iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iraq: Fear And Insecurity Still Reign Country, Even After Saddam

Iraq Fear Insecurity

By LARA JAKES   09/ 6/11 03:46 AM ET   AP

BAGHDAD -- As a Shiite Muslim who was interrogated by Iraq's secret police and lost her job because she would not join the regime's Baath Party, Fawzia al-Attia should feel safer now that Saddam Hussein is no longer in power. She does not.

Death threats and Baghdad's daily bombings have made al-Attia more afraid than she was during Saddam's reign of terror, she says.

"Before, I couldn't say anything in my own home," said al-Attia. "But at least I was safe. I was only afraid of Saddam. It is not like now. Now, you open the door to your home and you could get killed."

American troops are preparing to pull out of Iraqi completely by the end of December, more than eight years after the invasion that ousted Saddam and promised a better life for Iraqis. As the country enters a post-U.S. era, many Iraqis who had welcomed the 2003 invasion feel they remain in even more danger than before Saddam's fall.

Security is a key indicator of Iraq's future – it drives business investment, government policy decisions and the psyche of the war-torn nation.

In interviews across Baghdad, Iraqis cited the random daily bombings and shootings that continue to kill people here. At least under Saddam, they say, they knew they could avoid being targeted by violence by simply staying quiet.

Al-Attia doesn't make the comparison lightly. She remembers the fear when, under Saddam's rule, she was called to a police station for questioning. Her husband followed her because he didn't know if he'd ever see her again.

Now that same uncertainty looms in the background every day. Because of sectarian violence, she and her family moved from a Shiite neighborhood to the heavily fortified Green Zone. A sociology professor at Baghdad University, she can't drive herself to work, relying instead on bodyguards to take her.

"Under Saddam, there was fear, but in a different way," she said.

Sectarian violence, which drove Iraq to the brink of civil war just a few years ago, was almost nonexistent under Saddam.

In May 2003, two months after the invasion, there were fewer than a handful of daily attacks on Iraqis, national security forces and foreign troops. That number spiked in May 2007, with an average of 180 attacks a day, according to the U.S. military data released by congressional investigators at the General Accounting Office. Between 2005 and 2008, an average of 60 Iraqis was killed daily.

Since then, violence has dropped dramatically, but attacks continue.

Several people a day die, and a bombing in a residential area or on a street of shops that causes no casualties still spreads fear among everyone who hears about it. This past July, U.S. forces in Iraq reported an average of 20 daily bombings, rocket attacks and shootings – including some that were thwarted before they were carried out.

Sunni insurgent groups, which sprung up when Saddam was ousted and Iraq's majority Shiites took power, continue to strike at anyone who tries to restore normalcy to Iraq – security forces, the government, Americans or even fellow Sunnis, like the 29 who were killed in a Baghdad mosque by a suicide bomber during Ramadan prayers this past month.

"I'm not going to short-sheet the current security situation; I think it's not what the Iraqis want or deserve," said U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Jeffrey S. Buchanan, the American military's top spokesman in Baghdad.

Asked to compare today's security in Iraq to what it was under Saddam, Buchanan called it "very, very different."

"I don't think we know as much of what was going on in the past, just because much of it was quiet," he said. "In the dead of the night, people would come and take you away, and you never heard from them again."

Certainly no one has forgotten the horrors under Saddam.

Estimates of how many Iraqis were executed or otherwise "disappeared" during Saddam's 24-year regime range from 300,000 to 800,000. Reviews of bodies found in mass graves from that era point to what Gerard Alexander, an expert at the American Enterprise Institute think tank in Washington, has called a "conservative estimate" that an average 16,000 Iraqis a year were killed.

Saddam persecuted prominent Shiite clerics and their followers and launched what Human Rights Watch calls a campaign of genocide against Kurds. People from all backgrounds rarely, if ever, dared to criticize the government, even to relatives or neighbors, for fear they'd be taken away by Saddam's secret police and beaten, imprisoned, killed, or simply disappear.

"When I was in Baghdad, I would always feel that today would be the day that I would be killed. But I was lucky," said Biekhal Alkhalifa, a 31-year-old Kurd who commuted between engineering classes in Baghdad and her hometown of Kirkuk when Saddam was president.

"I am sure there are a lot of Arab people who now say, 'We wish Saddam was still in power,'" she said. "But for the Kurds, it is 100 percent of us who are happy that he is gone."

The U.S. military surge that poured more than 160,000 troops into Iraq in 2007 quelled much of the sectarian violence.

But a July report by the U.S. watchdog that oversees construction in Iraq concluded that the nation is more dangerous now than it was last year due to bombings, assassinations and a resurgence in violence by Iranian-backed Shiite militias. Iraq Body Count, an independent British monitoring group, estimates at least 102,043 Iraqi civilians have been killed since the war began.

Iraq has gone into what Sean Kane, a former United Nations diplomat now with the U.S. Institute of Peace, calls a "sideways drift" – progress has plateaued and Iraqis have a hard time predicting what may come next.

The violence looms over the American military's planned exit, fueling fears about instability and burgeoning influence from neighboring Iran. As a result, Baghdad and Washington are reconsidering whether the U.S. troops should leave by Dec. 31, as required under a 2008 security agreement.

Saddam's last wide-ranging campaigns of death against Shiites and Kurds ended in 1991. As a result, in the perception of many Iraqis, the years before the 2003 U.S.-led invasion seemed peaceful – even as Saddam continued terrorizing people in smaller numbers without attracting much nationwide attention.

