iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Michele Bachmann Avoids Gender Politics In Presidential Campaign

Michele Bachmann 2012

First Posted: 09/08/11 03:26 PM ET Updated: 11/08/11 05:12 AM ET

During Wednesday night's Republican debate, Rep. Michele Bachmann (Minn.) stood at a podium flanked by seven men. She articulated her plan to repeal "Obamacare" and to slash gasoline prices when the moderator addressed her, but she generally faded into the background as Rick Perry and Mitt Romney pulled ahead of the pack. Notably, she failed to mention the one thing that really could have separated her from the rest: She is the lone female in the race.

Quite unlike prior presidential and vice presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin, Bachmann has consistently downplayed the fact that she is a woman in her campaign. She never mentions any of the barriers that would be broken if she were to become the first female Republican presidential nominee or the first female president. She doesn't identify as a feminist or embrace any particularly feminist or pro-woman policies. She talks about how wives should be "submissive" to their husbands, and on Women's Equality Day, she shared a stage in South Carolina with the state's first woman governor and entirely ignored the fact that it was the 91st anniversary of women's suffrage.

Jennifer Lawless, director of the Women and Politics Institute at American University, said Bachmann's decision to downplay her gender in her campaign could be a smart electoral strategy to win over the evangelical, conservative base.

"She does not embrace feminist policies or feminist principles," said Lawless. "For them to portray her as breaking a glass ceiling becomes tricky. I think the campaign has rightly tried not to do that. The counter to that is Sarah Palin, who didn't embrace feminist principles or feminist policies, but was a self-identified feminist and said she was out there to finish the work that Hillary Clinton started. That disconnect between what her beliefs were and what her rhetoric said ultimately raised a lot of questions."

Women's groups such as the National Organization for Women and NARAL Pro-Choice America have expressed concern that Bachmann as the first female president would actually be a setback for women rather than a victory.

"She is so opposed to women's equality and women's rights that I suppose it's appropriate that she's not touting herself as a woman candidate," said Terry O'Neill, president of NOW. "Palin at least claims to support Title IX. I'm searching for an issue on which Bachmann and NOW would agree."

While shying away from some women's issues, Bachmann has been extremely vocal about her opposition to reproductive choice and family planning. On a campaign stop in Iowa, she labeled Planned Parenthood "the LensCrafters of big abortion" -- despite the fact that abortion only accounts for 3 percent of Planned Parenthood's services annually -- and promised to defund the health care provider if she were elected president.

According to Planned Parenthood, one in five women in America have visited one of its clinics at some point for health services, and a recent Guttmacher Institute report found that six in 10 clients consider a family planning center like Planned Parenthood their primary health provider. If Planned Parenthood is defunded on a federal level, millions of low-income women, many in rural or medically underserved communities, would lose access to basic preventative health services, such as pap smears, breast exams, screenings for sexually transmitted diseases and affordable birth control.

Bachmann also voted in favor of the Stupak amendment, which would have banned abortion coverage for women under the new health care system. She twice co-sponsored legislation that forces women to hear a state-written lecture 24 hours before having an abortion, and she voted to block medical schools from using federal funds to train doctors in safe abortion care.

"[Bachmann's] record and rhetoric show a consistent hostility to women’s freedom and privacy -- and, in fact, she’s elevating these themes in debates and on the campaign trail," said Elizabeth Shipp, political director of NARAL Pro-Choice America. "Bachmann’s campaign may break a barrier for one woman –- herself -- but what about the barriers for other women that will come as a result of her policies if she moves into the White House?”

But conservative women's organizations are miffed by the criticism. Ciara Matthews, communications director at the Susan B. Anthony List, which works to elect women who oppose abortion rights, said she can't understand why any women's group wouldn't be pleased to see the first woman president elected.

"If we're trying to send the message that women are as strong as men are, why do we need to highlight the fact that we are women doing something that women are expected to be able to do as well as men?" said Matthews. "And Bachmann has a very pro-woman agenda. She's pro-life, and I think that the most pro-woman position you can take -- wanting to defend women against the horrors of abortion."

Bachmann's campaign spokeswoman said the candidate doesn't need to identify as a feminist or play up the fact that she is the only woman running because she leads by example.

"Michele speaks with great pride about being a mother to her five wonderful children, foster mother to 23 children and wife of almost 33 years," Alice Stewart said. "She has talked about the many fond memories of raising her children and being a homemaker. She has shared the most personal story a woman can tell -- that of losing a child due to a miscarriage. At campaign events across the country, mothers bring their daughters to meet Michele and say she is a tremendous role model to girls and women everywhere."

Being a proud mother and a homemaker, however, hasn't been enough to propel Bachmann's campaign into the lead. She had a strong start in the Iowa Straw Poll, but her lackluster debate performances and her slip in popularity over the past month has left some wondering whether it's time for her to shake things up and embrace her power as a woman.

"At this point, she has no choice but to employ a different strategy," said professor Lawless. "There's something to be said for being the only woman in the race, and I think Bachmann could do a little more to point out that she doesn't have to be a pro-choice liberal to say the Republican Party should be a little more diverse and be open to people of different races and genders."

