More

Romance Novels Lead To Empowerment (And Better Sex) For Mormon Women

Romance Novels Better Sex

First Posted: 09/13/11 07:55 PM ET Updated: 11/13/11 05:12 AM ET

By Peggy Fletcher Stack
Salt Lake Tribune

(RNS) Mormon leaders have condemned romance novels as "soft porn," and literary critics have long railed against these fictional yarns as "dope for dupes."

So why are so many self-described Mormon feminists drinking from such a theologically poisoned well?

That's easy, say three women who've studied the genre. It's because church leaders and critics are missing the messages of independence and empowerment embedded in a genre written largely by women, for women and about women.

These novels, though often erotically explicit, seem to support many Mormon teachings, especially the primacy of monogamous marriage, childbearing and family life.

Indeed, Caroline Kline discovered that nearly every Mormon congregation she has attended has had a group of romance readers.

Kline, who has a master's degree in classics from the University of California at Santa Barbara, conducted an informal survey of 40 Mormon women, who were self-described romance devotees.

More than half (54 percent) said their marital relationships (75 percent were married) were strengthened because they were more sexually interested in their husbands when reading the novels, and 40 percent said that such books made their sex lives more fulfilling.

Although 55 percent saw romance novels as pornography to some extent, Kline reported that 80 percent did not see these novels as harming their spirituality in any way.

"My women felt they deserved to have a great sex life with their spouse. They were willing to say that their sex lives matter," she said at a recent symposium sponsored by Sunstone, an independent Mormon journal. "If the books contributed to that and to the health of the marriage, then they didn't accept those negative pronouncements."

Simply put, the steamy novels heated up their bedrooms and warmed their marriages.

Feminists also have reason to value this genre, said Margaret Toscano, who teaches classic literature at the University of Utah and was another Sunstone panelist.

"Romance writers and readers today do not like weak heroines; they do not like submissive or manipulative little doormats who give over their identity to men and subordinate their wills in order to get a husband," Toscano said.

"Heroines can be plain, they can be beautiful; they can be innocent or the soiled dove; they can be anti-heroines or kick-a** alpha heroines; they can be feminine or tomboys. But they cannot be stupid or utterly dependent, or women readers will reject them."

Amelia Parkin, a single Mormon who has a master's degree in English from the University of Virginia, enjoys reading the romance novels of today, but recognizes how different they are from their literary predecessors.

The hero of Kathleen Woodiwiss' 1972 book, "The Flame and the Flower," rapes the 17-year-old heroine, mistaking her for a prostitute, then marries her when she becomes pregnant.

In the 1970s and '80s, Parkin said, such heroines regularly fell in love with their abusers despite being imprisoned, kidnapped, tied up and, of course, raped.

What's changed in a lot of modern romances is the men.

Some power discrepancies -- of class, money or sexual experience -- remain, she said, but "where older romances generally focus on the heroine's developmental arc, more recent romances portray the complementary development of both hero and heroine."

Sex between these two fictional lovers now is transformative for both. She may be a virgin and he more experienced, Parkin said, but once he makes love to the heroine, the hero finds himself unable to be attracted to or involved with any other woman.

"This," she said, "will be a first for him, too, a first in terms of emotional connection and vulnerability."

What these books have in common is a more equal emotional and erotic relationship, and, the Sunstone panelists argued, both Mormons and feminists should be delighted by that message.

"For her spiritual well-being, happiness and personal growth," Toscano said, "every Mormon woman should read at least one good romance -- filled with lots of good sex -- at least once a year."

A version of this story originally appeared on the The Salt Lake Tribune.

