More

Obama To Boehner: New EPA, Transportation Regulations Would Cost Economy More Than $1 Billion A Year

Barack Obama Economy

JIM KUHNHENN   08/30/11 07:18 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama says his administration is considering seven new government regulations that would cost the economy more than $1 billion each a year, a tally Republicans will pounce on to argue that Congress needs the power to approve costly government rules.

In a letter to House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, Obama lists four proposed Environmental Protection Agency rules and three Transportation Department rules estimated to cost in excess of $1 billion. One of the proposed EPA rules – an update to the health-based standard for smog – is estimated to cost the economy between $19 billion and $90 billion.

The letter, dated Tuesday, comes as the Republican-controlled House prepares to consider legislation that would require congressional approval for any new regulations that would impose a significant cost on industries.

The four environmental regulations, which target air pollution and coal residue primarily from coal-fired power plants, already have been attacked by House Republicans, who have said they would kill jobs and harm the economy.

A federal court ordered the Obama administration to propose two of the four environmental rules.

And while the regulations would be expensive to comply with, EPA officials say they will save billions of dollars in avoided health care costs each year by reducing asthma and other illnesses, such as cancer. In some cases, the cost savings are greater than the upfront expense, according to EPA figures.

Obama's letter was in response to a Boehner request last week for more details from the president on the proposed costs of the most expensive regulations under consideration by his administration. Obama's administration has identified 219 proposed regulations this year with a cost to the economy of more than $100 million each.

Boehner, in a statement, said the administration should now release detailed cost estimates for all those proposed regulations.

"At a time like this, with our economy struggling to create jobs, it's misguided for the federal government to be imposing so many new rules with such enormous costs, even when some of those rules may be well-intentioned," he said.

Obama said a number of regulations being contemplated are in such preliminary stages of review that they have no reliable cost estimates.

The president said the seven proposals he did identify are not final and that his administration will "give careful consideration" to cost-savings. He said his administration already has made changes that have saved more than $10 billion in regulatory costs over the next five years, and said new regulations must meet cost-saving requirements that he ordered earlier this year.

He also defended his regulatory record, saying the cost of final rules adopted in 2007 and 2008, during the administration of President George W. Bush, were higher than in the first two years of his administration.

"In 2009 and 2010, the benefits of such rules – including not only monetary savings but also lives saved and illnesses prevented – exceeded the costs by tens of billions of dollars," Obama wrote.

___

Associated Press writer Dina Cappiello contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama says his administration is considering seven new government regulations that would cost the economy more than $1 billion each a year, a tally Republicans will...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama says his administration is considering seven new government regulations that would cost the economy more than $1 billion each a year, a tally Republicans will...
Filed by Paige Lavender  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,466
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (77 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
tony wise 06:17 PM on 08/30/2011
yovinny100 39 Fans Become a fan 4 minutes ago (6:08 PM) Where are the jobs, Boehner?

Where are the jobs, Cantor?

Where are the jobs, McConnell?

New rule- you don't get to complain about anything the president does until you start  Read More...
photo
rreggaeredkc
Read the Desiderata
04:49 PM on 09/05/2011
Great idea! Let's stop spending on those great benefits for Congress. They can pay for their own insurance and the rest of all the expenses we have to pay for but they don't. Sheweee! Would ya look at all that money flying around?
12:18 PM on 09/02/2011
Obama just lost my vote by choosing the economy as a higher priority over the environment. We can't have a healthy economy without a healthy environment, and it's pure idiocy to continue to allow our planet to be polluted to the high levels that it is.
08:36 AM on 09/01/2011
Obama has cost us some 14 trillion dollsrs, so lets get rid of both and we wind up with a huge gain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leadsled
Love-child of the ghosts of FDR and Napoleon
09:37 AM on 09/01/2011
How? How exactly do you think he cost you that much? You do realize that like 90% of the debt was accrued under Reagan, Bush and Bush, right?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
OSCPJ
Want it? Work 4 it. No 1 has ever drown in sweat.
10:20 PM on 08/31/2011
But this is the good kind of spending. And through eliminating fraud and abuse...............yeah right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cvermeulen9
And you thought it could never happen!
10:17 PM on 08/31/2011
Have you guys ever complained about government red tape??????? Just to get anything done???
I rest my case.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:27 AM on 09/01/2011
You rest your brain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wayne the pain
07:43 PM on 08/31/2011
It is good he can spar it sure looks like he can't fight! He appears adverse to to doing any real fightig with the Republican! His history is not fighting but talking, compromising, and caving in! Blah, blah, blah, all he excels at is talking! Good luck on this guy fixing the economy!
06:44 PM on 08/31/2011
It would be interesting to find when the rules of due diligence in filing mortgage applications where suspended by congressinal mandate and who would have issued such rules.If this is the case republicans controlled the presidency,house,and senate until Jan,2007.This is basically the year that the housing bubble burst.Who in all their Fox News talking point vocabulary can explain this obvious conflict in facts to rhetoric.This should be a simple question that you can answer without much thought since that is basically how you answer everything.
06:28 PM on 08/31/2011
Yeah! More government control!!!! I wonder how this is going to work out...

