iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

John Boehner Jobs Speech Blasts Obama Plan, Rules Out Tax Increases

First Posted: 09/15/11 03:22 PM ET Updated: 11/15/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) threw cold water on the prospect of passing President Obama's jobs bill during a speech on Thursday, casting doubt over the viability of longterm debt talks as well.

Addressing the Economic Club of Washington, Boehner called Obama's plan to create jobs, which includes a mix of tax incentives and state-targeted spending, a "poor substitute" for policies he views as more effective.

“Private-sector job creators of all sizes have been pummeled by decisions made in Washington. They’ve been slammed by uncertainty from the constant threat of new taxes, out-of-control spending, and unnecessary regulation from a government that is always micromanaging, meddling, and manipulating," said Boehner. “They’ve been hurt by a government that offers short-term gimmicks rather than fundamental reforms that will encourage long-term economic growth."

Coming a week to the day after Obama unveiled the American Jobs act to a joint session of Congress, Boehner's remarks are the most overtly critical lines of pushback yet from Republican leadership. Along with skepticism over the jobs package expressed by centrist Democrats, they raise questions about the White House's ability to pass its legislation through Congress intact.

The foreshadowing of political paralysis didn't end with Boehner's comments on the jobs plan. Elsewhere in his speech, he made clear that he wanted tax increases off the table when the congressional super committee tasked with finding $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction makes its recommendations.

"It's a very simple equation. Tax increases destroy jobs. And the Joint Committee is a jobs committee. Its mission is to reduce the deficit that is threatening job creation in our country," he declared.

That absolutism ran directly in contrast to Boehner's pitch, earlier in the speech, for "politicians of all stripes" to drop the “my way or the highway” approach. It was also a tougher line than the Speaker reportedly took when he himself was negotiating a deficit reduction deal with the president during the debt ceiling showdown.

And, indeed, when pressed about Boehner's insistence that the super committee should not consider tax increases, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney recalled those moments, not so long ago, when he was more willing to compromise.

"The public overwhelmingly, overwhelmingly agrees with the president that to get our long-term fiscal house in order, we need to approach it in a balanced way," said Carney. "If the answer is [Rep. Paul] Ryan's budget, we know how Americans feel about that. They do not believe that we need to end Medicare as we know it to get our deficits and debt under control, because we don't."

"We don't have unlimited resources," Carney added. "And we have to make choices about, do we provide tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans ... or do we make sure that responsibility for resolving this problem is shared and we have a balanced approach?

"I would simply note that the Speaker of the House made clear in the negotiations he had with the president, he put, in his words, 'revenues on the table.' Well, we believe revenues have to be on the table if we are going to solve our deficit and debt problems."

UPDATE (6:51 p.m.): The White House Press Secretary issued a statement in response to Boehner's speech:

Any plan to grow the economy and create jobs should be measured by whether it puts money in the pockets of middle class families, puts teachers, police officers, firefighters and construction workers back to work, and invests in our small businesses so they can grow and hire. The President’s plan meets that test. The American Jobs Act includes the kinds of proposals that have been supported in a bipartisan way in the past, is fully paid for, and prominent, independent economists say it could create between 1.5 and 2 million jobs. And the President’s plan rebuilds the economy the American way, based on balance, fairness and ensuring there is the same set of rules for everyone from Wall Street to Main Street. The President is committed to working with members of both parties in Congress to pass the American Jobs Act right away.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) threw cold water on the prospect of passing President Obama's jobs bill during a speech on Thursday, casting doubt over the viability of longterm debt...
WASHINGTON -- House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) threw cold water on the prospect of passing President Obama's jobs bill during a speech on Thursday, casting doubt over the viability of longterm debt...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22,569
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (417 total)
03:06 PM on 10/17/2011
Boehner, if you and your party don't look into your hearts for this Nation things Will run over into the Rich, if the Rich believes they can continue this evil way of survival It will not work, only unity works, a stand together for all. You've been given chance after chance. Maybe President Obam was made President for a reason and we can't touch that. Listsen close Boehner and all who follow him: It is written: If my people who are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray and seak my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sins, and "HEAL" their land.

