More

Libya: New Leaders Split Over How To Divide Power

Libya New Rules Split

RYAN LUCAS   09/12/11 12:46 PM ET   AP

TRIPOLI, Libya — Sharp splits are already emerging in the ranks of Libya's new rulers between Islamic conservatives and more secular figures competing for power even as the leadership begins to settle in Tripoli and start creating a post-Moammar Gadhafi government.

The rising tensions, which have become increasingly public, could jeopardize efforts to rebuild the country and form a cohesive state after six months of civil war.

Each side accuses the other of trying to monopolize a new government. On one side stand more secular technocrats, some of whom have long lived abroad or once had ties with Gadhafi's regime. On the other are conservatives, including the Muslim Brotherhood, who opposed Gadhafi for years on the ground in Libya and suffered during his rule.

"There are fears that these tensions could hamper reconstruction or just cause it all to unravel," said a Western official in Tripoli who deals with members of the leadership of all stripes. He spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the issue.

The two sides are wrestling over a fundamental question facing Libya's new leaders since the uprising began in mid-February – how to divvy up the powers of the nation after the downfall of Gadhafi's 42-year rule.

Caught in the middle is Mustafa Abdul-Jalil, the head of the National Transitional Council, the closest thing the former rebels have to a functioning government. Abdul-Jalil is the sole figure in the leadership who enjoys almost universal support, earning the deep respect of many Libyans for criticizing Gadhafi's regime even while serving as its justice minister.

"Abdul-Jalil is trying to keep the peace, and it's a struggle between both sides, between the two powerful camps," said one official close to the NTC on condition of anonymity in order to speak freely. "He's trying to maintain a balance between the two camps, and keep the international community happy. It's very difficult."

The disputes for now appear to be primarily over personnel, and not deeply rooted in ideology, although the dividing line is increasingly stark.

The more secular camp is headed by Mahmoud Jibril, the U.S.-educated acting prime minister who has found favor among the revolution's Western backers. But Jibril, like a handful of others falling on this side of the fault line, also served briefly in the Gadhafi regime, and spent much his time during the civil war abroad, trying to drum up international support.

One of the most prominent Islamist figures at the moment is Abdel-Hakim Belhaj, a former fighter in the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group – a militant organization that long opposed Gadhafi – and now the commander of the Tripoli military council.

The Islamists, who control the main military force in the capital, the Tripoli Brigade, have tried to ramp up the pressure on Jibril, calling for his resignation.

"We think that Mahmoud Jibril has lost the confidence of people on the ground in Tripoli, in eastern Libya, in Misrata, and in the majority of the western mountains," said Anes Sharif, a spokesman for the Tripoli military council.

"He has been living for the last six months outside the country," Sharif said. "He is appointing people depending on their loyalty to him, not depending on their worth and their activities in the revolution. We think he's a project for a new dictator."

On Friday, Jibril arrived in Tripoli – nearly three weeks after the capital's fall – and in his first public comments took a swipe at groups who he said have already started "the political game" before the rules have been set.

He did not elaborate or name names, but Naji Barakat, the health minister in the Cabinet and a former exile, said the comments were directed chiefly at the Muslim Brotherhood.

"They've started doing dirty politics because they want to take the lead," Barakat told The Associated Press. "I think they've been trying for a long time to be seen and heard. I think they're getting support from countries as well. They think this is fertile ground."

The Brotherhood and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group were both heavily oppressed by Gadhafi's regime. They played a key role in the revolution's security apparatus, including as front-line fighting forces. The LIFG once had links to al-Qaida but has renounced its jihadist past, and both it and the Brotherhood have pledged allegiance to democratic principles. The Brotherhood was repeatedly targeted by Gadhafi's security services and was never able to establish a firm organizational structure inside the country.

George Joffe, a Libyan expert at Cambridge University, said the Brotherhood remains a potent force in this conservative Muslim country despite its past struggles.

"Don't underestimate its importance," Joffe said. "It has a long-standing tradition in Libya. ... There is a profound sentiment in favor of the Brotherhood, and it is quickly being re-established with a structure."

Barakat criticized the Islamists for playing politics while the fighting continues. Revolutionary forces are still battling Gadhafi loyalists in the former regime strongholds of Bani Walid, Sirte and Sabha, and Gadhafi himself remains in hiding.

"We're saying now is not the time for this. Now, they (the Brotherhood) are trying to weaken the NTC and to jump in," he said. "With Tripoli liberated, they think now is the time."

Libya's new leaders have only just arrived in Tripoli, and are taking halting steps toward setting up a new government. Workers are busy readying the offices of the Gadhafi-era government for officials arriving in the capital to work in the various ministries.

Jibril said Sunday that efforts are being made to pay government salaries on time, and bonuses added to August salaries. He also said that oil production had resumed at one unspecified oil field in Libya's east.

But the NTC is struggling to bring all the various armed brigades spanning the country under its authority.

