iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Solyndra: White House Pushes Back As House Republicans Probe Loan Guarantees

Jay Carney

First Posted: 09/14/11 06:10 PM ET Updated: 11/14/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- House Republicans on Wednesday charged top administration officials with rushing the review of more than $500 million in loan guarantees for Solyndra, the California-based solar company that recently filed for bankruptcy, so that Vice President Joe Biden could announce their approval at a company event two years ago.

"The documents demonstrate that, when DOE was reviewing the Solyndra guarantee in 2009, it was well aware of the financial problems the deal posed," said Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, during a Wednesday subcommittee hearing on Solyndra. "What the documents also show is that the rush to push out stimulus dollars may have impacted the depth and quality of DOE and OMB's review."

House Republicans point to a series of internal emails that they allege show the administration placed considerable pressure on the Office of Management and Budget and the Energy Department's loan programs office to speed through a decision on financing for Solyndra.

The Obama administration is pushing back against those allegations, with White House spokesman Jay Carney insisting on Wednesday that the White House had not rushed the review of loan guarantees and that the emails reveal little more than a "scheduling decision."

"What the emails make clear is there was urgency to make a decision on a scheduling matter," Carney told a group of reporters on Air Force One. "It is a big proposition to move the president or to put on an event and that sort of thing, so people were simply looking for answers about whether or not people could move forward. ... It had nothing to -- and there is no evidence to the contrary -- nothing to do with anything besides the need to get an answer to make a scheduling decision."

According to the internal emails, which House Republicans have released, one OMB reviewer noted that a credit-rating agency had predicted Solyndra would go belly up by September 2011, almost precisely when it did.

"We have ended up with a situation of having to do rushed approvals on a couple of occasions (and we are worried about Solyndra at the end of the week)," an OMB staffer told Biden's domestic policy adviser in 2009, according to one email. "We would prefer to have sufficient time to do our due diligence reviews and have the approval set the date for the announcement rather than the other way around."

But at Wednesday's hearing before the Energy and Commerce subcommittee, Jonathan Silver, executive director of DOE’s loan programs office, insisted he wasn't under pressure to approve Solyndra's financing, and Jeffrey Zients, deputy director for OMB's management office, said, "Our analysis ... reflected the information as it was understood at that time."

While Zients conceded that emails among the White House did seek to coordinate the Solyndra loan guarantee with Biden's appearance, he reiterated at Wednesday's hearing that such scheduling had "nothing to do with the decision to give the loan or not."

Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.), chairman of the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, placed blame for the Solyndra debacle squarely with the Obama administration.

“The Obama administration has repeatedly touted its green energy plan as the savior of our faltering economy,” Stearns said in an opening statement. He added, “Only after the Obama administration took control and the stimulus passed was the Solyndra deal pushed through.”

And a number of media outlets, citing a 2009 decision by the Energy Department’s credit committee, have broadcast that the Solyndra loan guarantee was rejected by the Bush administration only to be approved by Obama’s.

In fact, the Energy Department began reviewing the deal during the Bush administration, advancing through the review and approval process between 2006 and 2009. A report submitted by the credit committee on Jan. 9, 2009, shows the committee decided to continue the due diligence process rather than to recommend the loan guarantee immediately proceed for further approvals.

As Silver noted in his testimony, the Energy Department during the Bush administration rejected more than 100 other applications while inviting Solyndra and 15 other companies to continue their applications, and the Obama administration ultimately approved the Solyndra loan guarantee on “the exact schedule that had been developed during the Bush administration.”

Touted as a model for green energy, Solyndra received a $535 million federal loan guarantee from the U.S. government -- before laying off 1,100 workers and and filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in August, leaving taxpayers on the hook for more than a half-billion dollars.

