iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Congressmen Skip Out On Town Halls After Facing Voter Opposition

Town Hall Meetings

AP/The Huffington Post   First Posted: 09/02/11 04:39 PM ET Updated: 11/02/11 06:12 AM ET

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP/The Huffington Post) -- Too much yelling, not enough listening.

Facing organized, often raucous confrontations at political events, some members of Congress this summer abandoned the long-time tradition of open meetings with the folks back home.

It was goodbye to one of the few remaining opportunities for voters and lawmakers to talk face to face.

Some cited security in the aftermath of the shooting that severely wounded Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords at a meet-and-greet event in January. Others blamed grass-roots groups for commandeering the town halls. Still others opted for smaller, sometimes private or paid events.

Whatever the explanation, the dearth of meetings sparked criticism that lawmakers were dodging their constituents when Congress is held in such low regard. A recent Associated Press-GFK poll showed 87 percent of Americans disapprove of lawmakers' job performance.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., described the trend as disappointing.

"I think (the town hall meeting) is one of the fundamentals of our government process, our democratic process - meeting with people and responding to them," said McCain, who held six town hall meetings this summer, including one in Tucson, where the Giffords shooting occurred.

While McCain said he understood the desire to avoid the "despicable" people who disrupt town halls, he said the decision to avoid them lets "those bad people win."

According to CQ-Roll Call, which kept a count, lawmakers held just over 500 town halls this summer compared to more than 650 in 2009 when the rancor over President Barack Obama's health care overhaul turned some events into shouting matches. This summer's recess began immediately after a down-to-the-wire, fiercely partisan debate on raising the debt limit and cutting spending.

The actual number of members holding the meetings dropped just slightly, from 164 to 154. It was not clear, however, if those numbers included pay-to-attend meetings that drew constituent ire in some states.

Protesters swarmed a $10-a-plate luncheon in Duluth, Minn., for freshman Republican Rep. Chip Cravaak to complain that his only two free town halls were in remote, rural areas. Cravaak, who has said he got into politics because his predecessor, Rep. Jim Oberstar, refused to meet with him about the health care law, then held a town hall in Duluth.

More than 200 people showed up for what ended up being a sometimes contentious hour-long discussion with the lawmaker.

"If nothing else, we gave them a voice and I heard them and I listened to them," Cravaack said.

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi held some town halls in California, but was heckled by those upset about the debt-ceiling deal. When she argued that Democrats fended off cuts to entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare, she was loudly chided for voting for "that Satan sandwich" and called a "sell-out."

Republican Rep. Phil Gingrey faced an angry crowd at a town hall meeting on Thursday in Kennesaw, Georgia, where frustrated constituents asked why he hasn't done more to help get the economy back on track.

"The questions were tough -- tougher than I've had before," he told Patch reporter Melissa Kory after the meeting. "And it frustrates me that I don't have ready answers to the lady that said, 'Well, what are you doing? Why aren't you the drum major? Why can't you wave a magic wand and get this economy going again and create some jobs?"

House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan held standing-room-only town halls in the spring while the federal budget debate raged, and faced occasional heckling. This summer, while supporters urged the Wisconsin Republican to run for president, he held only one town hall - by telephone, with only a few hours' advance notice to constituents.

Pressed on whether this made it harder for people to discuss issues with their congressman, spokesman Kevin Seifert said no. Ryan is scheduled to headline a $15-a-head event next week at a Rotary Club in Greenfield, Wis., at the Rotary's invitation.

In Pennsylvania, freshman Republican Lou Barletta, who last year chided his Democratic predecessor Paul Kanjorski for failing to hold town halls, cited the Giffords shooting and what he said was organized harassment by the liberal group MoveOn.org, for not holding any town halls this summer, according to local media reports.

"The behavior of these protesters has put myself, my staff and innocent people in attendance at risk," he said.

Justin Ruben, executive director of MoveOn.org, said they simply let people know about opportunities for voters to address their elected officials.

"People won't go unless they are passionate," he said. "In 2009, there were large groups of people who were really concerned about health care. You can't manufacture that. You can tell a lot of lies if you want ... but the concern is real. People have really busy lives. And we can't get them to turn out to a town hall meeting and ask about jobs if they are not so frustrated that no one in Washington seems to be doing the right thing."

