iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Jobs Plan: $447 Billion, More Than Half In Tax Cuts, To Be Paid For By Super Committee

First Posted: 09/08/11 08:08 PM ET Updated: 11/08/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Hoping to stem the tide of poor economic news and boost his falling poll numbers, President Barack Obama proposed a $447 billion jobs plan to Congress on Thursday evening.

Titled the American Jobs Act, the proposal includes more than $250 billion in tax incentives for small businesses and employers, according to administration estimates. The rest of the money would be devoted to infrastructure spending, state aid, unemployment insurance, and neighborhood rehabilitation. The president will pay for the proposal by asking the congressional super committee tasked with finding $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction to offset the cost of the package in their proposal.

Senior administration officials said that the White House plans to introduce the president's proposal next week as a single piece of legislation. The same administration officials did not rule out the idea that the White House would petition the congressional super committee to simply include the jobs bill in the set of recommendations that they reveal later this fall. In his speech to a joint session of Congress, however, the President repeatedly made the case that quicker action is needed.

"I am sending this Congress a plan that you should pass right away," he said. "There should be nothing controversial about this piece of legislation. Everything in here is the kind of proposal that's been supported by both Democrats and Republicans -- including many who sit here tonight. And everything in this bill will be paid for. Everything."

A White House official said Obama phoned House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) earlier in the day to discuss the need for rapid passage of his jobs plan. During his speech, which was peppered with a defiant sometimes combative tone, he pledged to sell his plan outside of the D.C. Beltway as well.

"I intend to take that message to every corner of this country," Obama said. "I also ask every American who agrees to lift your voice and tell the people who are gathered here tonight that you want action now. Tell Washington that doing nothing is not an option." In all, the phrase "pass this jobs bill" was uttered eight times in the president's speech, with several variations of the phrase appearing elsewhere.

There was no mention as to how many jobs the president believed his proposal would create. At a briefing before the speech, senior administration officials declined to make such an estimate as well. But underlying the whole proposal was the promise that, down the road, it would be paid for. And in the latter portion of his speech, Obama called for Congress to close special interest tax loopholes as one way to cover that cost.

"This isn’t political grandstanding," he said. "This isn’t class warfare. This is simple math. These are real choices that we have to make."

At the heart of the president's plan is an extension of the payroll tax cut passed last year, through 2012. The proposal, which would affect an estimated 160 million workers by providing a $1,500 tax cut for the average family, comes in at a cost of $175 billion.

The tax components of the president's plan don't end there. The White House also wants a payroll tax holiday for businesses that add new workers or increase the wages of current employees; a fifty percent reduction of the tax rates businesses pay on the first $5 million in payroll; and a $4,000 tax credit for employers who hire long-term unemployed workers.

On the spending side, the president is calling for $50 billion in infrastructure repairs; $10 billion for an infrastructure bank to help leverage private capital; $30 billion for school modernization and repairs; and $35 billion in aid to states and municipalities for the purposes of rehiring and retaining teachers and first responders. The proposal would also re-authorize federal unemployment benefits for another year, with additional incentives for employers to retain their workers and train new ones without any cost. A national wireless internet initiative and changes to federal refinancing programs are also part of the American Jobs Act.

The most innovative addition may be the $15 billion that the president is proposing for "Project Rebuild" a program that would leverage private capital to finance the refurbishing of vacant or foreclosed homes. According to a senior administration official, the program would focus on "emerging residential and commercial foreclosure problems" in an effort to raise plummeting property values in those areas and avoid "community blight."

The president's suggested spending totals are a drop in the bucket in terms of the economy's actual needs. Obama's top advisers have, in the past, estimated that the country faces a $2 trillion infrastructure deficit. There is an estimated $270 billion to $500 billion in backlogged school maintenance costs. More than 200,000 government jobs have been slashed in the past year, many of them teachers and emergency first responders.

But the outlines were cheered by Democrats as an important start, as well as a much-needed shift in a political conversation that has been dominated by budget cuts.

Even in the face of obvious need, however, it's unclear if Congress as a whole possesses the political will to back the president's requests. Republican lawmakers have made cutting taxes a top priority over the past few years, but even before the president's address, GOP senators were balking at the idea of temporarily extending the payroll tax cut. Even progressives aren't entirely enamored with the idea, with serious concern among Social Security advocates that an extension would drain money from the entitlement program's trust fund -– even though the administration's proposal instructs the Treasury to replenish that fund's coffers.

