iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Super PAC For Rick Perry Plans To Raise, Spend $55 Million

Rick Perry

First Posted: 09/06/11 08:50 PM ET Updated: 11/06/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- A Super PAC backing Texas Gov. Rick Perry's bid for the Republican presidential nomination plans on spending $55 million to help secure the nomination for Perry, according to documents obtained by NBC News.

The extensive plans of Make Us Great Again, a Super PAC founded by former Perry chief of staff Mike Toomey, mark the most striking development in the rise of Super PACs and the decentralization of political campaigns following the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision last year.

Super PACs were created after the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and subsequent court cases implemented the ruling, that there was no legitimate corruption concern when independent political action committees raised and spent money in elections but did not donate directly to politicians. The decision allowed corporations and unions to make unlimited direct donations to these committees or to spend that money themselves to make direct electoral appeals to the public.

"It's a game changer," Paul S. Ryan, the FEC director for the campaign finance watchdog Campaign Legal Center, said of the $55 million plan. "Super PACs will make the 2012 presidential election unlike any election we've seen before."

Make Us Great Again, which asserted control of the pro-Perry Super PAC universe in August, has fielded a top campaign team to reach its spending target. Aside from Toomey, the Super PAC boasts executive director Scott Rials, formerly on Newt Gingrich's presidential team, which also included Perry campaign staffers Dave Carney and Robert Johnson; senior adviser Barry Bennett, a close associate of Carney; and finance director Tony Russo, a California fundraiser.

The $55 million plan, if successful, would vault Make Us Great Again into the stratosphere of outside spending in elections, besting the $33 million in "issue" advertising by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the $21 million by the Republican-supporting Super PAC American Crossroads in 2010. That a Super PAC supporting only one candidate might raise and spend so much should come as both a surprise and a rebuke to both the Supreme Court and the appeals court that issued rulings creating this deregulated campaign finance playing field.

"How five members of the Supreme Court, or anyone else, can think that this environment is any different than someone cutting a $1 million check and giving it to a candidate is beyond me," Ryan said.

Make Us Great Again will likely be able to raise and spend more money than the actual Perry campaign and will easily dwarf the campaigns of all the other candidates and their Super PACs, with the exception of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. The Perry campaign, which must raise money under federal contribution limits, could be freed to spend more on grassroots organizing than television advertising. Make Us Great Again donors would surely have great influence.

According to NBC, those close to the Super PAC state that Toomey is telling donors that it's impossible to run a presidential campaign with the current contribution limits of $2,500 or $5,000 per individual.

"It strikes me as beyond odd that that remark would be made less than four years after a presidential campaign was run that shattered all records while under federal campaign limits," Ryan told HuffPost.

Only three of the single-candidate Super PACs -- of which there are nearly a dozen -- have reported any contributions yet, and only one can hold a candle to the amount Make Us Great Again plans to raise.

Restore Our Future, a Romney-supporting Super PAC, raised $12.2 million in the first half of 2011, with an average donation of $135,000. A mere 12 donors -- four giving $1 million and eight giving $500,000 -- accounted for $8 million of the total raised.

The Make Us Great Again plan obtained by NBC calls for raising and spending $45 million between now and March 24, 2012, the peak of the primary season. That would mean raising $225,000 per day from Sept. 6 through March 24. The PAC plans to raise another $10 million to cover the final months of the primary campaign.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- A Super PAC backing Texas Gov. Rick Perry's bid for the Republican presidential nomination plans on spending $55 million to help secure the nomination for Perry, according to documents o...
WASHINGTON -- A Super PAC backing Texas Gov. Rick Perry's bid for the Republican presidential nomination plans on spending $55 million to help secure the nomination for Perry, according to documents o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 663
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mixguru
Those aren't flag pins, they're price tags.
04:47 PM on 09/07/2011
Thank you SCOTUS for wrapping up our political system and delivering into the hands of corporate special interests. The best government money can buy.
03:57 PM on 09/07/2011
rick perry and mitt romney are corporate pawns just like obama. perry has the upper hand in the debate cuz he's a bilderberg pawn.