Solyndra executives Brian Harrison and W.G. Stover Jr. are expected to testify before the committee next week.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- House Republicans on Wednesday charged top administration officials with rushing the review of more than $500 million in loan guarantees for Solyndra, the California-based solar company ...
WASHINGTON -- House Republicans on Wednesday charged top administration officials with rushing the review of more than $500 million in loan guarantees for Solyndra, the California-based solar company ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,853
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (31 total)
08:44 AM on 09/20/2011
It's only crony capitalism when the other side does it. Face it. It's the way things work (and don't work) in DC, a place where a guy from Chicago would need no on-the-job training.
03:04 PM on 09/16/2011
It is unfortunate that this didn't work out. However, this is relatively small. If you want corrpution, go see republicans and what they do for their corporate clients. Billions and billions wasted. At least this was an attempt to jump start something that would actually be good for society instead of a war or something. But the haters got to have something to latch on to.
08:24 AM on 09/18/2011
you sit there and use the word unfortunate, and the go off on republicans. So I guess its ok with you that this president has wasted 29B on green jobs and all flops..thats ok with you? Wow...you might want to pay a few more dollars in taxes yourself so they can waste some more. I guess this is small, as you put it, well how small does it have to be to be crooked?
photo
TROOPER-X
Opportunity is Equal, not Wealth.
12:38 PM on 09/16/2011
Obama's Whitewater-loo?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robgrut
12:08 PM on 09/16/2011
This is the most corrupt White House and pres. in history. No question about that now...
02:59 PM on 09/16/2011
How so? Why does an unfortunate loss = corruption? Prove it. If you want to look at corruption, look at the multi billion, thats billion with a B, no bid contracts to Haliburton, Cheney's ex-company, during the prior administration. That's corruption. There is NO evidence of corruption in this adminstration at all. What are your sources?
08:26 AM on 09/18/2011
Solyndra,,,fast and furious..closing down oil and coal industry so you can push green jobs which is a myth.. pressuring a general to change his testimony..and more. Is that enough for you
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EarlP
05:08 PM on 09/16/2011
And you say this after eight years of the Bush Administration...using the WTC attacks to profit on military infrastructure and private army's...you say this after WMD's was given as the reason to spend billions + on wars...you say this after Bush Presidency and a republican congress allowed our economy to tank, raising the debt, keeping interest rates low and promoting Adjustable rates mortgages??

Really now, you don't say...
10:47 PM on 09/15/2011
The company went bankrupt. Sometimes that happens in the free market you conservatives hold so dearly! What happened to "let the free markets decide"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeamMeUpScottie
None of the Above should be on every US ballot.
11:37 PM on 09/15/2011
The presidents $40 billion Green Jobs program,,with half a billion going to Solyndra which we are on the hook for,, has created 3500 jobs,,,,not the 65000 the administration said it would.

Sometimes this happens in the socialist utopia you libbies hold so dearly.

Well actually,,,it happens a lot.
01:41 AM on 09/16/2011
Do you care that we're on the hook for the oil and gas company subsides, or the rebates for the likes of GE that pay no taxes? Not to mention the money that gets poured into the military to protect shipments of oil from the middle east? $500 million lost on one company that's trying to produce and develop technology that will sustain us past the immediate future is nothing. How about the billions wasted in Iraq on abuses by war contractors and fraud and corruption? Not sure where you got your $40 billion Green Jobs program facts, care to cite your sources?

I'm not looking for some socialist utopia, none have ever existed, so I don't know why you can claim it happens a lot. Unless you're at the top of a company in the capitalist food chain, "socialist" companies in which the workers have a stake in the company would work out much better for those of us that actually do the work that makes the company's profits, rather than a company giving returns to investors that didn't actually produce anything. It gives incentives to workers to retain company loyalty, and provides an incentive to work harder to see an increased return for the business, rather than working harder and harder for a flat, or these days, decreasing wage. If you can't see the benefit of a company set up that way, you're a fool.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EarlP
05:35 PM on 09/16/2011
a socialist utopia?? ha!

Dems support America's long-running mixed-economy (capitalism AND socialism)...Repub's are the one's promoting an extreme ideology, of extreme capitalism. Promoting something that will NEVER EVER happen...a fairy-tale world of self-sufficient entrepreneurs, doctors and lawyers
11:53 PM on 09/15/2011
majorillnesses: in a "free market" the government would not give $500M dollars to a favorite company or two or three in a particular industry. Instead companies could invite free people to invest in their ventures and free people would be free to choose to invest or not. Those free investors would profit or lose, depending on the success or failure of the company. But under the Obama scheme the GOVERNMENT took people's money and invested it in a company (where one of the bigwigs was a campaign donor to Obama and a frequent visitor to the White House). THAT IS NOT THE FREE MARKET, majorillnesses. Solyndra got money, but not from free investors freely investing in a free market.
07:42 AM on 09/16/2011
You do not get it do you?

