More

Blueprint For Troubled Postal Service Included In Obama's Deficit-Reduction Plan

Usps

First Posted: 09/19/11 04:19 PM ET Updated: 11/19/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- In his deficit-reduction plan detailed on Monday, President Obama put forth a comprehensive reform package aimed at restoring financial stability to the beleaguered U.S. Postal Service.

The President's plan includes five proposals that would cut costs at the agency, which has said it could go bankrupt as early as next year if Congress doesn't intervene. Parts of the President's plan are expected to be widely agreed upon as necessary -- such as the restructuring of billions of dollars in payments to workers' retiree health benefits. But other elements, such as allowing the agency to move from six-day delivery to five, may draw less of a consensus.

The White House said the plan would bring the postal service $20 billion in relief over the coming years, as well as trim the federal deficit by $19 billion over the next decade.

"The Administration recognizes the enormous value of the U.S. Postal Service to the Nation's commerce and communications," the plan noted. "Bold action is needed to ensure that USPS can continue to operate in the short-run and achieve viability in the long-run."

In a hearing on Capitol Hill earlier this month, Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe told lawmakers that the postal service is "at the brink of default" and could miss a $5.5 billion payment on retiree benefits at the end of this month.

With the agency expected to post a $9 billion deficit this year, Donahoe said he would like to cut more than 100,000 postal jobs that are covered by no-layoff clauses in union contracts, as well as eliminate the agency's mandatory annual payment into employee health benefits. He pleaded with lawmakers to pass legislation that would make the postal service more like "a private-sector business."

Obama's plan would appear to give the agency more of the discretion that businesses enjoy. In addition to allowing the elimination of Saturday delivery, the plan would allow the agency to offer "non-postal products," although it did not detail what such products might be. It also suggests allowing the postal service to "better align the costs of postage with the costs of mail delivery" -- that is, raise prices -- while still working within the current postage price cap.

Republican Rep. Darrell Issa, chair of the House oversight committee, quickly pounced on the President's plan for the postal service, saying it proposes "sticking taxpayers with the tab." He said the oversight committee will propose on Wednesday its own plan that would save $10.7 billion annually.

"Rather than backing an effort to seek fundamental reform, the accounting gimmicks used in the plan are a thinly veiled attempt to offset continued operating losses with a taxpayer funded bailout," Issa said in a statement.

Yvonne Yoerger, a spokeswoman for the postal service, said agency officials haven't fully reviewed the President's plan and couldn't comment in detail. However, she added, "We're grateful that the President acknowledged the value of the postal service. Also, it's heartening that he's recognized the urgent need for reform."

The National Association of Postal Supervisors, which represents 32,000 active and retired postal managers, agrees with the President's recommendation to restructure the health-benefit payments, as well as to refund two years' worth of overpayments to a retiree pension fund, worth $6.9 billion. But like the union representing letter carriers, the association believes that ending Saturday delivery would be bad policy.

"We oppose cutting service to the country by allowing deliveries to be reduced to five days," Louis Atkins, the association's president, said in an email. "This change would have serious implications for Americans who rely on the mail for the delivery of prescription medicine and the local newspaper industry that relies on the Postal Service for the delivery of weekly newspapers, generally on Saturdays."

Donahoe has warned that the postal service could run out of cash as early as next summer and may no longer be able to make good on its contracts. With a $1 trillion mailing industry relying on the postal service, a bankruptcy could have broader impacts on an already weak economy. In its deficit plan, the White House noted that the postal service's operating deficit has been " exacerbated by the precipitous drop in mail volume in the last few years" due to a slow economy and the growth of online transactions.

The President's larger, $3 trillion deficit plan calls for $1.5 trillion in new taxes over the coming decade, and he promised to veto any package coming out of Congress that does not include new revenues.

This story has been updated with comment from the postal service.

READ the White House's plan for cutting costs at the U.S. Postal Service:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- In his deficit-reduction plan detailed on Monday, President Obama put forth a comprehensive reform package aimed at restoring financial stability to the beleaguered U.S. Postal Service. ...
WASHINGTON -- In his deficit-reduction plan detailed on Monday, President Obama put forth a comprehensive reform package aimed at restoring financial stability to the beleaguered U.S. Postal Service. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 560
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
Icantbelieveher 08:54 PM on 09/19/2011
But the root cause of the financial distress that the Postal Service is going through is overwhelmingly caused by Congressional mandates that were imposed upon the Postal Service. Congress passed the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA), which was signed into law by President G.W. Bush on December 20, 2006. Under the guise of modernizing the Postal Service for the 21st Century, it actually  Read More...
markgoode
a voice from the center
04:01 AM on 09/28/2011
H.R. 1351 has 216 sponsors in the House. Only needs 2 more to hit the magic number 218. Hooray for these sensible bipartisan sponsors!