Tea Party activists have also been blamed for disrupting the public forums. But Tea Party Express spokesman Levi Russell said his group has not been coordinating any protests at town halls this summer. Still, he agreed with Ruben that members need to make themselves available to the public - even when voter anger is high.

"These people are not kings. They are put here for a short, determined amount of time to vote for the people in their district - not to go to Washington and do whatever the hell they want," Russell said.

In New Mexico, only two of the state's five-member congressional delegation held town halls. Those skipping such events were Rep. Martin Heinrich, who is running for Senate. Heinrich and Democratic Sen. Tom Udall said they were focused on attending community events and visiting local businesses during the August break.

Ruben, however, called such events a "really poor substitute."

"Imagine you're a worker at one of these companies," he said. "Your member of Congress gets invited by your bosses, so your CEO is standing there next to your congressman. Are you going to stand up and say, `How come you're not taxing the rich?'"

Those events are also generally closed to the public. Food giant General Mills, Inc., refused to let a reporter cover a meeting Heinrich held at its Albuquerque cereal plant with employees there on Wednesday.

McCain said he has been holding town halls for 30 years, and to "stop now would be ridiculous."

___

Associated Press writers Martiga Lohn in St. Paul, Minn., and Dinesh Ramde in Milwaukee contributed to this report.

___

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP/The Huffington Post) -- Too much yelling, not enough listening. Facing organized, often raucous confrontations at political events, some members of Congress this summer abando...
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP/The Huffington Post) -- Too much yelling, not enough listening. Facing organized, often raucous confrontations at political events, some members of Congress this summer abando...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,632
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (148 total)
11:17 PM on 09/25/2011
They are out of touch, and CHICKEN, to face their constituents that elected them. Look at Paul Ryan charging people who already pay for his health care, and then doesn't even bother to show up except by video conferencing. Kick them all out of office, start from scratch. For this batch is nothing but junk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JTyroler
Hoping Congress doesn't destroy the nation.
03:33 AM on 09/18/2011
Didn't town hall meetings tend to be fairly civilized prior to 2009? If so, then blame the Tea Parties, Americans for Prosperity, the Koch Brothers et al for the deterioration of town hall meetings, and, in turn, democracy in America.

How many of these elected officials are supportive of unlimited (or somewhere in that vicinity) gun rights that are using the shooting of Rep. Giffords as an excuse to not meet with the public? Is this because they are really afraid of people owning legal weapons attending their events? After all, the semi-automatic rifle is to protect the home - even if they're carrying it around in public.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Debbie Wathen Clute
07:23 PM on 09/05/2011
We are also getting extremely pumped up negative data in order to suppress the stock market. You cannot make one $ in the market!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Debbie Wathen Clute
07:21 PM on 09/05/2011
So, if the voters disrupt the town hall meetings with concerns and questions then they are "despicable"?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bdoug25000
Bio? Nope, Mostly mechanical
04:59 PM on 09/05/2011
There is something wrong here, and it ain't the gov'ment. We, The People have been too comfortable, for too long. We believe security is our due; that the lights should always come on when we flip a switch; that the grocery store shelves will be overflowing. We, the People expect our government to take care of everything, to fix everything that's broken, and to take the blame when it breaks. So far, my gov'ment has done a good job of trying to be just and fair, concerned and responsive, and has maintained a high standard of service, at least in my lifetime, and that's better than half a century. I would say that our way of life has been too easy for too long and most people sense that it is about to get harder; that the wealth that even poor people in this country could rely on, is about to go away, and they would be right. But it isn't the gov'ments fault, and the gov'ment probably can't restore it. So, as the crowds get more and more unruly, and go away increasingly unfullfilled, how long before the lid blows and We, the People find ourselves living in a real live Police State, where the wrong words will be punished and all our fears will be justified?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Debbie Wathen Clute
07:15 PM on 09/05/2011
Our military has been in an ongoing training session to handle civil unrest, if that means anything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bdoug25000
Bio? Nope, Mostly mechanical
08:31 PM on 09/05/2011
Not really, I was in the Army back when it wasn't cool, in the early 70s. The military has always trained to quell civil unrest. Remember Kent State? It is NEVER pretty when the military is deployed to "maintain order".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jlg1952
09:14 AM on 09/06/2011
They realize that there is discontent to the point of violence. Congress has ignored the will of the people by passing legislation which should have never happened. The people that have been disenfranchised and those which have their voice ignored see the government as corrupt.

