iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Debt Reduction Plan To Be Proposed

Obama

JIM KUHNHENN   09/19/11 12:51 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Drawing a bright line with congressional Republicans, President Barack Obama is proposing $1.5 trillion in new tax revenue as part of his long-term deficit reduction plan, according to senior administration officials.

The president on Monday will announce a proposal that includes repeal of Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthiest taxpayers, nearly $250 billion in reductions in Medicare spending, $330 billion in cuts in other mandatory benefit programs, and savings of $1 trillion from the withdrawal of troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, the officials said.

The plan includes no changes in Social Security and does not include an increase in the Medicare eligibility age, which the president had considered this summer.

The officials briefed reporters Sunday evening, but spoke on the condition of anonymity in advance of the president's announcement.

All in all, the president's plan is as much an opening bid as it is a political statement designed to draw contrasts with Republicans, who control the House of Representatives.

As such, it was not intended as a compromise and did not include agreements Obama had reached with House Speaker John Boehner during failed deficit reduction negotiations this summer.

The new taxes in particular have little or no chance of passing Congress as proposed. Republicans were already lining up against the president's tax proposal before they even knew the magnitude of what he intended to recommend.

Key features of the proposal:

_$1.5 trillion in new revenue, which would include about $800 billion realized over 10 years from repealing the Bush-era tax rates for couples making more than $250,000. It also would place limits on deductions for wealthy filers and end certain corporate loopholes and subsidies for oil and gas companies.

_$580 billion in cuts in mandatory benefit programs, including $248 billion in Medicare and $72 billion in Medicaid and other health programs. Other mandatory benefit programs include farm subsidies.

_$430 billion in savings from lower interest payment on the national debt.

By adding about $1 trillion in spending cuts already enacted by Congress and counting about $1 trillion in savings from the drawdown of military forces from Iraq and Afghanistan, the combined deficit reduction would total more than $4 trillion over 10 years, senior administration officials said.

Obama backed away from proposing sweeping changes to Medicare, following the advice of fellow Democrats that it would only give political cover to a privatization plan supported by House Republicans that turned to be unpopular with older Americans.

Administration officials said 90 percent of the $248 billion in 10-year Medicare cuts would be squeezed from service providers. The plan does shift some additional costs to beneficiaries, but those changes would not start until 2017, and administration officials made clear as well that Obama would veto any Medicare cuts that aren't paired with tax increases on upper-income people.

The deficit reduction plan represents an economic bookend to the $447 billion in tax cuts and new public works spending that Obama has proposed as a short-term measure to stimulate the economy and create jobs. He's submitting his deficit fighting plan to a special joint committee of Congress that is charged with recommending how to reduce deficits by $1.2 trillion to $1.5 trillion over 10 years.

Republicans have ridiculed the war savings as gimmicky, but House Republicans included them in their budget proposal this year and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, had agreed to count them as savings during debt ceiling negotiations with Obama this summer.

But the Republicans' biggest objections will be with the president's tax increases.

"Class warfare may make for really good politics but it makes for rotten economics," GOP Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the House Budget Committee chairman, told "Fox News Sunday."

Ryan was commenting on Obama's plan to propose a new minimum tax rate for taxpayers earning more than $1 million.

The measure – Obama is going to call it the "Buffett Rule" for billionaire investor Warren Buffett – is designed to prevent millionaires from taking advantage of lower tax rates on investment earnings than what middle-income taxpayers pay on their wages. At issue is the difference between a taxpayer's tax bracket and the effective tax rate that taxpayer pays. Millionaires face a 35 percent tax bracket, while middle income filers fall in the 15 or 25 percent bracket. But investment income is taxed at 15 percent and Buffett has complained that he and other wealthy people have been "coddled long enough" and shouldn't be paying a smaller share of their income in federal taxes than middle-class taxpayers.

Still, the White House considers passing the jobs bill far more pressing and Obama has been looking for every opportunity to bring it to the public's attention.

In his Saturday radio and Internet address, Obama said he would lay down a plan that would show how to pay down the nation's debt and pay for his employment legislation.

"But right now," he said, "we've got to get Congress to pass this jobs bill."

To that end, Obama on Thursday will be at a bridge linking Ohio and Kentucky – home states to Boehner and Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell. He will use the bridge as a prop to call for increased spending on infrastructure.