The Postal Regulatory Commission is supposed to have 5 members, yet only has 4 since the R's in the Senate are holding up confirmation of Obama's nominee. However, starting Oct. 15, 2011, it will have only 2 members. The two R's on the Commission must GO because their 7th year is up. Both of the remaining members are D's. In other words, as of Oct. 15, 2011, D's will control the Commission.

That's why certain members of the House are in a hurry to pass a law to strip the powers of the Commission.
05:23 PM on 09/20/2011
How does unemploying more people help the economy.?
02:11 PM on 09/20/2011
@Teacher Trish, Many years ago I suggested there be a sticker that said "no junk mail" on it to adhere to the mailbox. While in Australia......low and behold, "no junk mail" stickers. They must have a lot LESS RED TAPE, LESS CORPORATE LOBBYISTS AND LESS LAWYERS to go through in between a common sense notion and it's application. The other day I asked my mail man what would happen if I put one on my box and he said I was not allowed to. Ummmmm but don't I live in the land of the free????????????????
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
01:56 PM on 09/20/2011
Actually closing stand a lone post offices and moving them into established businesses like pharmacys is the only good idea to come from the post office executives in decades..........

I see it as a win-win situation........ the post office costs are less and it drives customers to those businesses that house them........
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
01:53 PM on 09/20/2011
The only change I see is that I will be getting junk mail only five times per week.............
11:27 AM on 09/20/2011
Who needs bills and overdue notices and demand for payments letters 6 days a week?
5 day delivery works everywhere else. Save the money now
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ezio
How can we win when fools can be kings?
11:17 AM on 09/20/2011
Uh oh post office.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
11:04 AM on 09/20/2011
The Post Office is an entitlement, pure and simple. One (of many) things that drives me up a wall is that even when there are long lines, a customer can take a bag of goods to the counter and the clerk will find the box, pack the bag then mail it for that customer. Is there a charge for this other than that for the box and postage? No Feel free to add your own comments.
photo
kathy001
Don't bogart that duck
12:59 PM on 09/20/2011
If the customer is paying for the box and the postage, what other charge should there be? The only problem I see here is if the Post Office is not making a profit on the box.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
01:13 PM on 09/20/2011
You don't see a problem with the clerk using his/her time for wrapping the bag in the box and charging for it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:02 PM on 09/20/2011
Yeah you pay for it, what do you think postal charges are, tips? Yes they sell boxes for packaging, and yes the clerk mails it for the customer, thats the service, you get the exact same services ad fed ex and ups.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
01:12 PM on 09/20/2011
And you pay a heck of a lot less than you pay at FedEX or UPS. It is an entitlement for those who don't want to pay what the cost of doing business is and shoves that cost onto the rest of us. No bailout for the Post Office.
photo
vonBeavis
Do what you can with what you've got while you can
10:57 AM on 09/20/2011
Republican Rep. Darrell Issa . . . quickly pounced on the President's plan for the postal service, saying it proposes "sticking taxpayers with the tab."

One of the worst congressmen in history with a personal history of grand theft auto and bawling when Schwartzenegger stepped in to steal his thunder, Issa tried to rip off the governorship of California. Now his little witchhunt for anything not repug is costing the taxpayers mucho dinero. So some feedback for the 10-watt dim-bulb: tax money currently doesn't support the USPS--it is mandated by the stupid, destructive rules imposed by rightwingers in congress (where you're supposed work for the taxpayers, Issa) to be self-sufficient, yet without profit. If my taxes supports the USPS, I'm fine with that.

Also, dillhole, who pays for your congressional franking privilege? You or the taxpayer?

Get rid of the repug restrictions and destructive rules regarding the USPS, unload some of its topheavy management, and let the letter carriers, window clerks and mail handlers do their job. Back around 1972 postal workers were so poorly paid that they qualified for food stamps. Around then was when it went from the US Post Office Department to the US Postal Service. Later, when the 30 years of repug terror against the middle class kicked off, it was their death by a thousand cuts that got the USPS in it's current straits.

Y'all broke it, just like Amtrak. Keep your lobbyist-lubed fingers out of the pie henceforth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibertarianCentrist
Dems/GOP..... Exactly the same....
10:29 AM on 09/20/2011
Did anyone else read the first collumn on that page in reference to taxing airfare??? $1300-2000 per flight??? You know that tax will be passed along to those of us who fly. That's BS!!! On the other hand... when did the US Post Office become too big to fail??? Why not privatize postal delivery?? You know how much money the US Government could save???
photo
vonBeavis
Do what you can with what you've got while you can
10:58 AM on 09/20/2011
Bull.
11:09 AM on 09/20/2011
For privatized postal delivery, you have a choice of UPS or FedEx, both significantly more expensive than USPS. If these were our only options for shipping, it would cost business in a big way. I can attest to this because I own a small business and we do tons of shipping.

