iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

New iTunes Match Feature Revealed (UPDATE)

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 08/30/11 11:16 AM ET Updated: 10/30/11 06:12 AM ET

Itunes Match Cloud Streaming Features
iTunes Match will feature music streaming from the cloud.

See update below

Apple is just full of surprises this month, aren't they?

iTunes Match, the recently announced cloud-based music service from Apple, just went a little farther toward justifying that $24.99 annual price tag. Apple has released a beta version to developers, and Insanely Great Mac is reporting that, in an unannounced move, all music that you own that corresponds to music in the iTunes store will be available to stream from the cloud on up to 5 computers.

The previous assumption had been that if you wanted to listen to music you had uploaded into the cloud, you would have to download it onto your devices; now, it looks like you'll be able to listen to that music from any device that has an Internet connection, without the need to download the tunes onto that gadget.

HOW IT WORKS

1. You have music on your computer. I won't ask where you got it; you just have it in iTunes.

2. You link up all the music on your computer to the music in iTunes using iTunes Match. Apple looks for a corresponding track in its database to "match" to your track.

3. If Apple finds a match, you can stream that song, as a high-quality 256kbps AAC file, from anywhere in the world, on up to 5 computers you register with Apple, plus your phones and tablets running iOS (Insanely Great Mac says 5 devices; This Is My Next says 10).

4. If Apple does not find a match, you can upload that song into the new iCloud so that it can be listened to from anywhere.

Here's a video overview from Insanely Great Mac that shows and explains, in very simple language, exactly how the cloud streaming service works:

On first glance, it is kind of shocking that record companies agreed to this, as this just might encourage illegal downloading of music at home--rather than buying the song from iTunes, users could potentially download it illegally, find its iTunes match using iTunes Match, then listen to that song anywhere via Apple's iCloud streaming service. So, good news for pirates, and also good news for audiophiles, who may have quickly ripped music from CDs or LPs, or who have music saved at lower bit rates in order to save hard drive space, and want to listen to higher quality recordings of their music.

TechCrunch points out the superiority of iTunes Match to the also recently announced Google Music, which requires users to upload all of their music into the cloud. Cloud streaming means that listeners must only upload the music not in the iTunes database for later enjoyment.

HuffPost Tech favorite Spotify has a service akin to iTunes Match that matches all the music in your library to the music in Spotify's database, then makes those songs available to stream. However, it lacks what appears to be the robust uploading capability of the iCloud, and has a slightly smaller music selection than iTunes.

iTunes Match will cost $24.99 per year and should be available some time this fall, perhaps at the same time as the release of iOS 5.

UPDATE: According to All Things D, an Apple spokesperson has said that the new service isn't technically streaming; rather, the service will play the song as it downloads to your device.

"Apple says that what looks like a 'stream' is really a simultaneous listen and download — users can hear the song while their machine ingests it," All Things D's Peter Kafka writes.

Still, it's a surprising (and fun) feature of iTunes Match. Read more from All Things D here.

WATCH:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

See update below Apple is just full of surprises this month, aren't they? iTunes Match, the recently announced cloud-based music service from Apple, just went a little farther toward justifying ...
See update below Apple is just full of surprises this month, aren't they? iTunes Match, the recently announced cloud-based music service from Apple, just went a little farther toward justifying ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 214
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opressor
10:27 PM on 08/30/2011
so i can take my media from my devices and put it on a server and get access when i want on what ever machine i want, wow...revolutionary. this "technology" is so caveman it's hilarious, but just put lowercase "i" in front of it charge Way too much and Blam..apple invented it and it's never been done...Weeeeeeeak.
09:32 AM on 09/01/2011
You're missing the point. It's not about the tech. It's about the ability to stream (listen-while-downloading, whatever) this music legally. That's the big news - that it's legal. Nobody is saying, except the anti-Apple crowd, that Apple invented this tech.

And after all this time and all the articles that point out that the so-called "Apple Tax" is a myth, are you really going to go after iCloud for charging $25/year? Per *year*? You lose more than that in dropped change every year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opressor
03:45 PM on 09/01/2011
i get what you mean, you still have to buy the music from apple (and use an apple product for playback, that's where they make the real money) at and inflated profit margin that the artists really see very little of...apple still makes the big money here, they're doing me no favors. i can stream from many sources for free and the artists actually get decent royalties, i'm one of those artists. i get more profit margin from online streaming than itunes sales.. there are plenty online Dropbox type ftp's you could put your personal library on and get access to on any amount of machines or stream them on your phone.
05:09 PM on 08/30/2011
This is OLD news--Steve Jobs made the announcement at the tail end of his Worldwide Developers' Conference keynote (as in keynote presentation) this past June. See the video on Apple's website.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Temsi
Non-conformist. Is that OK?
05:19 PM on 08/30/2011
That's what I said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Temsi
Non-conformist. Is that OK?
04:31 PM on 08/30/2011
As for encouraging piracy - that's not correct.
Your annual fee does cover payments to copyright holders based on how much their music is downloaded. When you download a song to your iphone, it will trigger a payment to the copyright holder, albeit far less per song than the 99 cents you'd pay through iTunes.

