iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama To Call For Extension Of Transportation Funds Currently Set To Expire

Obama Transportation

First Posted: 08/30/11 06:51 PM ET Updated: 10/30/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- As part of an effort to spur additional job creation, the Obama administration will push Congress to keep surface transportation spending at current levels rather than subject it to cuts, according to sources familiar with the matter.

A White House official tells The Huffington Post that the president will hold an event Wednesday alongside Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, and U.S. Chamber of Commerce Chief Operating Officer David Chavern calling on Congress to pass a "clean extension" of surface transportation funding.

"The president will discuss the importance of moving forward with this extension to protect nearly a million American jobs and highlight the opportunity we have to work in a bipartisan way to further invest in rebuilding our nation’s infrastructure to strengthen our economy and create new jobs across the country," the aide said.

It remains to be determined whether the president will also include the issue in his highly publicized speech on job creation, set for next week. Administration officials were mum on the matter when asked about it by The Huffington Post, choosing instead to speak in broad strokes about what the president will discuss.

But Democrats on and off the Hill say that the current spending levels must be maintained if the party is to be viewed as serious about jobs. Surface transportation spending is set to run out on September 30; if it is allowed to lapse, thousands of federal construction jobs would simply be lost.

Discussions about specific legislation that would extend the funding has caused friction between Republicans and Democrats. A bill has not yet been officially introduced. But Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), who chairs the Environment and Public Works Committee, has outlined a two-year extension at the cost of $109 billion, which would keep spending at its current levels. House Transportation and Infrastructure Chair John Mica (R-Fla.), meanwhile, has pushed a six-year extension with a 34 percent reduction in the amount spent.

A top Republican aide explained that the longer-term extension, which is more common for surface transportation authorizations, would "give states and transit agencies the predictability it needs to plan for long term projects." The aide added that given diminished revenues coming into the Highway Trust Fund, it was necessary to reduce the amount being spent on surface transportation. "You can't continue to write these checks that we can't cash," said the aide.

For Obama, however, the immediate standard to meet is job creation. And according to Boxer's office, the numerical difference in dollars spent between her plan and Mica's is the equivalent of 630,000 jobs. It was, perhaps, little surprise that at a time when it's extremely difficult to get information about the president's job speech, CBS reported that the White House wanted the $109 billion two-year package as part of Obama's plan to "spend big on the nation's roads and bridges."

Conservatives attacked the item as further evidence that the president couldn't tame his spending urges, though Democrats note that the $109 billion wouldn't be a spending increase, just a continuation of current spending levels. Indeed, when the last surface transportation bill expired in September 2009 (there have been seven temporary extensions since then) House Democrats proposed a $500 billion measure to takes its place -- the type of price tag that make lawmakers blush given the current push toward austerity.

Still, it's not entirely clear whether Obama will make a formal pitch for Boxer's proposal when he delivers his jobs address. While her outline does have a prominent Republican supporter -- Environment and Public Works ranking member Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) -- the window for passage is incredibly tight. With all spending set to expire in one month, both chambers in Congress will rarely be in session simultaneously during September.

Most transportation spending advocates predict that Congress will resolve the issue in its usual fashion: by simply extending the current law until some future moment. That would keep current projects funded for now. But it would also mean that lawmakers will have punted on specific legislative changes that could spur even more job creation, such as allocating $1 billion (as opposed to $122 million) for the TIFIA program, which helps communities use federal credit assistance -- direct loans, loan guarantees, and lines of credit -- to leverage their transportation projects.

