iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Long-Term Unemployment: States Search For Strategies To Counter Joblessness


First Posted: 09/05/11 09:14 AM ET Updated: 11/05/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- When Steve Clark of St. Louis, Mo., lost his IT job in 2009, he intuitively knew that as someone older than 60, he'd have a tough time getting back to work. So he scrambled, compiling all of his professional contacts, drafting 13 different versions of his resume and meeting with anyone he could.

A former client who owned an IT consulting business told Clark he could have hired him before the economy went sour, but not now. Still, Clark pushed ahead.

"I knew his business because I'd been selling to him for 20 years," Clark said. "I said, 'I can come in and work in your office. I can answer the phone, I can dispatch your technicians. I'll do it for free just because I want an office to go to, a place to work out of.' "

Clark said the former client set him up with a desk and a phone. Clark got to work, and within three months, he said, he'd made himself so useful that he got hired in August, 2009. Now Clark, 62, is making a third of what he used to, but he's grateful to have a job.

"In a couple years, everything will be in place and I'll retire," he said.

To confront the growing problem of long-term unemployment, the Obama administration may seek to put Clark's strategy into practice on a national scale. The White House has signaled that it may replicate a program in Georgia that allows businesses to train jobless workers for two months without having to pay them.

The program, called Georgia Works, is only open to workers receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Businesses have no obligation to hire participating workers, and the arrangement is voluntary for both parties. Its proponents say it lets workers get their foot in the door and that it reduces businesses' hiring risks. Labor advocates are howling that Georgia Works exploits workers and violates federal labor laws, and they argue that it shouldn't be tangled up with unemployment insurance dollars. (It could be that the White House is interested in Georgia Works, which is popular with Republicans, as part of a bargain that includes a re-authorization of federal extended benefits, which are set to expire in January.)


But there is urgent need for an innovative solution to the problem of long-term joblessness. In 2007, there were 228,000 people unemployed for 99 weeks or longer, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Now there are more than 2 million who've passed the 99 week milestone, which is the cutoff point for unemployment insurance in the hardest-hit states. The longer a person is out of work, the less likely he or she is to find a new job.

Georgia Works isn't the only way state innovators are trying to break the cycle. A unique public-private partnership in Connecticut, for example, targets people who have already exhausted 99 weeks of unemployment benefits without finding work.

"I recognize that businesses don't need to look at people who've been out of work two years because there's a rich, rich field of people who haven't been out of work that long," said Joe Carbone, president of The Workplace, Inc., the company implementing the Connecticut initiative. "Unfortunately these folks are the sacrificial lambs of the Great Recession."

The brand new program, called Platform to Employment, puts workers through a four-week training period followed by an eight-week tryout at a participating business. During the tryouts, the workers' wages are paid by The Workplace, which raised enough funds to support 100 jobs starting this fall. In December, Carbone's team will evaluate the program's success.

"We're giving a lot of advantage to business, but we're also giving our candidates sort of an eight-week interview," Carbone said. "It gets their foot in the door."

Yet another strategy would use public dollars to subsidize wages. Early in 2010, Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) pushed legislation that would have revived a wage-subsidy program that he said put 7,400 people to work within six months of its launch during the recession of the early 1980s. The plan, known as the Minnesota Emergency Employment Development (MEED) program, lasted from 1983 to 1987. A new version, called Strengthening Our Economy Through Employment and Development (SEED), would have used leftover bailout dollars to subsidize up to 50 percent of a workers' wages for up to 12 months.

"MEED was an incredibly effective program and created thousands of jobs in Minnesota, which is why I thought it had enormous potential to do the same on the national level and why I introduced the SEED Act in Congress," Franken said in a statement to HuffPost. "I still think that SEED is a great model, but whether it's this particular plan or another, my top priority is clear -- we need to create jobs and get people back to work."

Instead of adopting Franken's proposal to subsidize wages, Congress enacted the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act, which gave businesses $13 billion worth of tax credits for hiring unemployed workers. The measure has not been evaluated.

In Mississippi, Republican Gov. Haley Barbour revived a program this summer called Subsidized Transitional Employment Program and Services, which in its first incarnation was funded with stimulus dollars from a new emergency fund attached to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program (formerly known as welfare). Congress let the fund die in 2010, snuffing some 240,000 subsidized jobs, according to the liberal-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

According to the Mississippi Department of Employment Security, the new version of the initiative, known as Subsidized Transition Employment Program and Services (STEPS 2), will be funded with left-over stimulus dollars and will last from August to December. It initially covers 100 percent of an employees wages, gradually reducing the subsidy for every 160 hours worked.

"Mississippi STEPS 2 is unique in that it is a program specifically designed to benefit both the employee and employer," Gov. Barbour said in a statement. "We saw tremendous results with our original program, which created more than 1,800 permanent, private-sector jobs. I fully expect the STEPS 2 program to provide much-needed support to small businesses by enabling them to hire new workers, thus enhancing the economic engines of our local communities."

