space station crews still would need Soyuz-launched capsules to serve as lifeboats, Suffredini said. The capsules are certified for no more than 6 1/2 months in space, thus the need to regularly rotate crews.

As for supplies, the space station is well stocked and could go until next summer, Suffredini said. Space shuttle Atlantis dropped off a year's supply of goods just last month.

For now, operations are normal aboard the 240-mile-high complex, he noted, and the additional week on board for half the crew will mean additional science research.

The Russians have set up an investigation team and until it comes up with a cause for the accident and a repair plan, the launch and landing schedules remain in question. None of the spacecraft debris has been recovered yet; the wreckage fell into a remote, wooded section of Siberia.

Suffredini said he hasn't had time to consider the PR impact of abandoning the space station, especially coming so soon after the end of the 30-year shuttle program.

"Flying safely is much, much more important than anything else I can think about right this instant," he said. "I'm sure we'll have an opportunity to discuss any political implications if we spend a lot of time on the ground. But you know, we'll just have to deal with them because we're going to do what's safest for the crew and for the space station."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

By Marcia Dunn, Associated Press CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- Astronauts may need to temporarily abandon the International Space Station this fall if last week's Russian launch accident prevents new cre...
By Marcia Dunn, Associated Press CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- Astronauts may need to temporarily abandon the International Space Station this fall if last week's Russian launch accident prevents new cre...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 598
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:14 PM on 08/31/2011
An ISS orbiting without a crew is a very bad idea.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
forestnfama
I was born at a very early age....
08:58 AM on 08/31/2011
They probably are abandoning the ship because within a few weeks the planet will be passing through the tail of the approaching meteorite or dwarf star or what ever it is and it has tons and tons of debris following it.... Some are speculating that we will be pelted by 70 pound rocks as if it were hail......We better be sure that this is not the case but as of now NASA or other agencies are not giving too much information but simulated orbital projection on NASA's site show we will pass directly through the tail of this massive object, what ever it is.......it could mean the destruction of mans ability to get these guys down after October 26.......when we start passing through the tail.......A good time to plan the end of the world parties......
05:55 AM on 08/31/2011
The cost of these missions are so costly people do not have a clue just what this type of waste cost and then they say we have to cut Social Security, no people what we need to cut is you and your stupid wastefulness, spending trillions of dollars into space is just making some of the people rich at the expense of the people who actually do or have worked all their life.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:02 PM on 08/30/2011
And it may keep running indefinitely. "Suffredini said flight controllers could keep a deserted space station operating indefinitely, as long as all major systems are working properly." Also, a similar article from another source mentions that the US will be launching automatic resupply craft in approximately one year.
The article fails to note that the US has moved beyond only launching future space junk into geosyncronious Earth orbit. Certainly, reformed deficit hawks in the GOP have noted how big the current NASA budget is.
06:40 PM on 08/30/2011
That's OK the space shuttle will be taken out of mothballs and flip up for a tag. Russian equipment is not too reliable anyways.
06:32 PM on 08/30/2011
Because thiers an Alien in the space station.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WorkhelpWorkhelp
Control your money locally. Charter banks now.
03:54 AM on 08/31/2011
there's......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
03:31 PM on 08/30/2011
It's time to cut loose from this boondoggle. The space station took 3 times as long to build and cost 10 times as much because all the components had to be parceled out to congressional districts controlled by powerful congressmen. It was a pork-barrel nightmare and it has long-since outlived any usefulness it ever had. Let the Russians have it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WorkhelpWorkhelp
Control your money locally. Charter banks now.
03:54 AM on 08/31/2011
Very thoughtful......
:-(
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
04:12 AM on 08/31/2011
I have advocated in other places, frequently, that we build a space station on one of the moons of Mars. We need to build a railgun and shoot capsules full of supplies to land on the chosen moon. When everything we need to build (excavate and equip) a station, plus supplies (oxygen, hydrogen, food, etc.) has landed safely on the moon we can build a ship in earth orbit and then send it to Mars. The colonists can build a space station and use it to conduct a close examination of Mars with an eye to colonization. The railgun can continue to ship supplies inc. a Mars Lander. The colonists can use the Lander to explore Mars and return to the station.