Other fault lines have also emerged since revolutionary forces swept into Tripoli on Aug. 21, driving Gadhafi from the capital and effectively bringing an end to the dictator's rule.

The Libyan uprising began in the city of Benghazi in mid-February, and the rebels managed to wrest free much of the eastern half of the country from Gadhafi's forces. The revolutionaries set up the NTC in Benghazi, and the body has been dominated by figures from the east – and Benghazi in particular.

Tripoli, which was under the thumb of the regime even after the eastern half of the country was liberated of his rule, is now trying to reclaim its pre-eminent political position, pushing back against a revolutionary leadership dominated by figures from Benghazi.

"The rift between Tripoli and Benghazi is pretty big," the Western official said. "It's worrying."

Tripoli has long been the base of power in Libya, a country of only 6 million people, 2 million of whom live in the capital. The capital's powerful political players are flexing their muscles, telling the NTC that they cannot dictate Libya's future.

"The Tripoli people also know that they actually created their own revolution on Aug. 20, and they want full recognition for that," said Joffe of Cambridge University. "And they're not sure they want to see the council in its present form, coming in and telling them what to do."

___

Associated Press writer Ben Hubbard contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TRIPOLI, Libya — Sharp splits are already emerging in the ranks of Libya's new rulers between Islamic conservatives and more secular figures competing for power even as the leadership begins to ...
TRIPOLI, Libya — Sharp splits are already emerging in the ranks of Libya's new rulers between Islamic conservatives and more secular figures competing for power even as the leadership begins to ...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 141
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
07:13 PM on 09/12/2011
This wasn't suppose to happen. I wonder which side NATO is going to take.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
07:26 PM on 09/12/2011
Whoever has the oil
06:57 PM on 09/12/2011
30K to 50K de.ad now the Al Qaeda is going to take over, little by little.
photo
realitycitizen
Proud American, Proud Gentile
06:06 PM on 09/12/2011
Saif al Islam will be the next leader of Libya. He is by far the most popular figure in the country at this point. He is strong politically and militarily and will thrive during the troubles.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryW_4jFpAoI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM9pijt0v1g
photo
realitycitizen
Proud American, Proud Gentile
05:56 PM on 09/12/2011
Libya is almost entirely Muslim.

It's not about "Muslims". It's about which Muslims.
05:33 PM on 09/12/2011
Who didn't see this coming? Country first is just a slogan for the masses as the powerful use any means to secure their seat at the table. Same thing anywhere you look..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:41 PM on 09/12/2011
Right you are.

There cannot be a single Libyan with any good intent.

Just cannot be.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
05:59 PM on 09/12/2011
Like to stay and listen to the wise and powerful Oz, but the Mrs just hit the bus station after 3 days in Bucharest.
07:07 PM on 09/12/2011
The strange thing is the ones with good intentions all worked under Gaddafi's regime. They allied themselves with the guns from the LIFG instead of dealing with Saif al Islam Gaddafi to transform Libya. Gaddafi himself was pretty much out of the politics anyways and wanted to just go around the world and be seen with different leaders of the world. The major reason for people's dissatisfaction was due to economic privatization in Libya demanded by the west which was being implemented by Seif Al Islam through many of the advisers who are the "good people" in the TNC. But my guess is they wont be around in six months.
05:26 PM on 09/12/2011
Now we are beginning to find out who is going to take over.
photo
realitycitizen
Proud American, Proud Gentile
05:31 PM on 09/12/2011
Who will take over the rebel movement anyway. None of these "leaders" will ever lead Libya.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:50 PM on 09/12/2011
Well, of course.

As all you Qaddafinistas have been telling us for half a year, Arabs are so primitive, so backward, so igno rant, that they can only exist under the thumb of a relentless tyrant or in deranged anarchy.

Arabs don't have what it takes to build a stable democratic society. Something is wrong with their genes. They are morally inferior to people of European descent.

Or so all the people arguing against this revolution would have us believe.
photo
realitycitizen
Proud American, Proud Gentile
04:54 PM on 09/12/2011
Turkey is an Arab country that is not primitive, backwards, or ignorant.

While Erdogan ultimately stopped protesting the Libya intervention and went along with the larger powers, he was very reluctant to get NATO involved for a long time and very publicly.

Interventionists seem to be of the mindset that all Muslims everywhere are as sensible as Turks.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
05:23 PM on 09/12/2011
His point - which he so much loves to trot out is - anyone who questions the rebels intent, NATO involvement, or worries about the future of Libya is Automatically a Complete and Total ijut and a Stauch Supporter of Gaddafi.

Straw argument he uses when there is a negative news release
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:39 PM on 09/12/2011
Good lord, how ign orant can you be?

