More

Iran Nuclear Bid: Head U.N. Nuclear Agency Increasingly Concerned About Country's Possible Warhead Experiments

Iran Nuclear Bid

GEORGE JAHN   09/12/11 11:33 AM ET   AP

VIENNA — The head of the U.N. nuclear agency on Monday announced plans to publish new information backing up his belief that Iran may be working on a nuclear warhead – developments that leave his organization "increasingly concerned."

The comments by International Atomic Energy Agency chief Yukiya Amano were significant because it was the first time he revealed plans to release some of the most recent knowledge available to the IAEA leading to such worries.

A diplomat familiar with IAEA affairs said Amano would seek permission from the agency members providing intelligence on the alleged warhead experiments before sharing them with the agency's 35 board member nations. Such new information would likely be detailed in the next report on Iran's nuclear activities in November or could be shared with board members at a special closed session. The diplomat asked for anonymity in exchange for divulging confidential information.

Israel, the United States and Washington's western allies have traditionally been the source of most of such intelligence. But Amano last month spoke of "many member states" providing evidence for his assessment and described the information as credible, "extensive and comprehensive."

The U.S. and its allies accuse Iran of using its civilian nuclear program as a cover to develop nuclear weapons. Iran denies the claim and says it only seeks reactors for energy and scientific research.

Speaking at the start of a five-day meeting of the IAEA's 35-nation board, Amano also reiterated that, despite Syrian denials, a target hit in 2007 by Israeli warplanes was a nearly completed nuclear reactor meant to produce plutonium, which can be used to arm nuclear warheads.

At the same time, he announced that his staff would meet with Syrian officials next month to work out an "action plan" allowing Damascus to make good on promises to present new information on the site in its attempts to prove that the structure was a non-nuclear military facility.

He also had some positive words for Iran, saying it had demonstrated "greater transparency" than usual, in allowing a senior IAEA official to tour previously restricted nuclear sites last month.

At the same time, Amano urged the Islamic Republic to show more openness on other nuclear issues of concern. The agency, he said, "continues to receive new information" about Iranian attempts to develop a nuclear warhead, adding that he hoped "to set out in greater details the basis for the agency's concerns" in the near future.

Amano had already said he was "increasingly concerned" about possible warhead experiments by Iran in a report made available to The Associated Press earlier this month, when it was also shared with board members and the U.N. Security Council.

The phrase "increasingly concerned" – was also used by Amano in his remarks to the board Monday. It has not appeared in previous reports discussing Iran's alleged nuclear weapons work and reflects the frustration felt by him over the lack of progress in his investigations.

In its report, the International Atomic Energy Agency said "many member states" are providing evidence for that assessment, describing the information it is receiving as credible, "extensive and comprehensive."

The report also said Tehran had started installing equipment to enrich uranium at a new location – an underground bunker that is better protected from air attack than its present enrichment facilities.

Enrichment can produce both nuclear fuel and fissile warhead material, and Tehran – which says it wants only to produce fuel with the technology – is under four sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions for refusing to freeze enrichment.

It also denies secretly experimenting with a nuclear weapons program and has blocked a four-year attempt by the IAEA to follow up on intelligence that it secretly designed blueprints linked to a nuclear payload on a missile, experimented with exploding a nuclear charge, and conducted work on other components of a weapons program.

In a 2007 estimate, the U.S. intelligence community said that while Iran had worked on a weapons program such activities appeared to have ceased in 2003. But diplomats say a later intelligence summary avoided such specifics, and recent IAEA reports on the topic have expressed growing unease that such activities may be continuing.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

VIENNA — The head of the U.N. nuclear agency on Monday announced plans to publish new information backing up his belief that Iran may be working on a nuclear warhead – developments that le...
VIENNA — The head of the U.N. nuclear agency on Monday announced plans to publish new information backing up his belief that Iran may be working on a nuclear warhead – developments that le...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 316
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
SamSeven
You're either with Humanity or you're not.
10:47 AM on 09/13/2011
Great! The World Government is now speaking for everyone it seems. NO Thank you! We, Canadians will decide if Iran is a threat. It is not so take your fear some place else.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tonyg10
09:29 AM on 09/13/2011
The UN is going to take care of this situation like they take care of every other situation they get invovled in. Don't worry about a thing. Just ask the people in Sudan or any African country, or even the after disaster in Haiti. Look how well they did there. No problem!
demsrsilly
Proud to be non union
05:59 PM on 09/13/2011
Very good point. Rwanda is another excellent example. The chief of peacekeeping at the time, kofi annan, was properly rewarded with how well he dealt with the Rwandan genocide, he got promoted.