A Department of Employment Security spokeswoman said 80 companies have signed up for the program, and that 450 workers were expected to enroll.

Of course, the best possible solution to long-term unemployment would be a stronger economy -- but that option appears to be off the table for a while. Last week, the White House said it expected the unemployment rate will not come down to 6 percent until 2016.

HuffPost readers: Participated in any of these programs? Tell us about it -- email arthur@huffingtonpost.com. Please include your phone number if you're willing to do an interview.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- When Steve Clark of St. Louis, Mo., lost his IT job in 2009, he intuitively knew that as someone older than 60, he'd have a tough time getting back to work. So he scrambled, compiling al...
WASHINGTON -- When Steve Clark of St. Louis, Mo., lost his IT job in 2009, he intuitively knew that as someone older than 60, he'd have a tough time getting back to work. So he scrambled, compiling al...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,430
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (82 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Over Fifty and OutofWork
Stories of the Great Recession
08:29 AM on 09/10/2011
The unemployment problem should be number one in the government's agenda. Right now more than 25 million Americans are out of work and among them are millions of baby boomers. Check out our documentary and multimedia project on people Over 50 and Out of Work. www.Over50andOutofWork.com.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Wendy Davis
Banned!
08:01 PM on 09/08/2011
This is to SilverLincoln - After numerous failed attempts to respond to your actual comment, I gave up and hope you will see this. Asking me why I hate the rich, stating the rich are worthy of all that cash, that 3 dollars an hour is good money when you are hungry - he knows, he has been there. I do not hate the rich. I do believe there is an active campaign in place being promoted by the republicans to invoke disdain toward the working man and woman today. I also believe that if a household requires 2 people to be working to survive, the cost of living is already too high. Any lower and it will be impossible - unless you team up 3 generations of families into bunkbeds and small spaces. The pie is being cut unfairly. I married a man of great success. He was a workaholic who punched numbers all day, was highly competitive in his field and he goal was to take out the competition and share as little money as he could to the govnt because "he created jobs." Nothing special about that man. He was no more special than the coach at the little league game, or the plumber who is home at night having dinner with his family, so America's future generation of productive citizens. I have been hungry as well. 3.00 an hour is a tip. Lower the cost of living or raise the wage. To think otherwise is just well un-American.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
10:40 AM on 09/08/2011
"We're not Michigan," said Lane Wright, a spokesman for the governor's office.

That's true. Apparently Florida has been the domain of the great Emperor Scott, and his cronies. We wouldn't want a little thing like the U.S.. Constitution to get in the way of expanding that fiefdom, would we?

We have already seen much of the shoddy rulings of the federal judges down there, so I'm not sure what kind of a ruling we'll get.  Florida actually elected a thief as their Governor, so who knows what to expect down there.  
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
10:45 AM on 09/08/2011
Whoops!  Sorry, I had two tabs opened at once, and put this comment on the wrong thread.  Sorry everyone, please ignore.
01:36 PM on 09/07/2011
WORK CAMPS
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bertski
just a guy trying not to be part of the problem
09:26 AM on 09/07/2011
Contrary to the pablum that some politician­s are trying to feed us, most folks who are out of work due to no fault of their own actually WOULD prefer to be working, productive contributo­rs to America's economy. Considerin­g the sad state of this nation's crumbling infrastruc­ture, there should be a way to utilize unemployed workers to help effect repairs and upgrades to roads, bridges, etc. Out-of-wor­k people could be put to work beautifyin­g public spaces and parks, be cross-trai­ned in any number of useful skill sets, and given a chance to show their worth once again, while our corporatio­ns continue to exploit the current situation and abuse those workers who remain employed.

This would be a win-win situation. The country would get a lot of much-neede­d work under way, those who can't find work but want to be productive would get the opportunit­y to be part of the solution, and it would help silence the insensitiv­e slugs who take joy in suggesting that the unemployed are lazy and don't want to work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tmf1977
The middle is a really sane place to be in!
04:57 AM on 09/07/2011
I was a 99'er nearly a year ago and I did everything I was supposed to do: volunteer, apply to at least 10 jobs per week, audit college classes, and take any job available, What landed me my current position? Lowering my salary 35%. I had to pick and choose my battle. Either hang in there and try to still market a job in the salary bracket I was earning in 2007, or choose less pay, but have benefits. If I didn't take a cut in pay, I would probably would still be looking for a job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HBobedajr
Plus que change,plus c'est la meme chose!
12:13 AM on 09/07/2011
If anyone commenting here can remember the movies called, "Dune" and "Road Warriors",just wrap your head around that for a moment.
Now,for those of you who were able to recall those movies, and their content,the images in your mind's eye will become a staggering reality...and much sooner than we think.
That is what is in store for this country, if everything keeps heading in it's present direction!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptainRenault
Here to keep an eye on the rascals.
04:13 PM on 09/06/2011
The best thing that government can do is launch an aggressive program against employers who discriminate against the long-term unemployed based on being unemployed and age.