The right to bear arms was important to the signers to protect ourselves from a corrupt government. But... guess what ?..........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Debbie Wathen Clute
04:02 PM on 09/05/2011
This is exactly WHY the "super-congress" was created!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Debbie Wathen Clute
04:00 PM on 09/05/2011
LOL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe man
I will never be part of the Plutocracy
03:15 PM on 09/05/2011
I thought our elected Congress were trying to do the will of the people?! Skipping out of speaking with them, avoiding them, ignoring them, and doing everything in their power to make sure they can't hear the will of the people is not going to make it easy to do the will of the people.

Something is a-foot, and it isn't good for the people!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gailsunday
I think what I think...therefore, I am
11:24 AM on 09/07/2011
WELL PUT! Sorry for the lateness here, just got back on line.....really liked your Post! As far as the Rethuglikans go, I do not think THEY have ANY interest in "doing the will of the people"....in fact it seems everything THEY do, is DESIGNED AND CONTRARY TO ..My Observation.
After all, WE the People, in general are not the ones who have the money to line their pockets...why therefore, would THEY deem it "necessary" to pay any heed to US?

AND, I HOPE AND PRAY, AND KNEEL AND GROVEL, that THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, WAKE UP....GET INFORMED HOW Evil, disrespectful, Disingenuous, out-of-touch with, backstabbing, selfish, money grubbing, UNPATRIOTIC, Hypocritical, Double-speaking, Two-faced, Slanderous, Corrupt, Pandering, immoral, Unethical, Honorless, Sexist, Lawless, Criminal, Irresponsible, Incorrigible, Recalcitrant, Foolish, Ignorant, Propagandizing, Greedy, Self-centered, Egotistical, UnChristian, Racist, Elitist, Amoral, Sabotaging, Hateful, Disloyal, Obstructionist, The Republican Party is to the "regular American" Public, other THAN the 2%ers. As I wrote tha list of negative attributes to the RethugliKan Partiers, I was running thru in my head, all the actions, reactions, proposals, amendments, disgraces and indiscretions, words, speeches, encounters with President and other Party members(either party) in Congress Houses and constituents, and being in the news any form,....and, those were what I came up with...with no doubt of the appropriate application, was really easy, am sure there are many more....Whew! then I got tired!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jl Walker
LET'S GO
12:39 AM on 09/05/2011
What is the problem here! They are all white people who drink tea and they all hate middle class/poor people...let's not for get they all hate the President so what is the problem...Oh did they find out that they were also poor people!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ariadne104
To Limit Yourself Is To Limit The Possibilities
06:08 PM on 09/04/2011
So...they're using the excuse of what happened to Congresswoman Giffords from attending town hall meetings.

Didn't a lot of Republicans and their follower's say it wasn't politically motivated? So it would take some heat off of them because of their bulls-eye rhetoric?

But now they are saying that it was politically motivated and they fear for their lives?

Really guys, do you even pay attention to what you say in public that is put in print and internet?
10:14 PM on 09/04/2011
They don't need to - it's not as if their constituency has the capacity to recognize hypocrisy on the part of their own.
NoBlueDogs
FIGHT Offshoring!!!
05:31 PM on 09/04/2011
Cravaack got into politics because the previous rep in his district avoided him. Now he's doing the same? Have these Republicans absolutely no sense of moral consistency? Or are their memories shorter than a gnat's hair?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gailsunday
I think what I think...therefore, I am
10:40 AM on 09/07/2011
hehehe....that's a good one! "...shorter than a gnat's hair...."
my visualization, thoroughly entertained!!!! That original? ROFL
03:39 PM on 09/04/2011
There is no employment problem in that "other" country. Wonder if they have town hall meetings there.

