iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Video Shows Controversial Forensic Specialist Michael West Fabricating Bite Marks

First Posted: 09/01/11 08:43 AM ET Updated: 11/01/11 06:12 AM ET

Leighstubbs
Leigh Stubbs, Mississippi Department of Corrections Photo

On Aug. 9, The Huffington Post reported on the case of Leigh Stubbs, a Mississippi woman serving a 44-year sentence for assault and drug charges. Stubbs was convicted in large part due to the testimony of Michael West, a disgraced bite mark specialist. Though West has been largely discredited, prosecutors and state officials in Mississippi (and to a lesser extent in Louisiana) continue to defend convictions won based on his testimony.

In Stubbs' case, West presented two key pieces of evidence. The first involved the bite mark wizardry that made him famous, and then infamous: West claimed to have found bite marks on alleged victim Kim Williams that medical personnel hadn't seen. He then used a dental mold of Stubbs' teeth to perform an analysis on the marks, and would later testify that it was a "probability" that Stubbs had bitten Williams.

FABRICATING EVIDENCE

On Wednesday, forensic specialists Mike Bowers and David Averill posted a video recording of West's examination of Williams on their site, Bitemarks.org. In his initial examination, West claims to have "missed" the evidence of a bite mark. He testified he found it in a a subsequent examination performed days later. That examination is depicted in the video below. Note that at the 50-second mark, a bite mark appears in Williams' skin, seemingly out of nowhere.

WATCH the examination:



On their blog, Averill and Bowers explain how that mark appeared:

In his second video taken 5 days later on March 15th the area that West says “that the bitemark is no longer visible due to the nurses taking such good care of the victim and using lotion on her skin.” West then proceeds to tamper with the evidence by actually imbedding a stone cast of Leigh Stubbs teeth into the comatose victims hip resulting in a fabricated bitemark on the skin of the victim.

In a phone interview Wednesday afternoon, Bowers said the video above may depict a number of crimes. "The tampering with the evidence on the skin is likely a crime. But to create those marks on a woman who was comatose, and who hadn't given consent, is also an assault," Bowers said.

West, who is a dentist and not a medical doctor, also performed a vaginal exam on Williams without her consent, though he did presumably have approval from law enforcement officials.

This isn't the first video evidence that may show West creating bite marks on an alleged victim. In 2009, this reporter examined a Louisiana case from 1993 in which a video recording shows West repeatedly jamming a suspect's dental mold into the corpse of a young girl. In that video, bite marks also mysteriously appear on the girl's cheek that aren't present earlier in the video. (While bruises can appear on a body after death, bite marks are abrasions, and generally cannot.) In that case, Jimmie Duncan was convicted of killing young Haley Oliveaux, and was sentenced to death. West's exam was the only physical evidence suggesting Duncan had murdered Oliveaux.

WARNING: Some readers may find the video below disturbing.


West doesn't deny any of this. In his court testimony in the Stubbs case, and in a 2009 statement to the Jackson Clarion-Ledger in response to the Duncan case, West claimed that this is simply how he identifies and matches bite marks.

"He says he's the only one who can see these marks," Bowers said. "And that when he pushes the cast into the skin, he says he's just enhancing marks that are already there." Of course, once West has altered the marks in the skin with a cast of the suspect's teeth, he has not only made the marks conform to the cast, he has also altered them so that no other expert can then second guess him as to whether they were bite marks in the first place.

Bowers and other forensic specialists say West's "technique" is at minimum malpractice, and that it's likely criminal evidence tampering. Yet those methods were accepted as evidence in criminal courts for more than a decade, and have still yet to be discredited by a court in Mississippi or Louisiana.

VIDEO ENHANCEMENT

The other damning testimony West gave in the Stubbs case was his analysis of a grainy security camera video taken of a motel parking lot. Prosecutors sent the video to the FBI, which sent back a report stating there was very little the agency could discern from the video. But district attorney Dunn Lampton (who passed away earlier this month) also sent the video to West, who claimed he was able to "enhance" the video using consumer software. Averill and Bowers have also posted that video on their blog:


From this video, West testified that he could see two separate figures entering and leaving the frame, that they were wearing different clothing (one shorts, the other blue jeans). While the FBI could only determine that someone had removed perhaps a bag or suitcase from a toolbox in the truck bed, West claimed that through enhancement, he could make out hair, legs and blue jeans, leading him to conclude that the object being removed was clearly a body. West also claimed he could read the body language of one figure in the footage. He testified that she appeared "anxious," and was exhibiting the sort of adrenaline-fueled "fight or flight" response one shows after committing a crime.

