iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Banks Who Received Bailout Funding Made Riskier Loans And Investments: Study

Wall Street Traders

First Posted: 09/16/11 06:30 PM ET Updated: 11/16/11 05:12 AM ET

After receiving hundreds of billions of dollars in bailouts in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, banks often did not come to the aid of credit-starved American businesses. Instead, it seems many banks went back to making the same high-risk bets that left them in need of government support in the first place.

Despite claims by government officials at the height of the financial crisis that bailouts would lead to more lending, banks that received bailout funding didn't increase total lending, according to a new study out of the University of Michigan.

But the banks did shift their investments toward risky loans and investments, including mortgage-backed securities. Under few guidelines, banks largely treated the bailouts as a windfall and, more importantly, a reassurance that the government would come to the rescue in the future, said the paper's co-authors, University of Michigan assistant finance professors Ran Duchin and Denis Sosyura.

The paper, released earlier this week, argued that the key factor predicting more risk-taking was not the bailout money itself, but the message that the government had the banks' back.

Banks that received bailout money were most inclined toward investing more money in speculative trading, corporate bonds, and mortgage-backed securities, Duchin said in an interview with The Huffington Post.

A higher level of risk-taking among major banks could make the financial system more prone to crisis, as banks face higher chances of seeing borrowers default and investments not pay off. Duchin said that risk-taking "definitely destabilizes the financial system."

With lagging economic growth, banks have had to compete more to find ways to reap profits. The overall demand for loans remains weak. As a result, many banks have lowered their standards while attempting to identify profit-making opportunities in a limp economy, said Gregory Daco, principal U.S. economist at IHS Global Insight.

Since the beginning of this year, banks have been easing their lending standards on most types of loans, especially those to corporations, according to the Federal Reserve. Banks have made 74 percent more floating-rate loans to junk-rated companies during the first eight months of this year compared to the same period last year, according to a study by the research firm Dealogic, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Another recent study found that financial institutions that actively lobbied the government in the years leading up to the financial crisis both were more likely to benefit from the government bailouts starting in 2008 and to have faster-growing portfolios of high-risk loans.

The Michigan study's co-authors said the government should have set clear guidelines for how banks spent bailout funds and should have tracked where that money went.

"Basically, they [the banks] just added it to total capital and did what they wanted," co-author Sosyura said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
After receiving hundreds of billions of dollars in bailouts in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, banks often did not come to the aid of credit-starved American businesses. Instead, it seems many ...
After receiving hundreds of billions of dollars in bailouts in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, banks often did not come to the aid of credit-starved American businesses. Instead, it seems many ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 531
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
11:42 AM on 09/20/2011
Remember the full page ad in the Wall Street Journal: THANK YOU TAXPAYERS!? Yeah, me either... Privatize profits, socialize losses. Ain't welfare great?
10:45 AM on 09/18/2011
Reward what you want more of.
That's a psychological truism.
Everybody understands that. You don't have to study Pavlov and Skinner deeply to get it.

We rewarded banksters with lots of money and bonus opportunity.
Why should they change?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
11:43 AM on 09/20/2011
Excellent point!
10:36 AM on 09/18/2011
Sure why not take risks with other people's money. After all they know they will be bailed out, so there is no impediment. Another Abomination failure, no real bank reform.
02:07 AM on 09/18/2011
"The government should have set clear guidelines for how banks spent bailout funds and should have tracked where that money went.
{However} the banks just added it to total capital and did what they wanted."

----------------

THAT sums up the politicians' "friendship" (collusion) with the banks and stu pidity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
10:02 AM on 09/18/2011
fanned already - kinda reminds me of the billions that were "given" to Iraq and Afghanistan and then "lost" forever.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:44 PM on 09/17/2011
of course, banks are up to their old tricks. as long as the repubs have any control this will happen. the repubs have always been against reform and regulations for banks and wall street.this goes back a lot further than regan, it goes back to republican herbert hoover, who was against reform and regulations for wall street. stood by, while they were using the unethical practice of "buying on speculation", which created the stock market crash, leading to the great depression...even further back, ullyses s. grant, known for being on the battlefield, but, has been known by many, as being one of the worst presidents in history... grant was fully aware of the corruption within his cabinet, while cabinet members were accepting bribes and extortion monies. grant had no regulations or reforms for the gold manipulators. stood by, while they literally ruined the economy, creating the first u.s. depression.. the repubs have created the two u.s. depressions and the deepest recessions in our history. as long as they have any power, including the repub controlled congress, this will happen. banks and wall street will have no guidelines, reforms, or regulations... and you can take that to the bank!!
10:54 AM on 09/18/2011
If we single out Republicans, we miss the other half - and both are used by the real party, the "Money Party." Mainstream media builds ratings on Rep. vs. Dem. rhetoric.

