iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mel Gibson Jewish Film: Should He Really Make A Movie About The Maccabees?

Mel Gibson Maccabee Movie

First Posted: 09/12/11 07:19 PM ET Updated: 09/12/11 07:19 PM ET

By Piet Levy
Religion News Service

(RNS) After combating claims of anti-Semitism for years, actor and filmmaker Mel Gibson is slated to bring the story of Judah Maccabee, the Jewish military hero whose decisive victory was the inspiration for Hanukkah, to the big screen.

News that Gibson is producing the film has drawn the predictable ire of Jewish leaders who criticized Gibson's 2004 box office phenomenon "The Passion of the Christ" and his drunken 2006 rant when he allegedly claimed that "Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world."

Rabbi Marvin Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles called the proposal "simply an insult to Jews," akin to having a white supremacist playing the role of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

But one Jewish leader, whom Gibson has consulted about the Maccabee project, said the troubled actor/director could find personal and professional redemption in the Maccabee story.

"Mel Gibson has the incredible opportunity to tell the Hanukkah story to half a billon people," said Rabbi Irwin Kula, president of
CLAL-The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership in New York. "When this movie comes out, and it reflects all his great storytelling and shows Judah Maccabee in a heroic way, many Jews who are criticizing him now will look at the movie and feel pride."

Kula said he has spoken with Gibson for a number of hours over the last six to eight months and so far he likes what he's hearing.

"He wants to do this with real truthfulness to historical fact," Kula said. "He's talking to Jewish academics and reading Jewish
literature on this, so he's telling it from inside the Jewish narrative."

But other Jewish leaders say Gibson should not try to lay claim to one of Judaism's proudest moments.

"It would be a travesty to have the story of the Maccabees told by one who has no respect and sensitivity for other people's religious views," said Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, who led the charge against Gibson's portrayal of Jews in "The Passion."

The Rev. Peter A. Pettit, director for the Institute for Jewish-Christian Understanding at Muhlenberg College in Allentown, Pa.,
said Gibson "bankrupted his moral account on my ledger with 'The Passion,' and I now relegate him to the piles of trash film producers whom I simply and effortlessly ignore."

Kula, however, said he doesn't believe Gibson is an anti-Semite, at least based on their conversations.

"I think he had a moment where his rage got the best of him," Kula said of Gibson's alleged anti-Jewish screed made during a drunk-driving arrest in 2006. "I think there is an element here, even if it's subconscious, of wanting to show people (he is) not an anti-Semite. ... If we can give (Gibson) the benefit of the doubt here it would probably be to our credit and be a healing moment across the board."

Gibson's Maccabee movie is currently in the very early stages of development at Warner Bros., according to spokesman Paul McGuire.

The fact that the studio has agreed to develop the movie may seem surprising, especially given the film's subject matter, controversial producer and the fact that screenwriter Joe Ezsterhas has yet to write a draft.

But Paul Dergarabedian, president of the box office division of Hollywood.com, said some Gibson movies -- such as the "Lethal Weapon" franchise -- have been box office gold for the studio; Warner Bros. has grossed more than $909 million in the U.S. alone, according to Hollywood.com.

And while the Maccabee story may be a Jewish one, Kula said the tale of courage and sacrifice is in line with Gibson's "Passion,"
"Braveheart" and "Apocalypto" films.

"I think, fundamentally, he is doing this project because he is a person who loves heroic stories and has a deep respect for religion, which is very rare in Hollywood," Kula said. "It fits his model perfectly."

WATCH:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By Piet Levy Religion News Service (RNS) After combating claims of anti-Semitism for years, actor and filmmaker Mel Gibson is slated to bring the story of Judah Maccabee, the Jewish military hero ...
By Piet Levy Religion News Service (RNS) After combating claims of anti-Semitism for years, actor and filmmaker Mel Gibson is slated to bring the story of Judah Maccabee, the Jewish military hero ...
Filed by Josh Fleet  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 318
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Christian puppets scare me
08:50 AM on 09/27/2011
Gad he looks horible. i can not believe i am older then he is. His Jesus movie, though it made me cry, was nothing but a long tortrue movie. very sadistic and unbelievable.
05:46 AM on 09/22/2011
Hollywood is about entertainment, not about religion. Gibson is not going to accurately portray the Book of Maccabees and no one should care if he does or not. He is an expert at creating epic films like Braveheart (pointed out by Alex Joffe at http://www.jidaily.com/melandthemaccabee) and he will do that here too. If you don't want to see the movie, don't go, but why are people wasting their energy being outraged?
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
01:03 AM on 09/25/2011
Jewish ideas,

I am speaking as a Christian, so I would like to offer my views here.