But think of it this way: they already know there's rampant piracy and that millions of people have music on their computers they didn't pay for. So when those people use this service, then the copyright holders will get paid whenever they listen to those illegally acquired songs - assuming they download them through the cloud. If those songs were purchased legally, they're actually getting paid twice. It's a win win. We get the music we want, they get paid.
There's no way the RIAA would have agreed to this if they hadn't run the numbers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inLA
04:22 PM on 08/30/2011
I'm still waiting for something half as good as Lala. Apple purchased it just to dismantle it. I've heard that they are building their new cloud system based on the Lala interface. I hope this is true.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Temsi
Non-conformist. Is that OK?
04:21 PM on 08/30/2011
How is this unannounced? Anyone who paid attention to the keynote when this was announced has known about the iTunes match feature for months. I know I have. It's what made me so excited about the cloud in the first place. Being able to match your existing library through the cloud is what separates iCloud from the competitors. I've been telling my friends I'm looking forward to being able to carry all my music with me even if it doesn't fit on my iphone.
They even explained how the annual fee will be used to pay the licensing fees for whatever music you play.

Is this a case of people not paying attention or did I miss something?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
04:15 PM on 08/30/2011
who cares
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jabandit
In vino veritas.
04:23 PM on 08/30/2011
you
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DarleenMB
04:05 PM on 08/30/2011
Why not ask "where I got that song." I transferred it from my CD! Not everyone out there is a pirate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inLA
04:23 PM on 08/30/2011
It is possible to purchase mp3s from the net.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:00 PM on 08/30/2011
God, this makes life worth living...huh?
03:59 PM on 08/30/2011
Buzzed about this, but still have a lot of questions. Like what's going to happen to all the metadata that I've painstakingly entered into my library, including songs I bought from iTunes? I often enter the names of friends or phrases like "Swimming" or "Car" or "NewMusic" so iTunes generates and auto updates smart playlists I've created for specific devices and events, I LOVE that and would hate to lose that feature if cloud matched versions don't retain and work with that data.

& I've literally gone into many of my songs that segued from one song to another and joined them as a single track, so that when I listen in shuffle mode I won't have those horrible jarring moments when a song is transitioning to the next song on the original album, but now it suddenly stops---I hate that!!!

Even gone so far as to fade in/out many of the my live concert albums so that the crowd noise between songs doesn't rudely cut in or out.

And if I get an H2O underwater housing for one of the new wifi enabled iPhones or iPods, will it be able to stream while swimming underwater? My Classic iPod with it's 180 gig hard drive works GREAT for that, but it would sure be nice to never have to bother syncing with my computer to add new music to it!!

Will be following closely to see how the new service deals with these kinds of events.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gfs5541
03:56 PM on 08/30/2011
I'm not so sure this is a boon to pirates. You're still paying $25 bucks a year for the privilege of being able to play tunes on any device. The guys who are pirating song will say, Why not do this for free?
03:56 PM on 08/30/2011
Read the whole article - there's an update which shows there's actually no news here. Everything accurate in this article is old news.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ryan Schmidt
03:50 PM on 08/30/2011
This service would be cool if I couldn't bring my iPod everywhere I go..
09:35 AM on 09/01/2011
I've got a music library 3.5 times the size of my iPhone's storage, so this service is cool. Don't fall into the trap of thinking that just because it's not useful to you that it must not be useful to anyone.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GlennWatson
Two million fans
07:34 PM on 09/01/2011
Ipods have 30 to 60 gigabits.
03:48 PM on 08/30/2011
I remember that the company MP3.com got completely run out of town for doing the same thing back in the 90s. THey were sued i think, by the record industry claiming that the service constituted unauthorized duplication and promoted copyright infringement. THey pretty much got killed-off after having settled out of court for zillion$. So, what's different about this deal? Is it possibe tha Apple somehow got permission from the record companies to let everyone stream whatever is in their itunes library - w/o having to prove that they own it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:54 PM on 08/30/2011
the difference is apple's probably making the record companies a ton of money that they wouldn't have with mp3.com or napster or whoever...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:40 AM on 08/31/2011
hee hee hee yeah tell the record companies they have apple to thank for their tons of money hoo hoo hoo!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EAPrince
My other car is an Al'kesh
04:12 PM on 08/30/2011
The difference is that Apple cut deals with the record labels. Amazon and Google didn't, which is why their cloud music services require you to upload all of your music manually to get access to it from the cloud.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:41 AM on 08/31/2011
In the same way those Zetas "cut a deal" with the management of Casino Royale in Monterrey.
03:42 PM on 08/30/2011
How long before they submit a list of all non-drm songs you own to the RIAA?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GlennWatson
Two million fans
04:29 PM on 08/30/2011
Bingo
09:38 AM on 09/01/2011
What would be the point? It's completely legal for me to rip a CD and save it to my hard drive. The RIAA can't tell the difference between a file that I legally ripped from a store-bought CD, a file that was downloaded DRM-free from a legal online source and one that someone downloaded illegally.

The lack of DRM isn't incriminating evidence.
photo
thaggas
JackpotFishyPoopyPants
03:41 PM on 08/30/2011
Big shocker. Listened to loud music growing up. 256kb is fine for me. I can barely hear it anyway.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:43 AM on 08/31/2011
Some of us still love the sound of guitars on vinyl. Thank god i can digitally take 24 bit audio files and put them in surround sound on AVCHD's that my PS3 can play on my home theater.