iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Small Business Says Obama's Jobs Plan Will Have 'Immediate Impact' On Hiring

Small Business

First Posted: 09/09/11 08:47 PM ET Updated: 11/09/11 05:12 AM ET

Economists have been quick to doubt the effectiveness of the payroll tax cuts laid out in Obama's $450 billion jobs plan. But Paul Ward of Media Mechanic in Oregon said that those exact incentives would allow him to immediately hire two computer programmers he has been hoping to employ for months.

Ward's business, a web design and development firm, had begun to slow down last spring as debates about the debt ceiling gripped Congress, consumer confidence sunk and projects dried up. Despite a couple of years of solid growth, in May he was nearly forced to lay off one of his employees before a series of significant discounts and deals started to get business moving again, albeit slowly.

Despite a bump in business in June, Ward said that taking on new employees still felt too risky. But the morning after Obama's speech, when he sat down and crunched the numbers, the future started looking a little bit brighter, he said.

Obama's proposal -- which also calls for infrastructure spending, state aid, unemployment insurance and neighborhood rehabilitation -- would cut in half the taxes that employers pay on their first $5 million in payroll and eliminate those taxes for businesses who hired new workers or gave raises to current employees.

"The economy has been rough, but these tax cuts would have a direct and immediate impact on me," Ward said. He figures the cuts will save him a minimum of around $15,000 over the course of the year, half the entry-level salary for a graphic designer on his staff. "If it becomes less expensive to make hires, there are people we want to bring on, and now we will -- as opposed to just putting it off and saying, 'Well, maybe in six months.'"

Estimates for how many jobs the plan will create range from 1 to nearly 2 million. However, some economists argue that the incentive provided by the payroll tax cuts won't be enough to sway employers. Still, many small business owners say that with unemployment above 9 percent, consumer confidence continuing to dip and gross domestic product stagnant at 1 percent growth, the cuts are a strong first step.

"Its not a magic bullet to solve all problems," said John Arensmeyer, the CEO of Small Business Majority, a research and advocacy group. "At the end of the day you're not going to hire someone if you don't need them. But if there's more money in the economy and there's more demand, you're going to hire more people."

Arensmeyer cited a recent poll conducted by the Small Business Majority, in which small business owners laid out their two biggest obstacles to increased hiring: uncertainty about the future and the rising cost of doing business. Both problems, he said, are addressed in the president's current proposal.

"The economy has continued to struggle for the last two plus years," Arensmeyer said. "This is as good a chance at any as creating a turning point."

Some in the small business community worry that the plan doesn't go far enough in addressing some of the long-term problems plaguing American businesses, and that the tax cuts -- which only last a year -- and are too weak to pull the economy out of its current slump.

"I have almost complete skepticism about this plan's job creation potential," said Alan Tonelson, a researcher at the U.S. Business and Industry Council, an organization of small and medium-size businesses. "Will so short-term a provision really give many employers enough confidence to renew hiring given all the other headwinds they face?"

But many of those concerned with American labor seemed relieved to have something -- anything -- on the table that might improve the current dismal economic circumstances and assuage growing fears that the economy may swerve toward a second recession.

"The job is far from done," said Mary Kay Henry, president of the Service Employees International Union. "But the biggest challenge right now is rebuilding the confidence of working people, rebuilding the expectation that you can work hard for a living and raise your family. That's the thing that's been broken, in people's spirits, and I think this plan is a great first step."

Ward, the Media Mechanic president, said he felt relieved that the proposal would enable him to give raises to existing employees, who have had seen slim wage growth since business grew scarce.

"Everyone here has been very patient in the past year, understanding that we are keeping it lean and mean until things turn around," he said. ""I'm just looking for an excuse to do it."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Economists have been quick to doubt the effectiveness of the payroll tax cuts laid out in Obama's $450 billion jobs plan. But Paul Ward of Media Mechanic in Oregon said that those exact incentives wo...
Economists have been quick to doubt the effectiveness of the payroll tax cuts laid out in Obama's $450 billion jobs plan. But Paul Ward of Media Mechanic in Oregon said that those exact incentives wo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 632
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
11:44 PM on 09/14/2011
No president in the history of America has been more regulation heavy towards businesses then Obama. Some of these regulations have given unions extreme power. Why do you think corporations have fled America in droves? It is because of the thug mentality of these unions. I know because I've had a union person try to man handle me. As a business owner I will not be hiring any new employees until I know Obama will not be office after 2012. All of my growth projects are suspended till after the 2012 elections.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:38 AM on 09/14/2011
The election in November 2012 will have the most impact on jobs until then nothing will change or improve.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:40 PM on 09/14/2011
Yes. In November 2012, the republicans will have to stop being obstructionists and start trying to govern.