More problematic could be the amount of spending Obama is proposing and the vague outlines for how it will be paid for. Despite petitioning for infrastructure money for their home districts, Republicans have castigated all proposals for federal stimulus. The idea that the super committee will pick up the tab seems unlikely to quiet GOP criticism that the plan will increase the national debt.

But that may be the trick up the administration's sleeve. The administration officials in the pre-speech briefing left open the door to having the super committee write the president's bill into their final set of recommendations, rather than just offset the cost of a separate proposal. Doing so would mean that the jobs plan wouldn't come up for a vote until late December. But it would also give it a much more likely chance of passage, as components of same triggers that apply to the committee's debt reduction suggestions -- mostly major cuts to defense spending and Medicare -- would suddenly apply to the president's jobs bill.

"Obviously it could be passed as a part of a larger grand bargain, but we don't want to limit our options to that," said a senior administration official. "It would be very positive for this economy for this to pass quickly and for it to pass in a way that people could see we're willing to work together to do something bold on creating demand in the short term, and a context in which we're also creating a confidence in our long term fiscal situation."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Hoping to stem the tide of poor economic news and boost his falling poll numbers, President Barack Obama proposed a $447 billion jobs plan to Congress on Thursday evening. Titled the...
WASHINGTON -- Hoping to stem the tide of poor economic news and boost his falling poll numbers, President Barack Obama proposed a $447 billion jobs plan to Congress on Thursday evening. Titled the...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21,295
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (284 total)
03:24 PM on 09/12/2011
Same old crap ... one mo' time: GOVT does NOT create jobs, the private sector does. When GOVT hires, it takes money out of the pocket of taxpayers and provides little to nothing in return (military being an example of the acception to that rule, and the proper role of Govt) ... when private industry hires, the taxpayers pay those salaries by purchasing goods.
photo
asiclilpup
Tax the rich Feed the Poor.
05:58 PM on 09/12/2011
Do government emplyees not pay taxes? Do they not contribute to the economy just like private industry employees do? Get yohead out of your hootii and quit following the kochjizz swallowers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JTyroler
Hoping Congress doesn't destroy the nation.
01:25 AM on 09/12/2011
The GOP is willing to turn the United States into a 3rd world nation. They want people to compete with workers in Bangladesh for wages. They want huge profits to go to those who already have plenty of money.

One problem with many 3rd world countries is that they become politically unstable and are prone to civil wars and revolutions.
08:40 PM on 09/11/2011
Okay my only question is how are we going to be able to afford this bill? I'm not saying it's not beneficial because for the time being it is and it would benefit a lot of people. But, the issue is that we are already 14 billion in debt and this bill costs close to half a trillion dollars. Lately people seem to want nothing but and immediate solution to our economic problems because of the steady downward spiral it has fallen into. What no one tends to think about though is long term affects it could have on the economy, say 5 years from now. I know it's awhile away but in all reality, it's not like it is impossible to calculate the affects from passing this act at this point in time. Just something to think about.
photo
asiclilpup
Tax the rich Feed the Poor.
05:59 PM on 09/12/2011
Obviously you're not thinking.
09:09 PM on 09/12/2011
Obviously, I'm new to this so cut me some slack. If you read this entire post just say that I'm not thinking then quite frankly you've wasted your own time. I was trying to gain a little knowledge, not get criticized. Thank you, and have a good day.
05:18 PM on 09/11/2011
How can there be a cost? People will be working for free and the corporations get tax breaks?
Oh a few of the elite will have to be hired at 6 figure salaries to organize the program?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:07 PM on 09/10/2011
Yeah, nice try Mr. President. You and your party minions have built your entire presidency on class warfare. You can't govern, so the strategy is and always will be to create chaos. Fortunately for you, those that elected you are still foolish enough to eat from one hand all while you rob them with the other.
photo
asiclilpup
Tax the rich Feed the Poor.
06:01 PM on 09/12/2011
Instead of the Pres and fellow Dems, you have decribed the 'pubelickkkers to a T.
10:59 PM on 09/14/2011
they do that finger pointing thingy a lot, they forget the ones pointing back at them.
common thing with them folks
photo
humanbeing-rick
Born in the USA 1947
12:03 PM on 09/10/2011
Obama said that this bill is not class warfare, amidst the class warfare being perpetrated by the Republican party, Grover Norquist, Koch Brothers, and the shadow elite.
End the war on the middle class! Stop the war!
Help rebuild America and put our own people back to work again.
Be a part of the solution, not part of the problem.
Support our President.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:02 PM on 09/10/2011
Big oil companies make huge profits with taxpayer support but cut jobs anyway.