___

Associated Press writer Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Drawing a bright line with congressional Republicans, President Barack Obama is proposing $1.5 trillion in new tax revenue as part of his long-term deficit reduction plan, according...
WASHINGTON — Drawing a bright line with congressional Republicans, President Barack Obama is proposing $1.5 trillion in new tax revenue as part of his long-term deficit reduction plan, according...
Filed by Alana Horowitz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,625
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (92 total)
12:28 PM on 09/19/2011
Heres the biggest problem with tax the rich what is this president going to do with the money. I know most liberals blindly support obama because they would rather run this country into tha ground then admitt they were wrong. How can you expect anyone to grant this president another 500 billion dollars after he funded shovel ready jobs then laughed on television that they were never there. Maybe he will lends it to another one of his friends like Solyndra which is another story the liberal press is ignoring but when there forced to answer for it meaning the obama administration and how they were connected to all of it they might have a problem pinning this one on Bush.
12:50 PM on 09/19/2011
"I know most liberals blindly support obama because they would rather run this country into tha ground then admitt they were wrong."

================================================================

That's funny because I'm a liberal, and I like most liberals, whom I know, regularly criticize Obama for things like his handling of Guantanamo, drone strikes in Pakistan, his handling of the Israeli-Palestinian fighting, his reluctance to denounce dictators in the Arab Spring, etc.
12:10 PM on 09/19/2011
I like how so many of you are playing the blame game, saying republicans did this, democrats did that, just wait until we regain control, etc etc. When will everyone realize that both parties are destroying the country? They are both responsible for where we are today. The system is broken. The carrots and sticks are in all the wrong places. Until everyone sees this, we'll just continue going back and forth between republican and democratic eras, perpetually playing this blame game.
12:10 PM on 09/19/2011
No, Obama to campaign on taxing the rich. The DEMOCRATS in the Senate won't vote for tax increases.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bpeirce
11:52 AM on 09/19/2011
The Majority is with you on this. DO NOT BACK DOWN AND GIVE IN
12:43 AM on 09/20/2011
The majority supports who? Obama? ROFL~
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NHblue89
Government must have a heart as well as a head
09:08 AM on 09/20/2011
Actually 75% of Americans support higher taxes on the rich. But hey those are facts, you would not know anything about that now would you?
IloveUSA
Freedom or Death
03:31 PM on 09/20/2011
The majority ....those who want to live off the rest of us.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
exclintonsupporter
Love your enemy --- it messes with their heads!!!
11:50 AM on 09/19/2011
People need to read this article...the GOTP's hero, Ronald Reagan was smart enough to know that the budget, deficit and taxes, go hand-in-hand....

http://thi­nkprogress­.org/econo­my/2011/06­/01/233526­/taxes-low­er-reagan/

Republican­s are very fond of saying that the U.S. has “a spending problem, not a revenue problem.” But the truth is that revenue has plunged due to the recession and if we are to continued misguided tax cuts, revenue needs to be raised to eventually bring the budget into balance. Reagan knew that taxes were an important part of the budget equation. After all, he “raised taxes in seven of his eight years in office,” including four times in just two years.
11:43 AM on 09/19/2011
I read through the comments and am surprised how many people think that getting rid of Obama or Obama is the cause of the country's problems. many problems have been inherited for one thing & with no cooperation from congress his hands are effectively tied - it's like a football team that has no cooperation between the quarter back and the rest of the team, how much winning would they do? and yes it is a team effort.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gpop824
11:28 AM on 09/19/2011
Repealing the Bush tax cuts on those making $250,000 a year will cost jobs to small business owners.

In the US, small business (less than 500 employees) accounts for around half the GDP and more than half the employment. Regarding small business, the top job provider is those with fewer than 10 employees, and those with 10 or more but fewer than 20 employees comes in as the second, and those with 20 or more but fewer than 100 employees comes in as the third The most recent data shows firms with less than 20 employees account for slightly more than 18% of the employment.

How can small business afford higher taxes - They would have to increase prices or lay off workers. With a economy lacking in growth, higher taxes on small business is certain to cause more strain on the economy.

Of the 5,369,068 employer firms in 1995, 78.8 percent had fewer than 10 employees, and 99.7 percent had fewer than 500 employees, and many small business have to pay employment taxes, Excise tax's, some pay environmental taxes, and fuel taxes. This does not include txes imposed by the states.
photo
sahsider
Veterans Rock!
11:36 AM on 09/19/2011
Hate to burst your bubble but this is 2011,quoting stats from 1995 is pretty lame.
If you are paying attention President Obama has just proposed raising taxes on $1M wage earners. Get in the fast lane there granpa.
photo
olehippie
expect nothing and you will never be disappointed
11:23 AM on 09/19/2011
The rich have gutted the middle class. They have continually passed paper around to one another in a financial game of musical chairs. While everyone riding on the gray train makes millions on providing nothing, doing nothing, and simply buying and selling everything, there is always a bubble that bursts. One rich guy gets left holding the bag looking out the back of the caboose of that "gray train" asking: where's the sucker that's supposed to buy this overpriced house, overpriced commercial property, overpriced .com stock, from me? So now what's left is a glut of overpriced houses, overpriced commercial properties, that those who actually want to LIVE in those houses and those who actually want to USE those commercial properties to start a business cannot even begin to afford the inflated prices now posted for these "investments".

