More

Soyuz Landing Rattles Nerves During Communications Breakdown

Soyuz Landing

PETER LEONARD   09/16/11 08:52 AM ET   AP

MOSCOW — A Russian Soyuz capsule carrying three returning astronauts from the International Space Station touched down safely Friday in the central steppes of Kazakhstan, but not without rattling nerves after a breakdown in communications.

NASA astronaut Ron Garan and Russian cosmonauts Andrei Borisenko and Alexander Samokutyayev landed some 150 kilometers (93 miles) southeast of the city of Zhezkazgan at 10 a.m. local time (0400 GMT) after 164 days in space.

Repeated calls to the Soyuz TMA-21 capsule from Mission Control in Korolyov, outside Moscow, went unanswered for several minutes, well after the craft had de-orbited. Communication was eventually established between the crew and an Antonov fixed-winged aircraft circling the landing site.

The landing was smooth in the area planned seconds before the expected arrival time.

Russian cosmonaut Sergei Volkov, NASA's Michael Fossum, and Satoshi Furukawa of Japan's JAXA space agency remain onboard the international space station and are due to return to Earth on Nov. 22.

There will be some taut nerves in the run-up to that return, which Roscosmos announced Friday should be preceded by a manned Soyuz launch from Baikonur on Nov. 14. Earlier this week, Roscosmos announced that the launch was to take place on Nov. 12.

Russia's space agency, Roscosmos, had to postpone that launch from October amid concerns over a failed supply mission last month. Another delay would almost certainly mean the space station would have to be left unmanned. Astronauts have been living aboard the station, without interruption, for almost 11 years.

Since phasing out the U.S. space shuttle program earlier this year, NASA is relying entirely on Russia to get American and other astronauts to the international space station.

On Friday, Russian space officials mounted their well-rehearsed search-and-recovery operation for Soyuz landings, deploying 14 Mi-8 helicopters in a holding circular pattern, as well as more than half a dozen all-terrain vehicles.

"What these helicopters do is that they sort of arrive at a targeted area and hover for a bit until they get a confirmation of exactly where the Soyuz has landed. But we actually did not hover at all today, we came straight in to the landing site," said NASA spokesman Josh Byerly, speaking from the landing site.

Samokutyayev, who occupied the central seat in the capsule, was the first to be pulled out and hoisted into a medical chair. He look visibly drained, but in good spirits, as a nurse mopped his brow and checked his blood pressure.

A beaming Garan was hoisted out a few minutes later, shortly followed by Borisenko.

The three men were then carried in their reclining seats into an inflatable medical tent positioned some 30 meters (30 yards) away, where they were to change out of their entry suits into more comfortable clothes ahead of their return home.

Around them, jubilant Russian space officials exchanged congratulations and posed for photographs. Some fixed a photo of Russian space pioneer Yury Gagarin together with seminal rocket designer Sergei Korolyov, after whom the Moscow mission control is named.

Helicopters will first take the three men to the Kazakh city of Karaganda, after which Samokutyayev and Borisenko will fly on to the Chkalovsky airport, near Moscow, while Garan will leave directly for the United States with a NASA support crew.

Russian Mission Control could not secure direct audio communication in the period between the Soyuz capsule de-orbiting and landing. A mission control official repeatedly called out their call-sign, "Tarkhany," and appealed for a response, but received no answer.

Still, a beeping signal indicated that the module separation process had been completed. Minutes before landing, an aircraft awaiting their craft's arrival reporting seeing the parachute deploy and shortly afterward a flying Antonov aircraft command center received the message that the crew was well.

The capsule landed gently around 30 seconds before 10 a.m. local time (0400 GMT) in the barren steppe, throwing up a puff of dust, before rolling onto its side.

While it is not unusual for the capsule to be pulled onto its side, it makes pulling out the crew a slightly lengthier process.