.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whyus
San Francisco native
11:22 AM on 09/25/2011
Dontcha just love how congress tries to work with our president to help solve our country's problems?!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
07:01 PM on 09/21/2011
JudgeMoonBox: I don't buy your line. I don't care if they raise the taxes on the rich, but the rest of the bill has more goodies in it? Now where do you think that revenue is going to go? To pay down the deficit? Heck no! To the unions! To NY. ILL. and California.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andres64
Religion is a sectually transmitted disease.
01:12 AM on 09/20/2011
Look. It's not rocket science. 1) We've tried tax cuts. They don't work. 2) The whole premise is flawed. Jobs come from the demand side, not supply.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
07:03 PM on 09/21/2011
Get rid of the social progressives and the 68 socialists in Congress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andres64
Religion is a sectually transmitted disease.
08:27 PM on 09/21/2011
Riiight. And what would the moocher red states do then?

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/04/the_red_state_ripoff.html
06:45 PM on 09/19/2011
"It's a very simple equation. Tax increases destroy jobs. And the Joint Committee is a jobs committee. Its mission is to reduce the deficit that is threatening job creation in our country,"

This is the typical Republican line on why the rich should not be taxed the same as the rest of us. Where is this "job growth" they profess. There has been zero job growth in the past 15 years and they have been enjoying these tax breaks all this time.
It's time the Grand Old Party stop living in this "Trickle Down" fantasy they have been living in since the Reagan era. IT'S NOT WORKING, GUYS!!! TRY SOMETHING ELSE!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
07:06 PM on 09/21/2011
Oh, so you want all of our tax dollars going to drilling in Brazil, jobs in India and China, Coal industry closed, gas prices out of sight, electric cars costing 40 thousand each and you have to pay when you plug it in. Ask Barney Frank why the housing market sucks.
10:43 PM on 09/21/2011
What are you talking about? What I was saying is this "Trickle Down" excuse has not & will not EVER work. The companies that the GOP professes will create jobs are only interested in pocketing the money. Show me the jobs and I will change my statement. Until then my statement stands
05:11 PM on 09/19/2011
It has not worked, so they'd want to some more tax cutting! Insane or criminal?
08:05 PM on 09/20/2011
What ? ? ?
08:00 PM on 09/21/2011
The tax cutting advocated by Republicans over these decades; recently Bush Jr.'s tax cuts didn't prevent our current financial crisis. So Mr. Boehner and his republicans are against raising any tax( revenue); thus he might want to do some more tax cutting?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vabnker
Retired banker, Old Dominion University, Graduate
03:43 PM on 09/19/2011
Boehner is a protypical congressional millionaire.He alreadry has free health care and lifetime pensions so he doesnt want any of that taxed, he would rather put tax increases and funding of defecits on the backs of the middle class. The republicans time is coming.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nate35
12:48 PM on 09/19/2011
I do not trust the politicians of this country to "reform" the tax code. Their jobs and income depends upon corporate campaign money. Too many of them are bought outright.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Finn
12:20 PM on 09/19/2011
What a surprise. Between President Obama and Boehner, this is just a campaign for 2012 instead of a REAL economic policy to turn around the economy and get 16 million unemployed Americans back to work. America is suffering and the only job President Obama seems to care about is HIS! It's disgusting. Why he can't get together with the leaders of the House and knock out a joint economic policy that everyone can live with is beyond me.It's sickening to see Americans suffer while the elite in Washington are just playing politics as usual. I'm so tired of this class warfare. I voted for President Obama in 2008, but I can't wait to throw him and ALL bums out of office in 2012. None of them really care about us.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
09:16 AM on 09/19/2011
rebelriser: How have they blocked jobs and recovery, when Biden said we recovererd? You are shifting the blame, since the Republicans have been up front and said they didn't believe new taxes would solve the spending problem. Jobs---shovel ready, and you didn't see Inmelt and Obama laughing about that? Maybe you should be asking the dems like Reid and Shumer why they are using class warfare out of the marxist book to split this country further.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JudgeMoonbox
09:29 PM on 09/19/2011
"the Republican­s have been up front and said they didn't believe new taxes would solve the spending problem."

If you look at what the Republicans are actually saying, it's that the defiicit needs to be brought under control at once, so they need to cut spending; yet at the same time, they say that the deficit is not such a problem that they have to raise taxes.

Considering how the spending cuts they want will kill just as many hobs, they are not up front about their strategic deficit initiative, meant to kill programs which they would never have the mandate to cut if they didn't have the deficit as an excuse, but which they would hate just as much if the government had money coming out of its ears.