Does that idea cheer you up? :-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Quasi Libertarian
Sometimes you get the bear, sometimes it gets you
01:50 PM on 08/30/2011
It saddens me that I have to tell my kids what it was like when America used to go to the moon. It is very unlikely that they will experience the profound pride of seeing our Nation do truly GREAT tasks as Kennedy said".....not because it is easy, but becasue it is hard..."
My kids should now be sitting with me as we see American's landing on Mars, or the the Moons of Jupiter after 40 years since the lunar landing......
Instead, we have abdicate our leadership role to be just a voice in the chorus..........
12:50 PM on 08/30/2011
I see some people blaming Obama for cutting the shuttle program, but don't Americans want the deficit cut too? you cant have it both ways budget cuts need to be made. You want a 1st class space programme you got to pay for it.
02:23 PM on 08/30/2011
Obama better be prepared to get out shuttle ready in a hurry. Russia isn't going to make it.
The deficit is going to have to wait.
03:34 PM on 08/30/2011
"I see some people blaming Obama for cutting the shuttle program"

For the umpteen thousandth time, the Obama administration had NOTHING to do with the decision to end the shuttle program. The space shuttle program ended as a result of the decision made in 2004 after the CAIB (Columbia Accident Investigation Board) report that it would not be safe or economic to keep flying the shuttle after the International Space Station was completed. The Obama administration actually asked for a budget INCREASE for NASA for fiscal 2012. That will likely be cut by the tea pot herd in the House. Between the SLS/MPCV project (look it up) and CCDev (Commercial Crew Development) U.S. human spaceflight is alive and moving into its next phase. Unfortunately, just like the 6 year stand down at the end of the Apollo program, there is going to be a noticeable gap before the new systems are ready. That is something that more money would minimize.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WorkhelpWorkhelp
Control your money locally. Charter banks now.
03:56 AM on 08/31/2011
Mighty daring of you to introduce facts into senseless hate. (Don't stop.)
Frankling
Fruit don't talk. Fruit just listens...and waits.
12:20 PM on 08/30/2011
"Suffredini said flight controllers could keep a deserted space station operating indefinitely, as long as all major systems are working properly."
How ironic that such a statement would be made in the wake of a rocket blowing up for unkwown reasons.
05:14 PM on 08/30/2011
The rocket didn't explode. The engine shut down prematurely in response to an unexpected sensor reading on the fuel inlet pressure. There could have been an actual problem with the fuel system, but usually this kind of failure mode is caused by a faulty pressure sensor.

If it were a manned Soyuz flight, the capsule would have separated from the launch vehicle and initiated a contingency reentry program that would have been quite survivable. In the worst case scenario they would land in a forest and the parachute might get snagged by a tree limb.

They basically need to determine whether this event was caused by a mechanical problem or by instrumentation, and in case of the latter, they can probably resume Soyuz launches with minimal delay. Occasionally a pressure transducer misbehaves. It happens.
InYourWorld
Progressive, educated, redneck but fan of no party
10:24 PM on 08/30/2011
Way to use science and knowledge to ruin someone's uneducated rampage......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Negron
"We are each responsible for all of our experience
12:09 PM on 08/30/2011
People should read more before complaining about the US Space Program that is still ver much alive. We are moving on while the rest o the world is feeding the already 11 year old space station. Get informed! Here's and excerpt- (The link below will take you to the NASA page)

"Exploration
NASA is designing and building the capabilities to send humans to explore the solar system, working toward a goal of landing humans on Mars. We will build the Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, based on the design for the Orion capsule, with a capacity to take four astronauts on 21-day missions. "

http://www.nasa.gov/about/whats_next.html
02:25 PM on 08/30/2011
I realize that and I'm all for it but as long as there a men on the Space Station our shuttles should be ready.
12:08 PM on 08/30/2011
I wonder what the Siberian woodland creatures will make of the year's space food supply that's fallen from the sky. They will probably vote freeze dried ice cream as the their top favorite!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Celebrindan
M=1∞/R=dM>1
12:08 PM on 08/30/2011
No wonder NASA is floundering.

"What's Happening At Apple?" is the closest thing we get to real science anymore.
12:51 PM on 08/30/2011
"What's Happening At Apple?" isn't even science. It's technology news - so not even technology or engineering.
11:31 AM on 08/30/2011
I have always wondered if everyone would at least agree on one thing, would it create a change. No wonder the House of Rep, and the Senate don't ever get anythng done. Facts should be the reason to change something NOT OPINIONS. The TRUTH is what people should listen to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mwood33333
10:59 AM on 08/30/2011
thank you obama ,you have really made the USA look good
12:11 PM on 08/30/2011
What's your point?
12:37 PM on 08/30/2011
You do realize the Shuttle shut down under Bush. It was multiple delays that caused the inevitable end years later. Why don't you blame Obama for the hurricane? I think he had more control over that.