iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Restaurant Music Licensing Fees Enforced More Consistently By BMI, ASCAP


First Posted: 09/12/11 12:38 PM ET Updated: 11/12/11 05:12 AM ET

There's a lot of overlap between restaurant lovers and music lovers, so it's not hard to imagine that, if you open a restaurant, you have a favorite band. But before you plug your iPod into the new speaker system in your Mexican-Ghanaian-Tamil fusion joint in Albuquerque, hoping to blast your favorite mashup of Taylor Swift and Ghostface Killah, there's something you need to do: buy the rights.

That's because, according to TJ Jacobberger at Inside Scoop SF, music rights managers BMI and ASCAP have grown increasingly vigilant about enforcing their licensing agreements with restaurants over the past several years. Apparently, the two companies, which each distribute the rights to millions of songs on behalf of artists, have sued more than two dozen restaurants for copyright infringement. These violations can be costly. One contentious case from a couple years ago involved Seattle restaurant Ibiza, which had not paid to use ASCAP's music. The rights managers asked the restaurant to pay a fee of $30,000 as remuneration.

Even if any little restaurant is unlikely to be caught by BMI and ASCAP's anonymous inspectors, the steepness of the fees makes paying for the rights to use music seem like a relatively easy decision. Rights aren't even that expensive. BMI's website quotes a fee of $2.45 per restaurant occupant per year of iPod or CD usage, meaning that even a huge, 200-seat restaurant would only end up paying about $500 per year. Fees do go up significantly, though, if restaurants want to play live music covers, allow dancing or set up a karaoke bar, even for occasional use. (ASCAP does not post rates on its website.)

And the National Restaurant Association has put together an easily comprehensible primer on the subject for would-be restaurant DJs. BMI calls itself a non-profit organization, and says that 87% of its fees are passed on to musical artists.

The other option is to hire a background music company like Muzak, which takes care of licensing itself. But that's expensive, and offers less individuation than your own iPod. You can also avoid fees if you install a paid jukebox from a licensed operator. But then you run the risk of have music-free periods if customers don't want to pay for music.

So, to that budding, Taylor Swift-loving restaurateur, we say, play on -- after you take care of a little paperwork.

CORRECTION:

An earlier version of this story imprecisely depicted the nature of BMI and ASCAP's business models. They are music rights managers, not owners, and their fees vary considerably depending on the nature of a venue's musical performance.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST FOOD

There's a lot of overlap between restaurant lovers and music lovers, so it's not hard to imagine that, if you open a restaurant, you have a favorite band. But before you plug your iPod into the new sp...
There's a lot of overlap between restaurant lovers and music lovers, so it's not hard to imagine that, if you open a restaurant, you have a favorite band. But before you plug your iPod into the new sp...
Filed by Joe Satran  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 651
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
11:47 AM on 09/15/2011
They should just play stuff that's in the public domain like classical music
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IPredictARiot
US Military = largest socialist entity on earth
11:01 PM on 09/13/2011
For those of you claiming this is a record label travesty/con/rip-off:

ASCAP protects MUSICIANS, not record labels. Period. I was an ASCAP member before I ever signed my first record deal, and they collect the money from that release just as well as they collect money for my label-backed releases. In fact, without ASCAP, I would never be able to collect a single penny for the use of my music for my non-label releases.

And let's get a little primer on what a record label actually does:

A record label is a bank.
A bank that makes extremely high risk loans to extremely high risk "businesses" that have no collateral and can (and frequently do) walk away from the deal with absolutely no recourse. You may know these businesses as "bands".

If your business model was to loan $50k-$500k to a couple hundred "businesses" per year, knowing full well that only 1% of them will actually pay off, you would be desperate to squeeze that 1% pretty hard.

Look at the $1 CD bin at your local CD store (if you still have one). See how many of those are label releases. Realize that every one of those albums needs to be paid for by that 1% of successful bands, otherwise, there are no record labels.

If you remember one thing, remember that record labels are actually banks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
h jablome
My micro-bio is empty? Your micro-bio is emptier!
03:24 PM on 09/13/2011
So, to that budding, Taylor Swift-loving restaurateur, I hope they shut you down for playing sh!++y music.
photo
silverfrost
Liberal & Democrat
02:52 PM on 09/13/2011
Whenever I'm in a restaurant I'm not just there for scoffing down my meal & bang I'm gone. I like to enjoy the experience .This is why if I hear certain music like Bieber I'll puke & leave! Some of the junk they call music nowadays is absurd.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edna Crabapple
Who watches the watchers?
03:56 PM on 09/13/2011
LOL
But I 'm sure the other patrons would appreciate it if you left first, then puked- rather than the other way around... :-)
photo
Mr Bobo
Punk Rock Libertarian. Different. Better.
01:03 PM on 09/13/2011
I've never understood the logic of charging businesses to pay for music. First off, it's an archaic system in the modern era and in cases where businesses simply play the local radio station, EMI and ASCAP are basically double billing since the radio station is already paying the licensing fees.

