iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Fed Expected To Implement 'Operation Twist' To Reduce Loan Rates

PAUL WISEMAN and MARTIN CRUTSINGER   09/21/11 08:01 PM ET   AP

Ben Bernanke

WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve said Wednesday it will shuffle $400 billion of its portfolio to try to drive down long-term interest rates and get the economy going. But economists doubted it would do much good, the stock market sold off, and the Fed itself was unusually divided over the strategy.

Lowering interest rates makes it cheaper for people and companies to borrow money and spend it throughout the economy, which has slowed sharply more than two years after the Great Recession. Consumer spending makes up most of the nation's economic activity.

But rates are already at historic lows. Americans, still feeling insecure about the future, might not be willing to take on more debt, even at lower rates. Others see no reason to jump into the housing market when prices are still falling. Others can't get credit.

"Frankly, I don't see it having any meaningful impact on the economy," said Bernard Baumohl, chief global economist with the Economic Outlook Group. "What the Fed did today was a distraction."

Yields on U.S. government debt were already among the lowest on record, and investors drove them down further after the Fed announcement. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note, an indicator for mortgages and other long-term loans, closed at 1.86 percent, down from 1.93 percent the day before and the lowest since at least 1962.

Along with the strategy statement, the Fed gave a stormy overview of the economy – slow growth, high unemployment and a slumping housing market. The Fed has already said it will keep short-term interest rates super-low into 2013, a sign that the central bank was not optimistic about the next two years.

Three members of the Federal Open Market Committee, the policymaking arm of the Fed, dissented. There are 10 members in all, including Chairman Ben Bernanke, and usually no more than two dissent. The three have said the Fed's policies may be raising the risk of inflation.

The stock market fell quickly after the Fed announcement, which came just before 2:30 p.m. The Dow Jones industrial average, which was down about 20 points before the statement, finished the day down 283 points, or 2.5 percent.

"It's being viewed as perhaps an admission that this is a longer-term issue that the U.S. economy is facing and not one that's going to be solved over a couple of years," said Oliver Pursche, president of Gary Goldberg Financial Services.

The Dow closed at 11,124. It had appeared headed for 13,000 earlier this year, but investors grew worried this summer that a new recession is coming, and stocks have been extremely volatile since late July.

Wall Street had expected the Fed move for weeks, and had come to call it Operation Twist. In 1961, the Fed tried something similar and named it Operation Nudge, the idea being to nudge long-term interest rates lower. Chubby Checker's dance craze was sweeping the nation in the era of "American Bandstand," and the name Operation Twist stuck instead. Economists still argue about whether it worked, but most say it didn't help much.

This time, the Fed will sell $400 billion from its holdings of short-term U.S. government debt – Treasury bills and notes that mature in three years or sooner. It will use that money to buy Treasury notes and bonds with maturities of six to 30 years. The Fed said the shift would be complete by June.

By comparison, the Fed spent about $2 trillion on two rounds of bond-buying designed to lower long-term interest rates. Economists generally agree that the Fed succeeded in driving rates down and kept the economy from getting worse. The Fed's total portfolio is $2.9 trillion, almost all of it in Treasury securities and mortgage-backed securities.

In general, major loans throughout the economy, like mortgages, track those long-term Treasury securities. Already, the national average interest rate for the most popular type of mortgage, the 30-year fixed, is 4.09 percent, the lowest in six decades. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said the Fed announcement could send it below 4 percent.

Frank Sorrentino, CEO of North Jersey Community Bank in Englewood Cliffs, N.J., said he didn't think the Fed decision would encourage anyone to buy a house or take out a car loan.

"I don't think Operation Twist really does a whole lot, at least not on Main Street," he said.

By lowering long-term interest rates slightly, Operation Twist will probably further pinch the budget for retirees and other savers who rely on interest income. Savers have been hammered by super-low rates the past three years.

The Fed appears to be the only U.S. institution with a realistic chance of doing much to help the economy. President Barack Obama has proposed a $447 billion package of tax cuts and public spending, but it is far from clear that the program can pass the Republican-controlled House.

Still, the central bank is under pressure to do more. In the first six months of this year, the economy grew at an annual rate of 0.7 percent, the slowest since the recession ended in June 2009. Job growth for August was zero. Economists peg the odds of a new recession at about one in three.