LINGERING CONVICTIONS

Michael West's bite mark testimony was also the main reason Kennedy Brewer and Levon Brooks were convicted in the rape and murder of two young girls in the early 1990s. Both men were exonerated by DNA testing in 2008 after serving more than a decade in prison. A third man, Albert Johnson, later confessed to both crimes.

Though West no longer testifies in court, law enforcement officials in at least two states have so far continued to defend his testimony. As HuffPost reported on Monday, Mississippi attorney general Jim Hood defended the Leigh Stubbs' conviction to a Hattiesburgh, Miss., television station just last week. Hood's office has also fought attempts to throw out West's testimony in the conviction of Eddie Lee Howard, who was sentenced to death in 1994 for the rape and murder of an elderly woman. As in the Jimmie Duncan case, West's testimony was the only physical evidence from the suspect found on the victim. Both Howard and Duncan are still on death row.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

On Aug. 9, The Huffington Post reported on the case of Leigh Stubbs, a Mississippi woman serving a 44-year sentence for assault and drug charges. Stubbs was convicted in large part due to the testimon...
On Aug. 9, The Huffington Post reported on the case of Leigh Stubbs, a Mississippi woman serving a 44-year sentence for assault and drug charges. Stubbs was convicted in large part due to the testimon...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 218
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
08:33 PM on 09/17/2011
Hopefully none of the convictions in question rested solely on this knucklehead's testimony.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rasheed Kalifani Knowles
Nun ya
08:55 PM on 09/05/2011
Dishonest, check. Incompetency on the part of the top cops...check. Innocent punished, guilty go free....check.

But ...does it strike anybody just how TRULY evil this is? Watching the first two tapes, got to see what that looks like.

What part of this grand system is there to protect us when the law just wants to book a warm body to close the case quickly and move on to the next---regardless of guilt or innocence?

Nobodies perfect, but these kind of mistakes destroy and take lives.

No one[unless of course you have super$$$, or super connects] is safe from lazy cops and greedy lawyers.

More of that good stuff from rampant incompetency at the top.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PengieP
06:50 PM on 09/04/2011
In California, it's a capital offense to frame someone for a capital offense. I wonder if this psychopathic quack has testified there in such a trial. It would serve him right.
09:54 PM on 09/03/2011
This is really beyond belief. You've got to read this for yourself.
09:16 PM on 09/02/2011
There of course are plenty of other Wests.
The problem ultimately isn't West and those like him - it's those who hire him: prosecutors and judges who have little respect for the law, civil rights and human life if it gets them up whatever their particular ladder happens to be - politics, higher judgeship, and other positions of power.
And of course, a huge problem continues to be Our laziness(and petty bickering), and the laziness of most journalists - all of which enables all of them, with very little impedance.
05:05 AM on 09/08/2011
Judges don't hire experts, prosecutors do. Although I don't know how West's "science" managed to make it past the Daubert test. Anyone know?
10:41 PM on 09/15/2011
No, but judges are the gatekeepers. One of their duties is to see that such voodoo "science" does not get before the jury. They are apparently not doing a good job at all as Daubert challenges are rarely successful in criminal cases. ^ Neufeld, P. (2005). "The (Near) Irrelevance of Daubert to Criminal Justice and Some Suggestions for Reform". American Journal of Public Health 95 (S1): S107–S113. Many prosecutors have a "win at any cost" mentality that has made our criminal justice system a travesty.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
05:47 PM on 09/02/2011
It's odd considering the circumstances, but she looks happy. Perhaps she believes she will be released soon?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kerry Cook
04:18 PM on 09/02/2011
My former dentist is a forensic dental specialist who usually has the horror of matching adult sized chompers to bite marks on children & he said this is BS. What I saw originally is what happens to your skin when you lay on sheets, blankets, or whatever fabric you choose & do not move for a long time. Sometimes they can even look like welts or hives. This is sickening. We'll never know the truth because it's apparent that the prosecutors went on a witch hunt & this fabrication of proof has destroyed the chance for justice. Sigh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rae Turner
02:16 PM on 09/02/2011
The bottom line is that a lot of people are in and have gone to prison because of West. He is the one who now should be in prison... that is the most amoral and disgusting thing is to deprive innocent people of their lives so this man can make money and feed his ego
01:30 PM on 09/02/2011
ALL GOVRERNMENT OFFICIALS R as CROOKED AS A PYTHON SNAKE.