"We are going to need to do an extension because I don't think anybody thinks we will be able to get a two-year bill or a six-year bill done in the next thirty days," said the Republican aide.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,484
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (33 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbwest84
10:48 PM on 08/31/2011
What if the president gave a speech and no one listened.
01:07 AM on 09/01/2011
It already happens that way. It's all just blah, blah, blah from a teleprompter. No one cares.
08:52 PM on 08/31/2011
Really? Obama wants to spend more tax money that we don't have? That is soooo hard to believe, next you'll try to get me to believe that he has relatives here ilegally! I bet you would even say that he said that he had been to almost all 57 states (including hawaii, all islands, Egypt and ???). But he was the smartest guy ever elected, right? Jimmy Carter part 2! We need him out!
05:47 AM on 09/01/2011
Yeah you are right. Maybe it would be better for everyone if ALL if the roads, bridges, railroad tracks, and airport runways collapsed or completely fell apart. Then we could all just walk to work. Gas is too expensive anyway. But then I guess that's Obama's fault too, right?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbwest84
07:41 PM on 08/31/2011
One thing I know Rick Perry does not have a drunk illegal uncle from Kenyan on the loose . Call me crazy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamesnpost
06:51 PM on 08/31/2011
Not to knock the man (who can control that ball, no question), nor to deprecate the value of the game of football to our culture and future, but.... I just read Michael Vick has been given a $100MILLION contract. Few teachers (overpaid union parasites?) earn $50,000 a year. At that rate, Vick's take would provide "jobs, jobs, jobs" for 2000 teachers. First things first, I guess...
Post www.postpubco.com
tnjr
Humor gets me through the day
10:51 PM on 08/31/2011
Well then tell Michael Vick to start a school and hire teachers. Vick is employed by a private employer, not the government. His salary is not paid by taxpayers, but by revenue generated by fans going and watching games. If you watch football, then you are supporting Vick. If you don't like it, don't watch football.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamesnpost
06:49 PM on 08/31/2011
Republican "spending guts" policy is so simple: "Fund our deserving program, and cut off that freeloader over there." www.postpubco.com/anticyclops.htm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nattxn
05:46 PM on 08/31/2011
Tired of politician­s screwing everything up. Go to GOOOH.com it stands for GET OUT OF OUR HOUSE, and it is a plan to evict the current members of congress. It is in the kick off stage but if it works we will have 435 new house members as of January 2013.
05:18 PM on 08/31/2011
To me, this looks like just another union payback for union job creation. Until they simply take bid for bid by companies regardless of what they pay the workers who will be completing the work. Most of the jobs/bids will be at "prevailing rate" which is union payscale rather than the lowest bid for the specified work/contract. In reality, the taxpayers get screwed everytime there is a stipulation of "prevailing rate" for the wages paid.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
boogie albert 55
I am proud to be called a Crazy
03:11 PM on 08/31/2011
Whenever I see something that Richard Trumka (AFL_CIO) is involved in I get worried. He is the reason the UMWA was almost destroyed back in the late 70's early 80's. He sold the union out.
photo
kenofksa
My micro won't meet your guidelines
07:46 PM on 08/31/2011
Amen. When he is involved, watch the country's wallet. I have never seen a union leader like Trumka so he ll bent on making this country a socialist state where he has a lot of power.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
boogie albert 55
I am proud to be called a Crazy
08:25 PM on 08/31/2011
I worked in the mines back then and he really did destroy it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:08 PM on 08/31/2011
Oh great...Another super intelligent idea...How in the world can anyone defend this guy? Meanwhile China will introduce more millionaires next month...Is this guy serious? Enough of this...He has no clue whatsoever...NEW PLAN:...No one allowed on ballots unless they have a solid & verifiable resume & has run at least a lemonade stand...
After China, the country with the next highest number of billionaires on the list is Russia. The BRICs are indeed making their presence known.
http://dailyreckoning.com/more-billionaires-in-china-than-any-other-nation-except-the-us/
02:59 PM on 08/31/2011
"Effective leadership is not about making speeches or being liked; leadership is defined by results not attributes."

- Peter Drucker
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tttedison
03:08 PM on 08/31/2011
Then it seems we are short of a Leader.
hatenomor
DO FOR SELF. BLACK SELF DETERMINATION
03:23 PM on 08/31/2011
What you fail to understand, Ms. Annie, is that Obama has led right from the beginning. He's led us right off a cliff, has he not? And isn't that what he promised to do, during the campaign? I say he's lived up to all expectations in the leadership department. LOL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Moschetti
02:52 PM on 08/31/2011
Would these be more of those "shovel ready" jobs the circus clown told about in 2009! Yhe ones that made his Patronage (stimulus) Bill so wildly effective in keeping the unemployment rate below 8%.

Oh, now I remember, the economic illiterate had to, sheepishly, admit that there is no such thing as a "shovel ready" job. He forgot to add, Or a viable "green" job, as he's discovering. I believe it is 4 of these pipe dream fantasies, including Solyndra who got hundreds of millions of (borrowed) dollars, plus millions in tax incentives never made it off the ground, that he visited, endorsed, or gave stimulus money have already gone belly up!

Folks, you couldn't make this stuff up!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tttedison
02:59 PM on 08/31/2011
Sad thing is they will still preach and demand and refuse to admit that those things are not ready to replace fossil fuels and may never be,but they will go on shuting down the coal mines,gas fields, Drilling and have absolutely no compulsion of costing people thier jobs.
04:24 AM on 09/01/2011
Those things are incredibly effective, and the technology is really taking off in so many directions. It's also where the jobs of the future are, as other nations already know.

What is the problem with the naysayers, that they want to remain so firmly rooted in outdated ideas? Scared of the future?

We could be like China and lose miners every day. They aren't into shutting down mines due to unsafe conditions. What are a few deaths here and there, when they could be making more profit?
02:36 PM on 08/31/2011
Once again the Obama Administration has by-passed Congress, federal laws, and the Constitution by granting what amounts to amnesty for illegal aliens within the US.

The Washington Times reported last week (Friday August 19th, 2011) the following: “ … the Obama administration said Thursday that it will halt deportation proceedings on a case-by-case basis against illegal immigrants who meet certain criteria, such as attending school, having family in the military or having primary responsible for other family members’ care.
02:35 PM on 08/31/2011
Whatever Obama say.........They go Nay.....
02:47 PM on 08/31/2011
For a good reason too! look Obama had clear sailing for Two full years all 3 branches of goverment were Democrat
04:26 AM on 09/01/2011
Lockstep opposition to every single solitary proposal and effort is truly smooth sailing.
02:30 PM on 08/31/2011
if it is actually creating jobs (at a reasonable cost, not 20 million for 14 jobs) then keep it going if it isn't then kiss it bye bye