You are "free" to let me (my name is Washington - the place even Obama wants to pretend he is not from) decide whatever you want to do with your life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
10:30 PM on 09/15/2011
Obama can not plead ignorance,
he is the smartest man in the room!
08:38 AM on 09/18/2011
But the Least experienced , no matter what the subject matter
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
10:09 PM on 09/15/2011
Push back! Stone wall?
Culpability.
10:08 PM on 09/15/2011
The $528 million Solyndra matter:
First, score one for the DOJ here.
Next, it appears that the major backing bank in
the Solyndra ‘stimulus money’ fiasco -
Deutsche Bank AG of Germany (DB, DBK.XE) –
has been accused by the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA)
in a $14.2 billion alleged mortgage fraud scheme from years 2005-2007;
and separately the bank has been indicted in South Korea (as of late August)
for alleged “market manipulation”.
These items - added to the fact that the bank was instrumental
in the actual financing of Auschwitz
and the nearby I.G Farben facilities – is a lot to take in all at once.
Possibly all this could bounce back on the already beleaguered
President Obama - as a possible gateway to impeachment.
09:48 PM on 09/15/2011
A half billion dollar photo op.
08:15 PM on 09/15/2011
Those of you following this case already know that the FBI raided Solyndra HQ last week and also paid visits to the homes of Solyndra's execs. The WH already tried to fluff this off by passing the Buck back to Bush. Claiming that his admin. began the loan process with Solyndra.

Now for the truth.......
That house of cards is now collapsing. Yesterday, ABC News dropped the bombshell that Bush era Energy auditors actually nixed the loan as unsound, and that Obama OMB staffers raised similar concerns upon their own evaluation. The White House's political team seemed to disagree, putting the deal on a "fast track." Mere days later, the massive government loan to the unstable "green" poster-child -- backed by major Obama donor cash -- was fortuitously approved.
08:36 AM on 09/18/2011
Honesty and transparency is NOT something a liberal looks for in a president. Geez. they elected Marion Barry as mayor of Washington after he was caught on tape buying and using cocaine. As long as you give them their welfare check , or that they pay no taxes, that is their main voting criteria
photo
Bankerrkt
He's making things worse.
07:45 PM on 09/15/2011
HP is not keeping up with the unfolding of this Obama administration scandel ..... wonder why that is (eye roll)
photo
media sux
left out is just right
08:02 PM on 09/15/2011
no kidding....these people are so one sided and myopic it almost laughable.

I want to make an appointment to be here next November the day after the election....not to rub their co-dependent noses in it ,but to see what kind of lies they drum up then!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
10:14 PM on 09/15/2011
It's not about Obama, it's Algore's fault.
Hockey puck!
01:16 PM on 09/16/2011
One-sided? Oh surely not?

Now what was that election we just had in New York? What election?
07:35 PM on 09/15/2011
Another boondoggle by the obama regime. obama has wasted trillions. Here is another view of the story.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2011/09/not-ready-for-prime-time-players.php
photo
friendofbear
Illegitimi non carborundum
04:33 PM on 09/15/2011
They got the money to build and equip a factory. The factory is built as specified. Does it really matter who is going to run it? Companies file chapter 11 all the time, GM did it, after a month of restructure it will be business as usual. Those screaming "BANKRUPTCY, BANKRUPTCY, are clearly avoiding the massive detail that this is an 11, not a 13.
01:52 PM on 09/16/2011
If the business model is a failure and/or the product a failure, there is no value to the production facility. That's what the vetting process for the loans is about, to ensure the borrower can pay back the money. If someone else takes over the property for 100 million, we're our 400+ million. Even if someone else makes cars- the taxpayer has to pick up a tab they could have avoided with due dilligence.
photo
friendofbear
Illegitimi non carborundum
03:11 PM on 09/16/2011
If the business model is a failure and/or the product a failure, they would have filed a chapter 13. The product still works, it just needs to be sold cheaper, hence the chapter 11 debt restructure. Sorry if that doesn't fit you're narrative mr. new account.
03:51 PM on 09/15/2011
The FBI investigation will reveal any political and financial accomodations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
10:15 PM on 09/15/2011
To whom?
08:42 AM on 09/18/2011
Eric Holder...the protector in chief
03:48 PM on 09/15/2011
Overally, it is rather puzzling that the prez is touted as being so intelligent and in control, yet there are so many instances, Solyndra being the most recent example, where neither he nor his staffers appear to have any recollection of any transactions relating to this matter, and when asked to explain or elaborate on what person or organization in the gov't did have such involvement, winds up being a low-level staffer that would not have in the first place, under any ordinary circumstances, due to lack of credentials, been given the responsibility and authority to authorize final approval of whatever decision or action happens to be the center of controversy. That being said, it is both incredible and fantastic to even suggest that approval of a loan of $500 Million would only need approval within the lower levels of the administration. Should that happen to be the 'excuse' that is given, it would demonstrate either gross incompetence/negligence, or, more likely, representations wholly incongruent with the facts and circumstances of which those individuals providing such excuses harbor full knowledge. Usually the more elaborate the excuse, the more likely that the person providing such excuse is in possession of many facts that would be against his/her better interest, since an excuse or alibi is most effective when it not only explains away presently-known facts, but those that the person providing the excuse anticipates will be discovered.