AS God says in Matthew n5:34-37 and James 5:12 that ANYONE that takes an OATH is of the EVIL ONE. God has NEVER LIED in the last googolplex years but government personnel LIE like Judge Judy does EVERY DAY they breath. They will LIE and say they don't LIE once in a while.
04:11 PM on 09/02/2011
Don't priests take an oath to serve god? Communion? Titheing? Promising god to serve him is an oath. All are forms of "taking an oath". Don't look now but your hypocrosy is showing. God must be evil.
05:25 PM on 09/02/2011
Christ NEVER told anybody to start ANY RELIGION nor did He EVER say anything GOOD about RELIGIONS, RELIGIOUS LEADERS, CRAFTED TEMPLES or the DEVIL. The are the same BALL OF WAX. Catholics included.

Christ asked you to 'HATE' those that introduced you to RELIGIONS in Luke 14:26 and they will weave His words into a tapestry of LIES that their congregation has been brainwashed to believe and convince you that God didn't mean what He said the way He said it and you will believe them but not Gods exactly correct wording.

Christ NEVER told ANYONE to tithe. Tithes means 'tenth portion in Hebrew" . Christ says to give 'ALL' in Luke 14:33 in the NEW LAW and other verses (ALL IS 100%) and He wants it distributed to the POOR AND SUFFERING. Tithes was in the OLD LAW to provide for the poor but they put a GNAT'S amount into the poor and suffering and the CAMEL's portion into the CRAFTED TEMPLES that are used to brainwash your children to get them started in believing them over God's inspired words. Christ told you to 'HATE' those that forced you into RELIGION in Luke 14:26. Why don't you read the Holy Bible instead of listening to a bunch of made up LIES.

If the OLD LAW had worked, we wouldn't need a NEW LAW but we do and I LIVE BY IT EVERY DAY, not just once in a while.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
05:48 PM on 09/02/2011
Okay, okay, settle down...the thorazine should kick in in a few more minutes...
06:12 PM on 09/02/2011
demilieu, U better not drink to much of dat stuff. It could paralyze U from U waist down.

If U don't use that section then don't worry about it.
photo
sean62965
Do you really need my "micro-bio"?
11:50 AM on 09/02/2011
Who does it serve to jail the wrong person? Why does LE, prosecutors and judges allow this to happen? The real criminal is still on the loose.
Who did West think he was helping by lying and falsifying evidence and testimony.
03:04 PM on 09/02/2011
Sean--

West (I refuse to call him Dr.) made very, very large sums of money with this kind of pimped testimony. Prosecutors are now barred from calling him to testify, and he has since solicited defense attorneys to keep the grift going. No one's biting. No pun intended, of course.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
05:51 PM on 09/02/2011
They do it for self-gain. Peer recognition, money and who knows what else.
11:39 AM on 09/02/2011
It was disturbing enough to see the video of what he did to that poor little girl and now this. The bite mark does appear to have come out of nowhere. Michael West should face criminal charges for his actions and EVERY case he testified in should be reviewed.
photo
360Dunk
Feeder of slot machines
11:25 AM on 09/02/2011
Now there's a unique occupation one can be proud of when filling out a credit card application - 'a disgraced bite mark specialist'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mithrall
My inner child is a mean little S.O.B.
11:20 AM on 09/02/2011
wow... just wow. Not too often do you get a look at the flow of logic a sociopath would use. Now that I think about it, it's rather reminiscent of politics right now. A crime was committed, (someone trashed our economy and left its corpse laying in the middle of the road) Obama shows up at the scene of the crime and flashes our intrepid investigators(The Republicans) with that big friendly grin and they make a dental mold from it. They then match the mold made from Obama's teeth to the corpse of the economy and it's a perfect match. They do the same thing with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and it's also perfect match. It's a slam dunk!
11:47 AM on 09/02/2011
How about this one? The economy was on the brink...maybe on life support. Obama shows up at the scene and says that he has the cure. His cure happens to be pulling the plug.
amd2857
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
12:17 PM on 09/02/2011
amd2857 Just thought you should get an extra f/f for that comment. I could not have expressed any better than you have. Enjoy while we still have a chance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rae Turner
02:13 PM on 09/02/2011
Obama haters are scary... Why dont you stick with the subject at hand!
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
11:16 AM on 09/02/2011
So when does some wronged innocent person sue this man in civil court for everything he owns or will ever own? Or is it illegal to sue someone who has ruined your life by fabricating evidence? Probably so. He needs consecutive sentences for every perjury he has ever committed.
11:05 AM on 09/02/2011
I am no expert by no means but, when I bite something I use both upper and, lower teeth. I just wonder if that question was raised. In the video I only see the upper or lower .
05:10 AM on 09/08/2011
It's worse than that. You'd have to dislocate your jaw to make a bitemark like that. That shows all teeth. Try biting into a large flat round thing (a basketball) showing all 16 bottom teeth. You cannot physical do it. Not unless the thing you are biting into is flat enough to fit into your mouth, which a thigh clearly is not.