I guess doing nothing while 800,000 people were butchered was a good thing, right?

Oh, wonder where annan got his support to become sec. general? Oh yeah, the clinton administration.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Herz
09:07 AM on 09/13/2011
I certainly hope they do have a nuclear weapon. They are surrounded on all sides by the most aggressive power in the world; something needs to control its depredations.
I have heard from people in the US Department of Energy that Iran was able to buy some bombs from Adzerbaijan in the confusion following the Soviet collapse, but they cannot use them for lack of the necessary arming codes. Anyone know anything about that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
01:36 PM on 09/16/2011
I'v not seen anything pertaining to this as of yet.As far as letting them have nukes though I certainly wouldn't allow it to stand.Not right now.Iran has a very very long way before it can ever be trusted again by the rest of the world.Hell,their still interfereing with Iraq and will not stop doing that.Take 2 of our people who supposedly stepped on their soil so they were deemed spy's and locked away for quite a long time.Now suddenly their wanting to let them go for a price of 1 million dollars(supposedly bail money)All in an attempt to get into the U.N.I thnik Iran has a very long way to go before they can be trustede by the rest of the world who for the most part do not trust them
07:34 AM on 09/13/2011
Can we please just Nuke Iran--please! I am so tired of these crazies lying 100 percent of the time. We just need to tell them that we will nuke them if they continue to develop nuclear weapon capacity...and mean it

We have to adjust our perspective. No more boots on the ground, it is too expensive. We need to let these middle eastern countries know that we will nuke them back to stone ages if they continue to pose a threat...and mean it.

It really is okay to kill people first who want to kill you. It is idiotic to stand by while they plot, plan and scheme to destroy this country. Besides, they have oil the world needs
08:35 AM on 09/13/2011
You just stay put in the trailer park. You'll be safe there.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lado Santiago II
War is peace, 2+2=5, Freedom is slavery
08:41 AM on 09/13/2011
So you want to nuke them because they want to defend themselves from the American "GRIP". I think you belong in Washington along with the war heads, better still file for a job @ Halliburton.
demsrsilly
Proud to be non union
07:17 AM on 09/13/2011
Wow, to see all the libs here defending Iran is eye opening.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:51 AM on 09/13/2011
Well, well, well... only 2 comments pending? Yet three of mine have not appeared at all -- and they are simply quotes from / links to articles in perfectly reputable mainstream European newspapers.
Has Mr Amano personally been appointed to moderate this thread?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:32 AM on 09/13/2011
Apologies -- I was being impatient. All there now. Thanks. :-)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nkurland
I'm going to leave this planet alive
05:18 AM on 09/13/2011
Where was this concern when Kissinger was working with the Shah to develop a nuclear weapons program back in the 1970's?
08:38 AM on 09/13/2011
Iran didn't have a nuclear weapon program in the 1970s either. Shah bought 10% of Eurodif for nuclear fuel and 2 Nuclear reactors from germany.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marknez21
04:57 AM on 09/13/2011
Who used Atomic bomb in Japan? USA
Who gave WMD to Saddam? USA, Germany , and England
Who used WMD against Kurds and Iranian? Saddam

