iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Judicial Nominations Set Record For Women, Minorities

Obama Judicial Nominees Minorities

JESSE J. HOLLAND   09/13/11 12:46 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is moving at a historic pace to try to diversify the nation's federal judiciary: Nearly three of every four people he has gotten confirmed to the federal bench are women or minorities. He is the first president who hasn't selected a majority of white males for lifetime judgeships.

More than 70 percent of Obama's confirmed judicial nominees during his first two years were "non-traditional," or nominees who were not white males. That far exceeds the percentages in the two-term administrations of Bill Clinton (48.1 percent) and George W. Bush (32.9 percent), according to Sheldon Goldman, author of the authoritative book "Picking Federal Judges."

"It is an absolutely remarkable diversity achievement," said Goldman, a political science professor at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, who is only counting judges once, even if they fit more than one category.

The White House recently has been touting its efforts to diversify the federal bench during Obama's tenure, now approaching three years in office.

The president won Senate confirmation of the first Latina to the Supreme Court, Justice Sonia Sotomayor. And with the confirmation of Justice Elena Kagan, he increased the number of women on the high court to three for the first time. The Obama administration also nominated and won confirmation of the first openly gay man to a federal judgeship: former Clinton administration official J. Paul Oetken, to an opening in New York City.

"All of us can be proud of President Obama for taking this critical step to break down another barrier and increase diversity in the federal judiciary," Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said upon Oetken's confirmation.

The first openly homosexual federal judge was Deborah A. Batts in New York City, a lesbian nominated by Clinton in 1994.

Of the 98 Obama nominees confirmed to date, the administration says 21 percent are African-American, 11 percent are Hispanic, 7 percent are Asian-American and almost half – 47 percent – are women. By comparison, of the 322 judges confirmed during George W. Bush's presidency, 18 percent were minorities and 22 percent were female. Of the 372 judges confirmed during Clinton's terms, 25 percent were minorities and 29 percent were women. In these figures, some judges fit into more than one category.

Last week, the Senate confirmed the first African-American woman to sit on the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, Bernice Donald. Earlier, she was the first African-American woman elected as a judge in Tennessee, the first appointed as federal bankruptcy judge in the nation and first confirmed as a U.S. district judge in Tennessee.

Obama also has doubled the number of Asian-Americans sitting on the federal bench, including adding Denny Chin to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York as the only active Asian federal appeals court judge. There currently are 14 Asian-American federal judges on the 810-judge roster.

"It's really amazing," said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond who wrote about the increasing diversity on the federal bench during Obama's administration in an article in the Washington University Law Review. "Obama has nominated as many as were sitting on the bench when he was inaugurated."

For more than 140 years, there were no females or minorities among the nation's federal judges.

The first female federal appellate judge was Florence Allen, who gained her seat on the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 1934. The first female U.S. District Court judge was Burnita Shelton Matthews, who took the bench in Washington, D.C., in 1950. William Henry Hastie Jr. was the first African-American U.S. District Court judge, sitting in the Virgin Islands in 1937 before being elevated to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 1949.

Reynaldo G. Garza became the first Hispanic federal judge when he was appointed to the U.S. District Court in Texas in 1961, and Herbert Choy became the first Asian-American federal judge when he was appointed to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 1971.

Thurgood Marshall became the first African-American to serve on the Supreme Court in 1967, and Sandra Day O'Connor was the first woman to be elevated to the nation's highest court in 1981.

"I think it's always good to have diverse perspectives, whether it's gender, sexuality or ideology," Tobias said.

Those who track diversity on the federal bench are pleased with Obama's progress so far but want more voices from all of America's communities in the federal courts. Obama has nominated three other openly gay judicial nominees, as well as what would be the only active Native American on the federal bench, if Arvo Mikkanen is confirmed to a federal judgeship in Oklahoma.

"The more diverse the courts, the more confidence people have in our judicial system," said Nan Aron of the liberal Alliance for Justice. "Having a diverse judiciary also enriches the decision-making process."

The makeup of the federal bench could be a major issue during the Senate, House and presidential elections in 2012.

Obama basically has until the end of this year to get as many of his judicial nominees confirmed as possible, because it is unlikely that a highly partisan Senate will confirm many judges with a presidential election looming in November 2012.

According to the Federal Judicial Center, there are 94 vacancies in the federal courts, with 55 nominees awaiting Senate action.

"Once we get into an election year ... things always slow down, both because people's attention is in other places and also because the party out of power thinks, `If I can just keep this vacancy open for another year, maybe my president will fill it,'" said Curt Levey, head of the conservative Committee for Justice, in an interview on "PBS NewsHour."

With cases on Obama's health care plan, the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy and gay marriage expected to reach the Supreme Court in the future, judicial selection will be front and center for Obama and the eventual Republican nominee, Aron said.

"The court will be a central issue," Aron said. "It will be in people's minds when they go into the ballot box."

