More

Sea Level Rise Would Be Costly In California, Economists Say

Sea Level

By JASON DEAREN   09/14/11 08:35 PM ET   AP

SAN FRANCISCO -- Economists predict erosion from rising sea levels could cost California hundreds of millions of dollars in lost tourism and tax revenues as beaches shrink and buildings would have to be protected, according to a new report.

A study by San Francisco State University released Tuesday shows a surge in the Pacific Ocean because of climate change, and accompanying storms and erosion, would batter California's shoreline, diminishing the appeal of coastal areas and threatening structures with flood damage.

The eroding beaches will also destroy scores of animal habitats, the report finds.

"More than 80 percent of Californians live in coastal communities, and California's beaches support local economies and critical natural species," said Philip King, the study's author and an economics professor at San Francisco State.

The study commissioned by the California Department of Boating and Waterways examined sea level projections at five beach communities.

As the authors note, coastal storms and beach erosion are a common event that have already shaped the geography of coastal environments. Yet, because sea levels are projected to rise and storms are expected to be more intense due to a warming planet, the effects over the next century are expected to be more significant than ever.

The study said because of the uncertainty of how much the sea will rise, the researchers used three different sea level studies and flood models to reach their conclusions.

"We used the best available science," King said. "We wanted to come up with something that could be used by local planners."

The San Francisco State study is the latest to predict major consequences for California due to rising seas. In 2009, in a report funded by three California agencies, the Pacific Institute determined that nearly half a million people, wetlands, ecosystems and infrastructure would be at risk. They estimated that average projections find that seas would rise 4 to 5 feet by 2100, causing $100 billion in damage.

One of the communities San Francisco State profiled was Venice Beach, which could lose up to $440 million in tourism and tax revenue if the Pacific Ocean rises 55 inches by 2100. The study found sea level rise could cause $52 million in flood damage to homes in the Venice Beach area, and nearly $39 million in habitat loses.

The new report also found Zuma Beach and Broad Beach in Malibu could lose up to $500 million in tourism spending, $28.5 million in damage to homes and more than $102 million in losses to habitat.

And San Francisco's Ocean Beach could see $540 million in damage to land, buildings and infrastructure.

Naturally, the damage predicted at each beach community differs by its geography, economy and land use decisions made by local officials.

While building seawalls to help protect buildings from an encroaching sea has been one response, King said, in some cases, allowing coastline to retreat or bolstering beaches with plants or other nourishment could be more cost-effective.

"Sea level rise will send reverberations throughout local and state economies," King said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

SAN FRANCISCO -- Economists predict erosion from rising sea levels could cost California hundreds of millions of dollars in lost tourism and tax revenues as beaches shrink and buildings would have to ...
SAN FRANCISCO -- Economists predict erosion from rising sea levels could cost California hundreds of millions of dollars in lost tourism and tax revenues as beaches shrink and buildings would have to ...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 228
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AxelDC
10:32 AM on 10/13/2011
Or we could just confront global warming head on instead of trying to mitigate its many symptoms.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
08:26 PM on 09/28/2011
"A study by San Francisco State University released Tuesday shows a surge in the Pacific Ocean because of climate change, and accompanying storms and erosion, would batter California's shoreline..."

This study says a surge would cause problems, but doesn't address the reality that this surge has not occurred over the 21st Century. The sea level along the California coast is currently lower than it was during most of the 1990s. The average sea level over the first decade of the 21st Century was actually lower than the average sea level over the last decade of the 20th Century.

So although a "surge" could cause trouble, in fact no such surge has occurred during this century. Rather the opposite. The sea level has dropped by a modest amount.

Thus, the cost to California for a surge in the Pacific Ocean has been essentially zero, since no such serge has occurred.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
03:47 AM on 10/02/2011
Averages mean nothing when one is talking about surges.  The California sea level is rising just like all other sea levels around the world and has risen approximately seven inches in the last century.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AxelDC
10:33 AM on 10/13/2011
Just like no devastating hurricane hit New Orleans, until it did.
03:18 PM on 09/27/2011
too bad the "projections" are so far way off the mark. typical of the AGW nonsense
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AxelDC
10:34 AM on 10/13/2011
Yes, if global warming were a reality, we would have record summer heat, more hurricanes, massive droughts, and the polar ice caps would be melting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
02:41 AM on 09/17/2011
Seriously, I have to go to bed!
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
03:33 AM on 09/17/2011
Done trolling for tonight?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
01:58 AM on 09/17/2011
I understand GE is pulling out of off-shore wind farm development. Even the Federal government can not justify it. And that is saying something considering their support for Solyndra, the Mojave Solar Farm project, and Lightsquared.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AxelDC
10:36 AM on 10/13/2011
This is a non-sequitor.  GE is a corporation looking out for short-term profits, not for the long term survival of our species on this planet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
01:54 AM on 09/17/2011
"Yet, because sea levels are projected to rise and storms are expected to be more intense due to a warming planet, the effects over the next century are expected to be more significant than ever." Projected to rise! Expected to be! future tense. Talk about Faith Based!
03:21 PM on 09/27/2011
yup. nonsense. we are 2/3 of the way to doubling CO2 and the dire consequences are not happening ......
03:22 PM on 09/27/2011
Fanned
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
01:51 AM on 09/17/2011
Maybe if we moved the earth back on it's axis to pre-Japan tsunami origin, we would gain some more time.

We can do that right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
01:41 AM on 09/17/2011
I am treating this with every once of respect it deserves.
Honest!

I've seen fire and I've seen rain,
I've seen sunny days that I thought would never end!
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
03:33 AM on 09/17/2011
A mind is a terrible thing to lose.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
01:28 AM on 09/17/2011
I can do this!
I can carry this thread.

I know you are out there. I know you are reading.

You have stopped posting on other threads.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
01:18 AM on 09/17/2011
Environmentalist put all their FAITH in a Man Made Computer model.
Every line of code,
Every algorithym,
Every addition or elimination of a variable,
changes the outcome.

Extreme Climatic Disruption IS man made.

By intelligent design.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
01:07 AM on 09/17/2011
This Administration has mandated that the Military look at renewable, Green fuels!

They successfully flew a twin engine jet on 50/50 bio-fuel at $35 dollars a gallon last month.

What is successful about raising the cost of fuel 600 per cent?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
01:02 AM on 09/17/2011
Algore had a 24 hour telethon and nobody came.

Except Chris Mathews, who has nerve issues in his legs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
12:59 AM on 09/17/2011
Can't we have a conversation?

Can't Algore have just one debate with a REAL scientist?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AxelDC
10:36 AM on 10/13/2011
Try to find a global warming skeptic among the scientific community who isn't on the payroll of Big Oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
12:57 AM on 09/17/2011
If Obama has doubled the Federal budget in 3 years, and none of it has addressed EXTREME CLIMATIC DISRUPTION, How much would we have to raise revenue (taxes, taxes, TEXAS!) to begin significant amelioration?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
12:54 AM on 09/17/2011
I'm not posting linearly, I've lost count.