In his 2008 campaign, Obama talked regulation, but not much action since election. And Frank and Dodd whose names are on the excuse for regulation both qualified as "friends of Angelo."

Some important stories are better told by non-MSM. Here's a link to a Mother Jones 2008 election campaign (Obama vs. Hillary) piece reminding how Dems contributed to deregulation. Clinton was the president who signed away the Glass-Steagall Act, removing the firewall between commercial banks and investment casions. Removing Glass-Steagall allowed compliance with World Trade Organization - and Clinton really pushed trade agreements that resulted in outsourcing jobs and loss of manufacturing capacity. (Follow the money, follow the power.)
http://motherjones.com/politics/2008/03/its-deregulation-stupid
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The ORF in Largo
Louder than a fart a hurricane
09:33 PM on 09/17/2011
The Banksters act like the House in Las Vegas where the house always wins and the public loses
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
05:20 PM on 09/17/2011
Americans can't afford four more years of a president who won't nationalize all banks and end the Federal Reserve.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:24 PM on 09/17/2011
a little common sense, the reason banks are doing their same magic tricks that got them in trouble before, because the republicans are against and regulations or reforms for the banks and wall street. they vote against any reform bills. as long as the repubs have any power, which includes the republican controlled house, expect this. it's not our presidents fault, it's the repub controlled congress, led by, none another than eric can't or...keep the repubs out, and vote out can't or anf his coherts, and there will be progress. less repubs/teapubs mean more progress!!
photo
joni brit
The road to success is always under construction.
10:32 AM on 09/18/2011
I didn't know that Timothy Geithner, United States Secretary of the Treasury, serving under President Barack Obama, previously the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was a Republican? What about Henry Paulson, Secretary of the Treasury before him and former CEO of Goldman Sachs?
photo
joni brit
The road to success is always under construction.
10:26 AM on 09/18/2011
Do you know the Fed is a for profit Bank? It's not a Bank that was created to protect the interests off the American Citizen, but a private Bank, with a catchy name, that somehow has the power to regulate interest rates. If you look in the phone book under Federal Institutions, the Fed is not there, because it's private, and making huge profits.
03:55 PM on 09/17/2011
I swear, we need to put None Of The Above as a ballot choice!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
07:07 PM on 09/17/2011
Let's learn what it is like to live as soverigns in our own country - we have been thoroughly educated otherwise. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAVIh7MipX8&list=FLp8R7uIpoBDK6WCzrXIgo6Q&index=2
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
10:04 AM on 09/18/2011
For the first time in over 50 years of voting, I am going to write in my choices for president and vice president. Yes, I voted for Obama, believing in the hope and change - BUT "the more things change, the more they stay the same".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eyecon
Retired CEO & Quality-Mgmt Consultant
03:11 PM on 09/17/2011
The real problem is that we never rebuilt that regulations and protections that were put in place in the 40's and then removed starting with Reagan. George, II eviscerated whatever was left of the key firewalls.
photo
Thumbody
just for the halibut!
01:27 PM on 09/17/2011
It's very easy to gamble with other peoples money, knowing your covered.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kerry keane
Proud Libertarian - but here I'm a "Bagger"
01:29 PM on 09/17/2011
Well said .. Already fanned ...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
10:06 AM on 09/18/2011
fanned - but if there comes a time for another bail out, the politicians and their ban buddies hopefully will feel the wrath of the people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BillyRI
01:08 PM on 09/17/2011
"You wicked, lazy servant! So you knew that I harvest where I have not sown and gather where I have not scattered seed? Well then, you should have put my money on deposit with the bankers so that when I returned I would have recieved it back with interest." (Mt. 25:26).
01:06 PM on 09/17/2011
Those of you not putting your money into gold and other hard assets are going to be in for a rude awakening in the next few years.
photo
4eva
.-.. --- ...- . --..-- / -. --- - / .... .- - .
02:08 PM on 09/17/2011
They can't say they weren't warned
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
05:22 PM on 09/17/2011
I've been telling people that for at least six years. Get aboard the Gold Express or be thrown under the oncoming train within 3 to 5 years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:30 PM on 09/17/2011
sounds like something glenn beck would say, instilling fear into consumers, to purchase gold. but, little do they know, he is a paid spokesman for one of the companies who sell gold.
10:27 AM on 09/18/2011
Check the linked video clip complilation of Bernanke telling CNBC 2005 there's no housing bubble as gold price $642 oz. pops up behind him. In 2007 Bernanke says no froth in the markets.
http://dailybail.com/home/a-movement-by-the-people-to-prevent-the-reappointment-of-the.html