Unless they lose control of the House, in which case they can continue being obstructionists.
09:37 AM on 09/13/2011
Tax cuts for the middle and poor classes will have some effect as it produces more money to spend on consumer items resulting in hiring. with the wealthy It wont work that way much due to lower numbers of them. as far as jobs it wont create any shelves are full and nothing is moving. new unsatisfied consumer demand products from invention conception and innovation that creates permadent jobs and is the way the ecomony expands providing export jobs also if we strength our patent system to match. Terriffs and immediate novelty checks are the way to stop pirating chineese bandits from stealing patent usage thats destroying the incentive to create. Non reciprocating trade partners or all trade partners if severe enough must be shown the door in tough economic times like japan and china.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lipps
Snopes is going to be busy editing errors soon
11:03 PM on 09/12/2011
I am sure glad this website has a business section..The comments here show how ignorant the progressives are about how the economy really works.
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
03:35 PM on 09/12/2011
Allot of companies are going to hire a temporary worker just to let them go as soon as the federal program expires...........
photo
joeisright
Semper Fi
12:42 PM on 09/12/2011
He has waged an unholy war on domestic energy production even as he calls for 'green energy' (there is no such thing in sufficient quantities to run our society). His administration churns out job destroying regulations at a breakneck pace (more than 600 in July alone).
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Hpotterfan77
The right side is the left side!
01:14 PM on 09/12/2011
Load of b.s. Drilling, in our country or someone elses is not the answer. Green energy is the way to go if it's done in the correct way. Look how wonderfully our economy is doing thanks to de-regulation. Oh wait....
07:04 PM on 09/12/2011
and im sure you have seen what a low regulation environment produces ? mass pollution, worker injuries and deaths by the bucketful and no compensation available after being injured on the job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StevieRae
Neutralize "being primaried" by voting
09:17 AM on 09/12/2011
Re-igniting our economy requires two elements, tax incentives for employers to hire AND, more importantly, people need money in their pockets to spend so as to create "demand" that justifies the jobs added. One will not work without the other, period.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
08:41 AM on 09/12/2011
This proposal is just a back door admission that the raising the minimum wage causes job cuts.
The Federal government will subsidize a wage so that the employer will be able to pay the minimum wage to the new worker. Its just more of the same in which liberals want the Federal government entangled in every aspect of our lives.
Whats next? Subsidize Cherry Cokes because the Super market is charging too much for them.?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TimRivers
Former Conservative; Now Progressive
06:08 AM on 09/12/2011
"At the end of the day you're not going to hire someone if you don't need them. But if there's more money in the economy and there's more demand, you're going to hire more people."

And that, in a nutshell, explains the unemployment problem. The more people with little or no discretionary money to spend, the less jobs created. Businesses "hire" people but they do not "create jobs". Working people, with a discretionary income, cause businesses to need to hire people and are therefore, the REAL "job creators".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
08:32 AM on 09/12/2011
Its funny. I agree with your statement.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
behavingbadly
lovingly crafted artisanal comments
08:36 AM on 09/12/2011
It's reality. What's to disagree?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
behavingbadly
lovingly crafted artisanal comments
08:38 AM on 09/12/2011
F&F. Economic Reality 101.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Root Wetherell
speaks my mind liberal/ coffeeparty member
06:03 AM on 09/12/2011
If this jobs plan will encourage small businesses to hire more..then it shohld be implemented immediately along with cutting the tx breaks for any big corporation who is not hiring here in thise country..the ones who should be getting any kind of breaks are theone who are willing to help their own country by hiring our own people..if they take jobs out they do not deserve and breaks..why would one continue to reward a company for outsourcing jobs?? so the question is why would repub/tp continue to support tax breaks for companies that contiue to outsource.???
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrination
02:27 AM on 09/12/2011
This jobs plan, like the first stimulus before it, will help in the short term, but our fundamental problem is our trade deficit. We simply consume too much that that we don't make.

It is cheaper to make things overseas to sell to us. Don't blame unions. No American can compete against a Chinese sweatshop worker laboring for $5 a day. Those poor people can't afford the crap they make to be sold to us by American companies, who are the ones making billions. Free trade agreements benefit mostly businesses who can take advantage in disparities in standards of living, using labor in poorer countries to make things for richer ones.