___

White House Information on diversity in Obama's federal judgeship nominees: http://www.whitehouse.gov/infographics/judicial-nominees

Current judicial vacancies: http://www.uscourts.gov/JudgesAndJudgeships/JudicialVacancies/CurrentJudicialVacancies.aspx

Supreme Court nominees by president: http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/nominations/Nominations.shtml

List of Asian-American federal judges and photos: http://aaba-bay.com/aaba/showpage.asp?codecurrent%20federal%20judges

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is moving at a historic pace to try to diversify the nation's federal judiciary: Nearly three of every four people he has gotten confirmed to the federal benc...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is moving at a historic pace to try to diversify the nation's federal judiciary: Nearly three of every four people he has gotten confirmed to the federal benc...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 296
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darcman
Don't B afraid of the Darc!
09:47 PM on 09/29/2011
Another Obama accomplishment his detractors will dismiss as no big deal. Just like saving the American auto industry and killing Bin Laden!
11:55 PM on 09/15/2011
Yes, we can and President Obama has brought a positive change to Washington, DC and the world. He has not forgotten about us women, as seen in the Supreme Court. Starting with the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act 2009, equal pay for women. He got Bin Laden as he said he would. He has tackled health care reform. Troups has left Iraq as promised by 2011... If Congress works with him in passing his bill to get America back to work....THIS TOO SHALL BE ACHIEVED !!! May we be mindful of him as he has been mindful of us.WE THE PEOPLE NEED , IN WASHINGTON , PEOPLE WITH A MIND TO WORK AND WORK TOGETHER.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cal3b G
UShypocrisy
02:44 AM on 09/15/2011
It's about damn time! I'm glad to see President Obama did deliver some see-change.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
goodmarina
Most People use Religion to justify their bias!
12:23 PM on 09/14/2011
What is wrong with those sitting in the Judiciary reflecting the American demographics? I say, bravo, President Obama!
photo
BVictor1
Chicago, My kind of town...
12:09 PM on 09/14/2011
Why are some people upset that president added some colored threads to the white sheet of America?

Does it not blend or something? Too mismatch?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
goodmarina
Most People use Religion to justify their bias!
12:18 PM on 09/14/2011
first - that is not just smart it is also a funny comment!

second - there are those people who will always want white sheets ... but pretend that anyone who brings it up is playing the 'race card'   ; 0

third - gotta fave & fan you!
photo
duckpuddle
Coexist, it's easier.
11:55 AM on 09/14/2011
re: Why don't you look at people as PEOPLE?

I do. Each person belong to many continuums of ideas, colors, qualifications, backgrounds, social advantages, education, religions, sexual orientations, birth places, nationalities, genders, physical abilities, and intellect.

ALL these factors and more should go into selecting a judge. I want the judiciary to represent America. By picking nominees from all of the above characteristics, we'll have a judicial system that is as representative of America as America itself. What is wrong with that?

The one exception is qualification. Any judge must be qualified, among the qualified, I want to see every piece of every spectrum represented in the judiciary.

It just so happens that a Democrat President is in the White House and gets to make the choice. When a Republican is in the White House, I would hope that those nominees would also represent a broad cross-section of the American populace.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrh85
11:26 AM on 09/14/2011
Finally a president that recognizes you do not need to be a white male over 50 to be a qualified candidate!
09:10 AM on 09/15/2011
Thurgood Marshall, 1967. First African-American to sit on the Supreme Court. Appointed by Lyndon Johnson.
Sandra Day O'Connor, 1981. First woman to sit on the Supreme Court. Appointed by Ronal Reagan.
Clarence Thomas, 1991. Succeeded Justice Marshall. Appointed by George H.W. Bush.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 1993. Second woman and first Jew to sit on the Supreme Court. Appointed by Bill Clinton.

Obama beats them all by a long shot by nominating way outside the good ole boys club. But a few gains were made after the 60's.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinsldr2
Retired Army Officer
11:15 AM on 09/14/2011
The question remains, is he selecting them because they are the most qualified or because they are minorities.

Certainly many of the individuals might meet the best qualified criteria. But is he using race and gender to pick them while more qualified people don't get the jobs.

"I think it's always good to have diverse perspectives, whether it's gender, sexuality or ideology," Tobias said."

But isn't the main criteria an understanding of the US constitution, law and precedent? Shouldn't their decisions be based on that and not the perspective they have based on ethnic and gender 'perspectives'.

Certainly minorities and women are just as capable to be good judges as 'old white men' but they should be selected because they are the best and not to fill a racial quota.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men (and women) are created equal
photo
duckpuddle
Coexist, it's easier.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
goodmarina
Most People use Religion to justify their bias!
12:19 PM on 09/14/2011
bravo for posting the link @ duckpuddle!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinsldr2
Retired Army Officer
12:47 PM on 09/14/2011
Thank you. THat is an excellent link. Please see my comment to Goodmarina below.

I pulled up three people on the list:

" Judge Greenaway has developed an extensive judicial record, authoring approximately 850 opinions. In his thirteen years on the bench,"

Judge Graves who " has served as a judge in Mississippi since 1991, sitting first for 10 years on the Hinds County Circuit Court and subsequently on the state Supreme Court, first as an associate justice and now as a presiding justice."