The Turks are most certainly NOT an Arab country.
07:10 PM on 09/12/2011
I wonder what your background is, and if anyone is against intervention and wars is "Qaddafinis­tas"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Brooks
I'm not a professional and I will try this at home
04:35 PM on 09/12/2011
Two words.....WHO KNEW!!??!
photo
realitycitizen
Proud American, Proud Gentile
04:36 PM on 09/12/2011
Yours truly.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
05:23 PM on 09/12/2011
Anyone who could read
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Brooks
I'm not a professional and I will try this at home
06:11 PM on 09/12/2011
You do know that it's a sarcastic term right? As in everyone knew that this would happen. Of course you did. You have smart bages. :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam L Brinklow
03:47 PM on 09/12/2011
I really don't see what the problem is here. What revolutionary movement has ever spawned the following headline:

"Everyone in total agreement about what to do after war. No political conflict of any kind occurs."

Democracy isn't about everyone sitting around and agreeing with each other, it's about different factions promoting different points of view, and out of the middle ground between them some status quo eventually emerges. You know, federalists, anti-federalists, that whole thing?

The important thing is not that they agree on what kind of government they should have (again, what kind of fool thought they would, or should?), but that they agree on the mechanics and principles that will shape that debate: democracy, free speech, checks on individual power, basic human rights.

But of course, even the shape of those is never the same in every new nation, and there will be conflict about how to form them. Welcome to government, this is how it works, do try to pay attention folks.

But no, all of the smirking apes are right, this is plainly a failure. They should all just be able to get along and agree on everything, like we do in our country.

Wait...
04:06 PM on 09/12/2011
"Everyone in total agreement about what to do after war. No political conflict of any kind occurs."

Aren't you tired from building strawman arguments such as this one? I don't see anyone arguing there wouldn't be any political conflicts other than war supporters. Most realists predicted that once Gaddafi is gone a power vacuum would occur. The disagreement between realists and people such as yourself is over whether this power vacuum would transform into longer term, bloody conflict. As the case with Iraq and Afghanistan, it was the war supporters who tell everyone else not to worry about what will happen, that magically things will turn out okay once the dictator is overthrown. It turned out that the neocons have been wrong about Iraq and the realists have been proven right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam L Brinklow
04:13 PM on 09/12/2011
Well nothing here looks like a bloody conflict, it looks like the forming of political ideologies that are naturally rubbing each other the wrong way now that their common cause has given way to their individual ambitions.

No one ever said that there was not risk involved in this. Risk is part of great change. The argument was that the risk of the country becoming a bad place is always preferable to the certainty of it remaining a bad place. If you want certainty in government, you can look to your dictators, but the certainties they offer you are always bad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:46 PM on 09/12/2011
Speaking of strawman arguments:

Conflict must devolve into bloodshed?
04:29 PM on 09/12/2011
I like your comments Democracy is not for sitting on chair to see a movie or a live match ,but this is for do many thing for people who have a lot of expectation .Democracy needs more attention from each side even behind the wall too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bombadillo22
Not all who wander are lost...
03:35 PM on 09/12/2011
"Sharp splits are already emerging in the ranks of Libya's new rulers between Islamic conservatives and more secular figures competing for power "

Equality between sexes and Separation of Church and state! If they learn anything from western/U.S. democracy, those two tenants should form the bedrock of their new government and the condition we set for our assistance in the future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam L Brinklow
03:26 PM on 09/12/2011
Wait, there are secularists in Libya's new government! That's Umpossible, I've read repeatedly that they're all "jihadists"! The blogosphere just wouldn't mislead me like that.
photo
realitycitizen
Proud American, Proud Gentile
05:07 PM on 09/12/2011
All the fighters and military leaders indeed are. The jetset crowd that jetted around to Washington DC to meet Obama have no control over the military structure of the rebel movement. And that has been the central argument in opposition to this intervention.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
03:13 PM on 09/12/2011
Golly, who would have guessed the unified rebels - recognized by half the world, owners of oil fields and banks - would splinter apart?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam L Brinklow
03:26 PM on 09/12/2011
Yes, because burgeoning democracies are all about being in unified lockstep with everyone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdl51
03:39 PM on 09/12/2011
Like the political factions in this country always see eye to eye, right? Get a clue.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
03:54 PM on 09/12/2011
those loved rebels are in it for the power and money, not the people. you get a clue
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wayne the pain
03:07 PM on 09/12/2011
I am shocked that an Arab country would have political divisions! Our VICTORY over terrorism in Iraq went so smoothly, hardly a ripple. No tribal divisions in Iraq! I can see how Obama would have been caught off guard in Lybian with a possible civil war among various moslim tribe! Afghanistan is a similar story, no tribal divisions or history of violence among various tribes. Who would have thought this could have happened in Lybia? Great job Mr. President!
03:02 PM on 09/12/2011
Really? Who would've thought this would happen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gutenmorgen
a.k.a. poopdeck
02:57 PM on 09/12/2011
It is the rebel government and not the Kadaffi remnant which has reported that at least 30,000 people were killed during this war. That is ten times the number of 9/11 victims. The Libyans should eventually make the date on which the first NATO bomb was dropped on Libyan soil their 9/11 memorial day.