WATCH: Mormon Community in Salt Lake City, Utah

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By Peggy Fletcher Stack Salt Lake Tribune (RNS) Mormon leaders have condemned romance novels as "soft porn," and literary critics have long railed against these fictional yarns as "dope for dupes.
By Peggy Fletcher Stack Salt Lake Tribune (RNS) Mormon leaders have condemned romance novels as "soft porn," and literary critics have long railed against these fictional yarns as "dope for dupes.
Filed by Jahnabi Barooah  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:11 AM on 09/18/2011
I get that last part. My wife is the greatest. Hindu though, not Morman.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bbriani3842
400+ yrs of science & STILL no evidence for a god
07:43 AM on 09/17/2011
Heh heh heh

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vA1IMSRN2Xk
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bbriani3842
400+ yrs of science & STILL no evidence for a god
07:42 AM on 09/17/2011
Better looking underwear would be more beneficial, as well.

http://1857massacre.com/MMM/mormon_underwear.htm
photo
BurtonDesque
Fear a Blank Planet
11:33 PM on 09/16/2011
I don't get Mormon women. Why anyone would want to belong to any organization that considers them less than equal is utterly beyond me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bbriani3842
400+ yrs of science & STILL no evidence for a god
07:42 AM on 09/17/2011
religion =/= logic
02:35 PM on 09/15/2011
Oh and the pic for this article - Black Couples???? HAHAHAHAHHAHA not that they aren't black Mormons, but really, I had to laugh and laugh hard. If you are a black Mormon and I've offended you - well I'm offended that you would participate in a religion that decided in 1978 that having Black people in its congregation was finally okay ( I guess if you’re that desperate – you can join it is the politically correct thing to do since you all have rights now….) After all they have soul quotas they have to reach and really when your dead – do they really know what color you are???
02:16 PM on 09/15/2011
"It's because church leaders and critics are missing the messages of independence and empowerment embedded in a genre written largely by women, for women and about women."

They aren't missing the message - they are scared of the message - that maybe just maybe women can think for themselves, and BEHOLD - they are able to shake free of that lamb's cloak and decide for themselves what they should believe and what they shouldn't - especially when it's coming from the mouth of a puffed up - self important - so-called 'religious' man.
02:53 AM on 09/15/2011
Come on these books turn them on, they have better sex with their husbands. Where is the harm in that?!! I just wouldn't use the word "empowerment" ...a little too weird.
07:24 PM on 09/14/2011
The great philosopher ENIAC said it best: Garbage in, garbage out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nlightenup
Retired psychologist, responds to open minds.
04:15 PM on 09/14/2011
As to "...the messages of independence and empowerment embedded in a genre written largely by women, for women and about women," romance novels are all written according to a formula in which a strong, independent woman falls for a guy who's a domineering narcissist who treats her rather shabbily, then she turns all weak-kneed, and so long independence and strength--she just can't function without him!

During the great hey-day of romance novels, every time a woman came to see me about being depressed, one of my first questions to her was "What do you read?" Many times the answer was "romance novels," and worse yet, they were her bedtime reading. In no few cases, their depression lifted when they changed their reading material. There's plenty of good literature about strong women available, and romance novels don't qualify.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nightmelody
Free Now! (20 yrs a fundy.)
06:56 PM on 09/14/2011
Romance books sales are 50% of all book sales. It is far more diverse than in the 'heyday' of the much maligned bodice rippers of the 70s and 80s.

I challenge you to find 10 romance novels written in the past five years that are written to a formula of ' a strong, independen­t woman falls for a guy who's a domineerin­g narcissist who treats her rather shabbily, then she turns all weak-kneed­, and so long independen­ce and strength--­she just can't function without him!'

Sorry, that smacks of no actual working knowledge of romance novels, and of plain prejudice against romance novels, with a fabricated fact about a formula romance writers use. The actual formula, if you must use a word that denigrates a romance writer's art, is called the Happy Ever After or Happy For Now ending. The stories end that way to be classified as romance. Otherwise they are marketed as a 'love story' or 'women's fiction'.

I find it very hard to believe that women who read romance novels were so depressed simply by their choice of reading materials that they had to see a counselor, and that depression lifted so miraculously when they stopped reading romance. Way to simple and unbelievable. I smell baloney.