Together, the Big Five oil companies:

Recorded $36 billion in profits in the second quarter of this year.

Repurchased nearly $10 billion worth of their own stock in the second quarter alone, thereby boosting the value of remaining shares.

Distributed more than $7 billion in dividend payments to their investors in the second quarter.

Paid their executives a total of nearly $220 million in 2010.

Despite these massive profits, oil companies are not creating jobs in the United States or globally.

Despite generating $546 billion in profits between 2005 and 2010, ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, and BP combined to reduce their U.S. workforce by 11,200 employees over that time.

Just in 2010 alone, the big 5 oil companies reduced their global workforce by a combined 4,400 employees, while making a combined $73 billion in profits.

The $43.6 billion in tax breaks the companies will receive over the next 10 years and the $53 billion in royalty-free drilling over the next 25 years make the situation particularly galling. The report explains, "Most oil and gas subsidies have been on the books in the United States for many decades. They represent an era when the oil and gas exploration was in its infancy, and when resources were plentiful but remained largely unexplored." As we know, that era is over for the oil and gas industries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Grace Hulbert
Get your Bichon!
11:55 AM on 09/10/2011
“Underminin­g Americans’ belief in their own institutio­ns of self-gover­nment remains a prime GOP electoral strategy. But if this technique falls short of producing Karl Rove’s dream of 30 years of unchalleng­eable one-party rule (as all such techniques always fall short of achieving the angry and embittered true believer’s New Jerusalem)­, there are other even less savory techniques upon which to fall back. Ever since Republican­s captured the majority in a number of state legislatur­es last November, they have systematic­ally attempted to make it more difficult to vote: by onerous voter ID requiremen­ts (in Wisconsin, Republican­s have legislated photo IDs while simultaneo­usly shutting Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) offices in Democratic constituen­cies while at the same time lengthenin­g the hours of operation of DMV offices in GOP constituen­cies); by narrowing registrati­on periods; and by residency requiremen­ts that may disenfranc­hise university students.

Read more: http://pla­netwaves.n­et/pagetwo­/daily-ast­rology/goo­dbye-to-al­l-that-ref­lections-o­f-a-gop-op­erative-wh­o-left-the­-cult/#ixz­z1XWnuJkxt

It's all laid out in the GOP playbook. Wake up America!” It is class warfare & war was declared by the GOP.
montanason
Justice for Annie Mae Aquash and Ray Robinson Jr.
11:54 AM on 09/10/2011
This is very much about class warfare, as well it should be. It is
a reality that should be understood and accepted for what it is
minus any attempts at rhetorical political correctness.
There has always been a caste system in this country, whether
it be based on ethnicity, financial status, education, or any number
of other considerations. It is the rule of thumb now.
Increasingly so the lines are drawn between the haves and the
have nots-the common working people and the wealthy who think
in their assumed sense of entitlement that all are drones whose
purpose is to maintain their personal fiefdoms.
Greed, avarice, and indifference are not virtues by any metric,
and any defense or legislation that supports these inequities are
nothing more than lies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tootsie56
help fellow travelers along the way, it comes back
06:14 PM on 09/10/2011
There is NO DOUBT this is class warfare from the GOP! No doubt at all
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blogging Patriot
Facts instead of Faux
11:08 AM on 09/10/2011
The top 1%, who get most of the dollars saved from the tax cuts, get most of their money from compound interest. In 2010, only 19% of the income reported by individuals making over $10 million came from wages, salaries or investments. In 2009 they accumulated wealth equal to the bottom 90% combined (a first).