As a person who often licenses music for television shows, I can say that this is merely a desperate effort by an industry that is looking to make up for revenue losses due to the digital era. I can understand licensing for uses like recordings,commercials, films, television and radio broadcasts, but the old copyrights formulas and the way they generate residuals for songwriters just don't work anymore. Sending "secret listeners" to spy on mom and pop businesses is a perfect example of that.
photo
tinkertoy
Smarten up the Chumps
08:27 PM on 09/15/2011
This is nothing new, ASCAP has been around for almost 100 years. It protects the rights of the owners of music, without which, the writers of music would have no incentive to create. The fees are not exhorbinate and it's an easy way to avoid being sued for copyright infringement.
photo
Mr Bobo
Punk Rock Libertarian. Different. Better.
01:18 PM on 09/16/2011
I juts think ASCAP and BMI need to drop the enforcement of music played in businesses and charging musicians for public performance of songs. Just seems petty.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:44 PM on 09/13/2011
LET ME CLARIFY A LOT OF CONFUSION HERE....Having been in the industry of 40 years, here is the simple, affordable and legal way to have music in a commercial place (by the way must pay if it's live, radio, or recorded). Call a vending company to install a cd player, internet juke box or even an old 45 rpm record machine. THE VENDING COMPANY pays for a license to the COPYRIGHT OFFICE who issues a "tag" that is placed visably on the music machine showing a fee has been paid....This fee is usually "split' with the location and covers all "recorded" music being played in the location. If there is a live band...the band usually has paid the fee to play music and therefore, its "blanket coverage" if they play in a club...any music, being played in a commercial location to increase sales( for the location as entertainment) is considered a "performance" and the royalty must be paid...playing your cd player in your house or car is not a commercial uses of the copyrighted material, and therefore not a violation.
RJKERB08
But why are you mad?
12:42 PM on 09/13/2011
So, the free advertising for a band/artist isn't enough. I hear a new song I like at a bar, I buy it. I guess that isnt enough money for them. I can't wait until I can't play music in my house for company without a license to do so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frenchautopilot
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
12:34 PM on 09/13/2011
Here's an idea - Don't play music. Why be forced to talk or eat over some annoying, overly loud silence filler. I love music. I play guitar. But when I'm eating with friends, the food and conversation is the focus. Yes, the right music can add something but that's rare. It's usually just annoying. So BMI, here's an idea to make more $$$ - try charging a fee for silence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edna Crabapple
Who watches the watchers?
01:45 PM on 09/13/2011
Mais oui! :-)
I too prefer a quiet restaurant without any music at all.
Personally, I'd rather see the restaurant install an indoor fountain so I could eat to the sounds of the trickling water. It would probably be better for the digestion as well.
All too often when I eat out I am aurally assaulted by hip-hop or hard rock when I'd rather be listening to the mellow sax of Paul Desmond or Stan Getz.
Since they can't please everyone, music-wise, then do away with the music altogether.
This also has the added benefit of taking money away from ASSCAP and BMI, which pleases me no end... :-P
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
O K Ali
Wash your hands, seriously.
05:10 AM on 09/15/2011
Because a restaurant has to turn the table to make money. If your conversation is going so well that you've been there for more than two hours, how is a business going to survive?
photo
GaBu2
You must destroy to rebuild, surrender to win.
12:34 PM on 09/13/2011
Question to you composers, musicians, assuming you use sheet music to record your lyrics, or you use an instrument, whether it be a guitar, saxophone or harmonica, what ever, are you willing to pay the manufacturer of the product you've used an ongoing fee because you're using their product in a commercial venture?
Is it fair for U2 for example to use their instruments to make millions without paying a monthly / yearly fee to an organisation set up to monitor how musical instruments are used? Saying it's the law doesn't make it just, they're many unjust laws out there.
12:26 PM on 09/13/2011
most music in public places are not likeable to every one so quit playing and save money
12:00 PM on 09/13/2011
Lotta loop holes here. Radio can be played over the speakers for free. The language specifies cd or ipod but not live from harddisk or memory stick from a computer. You could setup a streaming radio station of your own with no profit then stream the radio feed live as it is not being sold or duplicated for any profit.
photo
rayonfog
Bananas
07:45 PM on 09/17/2011
So many "experts" here, but nobody really understands even the most basic tenets of music licensing.

There actually aren't a lot of loop holes. Read the DMCA. It specifically covers everything you mention.

However, there are a lotta loop holes in your solution. For one, you can't set up a streaming radio station license-free. Licensing fees still need to be paid, AND you also have to pay Soundexchange for a master use license. Nowhere does Soundexchange make a exception for non-profit - duplicating is duplicating.
11:57 AM on 09/13/2011
There is nothing more frightening than the indignant ignorant.
11:34 AM on 09/13/2011
Bring your I pods and play music at your table when you dine. Keep the volume low though so that others with the same idea can hear what they are playing!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edna Crabapple
Who watches the watchers?
02:06 PM on 09/13/2011
No, do not. Sound carries.
I don't want to try and enjoy a meal and have to listen to some idiot playing gangsta rap at the next table.
Please keep your music to yourselves.
Thank you.
11:26 AM on 09/13/2011
Gone forever are the days of Jerry Garcia and the Grateful Dead.
photo
geo999
"Well, who's gonna monitor the monitors?"
11:54 AM on 09/13/2011
Furthur is still a great band.
Saw them back in March.
Cameras welcome!
11:24 AM on 09/13/2011
Are the companies paying advertising fees to the restaurants? A customer may be exposed to artists and music he or she has not heard before and may want to know more so he or she can buy the music. I've certainly heard stuff playing that I've really liked in various places, found out what it was and then went and bought it.

It seems like a hassle to deal with, so how about no music in restaurants? We'll just have to talk more. :)