Their craft carrying the returning crew was dubbed the Gagarin, as they began their trip to the space station from the Baikonur spaceport in southern Kazakhstan on April 4, just eight days shy of the 50th anniversary of Yury Gagarin's maiden voyage into orbit.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 243
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:44 PM on 09/17/2011
Its refreshing to see cooperation between Russia and the US benefitting all humans in terms of technological progression. We have come a long ways, 40 years ago Americans were so concerned with containing communist expansion. Now we hope they can continue orbital missions such that we can ride along. Larger problems exist than ideological disagreements, and its nice to see some reflection of this in modern foreign policy.
12:13 PM on 09/17/2011
Say what you want about the Soyuz, but it's our only ticket to the ISS. Unbelievable, but the US has no way to put a man in space for probably 5 years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:45 PM on 09/17/2011
The US chose to discontinue the shuttle flights. They are still viable and would continue to be viable for years.

Pretty odd this was done.
UtahLiberal45
End the radical right
01:38 PM on 09/17/2011
They were also expensive, in an era of budget cuts, when NASA has many other fascinating unmanned probes that need to be funded as well. Too bad Congress can't increase NASA's budget to include the Shuttle and other programs. Much better than funding unnecessary wars.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
evilchihuahua
Crossing the line just because it's there.
09:19 AM on 09/17/2011
When I saw the picture,
I thought it was another South West passenger being thrown off of a flight.
03:44 AM on 09/17/2011
Death traps, like everything else the Russians make.
04:33 AM on 09/17/2011
Oh, please. Challenger. Columbia. Gemini capsule. This stuff is not a walk in the park.
07:28 AM on 09/17/2011
Not as bad as the American junk. The Soyuz has a better safety record than the Shuttle.
03:19 AM on 09/17/2011
Hell..we get along better with Russia than we do with ourselves. Whodathunkit.
photo
Rude Monk
No God can stop a hungry man
10:57 PM on 09/16/2011
Good old Soyuz barrels,set on fire and pushed over the edge.
Not only works but is a hundred times cheaper than the Shuttle.
Hope that the astronauts don't lose their nerve in this ultimate roller coaster ride.
07:44 PM on 09/18/2011
Soyuz vehicles seem far more dependable that our orbiters were.
09:39 PM on 09/16/2011
We need something like a space shuttle.
photo
dumosumo
Try finding a plumber on Sunday
09:26 AM on 09/17/2011
We need something. Period.
photo
IfIonlyknew
Politics is Hollywood for ugly people.
11:35 AM on 09/17/2011
What country are you from?
photo
7dr361
Air Force Flyboy 59 Years ago
09:37 PM on 09/16/2011
bet that was a little ruff ride......
photo
flossophy
Liberalism is not liberal.
08:12 PM on 09/16/2011
Question: Why do the Russians not land on water? It's a little softer than the Kazakstan steppes.
09:04 PM on 09/16/2011
I guessing that they don't have recovery vehicles for an ocean landing also the reentry vehicle would have to be capable of floating which would require costly modifications. On one US space mission the return capsule nearly sunk before the astronaiuts could be retrieved. Pick your poison.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Interbartolo
09:14 PM on 09/16/2011
because they control a lot more land than water areas to land in. you need a long track to protect under shooting (especially for the case where the vehicle downmodes to ballistic entry) and to a lesser extent over shooting the target zone. That is why for the US the plan is to put the MPCV down off the coast of San Diego, any under performance issues would put it closer to Hawaii.
06:43 PM on 09/16/2011
"The capsule landed gently around 30 seconds before 10 a.m. local time (0400 GMT) in the barren steppe, throwing up a puff of dust, before rolling onto its side."

This thing falls from space, lands on the Kazakh steppe and they say it landed gently? I know it has a huge parachute but I'd like some corroboration on the gentle landing part from one of the dudes inside the thing.