RON PAUL 2012 or BYE BYE USA Hello north american union
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rainkitty
Lively up yourself.
03:09 PM on 09/07/2011
Memo To Rick Perry: Don’t Hold Your Arm Like That
http://www.buzzfeed.com/jpmoore/memo-to-rick-perry-dont-hold-your-arm-like-that

The Perry Trap
http://www.austinchronicle.com/rick-perry/
photo
TJ Logan
Fifth Generation Real Republican
03:07 PM on 09/07/2011
Darn!

Ill have to send the Colbert Super PAC more money now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mixguru
Those aren't flag pins, they're price tags.
04:50 PM on 09/07/2011
What is a real republican? This is not a snark, I would like to hear your opinion of that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ocrmom59
02:27 PM on 09/07/2011
They will be so very sick people when raising all that money and still losses. This just goes to show that none of the candidates really want to run for president but are doing so because it makes them look like they are at least half way trying.

Who in their right mind want this president job and all the headache that goes along with it? All these candidates know it isn't worth the money get his job and really make things worst then they are now. At least know we have a chance of getting things half way straight if the congress would work with the president and stop acting like babies who havelost their bottle.

When someone want something bad enough they work hard for it by campaigning and to the real people, not big corporations and right wing nuts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rainkitty
Lively up yourself.
03:11 PM on 09/07/2011
Nice post.
photo
TJ Logan
Fifth Generation Real Republican
03:11 PM on 09/07/2011
If I remember correctly Republican Meg Whitman spent $140 + million dollars on her failed run for Governor of California against our old "Governor Moon Beam."

Whitman spent almost $200 dollars for every vote she got, and she was crushed in the election by Jerry Brown - simply stunning. Whitman go crushed even in Silicon Valley where she styled herself as a business wizzard.

If Rick raises $55 million or $200 million, he may well learn its not so easy to buy an election as it once was.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carmen Slade
5150 Or Fight!
04:49 PM on 09/07/2011
Whitman lost because nobody could figure out why a billionaire would want to be governor of California. Well, we couldn't figure out any good reason that would benefit anyone but Whitman, that is.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jlg1952
02:22 PM on 09/07/2011
55 big ones......to campaign? Tell me that special interests groups and corporations arn't expecting any returns on that investment!!!!! Darn he has already being bought and he hasn't even been elected. As the saying should read, " thars gold to made on that there fella"
01:15 PM on 09/07/2011
Why is someone BUYING our elected officials? What happened to transparency? This is scary!
You don't have to be a leader or have a clue, just raise a lot of money and POOF! job's yours! WOW
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jlg1952
02:26 PM on 09/07/2011
unfortunately even the news media will tell you the candidate who sold out for the most money will likely win.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rainkitty
Lively up yourself.
03:13 PM on 09/07/2011
Bachmann bought her straw poll votes. And that made her think she was a "winner". It's called delusion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vobox3343
Each day is a new day - make the most of it
01:12 PM on 09/07/2011
Why don't they take these millions and create jobs, instead of spending that much for a job which pays less than a million? How many of us average humanoids spends more on getting a job than what that job pays? Something's amiss. No wonder they don't want to tax the rich further - they're in their pockets
01:17 PM on 09/07/2011
The White House recently ADMITTED the stimulus cost the American taxpayer $275,000 for each job it DID create!!

Many knew it all along but Obama recently came clean when he said:

"The stimulus was not quite as shovel ready as we had hoped."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
margoharris
I used to be Snow White but I drifted.
01:23 PM on 09/07/2011
You are a liar.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rainkitty
Lively up yourself.
03:17 PM on 09/07/2011
The candidates get their actual money outside of the office of president. That is part of the problem. These days they can make more money running (or pretending to run) than actually ever having to do any work. Your question comes from the heart. Why? why? because politicians don't have to have a heart, although some still do (like Sanders), just the right aides and advice on how to WIN. If they have a heart going in it's going to be either broken or scared out of it's drawers by the likes of people like Cantor, ya know.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
01:08 PM on 09/07/2011
The difference is:

Perry: 55 corporate citizen donors of $1 Million
Obama: Ten Million people citizen donors of $5
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sylvia wadlington
Kindle Writer
12:40 PM on 09/07/2011
I don’t like the supreme court’s decision to destroy campaign finance laws, but it may have unintended consequences. There will always be some form of the Koch brothers out there with huge amounts of money, trying to buy control of our government, but people are rapidly becoming immune to the propaganda used to build up or destroy political choices. You hear things now like, “The real story is never told on Fox”. The Russians were bombarded with so much propaganda that now no one bothers to try and influence them because they don’t believe any public information. Millions were spent during the last elections to buy powerful political positions in Calif. and nothing was gained. People have become aware that their vote has a real impact on their lives and the internet gives everyone the ability to check out the facts. When voters discover people like the Koch brothers they vote not only against their candidates, but against their industries. Once you lose the people’s trust you never get it back whether you’re the Koch brothers, the Supreme Court or Fox News.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
01:06 PM on 09/07/2011
You make a VERY valid point . . . the MORE people use their minds to actually think and explore the facts, the less of an impact "propaganda" becomes . . it is no secret that the Becks, Rushes and Faux of the world have created a solid backlash and :fact suspicion" that never existed before . . . "news was believed without question" . . . . we ARE reaching a point where the "powers" realize that "education" is the real danger to control . . . so wonder it is the first target.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rainkitty
Lively up yourself.
03:21 PM on 09/07/2011
The Plutocrats behind the curtain know it's to their benefit to have some truly dumb ones elected. The gullible will then follow willingly to their own serfdom.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy
photo
moby49
I will act as if what I do makes a difference.
12:25 PM on 09/07/2011
Man, that's a lot of attack ads I will have to avoid or mute. My remote is going to get a real workout.

Couldn't they just pay for some good entertainment with a short statement at the beginning, middle and end that says "Vote for Perry, everybody else stinks" and let us watch TV in peace??
photo
harveyr2
Be skeptical of politicians or be their pawn
12:25 PM on 09/07/2011
Say its not so. A Republican who can garner campaign contributions.

Let's see some real scrutiny on Obama's projected haul of $1,000,000,000. Does anyone really doubt that all of that money is clean and comes with no strings attached?????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
margoharris
I used to be Snow White but I drifted.
01:14 PM on 09/07/2011
He has to catapult over the propaganda machine.
photo
harveyr2
Be skeptical of politicians or be their pawn
01:45 PM on 09/07/2011
He = Obama or Perry?
photo
Simply put
Vell, he's just zis guy, you know?
12:19 PM on 09/07/2011
"Make Us Great Again will likely be able to raise and spend more money than the actual Perry campaign and will easily dwarf the campaigns of all the other candidates and their Super PACs . . ."

Thank you Supreme Court! The campaigns themselves have now become totally irrelevant to the marketing of the monied interests and the only rule is that there be not direct coordination between the candidate and the PAC. No need to have direct coordination when the PAC is run by the guy who was chief of staff and helped devise that candidate's original strategy. The thin veil that masked our already corrupt system has now been completely lifted. Robert's Supreme Court will go down in history as did Taney's Dred Scott decision - a crime against the people of this nation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Left on Red
Micro Bio 201 T-Th 1 - 2:30 Lab W 1-5 Dr. Price
12:13 PM on 09/07/2011
I kind of long for the days when the Gopher Gal, M. Bachmann, was the least qualified candidate for the Greed Over Principle folks.

Read my lips: No new Texans!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:08 PM on 09/07/2011
Flush With Prison Industry Dollars, Rick Perry Pushed Privatized Prisoner Care
Texas Gov. Rick Perry Rick Perry/FlickrCorrections industry lobbyists and execs donated generously to the Texas governor's reelection campaign. He advanced policies that would benefit the prison industry. Coincidence?

motherjones.com/politics/2011/09/rick-perry-prison-privatization