"Even though Saddam was a tyrant, we Iraqis used to live a good life," said Huda Aqeel Jaffa, 35, a Sunni housewife with three children and a husband who receives death threats because, as a construction contractor, he is seen as working with Americans. "Life was simple, and we could go everywhere we wanted. Now, there is no security. There is no stability. There is no humanity. We are afraid of everything."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BAGHDAD -- As a Shiite Muslim who was interrogated by Iraq's secret police and lost her job because she would not join the regime's Baath Party, Fawzia al-Attia should feel safer now that Saddam Husse...
BAGHDAD -- As a Shiite Muslim who was interrogated by Iraq's secret police and lost her job because she would not join the regime's Baath Party, Fawzia al-Attia should feel safer now that Saddam Husse...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:29 PM on 09/07/2011
The problem is that the same neocon thinktanks who tricked Americans into thinking that Iraq had WMDs and thus must be invaded, are still working hard to trick Americans into supporting other military adventures. The true intent of "liberating" other nations is not to make the foreign citizens' lives or even the average American's life better, but to make the few in the US defense industry wealthier.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rallis
Virtue is Harmony
11:02 AM on 09/07/2011
''Fear And Insecurity Still Reign Country, Even After Saddam''

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donns
07:40 AM on 09/07/2011
Billions of dollars, thousands of lives wasted and we have only replaced one set of fears with another set. Not to mention gaining hatred for the USA from large parts of the world. Thanks Bush and Cheney.
06:06 PM on 09/06/2011
There were more Shiites in the Baath party of Iraq than Sunnis, but the higher positions tended to be occupied by Sunni rather than Shia.

Several trillions of dollars squandered by the US on this idiotic military adventure!
09:59 PM on 09/06/2011
that was true before saddam purged most of the shias in the 80s for fear of their 'loyalties to iran'. it was also true that most of the soldiers attacking iran in the iran-iraq war were shiites, but they only wanted to defend their country and their service was loyalty to country - not to the baath. that was why the iraqi army surrendered so quickly during the american invasion of 2003, since most in the army were sunnis after 1991 shiite uprising - and as a result it was smaller than the army that attacked iran (and as a result was much weaker).
a similar thing happened in syria - most soldiers involved in the 1982 massacre were alawites from lattakia since the leader feared the sunnis would have loyalty to the locals of hama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p-junkie
never shut the door to knowledge
05:21 PM on 09/06/2011
["Life was simple, and we could go everywhere we wanted. Now, there is no security. There is no stability. There is no humanity. We are afraid of everything."]

But you were LIBERATED- Dick Cheney and George Bush said so....SARCASM
02:49 PM on 09/06/2011
Where are the weapons of mass destruction ? Donald Rumsfeld is happy now.
photo
Richard Aron
Be the change you wish to see in the world. Gandhi
01:53 PM on 09/06/2011
If you hadn't invaded them illegally in the first place, they would have been safe now. Maybe they would have toppled Saddam on their own in the spirit of the Arab spring, and we would have lost so many innocent lives.
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
01:21 PM on 09/06/2011
Mission accomplished indeed. Bush's stated goal (one of may that changed over time) was turn turn Iraq into a picture of American-style democracy. Well, he succeeded. Iraq now has a bloated military, a corruption dysfunctional government, no respect for the rule of law, and a population split into belligerant sectarian factions - just like the US.
06:08 PM on 09/06/2011
Mike - - The neocon agenda was to convert Iraq into a stable ally of Israel. This was primary object of the illegal invasion.
Rexter
Question everything.
11:54 AM on 09/06/2011
Saddam ruled with an iron fist and kept all these groups in line. That is all most Iraqi's have ever known. For anyone to think that we could topple Saddam and instantiate a working democracy to replace him was/is delusional. The same can be said for Afghanistan and many other nations in that part of the world. It seems none our gifted "planners" considered the long term consequences of the U.S. occupation/liberation of Iraq.

Maybe it is as it appears, a big Texas style shoot'em up and everyone makes money as long as long as it lasts. Until Iran is dealt a decisive blow the violence they fund and inspire will continue in the region. We're just treating symptoms, not the root cause.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
season555
Allaah knows best
11:23 AM on 09/06/2011
Bush and Cheney's version of democracy?
photo
Djay0252
America needs to Bless God
10:58 AM on 09/06/2011
But....but ..what happened to "Mission Accomplished? (just another Bushism)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Farsha
11:15 AM on 09/06/2011
Yes "Mission Accomplish­ed"

Mission was to let Western oil companies in.
Create chaos for bases can be justified and control whosoever is in power.
And for friends(military industrial complex ) and family(oil companies) to make lot of money.

So Mission is going as per the plan.
06:09 PM on 09/06/2011
Farsha - - US bought more Iraqi crude oil than any other country, from Saddam Hussein. Before the illegal invasion of Iraq.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KMBerger
"Cui adhaereo, prae est,"
10:05 AM on 09/06/2011
I don't like it when we interfere in a civil war through this occupation of Iraq; however, what has yet to be resolved is a sectarian war between the Shi'ia and Sunni Arabs of Iraq and a final determination whether they can bridge the sectarian and ethnic divides and operate as a single nation called Iraq, or let the Kurds secede to form an oil rich Kurdish nation, and divide the rest of the spoils of that nation between the other tribal entities. This is no longer our war to worry about. As long as we aid in supporting the Kurds remaining independent and prosperous that is the best we can expect to do and feel obligated doing it. al-Maliki refuses to make a decision about troop withdrawals, the time comes for us simply to do it.
09:49 AM on 09/06/2011
No say it isn't so. I can't believe it.