Amanda Terkel contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
During Wednesday night's Republican debate, Rep. Michele Bachmann (Minn.) stood at a podium flanked by seven men. She articulated her plan to repeal "Obamacare" and to slash gasoline prices when the m...
During Wednesday night's Republican debate, Rep. Michele Bachmann (Minn.) stood at a podium flanked by seven men. She articulated her plan to repeal "Obamacare" and to slash gasoline prices when the m...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,202
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (41 total)
08:59 PM on 09/14/2011
Why should she have to mention she's a woman? Why should she have to "expand" on the fact that she's a woman running for president of the United States. I think we can all see that!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elgeezr
03:20 PM on 09/12/2011
What does Bachmann's gender have to do with her quest to be president? I asked that same question about Obama except of course it was race, not gender. Those who believe a person's, race, gender, or for that matter, religion have anything to do with their qualifications to be president, are walking down the wrong road. When I look at a candidate I always ask the same question; What has this person been doing with their life that tells me they are presidential material?
08:20 PM on 09/10/2011
She's not a cheap-shot artist, like Democrats; she stands on the content of her character as a human being, not a political commodity.
09:01 PM on 09/14/2011
Well said.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:41 AM on 09/10/2011
She is reaping the rewards of those who fought for women's equal rights before her, while at the same time wanting to take away those rights with the backward ignorance of her own campaign, for the next generation of women. This ignorance, this denial of the facts, even that she is a liberated woman, which she needs to appeal to her voters, whether it be how we got to this place and who is responsible for the economy, the war, evolution, global warming to name a few; is just why she is so dangerous and thus desirable, for some.
How can we move forward as a nation and deal with today's problems with people who keep taking us backward, hiding their heads in the sand?
There are some who happily reap the rewards from her ignorant supporters, but it certainly is not the majority of the naive individuals who fall for her platitudes themselves.
photo
ydnas639
I want my country forward
01:22 AM on 09/10/2011
Lynette
32 Fans
Become a fan
Unfan
4 hours ago (8:54 PM)
Or she should change party. They asked Perry to be in the race to make sure that she didn't win, and it worked. She would have otherwise captured the nomination­.
_
??????????????????????
Marcus, is that you?
photo
ydnas639
I want my country forward
01:18 AM on 09/10/2011
News flash! This just in. Sarah Palin has dust up with police in Sweden:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/09/07/drunk-moose-rescued-from-tree/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aquinnah
12:12 AM on 09/10/2011
Bachman is an insult to smart women everywhere. When Palin was picked to be McCain's sidekick I felt the same way. Sickening to think the GOP would choose this va gina for hire in hopes of picking up some Hillary supporters.
11:15 PM on 09/09/2011
Amazing how low the bar is set for female leaders within the Republican Party.
Bachman? Palin?
Really?
What an insult to women.
photo
ydnas639
I want my country forward
01:20 AM on 09/10/2011
Angle, Foxx, O'Donnell, Brewer, Lowden, Cantor, Perry . . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elgeezr
03:21 PM on 09/12/2011
And of course, there's Pelosi.......a limbo dancer if ever I saw one.
10:17 PM on 09/09/2011
She should now dress like Donna Reed and talk about how to bake a proper Apple Pie.
10:05 PM on 09/09/2011
"At this point, she has no choice but to employ a different strategy,"

It doesn't really matter anymore. Just like SP, her star is rather quickly falling from the sky. She can just go back to the House and do nothing except collect that very nice salary and those great benefits, just like she has done since she was elected in 2006. Eventually, the people of her district will wise up.
Lynette
Liberals have a lot more fun!
08:54 PM on 09/09/2011
Or she should change party. They asked Perry to be in the race to make sure that she didn't win, and it worked. She would have otherwise captured the nomination.
08:20 PM on 09/09/2011
Bachman can't run as a "woman" because she is against most "women's" issues.
Pretty much the same with Palin.

Also too, of the four women who might have gained the VP or P spots, only Clinton and Ferarro have the brains to even attempt the appearance of having enough gray matter to do the job. And with Bush in our rear view mirrors even Republicans, for the most part, know that dumbness is not a qualification for POTUS.

Republican women also have the problem that the mostly white patriarchy of the conservative party dosen't really want the party to be run by women, and the women they run tend to be nasty name callers with extremely unfeminine personalities.
Given a choice between a woman who calls people names and belittles men on a daily basis and a good ol boy. Guess who the R's will vote for every time.

Well not every time Kay Bailey Hutchinson got elected for or a while.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tonewheel
I'm the boss. Need the info...
04:17 PM on 09/09/2011
"Michele Bachmann Avoids Gender Politics In Presidential Campaign"

Because she's really a guy...which makes Marcus very happy.
04:09 PM on 09/09/2011
Bachmann is an embarrassment and in no way represents the women of America. It's bad enough that pro life men try and tell women what to do with their own bodies. She's just another pro life republican who wants to take away funding for groups like Planned Parenthood, where abortion is only 3% of all medical services provided to low income women. Boy, they want small government until it's all about their religious beliefs. Make low income women have unwanted kids but don't do anything to help them once they are born. Adoption? Of course, because there isn't a surplus of unwanted kids now. And, take away poor womens' access to things like pap smears, breast exams, STD screenings. Take away affordable birth control so they keep getting pregnant. Intelligent! Bachmann is part of THAT sector of America, the part wanting women to remain second class. Yeesh. She doesn't want to protect us from the "horrors" of abortion. It's all about her religious views. She does not represent women of the 21st century. She doesn't even represent women of the 20th century. Mind your own business and stay out of my private decisions.
02:17 AM on 09/10/2011
Oh come on now!!! I'm SURE she "represents" at least 1... Possibly 2 women in America!!! ;)

Cheers!!! :)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anniebody
Coexist
03:32 PM on 09/09/2011
Maybe because she is the "man" in her family.