More

Working-Age Adults Now Constitute Record Share Of U.S. Poor

First Posted: 09/06/11 06:04 PM ET Updated: 11/06/11 05:12 AM ET

By HOPE YEN, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Working-age America is the new face of poverty.

Counting adults 18-64 who were laid off in the recent recession as well as single twenty-somethings still looking for jobs, the new working-age poor represent nearly 3 out of 5 poor people — a switch from the early 1970s when children made up the main impoverished group.

While much of the shift in poverty is due to demographic changes — Americans are having fewer children than before — the now-weakened economy and limited government safety net for workers are heightening the effect.

Currently, the ranks of the working-age poor are at the highest level since the 1960s when the war on poverty was launched. When new census figures for 2010 are released next week, analysts expect a continued increase in the overall poverty rate due to persistently high unemployment last year.

If that holds true, it will mark the fourth year in a row of increases in the U.S. poverty rate, which now stands at 14.3 percent, or 43.6 million people.

"There is a lot of discussion about what the aging of the baby boom should mean for spending on Social Security and Medicare. But there is not much discussion about how the wages of workers, especially those with no more than a high school degree, are not rising," said Sheldon Danziger, a University of Michigan public policy professor who specializes in poverty.

"The reality is there are going to be a lot of working poor for the foreseeable future," he said, citing high unemployment and congressional resistance to raising the minimum wage.

The newest poor include Richard Bowden, 53, of southeast Washington, who has been on food stamps off and on the last few years. A maintenance worker, Bowden says he was unable to save much money before losing his job months ago. He no longer works due to hip and back problems and now gets by on about $1,000 a month in disability and other aid.

"At my work, we hadn't gotten a raise in two years, even while the prices of food and clothing kept going up, so I had little left over," Bowden said. "Now, after rent, the utility bill, transportation and other costs, my money is pretty much down to nothing."

"I pray and hope that things get better, but you just don't know," he said.

The poverty figures come at a politically sensitive time for President Barack Obama, after a Labor Department report last Friday showed zero job growth in August. The White House now acknowledges that the unemployment rate, currently at 9.1 percent, will likely average 9 percent through 2012.

Obama is preparing to outline a new plan for creating jobs and stimulating the economy in a prime-time address to Congress on Thursday. The Republican-controlled House has been adamant about requiring spending cuts in return for an increase in the federal debt limit. Suggested cuts have included proposals to raise the eligibility age for future Medicare recipients or to reduce other domestic programs in a way that would disproportionately affect the poor.

According to the latest census data, the share of poor who are ages 18-64 now stands at 56.7 percent, compared to 35.5 percent who are children and 7.9 percent who are 65 and older. The working-age share surpasses a previous high of 55.5 percent first reached in 2004.

Lower-skilled adults ages 18 to 34, in particular, have had the largest jumps in poverty as employers keep or hire older workers for the dwindling jobs available. The declining economic fortunes have caused many unemployed young Americans to double up in housing with parents, friends and loved ones.

In 1966, when the Census Bureau first began tracking the age distribution of the poor, children made up the biggest share of those in poverty, at 43.5 percent. Working-age adults comprised a 38.6 percent share, and Americans 65 and older represented nearly 18 percent.

Douglas Besharov, a University of Maryland public policy professor and former scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, says that expansions of the federal safety net including Social Security retirement and disability payments have been important in reducing poverty.

In 2009, for instance, the Census Bureau estimated that new unemployment benefits — which gave workers up to 99 weeks of payments after a layoff — helped keep 3.3 million people out of poverty. For 2010, Besharov said demographers on average expect an increase in poverty of roughly half a percentage point to nearly 15 percent, depending partly on the impact of unemployment insurance, which did not run out for many people until this year.

The current poverty level was set at $10,956 for one person and $21,954 for a family of four, based on an official government calculation that includes only cash income, before taxes. It excludes capital gains or accumulated wealth, such as home ownership, as well as noncash aid such as food stamps.

Taking noncash aid into account shifts the poverty numbers notably. Next month, the government will release new supplemental poverty numbers for the first time that will factor in food stamps and tax credits — which often benefit out-of-work families with children — but also everyday costs such as commuting that tend to have a bigger impact on working Americans.

Preliminary census estimates released this summer show a decline in child poverty based on the new measure and a jump in the shares of poor who are working age — from 56.7 percent to nearly 60 percent. In all, the child poverty rate decreases from 20.7 percent under the official poverty measure to 17.9 percent, according to estimates. But the senior poverty rate jumps from 8.9 percent to 15.6 percent after including out-of-pocket medical costs, and working-age adults see an increase in poverty from 12.9 percent to 14.9 percent.

Food banks say they see a shift to a new working poor.

"Americans from all walks of life are now finding themselves in need of help for the first time in their lives," said Vicki Escarra, president of Feeding America, a national network of food banks that is based in Chicago. She noted that demand has increased by 46 percent since the recession began in late 2007, with more than 1 in 3 families who get their assistance having one or more adults working.