Bernanke has drawn criticism from Republicans running for president in 2012 and in Congress. On Monday, the four highest-ranking Republicans in Congress sent Bernanke a letter cautioning the Fed against taking further steps to lower interest rates. Their letter suggested that lower rates could escalate the risk of high inflation.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry, the front-runner in most polls for the Republican presidential nomination, has gone so far as to say Bernanke would be "almost treasonous" to launch more bond-buying. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, another 2012 hopeful, said Wednesday that he wanted the Fed to return to its "proper, limited role of stabilizing prices and preventing rampant inflation."

In recent years, inflation has been low by historical standards, but it has increased over the past year, primarily because of more expensive food and gas. Most economists say unemployment is a far bigger concern than inflation.

Joshua Feinman, global chief economist of DB Advisors, praised the Fed for pushing ahead with Operation Twist despite the criticism.

He said he expects the Fed to consider something bolder if things don't improve. The Fed could try a third round of bond purchases to drive down long-term interest rates, a strategy known as quantitative easing. The second round ignited a 28 percent rally in stocks from its announcement, in August 2010, through April.

"Their ammunition is depleted," Feinman said of the Fed, "but it's not all gone."

___

AP Business Writer Derek Kravitz contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve said Wednesday it will shuffle $400 billion of its portfolio to try to drive down long-term interest rates and get the economy going. But economists doubted it w...
WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve said Wednesday it will shuffle $400 billion of its portfolio to try to drive down long-term interest rates and get the economy going. But economists doubted it w...
Filed by Harry Bradford  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 149
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Barron
09:55 PM on 09/22/2011
I wouldn't allow one good made in another country by a company in this country across our borders.I doubt that the argument that cheaply made abroad benefits us here is valid any longer.
One cannot argue that prices would rise because they already have and moving abroad has shown itself not to be the solution.
There are still enough wealthy to support the market yet fewer people are buying then why are prices rising.Perhaps it is profiteering?
Not living within one's means,meaning us and the government has come now to haunt us.
It is a very simple matter to determine what is a just tax.

Avarice and greed are quite destructive.And then the matter of wholesale corruption must be considered and of morals specifically.

The Wealth Distribution
In the United States, wealth is highly concentrated in a relatively few hands. As of 2007, the top 1% of households (the upper class) owned 34.6% of all privately held wealth, and the next 19% (the managerial, professional, and small business stratum) had 50.5%, which means that just 20% of the people owned a remarkable 85%, leaving only 15% of the wealth for the bottom 80% (wage and salary workers). In terms of financial wealth (total net worth minus the value of one's home), the top 1% of households had an even greater share: 42.7%. Table 1 and Figure 1 present further details drawn from the careful work of economist Edward N. Wolff at New York University (2010).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Barron
09:39 PM on 09/22/2011
Capital flows outward
across borders, supported by the chaos of the time, seeking
refuge from tax obligations. The state must pursue it in order to find it
in its hiding places in neutral sites. It is a sign of the times that the state,
in its direst need, must resort to the most extreme legal measures to
combat capital flight and tax evasion. It is the selfsame egotistical
capitalistic spirit, contemptuous of the moral law and of the most basic
requirements of the national welfare and fattened on orgies of
profiteering, which now in totally irresponsible fashion wants to evade
its tax obligations at the expense of the entire nation. It is this “cream”
of society which sat around champagne-laden tables in our large cities,
which now hastens abroad to seek salvation from the threatening
avalanche of taxes, while the noblest segment of our national wealth, our
male youth who were the hope of our future, bled to death in the muddy
fields of Ypres and Langemark. Public opinion should brand and pillory
these crimes against the nation as what they are: the flight of capital
abroad as national desertion in time of need; the avoidance of taxes as
contemptible betrayal of the nation’s integrity.
But will not a simple appeal to morality fall largely on deaf ears
in our age that is steeped in materialism
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Barron
09:04 PM on 09/22/2011
What is the Fed doing with a portfolio? And how does it aquire it and how much is their portfolio.

The Federal Reserve’s Next Moves …Larry Edelson | September 13, 2010 (Uncommon Wisdom) This will frighten you to death.

The Fed does nothing that isn't in the short or long run very profitable for them.