The want for more is out of control. Until those with all the money stop buying up everything that they can afford but have no use for, things will only get worse.

As I see it the answer is simple. The rich have too much money to play with and they have no interest in doing anything constructive with what they have. They "play" the stock market as if it were Las Vegas-- with no concern to what inflating the commodities market does to the average American.

Raise their taxes. Less money motivates the working class to work harder. Why would it not do the same for the rich?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoanMeijer
Author of Relentless: The Search For Typhoid Mary
11:22 AM on 09/19/2011
This is the direction to go in - it has huge VOTER support. America's enemies are clear - they are the greedy oligarchs and out of control banksters.... taxes for them will be supported by the 98% - and if the GOP blocks those taxes - well, for the first time in history people are talking about replacing their own Congressmen - let's see if they'll actually do it.
photo
noroom4ears
"hello, hello, hello, is there anybody in there"
10:34 AM on 09/19/2011
debt reduction plan: remove obama.
10:31 AM on 09/19/2011
Has any one heard of Adam Smith?
In case you've forgotten he's considered the God father of Capitalism. Republicans love to cite his famous book, Wealth of Nations, but if they actually read what Adam Smith said, they'd recognize that Adam Smith favored taxation. He in fact believed that citizens should be proud to pay taxes as a symbol of their freedom.
Not only did Adam Smith favor taxation, but he believed that the rich should pay more taxes than the poor. According to Smith, society enabled the rich to prosper. The more the rich prospered, the more they owed society. In addition, Adam Smith did not like poverty because poor people could not buy goods and services that enabled business and commerce to prosper. So he favored measures to allieviate the poor.
The current debate that the GOP is raising is really lousy economics. I'm sure Adam Smith would agree.
S M V
Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses
03:18 PM on 09/19/2011
I would be very interested to see the sections you refer to from Smith. Is it in Wealth of Nations or Theory of Moral Sentements? I do not remember a quote in W o N about citizens being proud to pay taxes. I never finished Theory of Moral Sentements.
S M V
Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses
03:28 PM on 09/19/2011
Are you refering to this quote?

"The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state. "

If so then you would be describing a flat tax and agreeing that everyoner should pay it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NHblue89
Government must have a heart as well as a head
09:13 AM on 09/20/2011
That is false, did you read the quote at all? Acoording to respective abilities. Are you telling me the bottom 50 have the same ability as the top 2 or 1? Flat tax has them all paying the same.
photo
Hugebrass
Defend the Constitution from "Progressive" Change
10:25 AM on 09/19/2011
I wonder if Mr. Obama would be willing to stand up before the American electorate and announce that he wants fewer and smaller gifts to support minority education or medical research or any of the myriad of other laudable programs and causes paid for by tax-deductible donations.  For this is what he's actually done with his plan to fund his latest Keynesian effort to stimulate the economy by  "soaking the rich".  

What the Left misses in their quest to redistribute wealth, are the unintended consequences of their actions. If you eliminate the incentive to make donations, who really suffers? The recepients of those donations. Minority students working on a medical or law degree perhaps? You bet.

So, here we are again... The president is showing to us all that he doesn't understand economics, nor does he understand tax policy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:43 AM on 09/19/2011
What a crock, ever bother to research how many minority actual recieve such through charities, less than 1% or how much goes into medical research vs. the NIH and govert sponsored reasrch its abuot 55 from cahraitable donations and 95% governtment
photo
Hugebrass
Defend the Constitution from "Progressive" Change
11:43 AM on 09/19/2011
http://www.msfund.org/

There it is. Right on the front page.

As usual, your Progressive policies are nothing but destructive. They create nothing, spread misery and promote decline.
10:19 AM on 09/19/2011
GOOD MORNING!!! MY FELLOW HOMO SAPIENS WHICH MEANS THE SPECIES WHO IS WISE.
Proof AIPAC (American Israeli Political Action Committee) is running the U.S. Governments foreign policy is the fact that once again this U.S. Government is going to vote against granting a Palestinian state in the UN Security Council.
Why the American people would tolerate another country running their foreign policy for 40 years is beyond me???!!!
It has never been in the best interest of America to favor Israel over the other countries of the Mideast.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:09 AM on 09/19/2011
Sign up for the latest Jewish conspiracy.
10:11 AM on 09/19/2011
GOOD MORNING!!! MY FELLOW HOMO SAPIENS WHICH MEANS THE SPECIES WHO IS WISE.
THIS IS THE OBAMA I VOTED FOR!!!
hhoc612710
Obam 0812
10:22 AM on 09/19/2011
ME TOO. HE IS BACK.
09:56 AM on 09/19/2011
The demon has spoken -
photo
BlueBird55
Love expands to meet demands.
10:52 AM on 09/19/2011
Yes, we can see that you have.