You are correct in stating that Hollywood is about entertainment, and not about religion (or history or science for that matter).

And Gibson has seriously distorted the historical record in virtually all the "historical" movies he has made. There are many errors (no doubt for dramatic effect) in Braveheart (the idea that Wallace had any kind of relationship with Edward II's wife is ludicrous, and the fact is that Wallace was executed several years before the death of Edward I.

Then he produced, directed, and starred in a film about the American Revolution (Patriots) which GREATLY distorted the history of the Revolutionary War in the South, and makes one of the British generals (with a fictionalized name, but there is no confusing who he is talking about) and has this British cavalry commander committing War Crimes (like placing an entire village of civilians into a church, and then burning the church down. Such an event NEVER HAPPENED. It is such a distortion of the history of that conflict, that it should be labeled (clearly) as complete fiction from beginning to end.

I hope I don't have to go into the problems with "The Passion" -- which was as troubling to many Christian leaders (particularly those who have worked hard to reconcile the two communities after centuries of Christian persecution of the Jews.

ctd.
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
01:06 AM on 09/25/2011
p2

In that film, Gibson, ignoring ALL advice from both Christian and Jewish scholars, repeated "the oldest lie" for a whole new generation of Christians, namely that the Jews were responsible for the death of Jesus, when in fact it was Pilate who played the pivotal role. That lie, I am sure I don't need to remind you (but many Christians are unaware of it) has resulted in countless number of Jewish deaths in Christian Europe, where Good Friday used to be a day of terror for Jews across Europe.


The problem with this is that people SEE the movie, and not having read much in the way of history, they believe it is REAL. Almost like they are seeing a documentary. Visual images are far more powerful than written words (especially in current times) and people come away from that movie thinking they have witnessed an accurate historical account.

Now while I may not mind a movie like "Armageddon" which had so many scientific errors that it left scientists feeling extremely frustrating, it is a different matter when dealing with the sensitive issues raised in the Passion, which in the past actually touched off pogroms.

Jews actually were killed because of this lie, I once met a Rabbi (who was an observer at Vatican II, and who has worked with Christian leaders to try to bring the two communities to reconciliation and healing.

And that hard work gets undermined when a movie which repeats the old lie is produced and seen by a wide audience.

I can tell you that (at least most Catholics) were NOT educated to believe this since Vatican II, which in many ways was the beginning of a new era.

But all that education gets undermined with a movie like the Passion, and those images are hard to correct (believe me I have tried).

One other point to keep in mind is that Mel Gibson was born and raised in a home where his father was strongly against the reforms of Vatican II, and was an avid Holocaust denier.

Gibson has been asked his views on this, and has always given a vague answer. He has never publicly distanced himself from his father's views in this area, or ever even given a definitive answer as to what his views are on this subject.

Now we have this. We don't even have a script yet, so I have a hard time understanding why this project is given any support right now.

From what he has been dealing with, it is my opinion that he needs to get his life in order, (the struggle over alcoholism, the family dysfunctions which have resulted) before making what may become another controversial film.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aresponse2dotcom
Let truth prevail over "stuff"
06:43 PM on 09/21/2011
If Gibson approaches this movie with the intensity and intent equal to the Passion of The Christ, the Jewish community will be pleased with the result. I know very few people that do not have a dark side and to discolor his entire life with that darkness is an injustice to his craft and his positive contributions. Go Mel
03:54 PM on 09/16/2011
He is a good film maker and really that is all i care about. I am not to judge anybody.
11:39 AM on 09/16/2011
These christians would do anything get the Jews converted and wipe them out of the map.

They have not given up yet. They want finish the unfinished business.
07:10 PM on 09/17/2011
LOL Paranoia becomes no one. You are no exception. The foundations of Christianity are built on Judaism. Please think before you hit "post"!
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
10:36 PM on 09/25/2011
Clairessa,

With all due respect, I would urge you to study the history of Christian and Jewish relations before you are so quick to dismiss what SoldAmerican is saying.

