iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Monsanto Seeks Approval For Low-Fat GMO Soybean

MICHAEL J. CRUMB   08/31/11 10:56 AM ET   AP

DES MOINES, Iowa — The soybean industry is seeking government approval of a genetically modified soybean it says will produce oil lower in saturated fat, offer consumers a healthier alternative to foods containing trans fats and increase demand for growers' crops.

Demand for soybean oil has dropped sharply since 2005, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration began requiring labels to list levels of trans fats, which have been linked to coronary heart disease. Vegetable oil does not naturally contain trans fats, but when hydrogen is added to make it suitable for use in the food industry, trans fats are created.

Agribusiness giant Monsanto Co. says oil from its new soybean will meet manufacturers' requirements for baking and shelf life without hydrogenation, resulting in food that's free of trans fats as well as lower in saturated fat.

The FDA approved the new bean, called Vistive Gold, earlier this year, and Monsanto and several state and national soybean groups are now seeking approval from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The USDA's Animal Plant Health Inspection Service said in an email to The Associated Press that it has no timeline for making a decision.

U.S. farmers harvested more than 3.3 billion bushels of soybeans valued at nearly $39 billion in 2010. But the Iowa Soybean Association said in a letter to APHIS that the industry's share of the food oil market dropped from 83 percent to 68 percent after the FDA enacted the labeling requirements. Iowa grows more soybeans than any other state.

"We believe because of the trans-fat labeling, 4.6 billion pounds of edible soybean oil was not used for food over a three-year period," said Bob Callanan, a spokesman for the American Soybean Association. The oil was turned into biodiesel instead, and farmers got less money for their soybeans, he said.

Industry officials believe Vistive Gold could command as much as 60 cents more per bushel than other soybeans, raising a farmer's income by thousands of dollars.

Jim Andrew, who grows 625 acres of conventional soybeans near Jefferson, Iowa, said he hopes Vistive Gold soybeans also will reduce consumers' fears about biotech crops by providing a direct health benefit. Most genetically modified crops so far have been engineered to fight pests and increase harvests, benefiting farmers.

"I think it's a case where we're trying to modify crops to address specific needs to make other industries more efficient and healthier," Andrew said.

St. Louis-based Monsanto introduced a first generation of the bean, called Vistive, in 2005 to reduce or eliminate trans fats in response to the labeling requirements. Vistive Gold retains those qualities and offers lower levels of saturated fat and higher levels of healthier monounsaturated fats.

Joe Cornelius, a Monsanto project manager who has worked on the Vistive soybeans for 15 years, said Vistive Gold could make a real difference in efforts to produce healthier foods. As an example, he said it could produce French fries with more than 60 percent less saturated fat.

"I don't think we can say fried food will ever be a health food, but you can improve the nutritional profile of that food," Cornelius said.

But Bill Freese, a science policy analyst with the Center for Food Safety, said Vistive Gold and other engineered crops don't face rigorous enough testing. No animal feeding trials were conducted on the new soybean to see what would happen when it was consumed, he said.

And, the FDA approved it based on the agency's review of a similar soybean produced by another company, not an actual review of Vistive Gold, he said, adding, "That struck me as very odd."

Without proper scrutiny, genetically modified crops have a "high potential for harmful and unintended consequences," such as increased toxicity that could make someone sick or decreased nutritional content, he said.

"Not every genetically modified crop is going to be dangerous," Freese said. "The bottom line is we need to have a really stringent regulatory system, which we currently don't have."

Monsanto said it tested Vistive Gold extensively and found it to be safe. A notice posted on the APHIS website in June said its assessment of Vistive Gold indicated the bean wasn't a risk to other plants.

Walter Fehr, an Iowa State University agronomist involved in soybean breeding research, said he thinks the federal government has a stringent and effective procedure for reviewing genetically modified crops and he saw no reason to question the soybean's safety.