And Judge O. Rogeriee Thompson where it says "her judicial record is relatively slim compared to other judicial nominees for the federal bench."

The first two seem extremely well qualified but the other apparently has less of a record (based on types of positions she held). So why was she selected?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
goodmarina
Most People use Religion to justify their bias!
12:22 PM on 09/14/2011
well ... it beats the heck out of promoting someone because their rank called for it.   it rarely speaks to skill, talent or ability to comprehend and apply philosophy based on any given situation.

i don't care if they are black, brown, purple  - if they are qualified, they ought to be nominated

and no one will convince me - ever - that the almost always nominated white male, nominated by previous Presidents, were the only Americans who met the highest and best standard
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinsldr2
Retired Army Officer
12:39 PM on 09/14/2011
You said and I agree completely with "i don't care if they are black, brown, purple - if they are qualified, they ought to be nominated"

I simply do not know enough about trial court judges to analyze their records.

But the poster duckpuddle gave a good link and I just went there. I pulled up a judge near the top that was confirmed. THis is what it said about her:

"her judicial record is relatively slim compared to other judicial nominees for the federal bench.1 In her more than 20 years on the bench, Judge Thompson has authored fewer than 100 published opinions. The vast majority of these decisions involve zoning and local land use regulations."

So was she promoted because as the article also says she was the great granddaughter of a slave and a plantation owner or the best qualified for the job?

http://www.afj.org/judicial-selection/nominees/o-rogeriee-thompson.html?templateName=template-30435193

She does seem to be a good judge according to the article and we can only hope she continues to make decisions based on sound Constitutional principles.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:07 AM on 09/14/2011
Should Ruth Badder Ginsburg allow President Obama to pick her replacement or wait and take a chance that a Republican will do it???
11:10 AM on 09/14/2011
NO, by all means she should wait until after 2013 to retire.
09:18 AM on 09/15/2011
She has sugggested that she might keep her seat until 2015. She's one tough cookie.
photo
duckpuddle
Coexist, it's easier.
11:16 AM on 09/14/2011
Its her choice to retire.

I would prefer that Obama pick the next Supreme Court justice. I wold not feel comfortable with a Romney, Perry, or Bachman choice.
10:54 AM on 09/14/2011
i would say he has.. installing people who are "constitution adaptable" (not people who believe the constitution as it was written), an more liberal leftwing believers than anyone. He seems to delight at the chance to take away constitutional guarantees, and change American government into the master of the people and seems to want to assume dictator status. While evidently, the republicans and especially the democrats seem to fear him and will not call him on the mat for his wide use of executive powers and otherwise. The government should always be the servant of the people, plain and simple and anyone who wants government to make the people its servants is nothing more than a dictator want to be.
photo
duckpuddle
Coexist, it's easier.
10:41 AM on 09/14/2011
This alone is enough to show that Obama should be reelected.
10:53 AM on 09/14/2011
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Muahahahahahahahahahahaha..


I love it when the clueless think they have said something that made sense.

It cracks me up.
photo
duckpuddle
Coexist, it's easier.
10:56 AM on 09/14/2011
Nice analysis.
08:53 AM on 09/14/2011
Progress! These nominees are brilliant.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
08:52 AM on 09/14/2011
The President's judicial nominees reflect the diversity that has been produced by the nation's finest law schools for the past two decades. Seemingly, in their fog, the Republicans have not recognized nor accepted this change and will continue to insist that only white males, many of whom are unqualified for the responsibilites, be named.
10:54 AM on 09/14/2011
Clarence Thomas, Roberto Gonzalez, Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice are laughing at you.
photo
duckpuddle
Coexist, it's easier.
10:58 AM on 09/14/2011
Gonzalez, Rice, and Powell are not judges.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joekel
11:02 AM on 09/14/2011
Only Thomas is a judge - ignorant fool
08:49 AM on 09/14/2011
Hey here's a unique concept - how about he appoints the best QUALIFIED?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joekel
09:14 AM on 09/14/2011
He did, just because they aren't white males doesn't mean they aren't the best - BIGOT
09:26 AM on 09/14/2011
Oh stop with the name calling, I feel like I'm on the playground at school here. Look at the article, the whole thing is touting the fact he is nominating for THAT reason.
10:55 AM on 09/14/2011
You assume they are best qualified just because they are women and minorities - BIGOT
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mustardhead98
Professional Fine Artist
08:41 AM on 09/14/2011
Unfortunately in his rush to get his name in the history books, Obama has clearly forgotten that the most important things are a person's qualifications and experience, NOT the color of their skin or gender.

Being gender and colorblind is a wonderful, needed thing when hiring. But Obama's clearly not gender and colorblind-it is BECAUSE of gender and color he is making his decisions. HOW is that laudable considering he's failed to fill many judicial positions because of his bigo try.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
busynurse
there is a light that never goes out
08:48 AM on 09/14/2011
Were you in the room at the time? Because you seem to know a great deal about his decision making process.
08:50 AM on 09/14/2011
I made my remark before reading this, you stated it perfectly!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joekel
09:15 AM on 09/14/2011
And you both are bigoted fools.