The gap between rich and poor grew to the widest amount on record representing the greatest disparity among Western industrialized nations. That ratio of 14.5-to-1 was an increase from 13.6 in 2008 and nearly double a low of 7.69 in 1968. At the top, the wealthiest 5% of Americans added to their annual incomes under Bush. Families at the $50,000 median level slipped lower. Everyone else saw their income stagnant.

This is money removed from the economy because earned income remains constant while compound interest is expotential with regard to total wealth dollars. If this money is not returned to the economy through either wages, social programs or taxes the economy stalls. Simple economics.

The top 1% own the greatest percentage of national wealth since 1928. According to the Federal Reserve U.S. non-financial corporations now have $1.9 trillion in cash assets, the highest level as a share of total corporate assets since 1959. Wages make up the lowest share of national income since 1947 and has since 2006.

I would call that class warfare.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:57 AM on 09/10/2011
All of this is true but Obama is not the one to get it done...too many broken promises, too many disappointments and an America that does not trust him. He will not be reelected and the further destruction of our country will continue with our Republican leaders...no matter whom they might be.
photo
asiclilpup
Tax the rich Feed the Poor.
06:04 PM on 09/12/2011
How's it goin Ron Paul?
09:33 AM on 09/10/2011
Its true the poor and middle class in my opinion fought and paid their way in contribution to unpaid for Iraq war. Now its time for rich to pay theirs and pay for deficit caused by the war. The war is a major component why we're in this pickle. Without the war we won't be here talking about class warfare.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jjsardo
Proud liberal in a red state.
09:27 AM on 09/10/2011
Aside from the speech offering a few campaign talking points, it revealed yet again Obama's continuing attack on the social safety net.

The president and fellow Republicans are determined to weaken Medicare to the point where no providers will accept the program. Not only will seniors not be able to choose a doctor. There may well come a time in the not too distant future when there will be few if any doctors to choose from.

When that point is reached Medicare will be effectively destroyed and seniors will be left to their own devices – or worse will become prey to profit insurance companies.

As for tasking the rigged Super Committee with the job of cutting to finance the plan, that task merely gives its members even more incentive to cut the safety net.

To make matters worse Obama included tax cuts in the plan. Utterly worthless tax cuts. Well, you say, there has to be something in it for the Republicans to bite on,. When did Republicans ever need to be coaxed to cut taxes? A good strategy would have been to let the Repubs offer the tax cuts. A good negotiating ploy would actually let the GOPers propose the cuts and take credit for the them even though they're practically worthless. Now Obama will have to concede even more tax cuts or risk demolishing his own plan.

Sorry, Mr. President. Nice try though.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jlg1952
12:00 PM on 09/10/2011
An issue which seems to fly over everyones head is the cost of the proposed universal health care. This system, when another serious need to reduce cost, can be overtly or covertly, provide to best health care and medicine to the productive citizens and minor health care to Seniors, retirees, disabled and cronic unemployed......But still how are we goin to come up with the money for the program. Is our government going to get a kick back from the Insurance companies? They are the big winners...Just ask Hillary she was the pioneer to get this thing going when Clinton was president. By the way ask her who she once worked for before becoming First Lady.

Now, addressing the cost of a workable employment scheme...it does sound good but it still leaves the government in the same financial trap. Where will the money come from to pay the 447 billion plus interest. Let us be realistic
avg american
It's about jobs, jobs, jobs...
08:56 AM on 09/10/2011
Great speech, good job Mr. President...

Great idea to keep talking to the people coast to coast.... They need to understand that this is what you want to do, and congress is too broken to pass the bill...

The American public needs to understand that it is OUR responsibility to vote out the corp obstructionists in congress to get our country back to health.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alafonse
It's definitely a crap-shoot.
08:16 AM on 09/10/2011
"This isn’t political grandstanding," he said. "This isn’t class warfare."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The problem is that the other party IS practicing class warfare against US citizens, and the Republicans are standing together like the Great Wall of China to block any legislation that you propose. Their goal is to win, and if winning means blocking any and all legislation, they'll do that and not even look back.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
2012 POTUS 45
44's defeat will be SWEET
11:26 AM on 09/10/2011
"This isn’t political grandstand­ing," he said. "This isn’t class warfare."

Oh yes it is and will be until his sweet defeat in 2012
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jazz41
11:49 AM on 09/10/2011
No it is not. Try reading, listening to different media, and understanding the facts a bit.