BTW... aren't you Libertarians/TPers fully invested in the idea that government should do only what's directed in the US Constitution? The US Postal Service is actually one of the few government agencies explicitly authorized by the Constitution, created by the "Postal Clause" in Article One.

This venerable American institution traces its roots to 1775, when Benjamin Franklin was appointed the first postmaster general. It is now the 2nd largest employer in the US. These are essential jobs that help the economy run.
photo
myakkakat
Compromise is not a 4 Letter Word
11:22 AM on 09/20/2011
"For privatized postal delivery, you have a choice of UPS or FedEx, both significan­tly more expensive than USPS. If these were our only options for shipping, it would cost business in a big way. I can attest to this because I own a small business and we do tons of shipping."

F & F'vd from a fellow small business owner/SHIPPER
12:06 PM on 09/20/2011
I concur. Also USPS from our stats has a better delivery record than UPS when it comes to handling ... USPS loses/damages less than 0.1% whereas UPS is at about 5%.
10:22 AM on 09/20/2011
Since everything Apple touches turns to gold, I'd like to see Apple adopt the US Postal Service, give it a total makeover, and the return it to the American people. An infusion of streamlined design, online functionality, and simplified processes would be a real boost to the outdated and clunky USPS. Once the transformation is complete, Apple could ship all iPhones, iPads, iPods, etc with a USPS App, directly interfacing customers with an elegant, new postal system suited for the modern era.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steph81
10:04 AM on 09/20/2011
How about getting rid of junk mail
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibertarianCentrist
Dems/GOP..... Exactly the same....
10:31 AM on 09/20/2011
Junk mail is the only thing paying the bills at this point for the USPS, Now that most bill paying is electronic now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
librldem
Snarking for Merika n jebus! Glory!
10:34 AM on 09/20/2011
That's what they make their money on!
09:48 AM on 09/20/2011
What is really killing the USPS? Healthcare costs.

What overhead cost nearly bankrupted American auto manufacturers? Healthcare costs.

Why do American employers hesitate to hire more full time workers? Healthcare costs.

Notice the pattern here.

The burden of healthcare costs should be removed from business through a single-payer, national healthcare system. This would be the single, best stimulus program for all American businesses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibertarianCentrist
Dems/GOP..... Exactly the same....
10:30 AM on 09/20/2011
Not quite as effective as repeal of Obamacare and his plethora of regulations....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibertarianCentrist
Dems/GOP..... Exactly the same....
10:31 AM on 09/20/2011
REGULATION UNDER OBAMA
http://www­­.investor­s­.com/New­sA­ndAnaly­sis­/Artic­le/5­81555­/2011­0815­1901/R­egu­latory-­Ag­encies-S­t­affing-Up­­.aspx
If the federal government­­'s regulatory operation were a business, it would be one of the 50 biggest in the country in terms of revenues, and the third largest in terms of employees, with more people working for it than McDonald's­­, Ford, Disney and Boeing combined.
Regulatory agencies have seen their combined budgets grow a healthy 16% since 2008, topping $54 billion, according to the annual "Regulator­­'s Budget," ....Progre­­ssive Policy Institute, found that between March 2010 and March 2011 federal regulatory jobs climbed faster than either private jobs or overall government jobs.
The Obama administra­­tion imposed 75 new major rules in its first 26 months, costing the private sector more than $40 billion, ... "No other president has imposed as high a number or cost in a comparable time period," The number of pages in the Federal Register — where all new rules must be published and which serves as proxy of regulatory activity — jumped 18% in 2010. This July, regulators imposed a total of 379 new rules that cost $9.5 billion...­­.
And much more is on the way. The Federal Register notes that more than 4,200 regulation­­s are in the pipeline. That doesn't count impending clean air rules from the EPA, new derivative rules, or the FCC's net neutrality rule. Nor does that include recently announced fuel economy mandates or eventual ObamaCare and Dodd-Frank regulation­­s.”
11:16 AM on 09/20/2011
You post offers nothing in response to my assertion that bloated healthcare costs are strangling American businesses. Typical of a TPer, you heap criticism upon President Obama without proposing a single serious solution to the problems we face. This is why your candidates are doomed for failure.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:13 PM on 09/20/2011
From a far right corporate rag, much untrue, the untrue rely on more untrue statements from right wing corporate funded think tanks that do anything but think.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
09:12 AM on 09/20/2011
dropping a single delivery day will cut fuel costs dramatically...oh wait big oil is against that, at least now we know who is paying that nickle poster
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:59 AM on 09/20/2011
If Saturday is a bad day to stop mail delivery, try Tuesday or Wednesday. What's the big deal....just pick a different day. You blowhards are really useless!!!
photo
lcr999
scientist
09:53 AM on 09/20/2011
Saturday makes a lot more sense. Businesses actually work during the week.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:58 AM on 09/20/2011
Per the article it states that delivery of the week's newspapers is on Saturday...