Frankly, gentle is not quite the first word that comes to mind when I see this:

http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_2062.html
mr majestic
It went from "Hope and Change" to "Lie and Deny"
07:33 PM on 09/16/2011
lol...exactly. That capsule hits the ground like a brick. Each chair is custom made for each astronaut so they won't break their backs on landing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:05 PM on 09/16/2011
That looks like some kind of retro rocket blast that goes right before it hits. Those plumes don't really look consistent with an impact.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jafafa Hots
USA out of Microbio NOW!
08:14 PM on 09/16/2011
Yes. Soyuz has always had rockets which fire just at touchdown, to slow the impact. So it stirs up dust, but lands more gently than Apollo, Gemini and Mercury did, which is why it's able to land on ground whereas the US capsules mentioned above always had to land on water.
09:13 PM on 09/16/2011
That's right, it's a thrust-produced "airbag" of sorts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterFormaini
06:08 PM on 09/16/2011
Gee - if I had another man's hand shoved into my crotch while being photographed, I;d be nervous too!! :D
photo
Colonel Muttonfield
Taking it one century at a time
05:35 PM on 09/16/2011
I remember such a particular moment in my life when the twilight came and the darkness completely consumed me. As I stood in that darkness, a glimmer of truth flared forth upon my mind like the scorching rays of the sun. At that moment I perceived clearly that humanity has overreached itself. Having been freed from its constraints, I could see this clearly. There is a finite end to human life which is denied by the human psyche except when inevitably forced upon it by fate.
08:28 PM on 09/16/2011
Reminds me of: the start of Dante: "In the midst of life I came to myself in a dark wood, where the way was lost".
05:09 PM on 09/16/2011
My nerves would be rattled flying in anything the Russians built.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Simondj
С днем рождения, мой брат!
05:24 PM on 09/16/2011
Ever flown a Russian airline? If not, you have no idea how right you are.
photo
Greg Mirsky
Riga dimd, Riga dimd, Kas to Rigu dimdinaj?
05:35 PM on 09/16/2011
Only if you have anything to compare with. I flew on many Tu, IL, Yak and even ANT-2. the best was flight from Petropavlosvsk to Moscow on IL-86 with red caviar for snack.
photo
Greg Mirsky
Riga dimd, Riga dimd, Kas to Rigu dimdinaj?
05:36 PM on 09/16/2011
Have you tried flying on BMD? Unforgettable ...
photo
flossophy
Liberalism is not liberal.
05:05 PM on 09/16/2011
I'm not into c0nspiracies at all... but I'd argue that Pootie would like nothing better than for us to abandon the hundred billion dollar ISS... simply because it would be a giant symbol of America's !nept!tude, weakness and decline reverberating around the globe.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Simondj
С днем рождения, мой брат!
05:26 PM on 09/16/2011
What are you talking about? You don't even know, do you?
photo
flossophy
Liberalism is not liberal.
05:49 PM on 09/16/2011
I'm just speculating. 

But I have a pretty good idea of how Poot-man thinks. 

Soviet leaders are notorious for doing juvenile stuff like this.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
azxff
rebuildjoplin.org
05:38 PM on 09/16/2011
Russia has an equal interest in the ISS, as does the EU and Japan...So if the ISS had to be left unmanned for any period of time any symbolism falls upon them as much as anyone else. Remember floss, it is not the "American" space station..It is an international asset.
photo
flossophy
Liberalism is not liberal.
05:42 PM on 09/16/2011
Sorry, that is not quite accurate. America has subsidized the vast majority of the station and it's construction through the very expensive STS program.... something like 80-85 percent of its total cost. I believe the Russians only have one module.... which is probably expendable in Pootie's eyes.
04:51 PM on 09/16/2011
Carefull all you Faux News fans. NASA was a socialist program. As you all like to ask: "Can you name one thing that the government does right?"
05:12 PM on 09/16/2011
Hey a broken clock is right twice a day too. We got the space thing right then we scrapped it,that makes sense.
05:51 PM on 09/16/2011
Bet you would have said the Panama Canal was impossible.

Woulda lost WW II also.
06:21 PM on 09/16/2011
The repubs kept saying the space program was too expensive. Now you want to blame the dems for shutting it down?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
08:48 PM on 09/16/2011
Hoover Dam.