I happen to be a Christian, and I have studied this history extensively. It is one which does not reflect well on Christianity. For centuries, there were forced expulsions of Jews from England, France, and Spain.  There were MANY forced baptisms, and then these "converts" were watched carefully for any signs that they may still be practicing Judaism in secret. If it was found that they were, or even a hint of a suspicion, then they were handed over to the Inquisition, and usually brutally tortured, and often burned at the stake as apostates. This was particularly true in Spain.

Then you had the blood libel -- which was the false accusation that Jews would murder Christian children and use their blood in the making of Matzoh. (for anyone who knows anything about Judaism, this accusation is ridiculous: Jews are not even permitted to consume the blood of animals.)  Yet thousands of Jews died as a result.

Good Friday used to be a day of terror for Jews throughout Europe. The reason? Well, they were falsely accused of being a "deicide people" and blamed for the death of Jesus, even though it was clearly the ROMANS who convicted and executed him, NOT the Jewish community (save a few in high places who were open collaborators with Roman occupation and oppression).

This lie -- which has resulted in the deaths of untold numbers of Jews at the hand of Christians, is what Gibson, ignoring the advice of both Christian and Jewish scholars alike, repeated and gave new life to in his movie "The Passion" Many people in both the Christian and Jewish community had spent a great deal of their lives trying to bring healing and reconciliation between the two communities.

But a movie is powerful, in that people see it and believe they are witnessing history, when in fact they are seeing complete fiction, with a dash of accuracy thrown in.

Now while it may not be a problem in "Braveheart" to add the completely fictional romantic relationship between Wallace and the wife of Edward II, (in fact the two NEVER even met), this doesn't arouse the strong feelings of the lies about the Jewish role in Jesus' death. People have DIED because of that lie.

But the problem with Hollywood and history is that people see fiction, but believe they are watching a documentary. That is problematic in and of itself, but when that history includes a pernicious lie, the results can cause a great deal of damage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aresponse2dotcom
Let truth prevail over "stuff"
06:45 PM on 09/21/2011
Get a grip. Sounds to me like you have your own bone to pick
12:56 AM on 09/16/2011
Haven't there been enough screwed up perverse lies already told about Jews?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aresponse2dotcom
Let truth prevail over "stuff"
06:47 PM on 09/21/2011
Sounds a little pre-judgemental on your part. Let's hope God is more forgiving then you. Whoops. Judge not lest ye be judged
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
10:44 PM on 09/25/2011
Actually, aresponse, I happen to be a Christian, and I can state with a fair amount of certainty two things.

Had Jesus lived in Medieval Europe rather than 1st Century CE Palestine, there is a good chance that he would have been murdered in his own name by some of his followers. (Read a good history of the relationship between Christians and Jews for the better part of 2,000 years in Europe).

I can also say that Hitler and the Nazis would have had a MUCH more difficult time trying to implement the Holocaust if there had not been 2,000 years of teaching (from both Protestants and Catholics alike) of contempt for Judaism.

Hitler's anti-Semitism was not based on religion, but race (a key difference from the Church's stance) and was FAR more murderous than the Church's practices, but Hitler wouldn't have had so many willing to cooperate or look the other way, and it would have been MUCH more difficult for him to carry out his genocidal plan.

This is not to say that this was ever the INTENT of the Churches, and there were many individual people who did try to save Jews, but the fact remains that the 2,000 year teaching of contempt for Jews, of teaching that they were an accursed people DID indirectly play a role in allowing the Holocaust to take place.

Many Christians are now trying to "forget" this major part of their history, but it DID happen. And it NEEDS to be dealt with, because many Christians are unaware of it, or refuse to even confront the possibility that it could happen.
05:01 PM on 09/15/2011
Instead Mel should go to a mental hospital first.........
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
10:51 PM on 09/25/2011
Well, I don't follow the details of his life all that closely, but I was aware that he has had problems with alcohol addiction in the past, and that more recently he has had major problems struggling with this addiction in recent months.

I am not sure where he is at with this at the moment, but I do agree with you that he needs to get things together before he wades into another needless controversy.

There are people endorsing this idea when there isn't even the first draft of a script available. That does not strike me as very prudent.
03:56 AM on 09/15/2011
I don't know if anyone has pointed this out, but Mel Gibson is Catholic and 1 and 2 Maccabees are considered canonical by Roman Catholics. That makes the story of the Maccabees part of Gibson's religion too. This would not be the first time a Christian made a movie about an OT story which is an important part of Jewish history.