As if we didn't know....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leadsled
Love-child of the ghosts of FDR and Napoleon
09:39 AM on 09/01/2011
Based on past experience with DOT and EPA rules the answer is pretty clear "its going to work out great for the US economy and our environment and the safety of the public". Much like every other DOT or EPA rule which Republicans fought against. Remember when cap and trade for sulfur dioxide was going to cost us untold trillions and cause permanent harm to everything? Yea turns out it cost the polluters very little compared to what was claimed before the rules went into effect and benefitted other sectors of the economy enough to more than offset the cost to polluters
06:12 PM on 08/31/2011
President regulate.
06:03 PM on 08/31/2011
THE EPA IS NOTHING BUT A GANG OF MARXIST NIT WITS OBAMA APPOINTED TO DESTROY THE ECONOMY
photo
Tenderlies1
Im Old Enough to know better, are you
06:12 PM on 08/31/2011
Your the Nit Wit EPA has been round a while but I am sure The President will take credit for it I Would.
01:34 AM on 09/21/2011
You have computer in kitchen?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kcwookie
Well behaved workers seldom prosper.
08:25 PM on 08/31/2011
I don't think you could find a real Marxist if he was the only person in the picture.
hsmachine
life's short, live it fast
05:22 PM on 08/31/2011
Yes just what this bad economy needs more regs Are they doing anything about the smog in China?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mgray34
They did it!! They ate all the blueberry pie!!
06:34 PM on 08/31/2011
Only a clueless person would say that lol.

As a resident of Los Angeles, California, which was at one time the smog capital of the world, I for one am glad we regulated companies that were polluting our air to the point where we were having 5 stage smog alerts on a regular basis during the summer months. If you come to LA now you will see we have one of the cleanest, if not the cleanest urban air regions in the nation. I don't have to worry about my grand daughter's chest burning like mine did as a child due to breathing in LA smog.

If you allow companies to do whatever without regulation you can guarantee that your air, water and food will be poisoned. Open your eyes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
thetxsndn
Man Plans. God laughs.
09:03 PM on 08/31/2011
Just a little FYI & sorry if it bursts your bubble....the Los Angeles basin was know by the ORIGINAL native Americans as the Vally of Smokes. We're talking 1000 years ago. It is a result of the constant fires in the late summer & fall months & the fact that the ocean winds can't blow the smoke & nast air past the San Berdoo mountains. I lived most of my life int he Los Angeles area till I was blessed & able to move away. I sure don't miss that chunky air. Don't have athsma anymore either.
11:05 AM on 09/04/2011
so let your STATE take care of it. The POTUS needs not manage 50 states for the failures of one....
photo
eyeforeye42
Do the right thing for the right reason
05:22 PM on 08/31/2011
We can get rid of lots of regulations if they agree to change business and corporate law to make CEO's and board members personally responsible for the actions of their subordinates when the rules and regulations left intact are violated.
04:56 PM on 08/31/2011
Fox News hates the EPA because their afraid they will be labeled a toxic waste dump.
06:04 PM on 08/31/2011
THE EPA IS A TOXIC WASTE DUMP FOR OBAMA'S LOW LIFE FRIENDS
06:11 PM on 08/31/2011
THE EPA IS A TOXIC WASTE DUMP FOR UNEMPLOYABLE
04:53 PM on 08/31/2011
Farmers are in fear with regulations;
These aren’t rumored regulations.
Dirt Road pollution
http://www.epa.gov/agriculture/trur.html
Milk as a regulated Oil
http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2010/06/epa_classifies_milk_as_oil_for.html
Pesticide Runoff Permit Requirement
http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/home.cfm?program_id=410
Etc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Rayburn
our leaders are the biggest threat to freedom
03:51 AM on 09/01/2011
what about the EPA permit required to build a bridge to across the stream to the farmers field?
04:51 PM on 08/31/2011
A history lesson for the uniformed Barney Frank did not become head of the house finance committee until Jan.2007 before that it was Mike Oxley(R) from Ohio.When is his name mentioned in the housing mess and who is Richard Shelby and when was he head of the senate banking committee.