I'm sure a lot of these chislers would be happy to let you work for free for a couple of months.

^ ^
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tmf1977
The middle is a really sane place to be in!
05:00 AM on 09/07/2011
So true. People do not realize that recruiters and HR still use the same old rules which applied in 2000 to today's market. It is unfair that most HR people still use the "6 month" rule when sorting through applications.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptainRenault
Here to keep an eye on the rascals.
06:06 PM on 09/07/2011
Actually, those rules have evolved to include even more "litmus tests" that are used to exclude a person from consideration, regardless of being well-qualified otherwise. Age discrimnation is rampant, for example. The worst thing to me, though, is the use of resume scanning software to screen out resumes. One study that I saw estimated that 85% to 90% of resumes submitted online never even see by human eyes on the other end.

It's all about culling the herd, not about finding the best candidate necessarily. Less work for HR, but a shoddy and arbitrary method of sorting out who is suitable. HR people claim there is a "skills gap". With this many people unemployed?! Hogwash!!

This "skills gap" is largely a result of these arbitrary and unfair screening methods, nothing more. People who got let go through no fault of their own and were perfectly satisfactory employees are now persona non grata. That is flat out wrong--and it needs to be addressed.

I have followed this issue closely and read a good number of studies and sad stories of what people have and are going through. It's tragic and sad--but most of all avoidable if only the hiring practices were done more fairly.

I sure hope that Big O quits playing around and takes on the GOP and their TP ways hammer and tongs.

^ ^
02:19 PM on 09/06/2011
First businesses get tax breaks and now they won't even have to pay their workers! I'm really trying to build up some tears for these poor businesses...

I'd like to think that this might help some good people get hired, but it's more likely to be abused by companies looking to make a quick buck. As a truck driver I've seen too many trucking companies set up "schools" and training programs to take advantage of student financing and other financial incentives and they don't really give the new driver a chance to succeed. As soon as the extra funding runs out they are out looking for more newbies instead of taking on experienced drivers. Same could happen in other industries just as easy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rick Ayers
01:41 PM on 09/06/2011
I say, it's really quite simple, governor: put them back to work! Ayyyy, what?
01:52 PM on 09/06/2011
How about you put yourself back to work. My dime is over spent
01:15 PM on 09/06/2011
Everyone's idea is to somehow get people to work for free. This is not a solution but a big problem.
I know interns who have worked 10 or more jobs without an offer. Not to mention all of the visa people now wining.
If I have a PHD in this country and they can hire a PHD from India and downgrade him to $8,000 a year-how can I compete with this?
Unless they are willing to pay living wages no one will be productive or even work at all.
Slavery is illegal so I thought.
12:56 PM on 09/06/2011
Demand and new infrastructure are not the only ways to improve employment. While many people think looser regulation is not a solution it in fact holds great potential. Obama himself said " Regulations do have costs; often, as a country, we have to make tough decisions about whether those costs are necessary. But what is clear is that we can strike the right balance. We can make our economy stronger and more competitive, while meeting our fundamental responsibilities to one another." Over regulation stifles innovation and prevents new businesses from entering the market.
12:35 PM on 09/06/2011
It does not say what kinds of jobs are being created. I bet this is another program where businesses get tax breaks and incentives just to give people busy work.
We already have interns, and visas who work for little or nothing.
If the corporations are sitting on all of this money on the sidelines they have plenty of money to hire. Sounds like they are just waiting for handouts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Howard Scott Pearlman 59
12:15 PM on 09/06/2011
1) The first thing we should do is have a Real " Tea Party " and go to the ports and DUMP all of the Communist Chinese Made Goods into the SEA.

2) We should raise the tarrif of all Chinese goods coming into America up to the 25% that China charges all American Goods going into China.

3) We need to put 6 Million Americans back to work NOW Rebuilding everything falling apart !

4) We need to end the practice of short selling and buying on margin all critical commodities like OIL and Gasoline. If you can't take posession of it you can't buy it. And you must have the cash in advance to purchase.

Now it's your turn to add to this list !
01:53 PM on 09/06/2011
sorry, I like my toothbrush to cost only 3 bucks, US made equals unions= 12.00 toothbrush
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bertski
just a guy trying not to be part of the problem
09:30 AM on 09/07/2011
Cheap is attractive, but just try to consider the repercussions - the domino effect of those cheaper products you prefer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
G Glover
08:34 PM on 09/13/2011
Yeah, I know...make mine melamine!
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
12:14 PM on 09/06/2011
The Republicans want to go back to the days of our Founding Fathers...When you could buy and sell your workers...BUT, the best thing was people would work for Food and Water.
01:54 PM on 09/06/2011
we do now....
02:22 PM on 09/06/2011
but only if you can FIND the job first... to many can't even work for that much
06:10 PM on 09/06/2011
omg, we are going backwards and we are working for food and water now !!!