What we need are trade agreements and import tariffs that reflect and equalize that imbalance. Some call that protectionism, which I am perfectly fine with. They protect DOMESTIC manufacturing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Root Wetherell
speaks my mind liberal/ coffeeparty member
06:05 AM on 09/12/2011
absolutely..the tarriffs have been way too low for years..it is time to equalize them..why should wwe pay more?? why should theynot pay what we pay??fairn trade has been a long term problem .. totally agree! F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
08:35 AM on 09/12/2011
If American workers can't compete against workers in other parts of the world, the US loses. Its a simple problem. The best and the brightest usually win the prize. Its always been that way.
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrination
10:12 AM on 09/12/2011
So you are saying that America is dommed to be India and there is absolutely nothing anyone can do about it because that's the way things have always been.

Conservatives believe that everything has always been this way, so why change. Don't worry. Liberals will drag you, once again, like we've done countless times through history, kicking and screaming, into the future.
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrination
10:30 AM on 09/12/2011
I apologize for the last remark. It was a little over the top.

In this case it's not a matter of the best and brightest, but the cheapest. If America wants to compete on that fron, the only way we can do so is to lower our standard of living and become that which we compete against.

Not a very bright future, if you ask me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Blass
said it wasn't a tax but it was
01:13 AM on 09/12/2011
That's quite a headline there, considering it refers primarily to one guy in Oregon who is thinking about hiring 2 people, having nearly fired someone just a few months ago. Clearly he is not much of strategic thinker but rather a tactical reactor and not anyone who should be referred to and/or quoted in half of the paragraphs in this rather slim defense of President Obama's rather slim jobs proposal. I'm not sure which type of die hard lefty is worse for our president: the extremists who demand he get tough and act like a Republican, or the soft-headed bleeding heart types who are just trying to give Obama a chance, to put the best face on whatever he says or does. He was president of the Harvard Law Review, he doesn't need your "help": your softball questions, your moony glances, your tingly legs, none of it. He should be held to a reasonable standard -- not the vicious loathing reserved by the left wing for the last president, but a reasonable standard of evaluation and measurement. Otherwise, it looks bad to other side and all those, you know, "independents." If Obama is indeed destined to be a one term president, it will be mostly the left that helps him get there. I think even the most hardcore right wingers are shocked to be this competitive with that gaggle of candidates they have.
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrination
02:14 AM on 09/12/2011
You apparently missed the the opinions of the other three people in the article from the Small Business Majority, US Business and Industry Council, and SEIU.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Root Wetherell
speaks my mind liberal/ coffeeparty member
06:07 AM on 09/12/2011
did you not read the whole thing???? does not sound like it ! I know folks who own small businesses who are very excited about this and are hoping the "do nothing" in congress will get over childish behaviour and vote this in..theywould start hiring right away..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ResearchtheFacts
Alert, awake & paying attention to the details.
12:49 AM on 09/12/2011
Yeah, now you can add someone on for free and get paid by the government to do so. It is welfare and if the employee is getting unemployment, extended unemployment or renewed unemployment after expiration it is another welfare to work program.

The bigger issue is worker devaluation. You work at a company and you see new hires coming in working for free, human nature is to devalue their value to the company. How serious should you take someone working for free with hope of getting a job with the company? If you are tasked with training them that will make matters worse. Now you are training someone you have no guarantee they will ever get the job. Not to mention, unpaid labor is what slavery was about. What if a person is in no way eligible or ever has been eligible for unemployment, do they work for free with the hopes of getting the job?  How long can employers string it along drop one to pick up another for free?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Root Wetherell
speaks my mind liberal/ coffeeparty member
06:10 AM on 09/12/2011
gee is that any different from big business welfare?? the one where they get big tax breaks for outsourcing?? oh that's right it was supposed to be for hiring here wasn't it..well that's not working..I think cut those tax breaks and give them to small business..after they would hire folks here, not in China.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fgrammit
11:56 PM on 09/12/2011
its just pozi scheme(lol) to get free workers for their crony money bases
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
10:26 PM on 09/11/2011
i dont think that it will have this big of an effect but i am cutting taxes sounds good for our bottom line.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libgrrl
Party On!
10:25 PM on 09/11/2011
This tax cut predominantly helps the poor/middle class more so than the very wealthy and they are not happy about it. Proves that just because someone owns a lot of wealth doesn't mean they are a "job creator".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Root Wetherell
speaks my mind liberal/ coffeeparty member
06:13 AM on 09/12/2011
actually they are less of a job creator..I beleive in small businesss and they deserve those cuts alot more than these big corporations whothink they should be rewarded for outsourcing..oops jobs here?? that's not working, so stop those tax breaks and give it to small business.