"The reality is we all know someone who has lost a job or a crisis that has caused financial concern. In fact, some people who used to be donors to our Feeding America food banks are themselves now turning to us for help," she said.

Demographers expect next week's poverty report to show:

—A rise in working families who are low income, to nearly 1 in 3. "Low income" is defined as those making less than 200 percent of the poverty threshold, or about $43,000 for a family of four.

—Larger numbers of people who are uninsured, due to slightly higher rates of unemployment on average in 2010. Most provisions of the new health care law, which in part expands Medicaid to pick up millions more low-income people, don't take effect until 2014.

—Blacks and Hispanics disproportionately hit, based on their higher rates of unemployment.

—A possible widening of the income gap between rich and poor, at least by some measures, due partly to last year's stock market rebound while the job market languished.

Timothy Smeeding, a University of Wisconsin-Madison professor who specializes in income inequality, called the outlook for younger adults in the U.S. especially troubling. He pointed to youth discontent in other parts of the world, such as England, where he says high unemployment and widening inequality contributed to recent rioting.

"We risk a new underclass who are not able to support their children, form stable families, buy houses and reach the middle class," Smeeding said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
By HOPE YEN, Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) — Working-age America is the new face of poverty. Counting adults 18-64 who were laid off in the recent recession as well as single twenty-somethi...
By HOPE YEN, Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) — Working-age America is the new face of poverty. Counting adults 18-64 who were laid off in the recent recession as well as single twenty-somethi...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 600
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegreenhornet
civil rights lawyer
07:01 AM on 09/09/2011
The problem is not that the US does not have the money to pay its debts. The problem is that corporate America and the wealthy in America wont pay up. I remember when the top incomes were taxed at 90%. No one complained. Now these super rich narcissists want to covet their billions and share nothing. They turn their backs on the country that let them accumulate that wealth -- on the people who contributed to their wealth -- and instead ask for tax breaks so they can accumulate more. The same is true of corporate America. What is truly dangerous to our way of life is the fact that these super rich narcissists use their money for power. They control the political activities in this country much like the Koch brothers. They are not using their money to help anyone but themselves. There are a few exceptions. The Gates' for example. But what makes their generosity so newsworthy is that it is so rare. We need a cultural revolution in this country, but it is not going to won by pitting young against old or caucasians against Latinos. It will be won by making the super wealthy pay their share of the debt. They acquired their wealth on an uneven playing field. Many were Wall streeters who contributed nothing to the country's growth and instead made money by gambling on the stock market. The time has passé for us to sit by and allow that boil on society's body
Berettasskeeter
For what we are about to receive, may we be truly
08:46 AM on 09/14/2011
Who, in corporate America or among the wealthy, has refused to pay their legal taxes? Names, please. If you remember when people paid 90%, then you also remember that ALL complained! Honesty as well, please.
Semper fi
04:19 PM on 09/08/2011
With 2 trillion in income. With 3.7 trillion outgo, What do the liberals want to happen????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pepper1311
POGS are dirt
03:30 PM on 09/08/2011
We bet the rance on the markets. We lost...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
weekendpartier
I need some money!
09:22 AM on 09/08/2011
Hey, what do you expect was going to happen when we started outsourcing jobs?
photo
jobscabin
Starry Eyed Liberal King
08:47 AM on 09/08/2011
Who knows for sure whether the Republican Party actually INTENDED to dismantle the middle class or whether it came as a surprise to them that giving manufacturers incentives to ship their plants abroad would eliminate jobs here?
Berettasskeeter
For what we are about to receive, may we be truly
08:47 AM on 09/14/2011
What incentives were given to manufacturers to take plants abroad?
Semper fi
photo
jobscabin
Starry Eyed Liberal King
09:00 AM on 09/14/2011
The AID program, assistance(or aid) for international development gave and continues to give tax incentives to manufacturers to relocate their plants. This is one of the Republican talking points: whenever the Democrats try to unravel the AID program the Republicans shout out, "Tax hike on American business!".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
12:16 AM on 09/08/2011
you know, its getting to the point where the gov is going to have to spend billions in tax payer money to hire huge contractors, who will hire illegals , and they will have them work 24 hour days to build new secure highways and roads so the ivy greed capitalist dont have to drive down the roads and see all the poor people they created in their quest to have it all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:38 PM on 09/07/2011
I always wanted to live in a third world country. Dreams do come true.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
12:19 AM on 09/08/2011
you know in Mexico they sell our old garage door panels to the public so they can build houses out of them. The insulted ones are premium building material too. So maybe we should start saving those for our own custom built homes. Though I'm sure some ivy greed sociopath capitalist will pay the puppets in DC to make a law saying you can dumpster dive anymore, so you will have to pay them to look in dumpsters, and they will sell you the scrap inside on a per pound basis.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
06:35 PM on 09/07/2011
If our system is set up to redistribute money it will always be corrupt. Hundreds of years of politicians being bought off and yet liberals still cling to the arcane notion that we need "to clean house". Won't work.