"the Republican­s have been up front and said they didn't believe new taxes would solve the spending problem."

If you think that asking the superrich to pay the same share they paid when Clinton was president and unemployment was at a post-Vietnam War low is class warfare, what do you call it when Democrats agree to Republican elitism? Class Surrender? Class Appeasement?

"...out of the marxist book"

You would not show yourself to be a bigger liar if you called Reid and Shumer One-eyed, one horn flying purple people eaters. Has no one ever told you that lies don't work if nobody believes them?
photo
68Namvet
Sioux, French, German, Jew, American mutt
08:19 PM on 09/18/2011
Okay, when someone can explain the following two items to my satisfaction, I'll agree with republicans that taxes should not be raised and loopholes should not be closed.

First, let us say I am a financial manager of a fairly large business. I earn $450,000/year which is taxed at a rate of 35%. Of course I am outraged at having to try to survive on a mere $292,500/year (less deductions of course), but I digress. My friend is a hedge fund manager. He made $4.500,000,000/year and is taxed at a rate of 15% (capital gains rate). Since we are both finance managers who do essentially the same work, why is my tax rate nearly 2 and 1/2 times greater than his when his income is 10,000 times greater than mine? Why do I have to pay an additional $6,572.00 in Social Security taxes and $6525 in Medicare taxes that he does not pay? How is this a fair taxation system?

Second question. People have stated that the reason the capital gains rate is "fair" is because people who invest their money have already paid taxes on this money once. Why then are the monies I place in interest bearing accounts (CD's, MMA's, savings accounts, etc.) which I have already paid taxes on, taxed as earned income at my 35% rate and not as "capital gains"? How are the monies different?

Well, I'm waiting.......
photo
robertaruth
The answer is in the music
05:33 PM on 09/18/2011
What kind of sense does Boehner's position make? Why would the "job creators" be afraid to hire because if they made any more money they'd have to pay taxes on it?

If you made 5 million dollars last year, and hired more employees, then increased your business and made 6 million because of that, what's wrong with paying taxes on that extra million? Even if it was taxed at 50%, you'd still be ahead an extra 1/2 million. I'm no economics PHD, but how stupid do they think we are?
photo
68Namvet
Sioux, French, German, Jew, American mutt
06:48 PM on 09/18/2011
"how stupid do they think we are? "

Well - people keep voting for them so - I'd say the voting public is pretty darn stupid!
02:27 PM on 09/18/2011
Only Boehnor and the GOP would consider fair taxation and taxing individuals and corporations like Warren Buffet as a tax increase. Especially after Warren Buffett, himself, stated publically that he did not pay nearly enough in taxes considering that his secretary and others on his payroll paid far more in taxes. Nothing ever changes with the GOP. They will still consider nothing beyond the usual and boringly repetitious demands of more cuts to programs and the deficit. Just more "their way or no way".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SerendipitousLib
Imagine...
12:25 PM on 09/18/2011
Oh, so having a different point of view on the Vietnam war made them "subversives?" I am 65 years old and I have never understood "my country's committments" to a war that cost us 55,000+ Americans. I'm sorry Ms Hitler...I failed to get your first name.
photo
68Namvet
Sioux, French, German, Jew, American mutt
12:20 PM on 09/18/2011
Boehner states “Private-sector job creators of all sizes have been pummeled by decisions made in Washington. ......... and unnecessary regulation from a government that is always micromanaging, meddling, and manipulating,"

History shows he is incorrect. When left to their own devices, businesses will sacrifice ethical behavior every time, whether it's buying off the government regulators or operating sweat shops with children working 12 hour days, or miners digging in unsafe mines. Businesses do not care about the welfare of their employees, their customers, or the nation. Their sole driving force is profit. While there is nothing wrong with profits, left on their own, businesses will always seek to maximize profits at the expense of everything else. Thus, we have anti-trust rules, minimum wage laws, child labor laws, health and safety laws, environmental protection laws - all placed to keep businesses from acting in morally unethical ways.

The fact that people believe the government "has more power to do harm than any other entity" is misplaced in that, "we" have chosen the government we have. So "we" are responsible for the unneeded wars it starts, the torture it conducts, the decisions it renders allowing international corporations to buy our elections and every other aspect of the government.

If you don't like the government we have - work to change it. But, please don't suggest unfettered business is any solution to our problems.