I tend to agree with whoever remarked that Gibson making a movie about Judah Maccabee is roughly equivalent to David Duke making a movie about Martin Luther King jr. Thing is, this is America, and if David Duke wants to make a movie about Martin Luther King jr., he gets to do that. No one has to like it; no one has to go see it. But please don't try to censor it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aresponse2dotcom
Let truth prevail over "stuff"
06:49 PM on 09/21/2011
Yahoooo a voice of reason in a sea of stuff........F&F
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
10:56 PM on 09/25/2011
allerleirauh.

Gibson is free to do what he wants, but that doesn't mean that a major movie studio has to fund and distribute the movie.

There have been many more deserving films that could have used the promotion that comes with being distributed and financed by a major studio -- films that deserved a wider audience.

So Gibson has the right to make whatever movie he wants. (though he should stick to fiction. Every time he has tried to make a movie based on historical events, he completely gets the history wrong, yet people come away believing they have seen an accurate representation of history).

However, he does NOT have the right to get the financial backing of a major movie studio. Very few filmmakers do get this kind of support.
photo
elsquibbs
Socially liberal, fiscally prudent atheist.
05:29 PM on 09/14/2011
He should do it for the lulz.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:09 PM on 09/14/2011
I can't wait for him to play "Mr. God" one fine day; or a remake of "Oh, God!' would be hilarious. Will Mr. God be a jew or an anglo/saxon? It will be a pleasure to watch jews and gentiles struggle for control of the vast PR machine and conttrol of our minds and religious destiny. LOL.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegodlessgeneration
better to embrace hard truth than reassuring fable
12:55 PM on 09/14/2011
So, forgiveness, "a central tenet" is not an option here?

"Although I preach a message of forgiveness and urge everyone to do the same, I will make an exception for Mel Gibson. He should never be forgiven."
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Json
Cynical dreamer, sarcastic idealist...
01:49 PM on 09/14/2011
Of course it is an option, and each person will make their own determination on whether to exercise that option.
12:58 AM on 09/16/2011
Well then, why don't you go kiss him so he can turn back into a toad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
palisades02
Keep Calm and carry on
01:15 AM on 09/16/2011
Forgive him? It is much easier to simply forget him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
erehwon man
don't drink the holy water!
11:53 AM on 09/14/2011
Having Mel Gibson do a film on Judaism might not be a bad idea if he could be
unbiased in his approach. Not likely given his beliefs. It would be like George Bush
writing(!) a book about using diplomacy to avoid unnecessary warfare or government
without cronies, or fair tax policies for all. His hand would probably wither at the keyboard.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aresponse2dotcom
Let truth prevail over "stuff"
06:51 PM on 09/21/2011
or like huffers to go a whole day without bloviating hatred, anger, distrust, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
peegan
Silence like a cancer grows...S/G.
11:20 AM on 09/14/2011
I am torn on this. On the one hand there can be no denying that Gibson is a terrific film maker and could and probably will do a terrific job at this. The history buff in me would want to see it.

But I still question whether he is the right man to make this movie and if important, his motives. I honestly believe that Gibson is his father's son and holds some deep prejudices toward the Jewish people, even if he doesn't want to. I wonder why, with all the stories he could tell, he would chose this one. Is he trying to change his image, to offer some sort of apology to the Jewish community, or, even subconsciencely, getting in their face? I doubt even Gibson knows.
01:00 AM on 09/16/2011
Is this a joke? It only hurts when you laugh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aresponse2dotcom
Let truth prevail over "stuff"
06:52 PM on 09/21/2011
a cathartic exercise for his own sake might be good for all
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dawn Castle
A liberal is your fellow American not your enemy.
06:32 AM on 09/14/2011
I think this is simply a pr move to change the public's view of him. simple as that.
BahtHarim
בת ההרים
09:54 AM on 09/14/2011
agreed. very cynical move.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
03:29 AM on 09/14/2011
He is an actor, and he can make any film he wants. It is more appropriate to ask if those of us who reject antisemitism should see it. I, for one, won't.
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
11:27 PM on 09/25/2011
I would also say it is a question of whether a major movie studio will give this film wide distribution and financing.

There are many excellent movies which NEVER get that kind of support or distribution. Anyone who wants to see it has to look hard to even find it.

While he can make any movie he wants, that does not mean a studio is obligated to finance it, publicize it, or distribute it.