~ Nightmelody, romance writer
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nlightenup
Retired psychologist, responds to open minds.
07:54 PM on 09/14/2011
The formula I referred to came from a scholarly paper published in an academic journal on linguistics. I wonder if you would also "smell baloney" if it were a case of a teenager hooked on RPGs needing counseling, or some other similar case. I also have no need to peddle baloney--I'm retired from the practice of psychology. I have no financial stake in reporting what I saw among my clients. As a writer of romances, you apparently have a financial stake in putting your opinion forward. If you smell baloney, your proximity to it is probably why.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
COPESTIR3
06:38 PM on 09/29/2011
fanned and faved. Interestingly, I have been finding similar responses on many of the clients. Had one patient switch to Miss Marple. Miss Marple is great. She solves the tangled riddle of complex relationships and brings the murderer to justice. Just what depressed Mormon women might want to consider reading.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rhondarenee
03:22 PM on 09/14/2011
It's amusing to read comments about a religion by those who know nothing about it.
02:26 PM on 09/15/2011
If only that were true, it isn't like religion is hiding somewhere in the back woods and we have to go looking for it - some of us - most of us maybe - were indoctrinated when we were babes in swaddling cloth - and to me it felt just like that, wrapped around me suffocating, twisting and twining around my brain until almost all intelligence was questioned – the only answer being ‘Because that is the way it is and always has been to the end of time, Amen.” Only that wasn’t the way it was and there was no room for growth, learning and expanding of truth. I want to believe in something based on truths – facts – I would like to believe in reality, not some ancient fantasy perpetuated by old celibate men in robes. And certainly not some made-up fairy tail – which is what Mormonism is, not even a particularly original one at that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cranmer1549
Fear is your only god on the radio.
12:57 PM on 09/14/2011
Uh, the most surprising part of this article is that there was a time when rape was considered "romantic."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Simplecomplexity
Keep your theology off of my biology!
04:05 PM on 09/14/2011
Those books, ( and there were hundreds ) used to get passed around our predominantly female workplace...we called them "smut books" but generally they were referred to as "bodice rippers."

Yes, the formula was almost always the heroine being overpowered ( not necessarily rape ) by the dashing, brooding, rich, stunningly handsome hero, and of course, the heroine ends up loving the sex. I was always a feminist, and the women who loved reading these books and sharing them with their girl friends NEVER, for one moment, read these books for any other reason than fantasy. The books would be RATED by how steamy the sex scenes were written. It was our preferred porn. The stories were set in historical settings, not modern downtown Los Angeles for heaven's sake. Women WERE treated like property and I beg to differ with the author of this article, there were rarely any simpering, stupid female characters. They were always feisty, beautiful, innocent, sarcastic, strong and fiercely loyal.

I don't disapprove of the most current crop of romance novels....on the contrary, I just don't read that genre any longer, but that book mentioned, The Flame and The Flower by Kathleen Woodiwiss was devoured by the fan base of historical romance in those years. Personally, I loved the book. It was hot. But no book was ever hotter than Rosemary Roger's, Sweet Savage Love. Steve and Ginny. Hmmmm....now where did I store that book? :-)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pam Herman
01:33 AM on 09/15/2011
My library has "Sweet, Savage Love." It's practically falling apart!
07:21 PM on 09/14/2011
We call that "surprise sex" today.

Surprise!
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
07:51 AM on 09/14/2011
Hey, sister! There's a line.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haval2
what to say?
07:22 AM on 09/14/2011
Glenn Beck's wife is benefiting?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr Anonymous
Mumpsimus, I am not entertained!
11:51 PM on 09/13/2011
HAHAHA, yeah maybe they can be empowered enough to take more nights with their husbands over the other wives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dschiff
Always learning
10:45 PM on 09/13/2011
I am saddened by how repressed these people are.
Such unnecessary sexual guilt and emotional stunting.