Please address safety of Nuclear plants in Japan, France, Russia and USA.
03:28 AM on 09/13/2011
All of this fits perfectli in the plans of thee USA and a tiny country in the Middle East to prepare for war against a country that never attacked another country. All this country has done wrong was to wanna posses its own oil. The USA and the UK are still frustrated about that. Iran nationalized its own oil. The big powers are trying a regime change since that day because, oil is USA property where ever found its USA p[roperty. When Iran, a civilization thousands of years older than the USA, wants to use its academic capacities to develop modern tegnologies the USA and a tiny country are protesting. Even if Iran was willing to develop a nuclear weapon, it cant be wrong, knowing there is a tiny neighbour that has enough bombs to ruin the USA. No, I am not anti tiny countries
photo
Jack Daniels Esq
Hold the ice
05:10 AM on 09/13/2011
Israel will obliterate them very soon - all being well with Bibi
12:06 PM on 09/13/2011
take a look at the map, the water Israel steels from the Palestine comes from ......Turkey. Israel is surrounded by ........ no. Israel has no friends in the neighbourhood and, let`s see whate happens. Israel may be richer in weaponry but, take a historybook, America lost all it`s wars the last 65 years.
12:48 AM on 09/13/2011
so he's concerned. now what is he going to do about it?
demsrsilly
Proud to be non union
07:14 AM on 09/13/2011
The UN? Of course nothing will be done.
11:57 PM on 09/12/2011
When you couple this with Iran's regular pronouncements about their preference that Israel cease to exist you can't blame Israel for being a little nervous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
04:59 AM on 09/13/2011
LIE
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:22 AM on 09/13/2011
Sorry, Mike -- but that alleged statement has long since been debunked. No such thing was ever said:

http://www.mohammadmossadegh.com/news/rumor-of-the-century/

(and, yes, I have asked Iranian colleagues of various political persuasions to confirm the content)
07:55 AM on 09/13/2011
http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/ahmadinejad-iran-is-determined-to-eradicate-israel-1.380629#commentsForm-380629

"Ahmadinejad: Iran is determined to eradicate Israel
Iranian president says those who are for humanity should also be for eradicating Israel, since the 'Zionist regime is a symbol of suppression and discrimination.'"

Thought I made this up? This is one of many such pronouncements by the illegitimate unelected bums who run Iran.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tonyg10
09:23 AM on 09/13/2011
I went to that, read the article. Concluded it is like quoting Clinton with his 'what the definetion of is,is'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keezze
10:27 PM on 09/12/2011
Its about time someone from that organization said something about this befor they blast off a few and poison millions of people with radiation. We allready realize iran cant be trusted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
11:04 PM on 09/12/2011
Who already has nukes? Who has invaded other countries on the WMD premise?
So, who exactly cannot be trusted. Iran, you say?
Bollocks.
demsrsilly
Proud to be non union
07:15 AM on 09/13/2011
You really trust what ahmenjihad says? Really?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Metcalfe
Caught at 1st. slip trying to cut
11:10 PM on 09/12/2011
How many countries has Iran invaded in the last 100 years - None. How many has the US invaded - oops too numerous to mention. Who has ever used nuclear weapons - Gee just the US. Who has 300 odd WMDs without sanction - oh - Israel, ally of the US. Who had a democratically elected givernment overthrown by the US - Iran. No wonder they want 'em. I'm thinking even my country should have some. :-) Just as a precaution mind.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackhawk78
12:48 AM on 09/13/2011
I think they had enough when Sadam kicked there @@@@
photo
wom122
Primum non nocere
10:07 PM on 09/12/2011
As the Iraq precedent amply demonstrated, the best strategy to avoid getting your country invaded on bogus pretexts of possessing WMD's would be to... actually possess WMD's.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Foodgrade
Learn to grow banannas
10:01 PM on 09/12/2011
I'm more concerned about an out of control homeland security/TSA, american cops with a license to kill, bankers with a license to steal and the criminal outsourcing than I am the diversion and smoke screens our government and their media throw up to cover the crimes.
09:53 AM on 09/13/2011
I totally agree. I'm growing weary of deception, yet apathy is not in my vocabulary.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:07 PM on 09/13/2011
Glad to hear that
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Haselden
An Enemy of Rupert Murdoch, since 1984.
09:54 PM on 09/12/2011
Do you think Isreal is going to let them build a nuclear arsenal? Anyone remember the Osirac reactor and it's destruction by "Unknown" aircraft in 1979?