Not gonna put Glenn Beck down for saying "buy gold" even if gold seller is his sponsor. Chat on investment blog zerohedge is about buy gold and silver, has been since Federal Reserve chose to monetizes debt extremely. FRD found out inflation was not the solution to the Great Depression, so why are we do it again?
photo
F4U Corsair
redpurpleblue.com
01:02 PM on 09/17/2011
And liberals think that other Americans will not waste increased Government giveaways?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xanas
libertarian, voluntarist, anarchist
12:57 PM on 09/17/2011
The Austrian economists told you this is what happens.
http://econstories.tv/2011/04/28/fight-of-the-century-music-video/

Many of the American people without understanding Austrian theory had a good sense that this was the wrong thing to do, and yet Congress members passed TARP even in areas of the country where the people were entirely against it. (And TARP was of course only a minority of what the government did, the Fed created about 1.6 trillion in additional reserves, shown by this graph...)

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/EXCRESNS

Whereas banks normally lend up to the full balance of reserves as can be seen historically, lately they have not been doing this. This is the only reason we haven't seen high inflation levels that many Austrians have predicted would occur. But when these reserves start dropping you will see prices go up substantially. The fact that this is happening with more bad loans will make it that much worse.

It was our betters doing the "best for us." But it's not like they started this yesterday. Vote for Ron Paul if you want to end this nonsense. It will be painful, but it will be more painful if we wait for it to occur on it's own.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BHLguFEN3M
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eyecon
Retired CEO & Quality-Mgmt Consultant
03:07 PM on 09/17/2011
Oh please. Selective observation and partial observation. Moreover, you haven't the first clue about Fed reserve funds. Read the Federal Reserve annual report which has all of the numbers and explanations. http://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/annual-report/default.htm

Ron Paul knows just slightly more than the BachWoman about economics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
05:25 PM on 09/17/2011
Anyone stupid enough to believe any self-serving report from the Federal Reserve deserves to become one of its next victims. Abolish the Fed and nationalize the banks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xanas
libertarian, voluntarist, anarchist
05:53 PM on 09/17/2011
How about instead of sending me to a 400 page report you explain just one thing you think needs to be observed that's not.

Because I've looked at the report and much of it has to do with trends in emerging economies or trends in the CPI or various other indexes of prices, but none of that contradicts what I wrote or seems to indicate that my analysis or that of the Austrians is incorrect.

Also, I don't know exactly what methodology is behind many of the figures or how they are constructed. I know that the GDP figure is completely ridiculous since it's rooted in the notion that government spending is just as valuable as private spending, and I know that the CPI calculation has changed. In any case, the report seemed to indicate what I had said, that increases in prices have been muted in many areas, are rising in others (like commodities), but that this hasn't drastically increased prices of all goods.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissingAmerica
12:28 PM on 09/17/2011
Disgusting! They risk our money, and they get bailouts. We Americans go broke by taking the tiniest risk on things like whether to buy discount bread or fresh. Something wrong with the system!
01:07 PM on 09/17/2011
If the Teabaggers were against the bailouts, then I'm for it!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eyecon
Retired CEO & Quality-Mgmt Consultant
03:08 PM on 09/17/2011
They weren't against the bailouts unless they can mistakenly assign them to Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
07:19 PM on 09/17/2011
Ugh, that's what we need, more blind leading the blind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
05:27 PM on 09/17/2011
There is no way the "system" will change until the people have filled the streets with clubs, torches, and guns demanding the execution of the criminal class ruling in Congress today.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
07:22 PM on 09/17/2011
This is silly. Congress has access to the most heavily armed military force the world has ever known. Think they won't use it against people they care nothing for? If you are a historian you already know this has been done before.

This is what we need the history and knowledge of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAVIh7MipX8&list=FLp8R7uIpoBDK6WCzrXIgo6Q&index=2