Solution? Republican system of limited government. If you can't dole out favors, you can't be bought.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
looneydoone
not a "cookie"
06:54 PM on 09/07/2011
SEEN THIS ? www.ALECexposed.org equal opportunity corrupter of politicians
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
06:25 PM on 09/07/2011
No surprise there. With a socialist at the helm be prepared for far worse if he gets a second chance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjtaylor22
05:20 PM on 09/07/2011
you know what the gop says..let them eat cake, fromthe dumpster...and they shoudl be happy they have a microwave
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
06:27 PM on 09/07/2011
That contradicts history my friend. Look at the record, the USA become an economic superpower under capitalism. The middle class today is wealthy by standards of the 1920's. Houses are much larger, everyone has a car, people have a dozen pairs of shoes, etc. etc.

How quickly we forget.
07:44 PM on 09/07/2011
I don't have a car. I don't believe in cars. Bicycles are the future, walking is the future, riding public transportation is the future. I save lots of money not having a car, and I am reducing my carbon footprint. I don't have more than two pairs of shoes, brown and black. Presently I rent, but when I get my student debt paid off, I will save for a house. My dream house is small, easy to clean and heat, cozy and something I can call my own. Don't have TV, will not ever get one. I do however have a refrigerator and oven, and my dream home would have those too. If I save enough, maybe I will be able to have a stacking washer and dryer too someday... My retirement plan is Walmart Greeter.
02:48 PM on 09/08/2011
"Republicans approve of the American farmer, but they are willing to help him go broke. They stand four-square for the American home--but not for housing. They are strong for labor--but they are stronger for restricting labor's rights. They favor minimum wage--the smaller the minimum wage the better. They endorse educational opportunity for all--but they won't spend money for teachers or for schools. They think modern medical care and hospitals are fine--for people who can afford them. They consider electrical power a great blessing--but only when the private power companies get their rake-off. They think the American standard of living is a fine thing--so long as it doesn't spread to all the people. And they admire of Government of the United States so much that they would like to buy it."
— Harry S. Truman
02:59 PM on 09/07/2011
>>>>>>"I pray and hope that things get better, but you just don't know," he said.

It's sad to say, but they're only going to get worse.
photo
Mark Cormier Arizona
√2012=∑(Hope)4(Change)
12:59 PM on 09/07/2011
"Working-Age Adults Now Constitute Record Share Of U.S. Poor "
I guess that Hope and Change has finally taken root.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Howard Scott Pearlman 59
11:30 AM on 09/07/2011
Corporations are people Too.

Mean Rotten Selfish Money Grubbing People.

Corporations are sitting on $2.5 Trillion in CASH.

This is enough money to hire 10 million Americans at $50,000 a year for 5 years.

And yet these moral wonders are hardly hiring anybody and are screaming even more tax cuts so they can sit on a lot more moolah.

Corporations arenot over taxed they are so way under taxed !

Howard Scott Pearlman
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
06:29 PM on 09/07/2011
I'm sitting on cash as well because the future is uncertain under Obama. Health care costs continue to skyrocket (and he said they would come down), inflation is up in every sector (thanks to govt. easy money policy) and interest rates discourage saving.

If a Tea Party Republican won the election the USA would change overnight. All these companies would start spending and hiring because the regulatory future wouldn't be changing every two seconds.
workquick
Vietnam Vet/ Writer. No PTSD, just paranoid
11:17 AM on 09/07/2011
There is no safety net for working age single males. If the suffer a financial apostrophe over which they have no control, unless they are rich already or have family who can help them, they are on their own and quite possibly out on the street. I'm still okay, but so many of the people I know in the construction field are actually in dire straights. A carpenter who worked for me in the past called looking for work. He told me he did everything right. Worked hard, saved money, raised his family to be decent and now he was divorced so his family could receive benefits. Their home was foreclosed. He was living in his truck and was frightened he would be pulled over and then arrested for no insurance. He rides around looking for any kind of work just to survive.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
06:31 PM on 09/07/2011
You should save enough money to live without a job for five years. That will give you time to sell your property if you have to and to learn another trade if required.

Safety nets make people weaker, they become dependent and helpless.
photo
1oldhippie
yes, WE can!
02:32 PM on 09/08/2011
what world do you live in? When the majority of Americans are living hand to mouth, how are they supposed to save 5 years wages?
photo
thanadar
Notary Sojac
10:50 AM on 09/07/2011
Let's start by cutting salaries of the Senate, House and State Department down to a more realistic $50K/yr, and having them pay 80% of their own health benefit package, delete pensions altogether, and allow them to contribute to a modest 401k "retirement plan". That would be a good start.
AquarianInExile
Eykis is Aquarian
11:01 AM on 09/07/2011
Thanadar,

Terrific post and GREAT IDEA! These PIGS only work two days a week (some weeks) and spend the rest of their time hobnobbing with their corporate overlords/lobbyists. They DO NOT DESERVE a high salary and WE SURE DO NOT DESERVE to PAY THEIR PENSIONS AND HEALTHCARE when they have WRECKED OUR JOBS and AMERICA.

F and F


Eykis
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FeyLadyD
11:16 AM on 09/07/2011
That would be a great start! If only ...