"People use different methodologies for different things, and scientists are very aware of potential negative side effects," Fehr said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST FOOD

DES MOINES, Iowa — The soybean industry is seeking government approval of a genetically modified soybean it says will produce oil lower in saturated fat, offer consumers a healthier alternative ...
DES MOINES, Iowa — The soybean industry is seeking government approval of a genetically modified soybean it says will produce oil lower in saturated fat, offer consumers a healthier alternative ...
Filed by Joe Satran  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 138
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
08:01 PM on 09/05/2011
As much of a left wing nut as I am, I am disappointed with the rhetoric over here. 1) GM seeds DO NOT need as much pesticide. 2) Poor people in foreign countries cannot afford to buy organic vegetation. GMO's are a last resort for them, because without them, the crop would be too little to survive. Get your facts straight, people.
06:31 AM on 09/04/2011
The more Monsanto genetically modifies our food, the more health issues we seem to have......think about it.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:15 AM on 09/04/2011
Care to add in some actual documentation for your claims? Oh wait.... I forgot...the loooony far left doesn't need facts.
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
04:11 AM on 09/04/2011
Only foolish people eat GMOs.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:21 AM on 09/04/2011
You anti-modern technology Luddites are the ones who look like fools.

Even the Amish now use GMO. LOL! That's how utterly backwards the far left on HuffPost is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Clearing-Brush
Badges? We don't need no stinkin badges.
01:08 PM on 09/06/2011
You sound like you've been eating way too much GMOs. I'd have that checked.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Clearing-Brush
Badges? We don't need no stinkin badges.
01:02 PM on 09/06/2011
Yet, we all eat GMOs. No labeling requirements.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:07 AM on 09/03/2011
oh look...it's a thread full of the usual left wing antiScience/antiGMO paranoia.

You people must buy tin foil hats by the truck load.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Clearing-Brush
Badges? We don't need no stinkin badges.
01:04 PM on 09/06/2011
Monsato's BT corn - NOT FIT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION! Need I say more?

Yet it's being fed to animals and we eat the animals. Nice workaround...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrh85
12:06 PM on 09/02/2011
Dear Monsanto

You are the epitome of what is wrong with the food industry, oh and you are simply evil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karl Wilder
Chef Stirring The Pot Harlem
12:28 PM on 09/01/2011
Protest this in every way you know. Monsanto is the leader of the axis of evil.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Ipswich, Mass. 1641
09:42 AM on 09/01/2011
Monsanto will k!ll us all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greatest Darthfruit
So, you the brains of this outfit, or is he?
09:59 PM on 08/31/2011
Its easy. Monsanto will get the approval, as always. Money talks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Clearing-Brush
Badges? We don't need no stinkin badges.
01:07 PM on 09/06/2011
Nobody loves the MIC more than our crooked politicians.....
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:11 PM on 08/31/2011
Let me ask you antiGMers something, If GMO products are so eeevill, why don't you go after the medical industry?

Many medical products are GMO. Most insulin is GMO these days. It was developed over 30 years ago. Swine genes are inserted into bacteria in a transgenic process to produce insulin.

If you are against the technology of GMO you MUST be against all GMO, right?

You people should go protest clinics if you are so obsessed with this.

Go protest...what are you waiting for?
02:52 PM on 09/01/2011
insulin use would drop significantly if people would cut back on the crap frankenfood that monsanto has forced into the food supply
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
05:22 PM on 09/01/2011
Touche'!
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
04:13 AM on 09/04/2011
Insulin is made by a simple bacteria in a close system. There is no comparison.
photo
Talking The Wolf
I support the right to arm bears.
08:46 PM on 08/31/2011
I wonder why they even bother with the charade of seeking approval. Monsanto owns at least half the FDA anyway.