America needs American made products.
NoBlueDogs
FIGHT Offshoring!!!
05:32 PM on 09/04/2011
Amen to that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gailsunday
I think what I think...therefore, I am
02:26 AM on 09/05/2011
YES we DO!
It is a terrible mistake to place our economic productivity, food source and control, in the "hands" of another country....globalization aside, tho that is what is promoted by Capitalist 2%ers, ....it is NOT in the BEST INTEREST of Average "regular" Americans. Far from it! Globalization, has no character, no allegiance, no nation"ality", is far removed, a "distant relative", no "face", is sterile, ethically and morally inert, and out-of-touch(just like our Government and "lawmakers"), with consumers, heck! Doesn't even "recognize them other than a revenue source.
We NEED to produce everything we NEED Right here at HOME, where it is available to us, safe from being used against us by an "outside" element. And, why we MUST get BIG Business OUT of controlling our Government.
photo
wmnorton
Moderate where moderate used to be
03:34 PM on 09/04/2011
The only way to make politicians responsible to the people is to overturn the Citizens United decision. We need for there to be a Constitutional Amendment that gets corporations out of politics. I would suggest something like the following.

No one may collect more to obtain an office than the office pays. Congress may provide additional funds. No one may contribute to a candidate for office who can not vote for that candidate.

The first sentence is to control who gets into races. It would also be the basis for how additional funds from Congress is provided. The second part is to have Congress provide most of the funds for races, public financing of the election process is the only way to rescue the country from the corporations. The last part is to ensure that it is the people being represented who the office holder is beholden to. For example Michelle Bachmann collected $13 million to run for Congress last time, almost none of it came from within her district. You have to ask, who does she really represent, the people of her district or the people who gave all that money? The people who gave all that money think she is bought and paid for.
rainman578
I'm a VIP - Veteran. Independent. Physicist
06:10 PM on 09/04/2011
I'm generally liberal, but this would be the FAIREST thing to do. A 90% tax on all political donations might do the trick, too, but this one's crossed my mind as well. Although I'd add this line "Once elected to office, a Congressional representative or Senator may ONLY meet with legal residents of his or her own district/state".
photo
wmnorton
Moderate where moderate used to be
01:16 AM on 09/05/2011
If you Google "overturn Citizens United" you will find a lot of organizations which are working toward that end, but most of them never say what they want to Amendment to say. If they would have what they would change the Consitution to say maybe I would reference them but they don't, so I'm left with wondering what I would be supporting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gailsunday
I think what I think...therefore, I am
02:29 AM on 09/05/2011
GREAT POST........Right there with YA!!!!
photo
wmnorton
Moderate where moderate used to be
09:41 AM on 09/05/2011
Thanks for your comment, Google "overturn citizens united" and pick a group to help. The problem I see with most of the sites is that on first clance they don't have the Amendment language they would use.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ocrmom59
01:38 PM on 09/04/2011
People are beginning to understand what happen when they let leaders who are suppose to care about all the american people really show their true feelings and beliefs. Yes they care about all the american people as long as each group of races stay in their place and not upset the status quo. For too long they have been blinded by the fact that it wouldn't change and that the american people would always let them stay on top no matter what.

When Obama became elected is when the real problem started and that is why those on the right and teaparty want to blame him for everything. They really never thought he would win and win he did, they thought if they tell the american people from the start that they was not going to help him no matter how good it would be for the people, that he would give up and resign. When that didn't happen and the hcr got pass, that really made them double made so it became all out war. They hired the teaparty to make it tough on him and they got burned themselves. Again they thought he would resign, he didn't, instead he keep trying to compermise and seemly giving into them. But what he is actually doing is making decisions that will benefit all the people in long term and not short term and can't be overturn. Smart move.
02:42 PM on 09/24/2011
Lol , You really believe that crap?
photo
drwtsn
Could I please get an upgrade to a macro-bio?
01:01 PM on 09/04/2011
"If nothing else, we gave them a voice and I heard them and I listened to them," Cravaack said.

"Now I will go back to Washington and ask the lobbyists how my corporate donors want me to vote."