I can't wait to take advantage of those amazing health benefits the shills referred to in this article. Nothing like clogging your arteries while growing extra eyeballs or a third arm from the genetic modifications. But at least this sludge will be lower in calories so I guess that makes it alright.
photo
Syl 13
We're all mad here
08:43 PM on 08/31/2011
Don't get me wrong, I love science. If anyone else said "I've made a lower fat soybean"! I'd be rejoicing. Not with Monsanto. They are to GMO what McDonald's is to fine cuisine. If they didn't sue farmers downwind from farmers planting their crops for royalties when their crops get genes from their frankenfoods, if they didn't force farmers into contracts binding them to plant their seeds and never save any for replanting, if they didn't try to patent organisms containing genes that existed for millions of years, didn't control 90% of the corn seed market in the U.S., didn't make the Rainbow Agent defoliants used in Vietnam, and if all their GMOs were thoroughly before being submitted for approval and provided actual advantages over standard crops (more nutritious, higher yields, etc.) rather than serve as tie-in products for their toxic herbicides, maybe I'd be more favorable. As it is, eff 'em, I hope their soybean doesn't get approved (it will, of course).
photo
Mr Bobo
Punk Rock Libertarian. Different. Better.
08:38 PM on 08/31/2011
You know what tastes really good on Monsanto products? A nice tasty Round-Up salad dressing. Yummmmmmm!!!
photo
girldog
I support Elizabeth Warren
07:37 PM on 08/31/2011
So will the GMO soybean oil be labeled as free of trans fat and lower in saturated fat? According to Monsanto, I mean the government, it would be misleading to label foods as GMO or non-GMO. The rationale is that labeling would somehow confuse the consumer into thinking that GMO foods are "different"

If you would like to see GMO foods labeled, here is a petition asking Obama to keep one of his campaign promises.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/707/petition-to-president-obama-for-meaningful-gmo-labeling/
07:31 PM on 08/31/2011
The article SHOULD be titled;

Monsanto pays to have GMO low fat soybeans approved

What Monsanto wants, Monsanto gets at all costs to human life or the health of this planet.

When they control all the world's food supply, it will be game over.

Two excellent documentaries on Monsanto; available free on line.

The World According to Monsanto

David versus Monsanto
photo
girldog
I support Elizabeth Warren
07:37 PM on 08/31/2011
Food Inc is good too.
07:56 PM on 08/31/2011
Does it have any animals getting slaughtered in it ?

I just can't watch those kind of documentaries on animal abuse.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:02 PM on 08/31/2011
Food inc is nothing but a propaganda film design to scare clueless urbanites who know nothing about agriculture.

Let me ask you something, did Food Inc ever once give details as to why GMO seeds are used? Most farmers use them by CHOICE. Did you know that? Even the Amish now commonly use GMO.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
08:53 PM on 08/31/2011
Pure paranoia.

Do you buy tin foil by the pallet load?
09:00 PM on 08/31/2011
Have you done any research on Monsanto ?

Do you live in a farming community ?

Have you talked to any farmers ?

Can you have a discussion with facts, not insults ?
05:16 PM on 08/31/2011
I think it makes bad ecological and economic sense to genetically modify plants to be resistant to a specific proprietary pesticide. That's not the case here, and there could be a major public health benefit. It would seem immoral to reject this crop out-of-hand, without any scientific basis, based on nebulous fears and an aversion to the name "Monsanto."
photo
girldog
I support Elizabeth Warren
07:04 PM on 08/31/2011
"reject this crop out-of-han­d, without any scientific basis, based on nebulous fears and an aversion to the name "Monsanto"

What scientific basis would that be? The "science" where Monsanto tells us their product is safe?

From the article:
"But Bill Freese, a science policy analyst with the Center for Food Safety, said Vistive Gold and other engineered crops don't face rigorous enough testing. No animal feeding trials were conducted on the new soybean to see what would happen when it was consumed, he said.
And, the FDA approved it based on the agency's review of a similar soybean produced by another company, not an actual review of Vistive Gold, he said, adding, "That struck me as very odd."
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
08:56 PM on 08/31/2011
And why should we blindly believe what the antiScience/antiGM zealots say?

Where the f... is data from the anti-GMers? where?
11:30 PM on 08/31/2011
There is data showing that very similar products is safe. Not ideal, of course, but there isn't a known mechanism by which this modification could cause harm. Hence, given its potential to significantly reduce the saturated fat in soy products, blind opposition seems irresponsible at best.