We've had our recession,ongoing stagflation,and now we are in an obvious depression .

Congress cannot by law spend more than they take in in revenue.We don't need a balanced budget amendment.The General Welfare Clause guarantees us,if anything,a balanced budget.

The Fed can lower long term interest rates at anytime and the banks still would be making a huge profit without all these "doings".So far they are an abyssmal failure as is Congress.However----- the Fed always makes a profit; can't go bankrupt either.



What the Fed did today wasn't just a distraction;it was theft and lying and probably murder.

"The Fed's total portfolio is $2.9 trillion, almost all of it in Treasury securities and mortgage-backed securities". This is a lie. See Edelson's Article.

The Fed knew this would happen and either it or one of its sleazy criminal affiliates of the international banking cartel bought up the falling stocks for a dime.

"Most economists say unemployment is a far bigger concern than inflation"

And once they put everyone back to work perhaps the Fed will complain about the inflation caused by high employment..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skate Free
Run if you can, fly if you must!
05:04 PM on 09/21/2011
USS Obama and his Ship of Fools:
We are the best and the brightest.... We can borrow and spend our way to prosperity!
All we need to do is to re-arrange the deck chairs, while the band keeps playing.

http://www.suntimes.com/business/7783097-420/stocks-plunge-after-fed-announces-stimulus-steps.html
photo
trumbull desi
If I have something pithy to say, see below
08:00 PM on 09/21/2011
Clearly you don't understand that The Fed is an independent institution of which the White House has no control.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WorkhelpWorkhelp
Control your money locally. Charter banks now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skate Free
Run if you can, fly if you must!
09:45 AM on 09/22/2011
Fed is independent? Riiiiight!
(Here's your sign)
05:03 PM on 09/21/2011
Well isn't that just so special of his highness Bernanke. I'm really going to be able to get a new, reduced interest rate, loan on my home that's worth *so* much more than it was when purchased, with a 40% down payment, 6 years ago. From what I've seen sold (or just being abandoned) in our neighborhood, my home is currently worth at least 35% less than I paid, meaning I have a maximum 5% equity (if I'm *very* lucky) which I'm sure *all* the banks are going to want to refinance.....NOT. And this is supposed to help people how???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WorkhelpWorkhelp
Control your money locally. Charter banks now.
02:33 AM on 09/22/2011
It won't and you'll be happy I bet, to see this killer award winning documentary on how the Fed can be brought to their knees..:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swkq2E8mswI&feature=mh_lolz&list=WL40442CD8FFF5BDEC
photo
Mark Cormier Arizona
2012 has put us on the path to Europe
04:40 PM on 09/21/2011
Way to go Ben, as soon as you opened your piehole and spilled your intelligent guts, the market coughed up another 290 points.
06:13 PM on 09/21/2011
Market dipped on NO news coming out of the FED. They want more liquidity, operation twist does not expand the balance sheet, that's why Wall St acted so negativily and positively this past week in expectation of more FED stimulus which wasn't delivered.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WorkhelpWorkhelp
Control your money locally. Charter banks now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kazzim Zongo
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
04:37 PM on 09/21/2011
DOW down 284. Thanks so much for helping out, Ben.
06:12 PM on 09/21/2011
The reason it went down is because investors were expecting a lot more and the only thing that drives stock prices is more liquidity. QE has been priced in and now with operation twist the market tanked expecting more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kazzim Zongo
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
11:44 AM on 09/22/2011
Dowm 384 today. Same reason?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Barron
10:00 PM on 09/22/2011
The Fed and their ilk are masters of studying the human emotional response to such "doings" and know exactly what they predict or want to happen will be and do so.
03:55 PM on 09/21/2011
Bernanke just doesn't get it.....manipulating the economy through the Fed is NOT the answer. We have got to get the government out of business owner's way.
08:10 PM on 09/21/2011
The Federal Reserve is independent within government in that "its decisions do not have to be ratified by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branch of government." It is owned by the Super Rich.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Barron
09:57 PM on 09/22/2011
That it is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WorkhelpWorkhelp
Control your money locally. Charter banks now.
02:35 AM on 09/22/2011
And there's a good lesson and answer presented here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swkq2E8mswI&feature=mh_lolz&list=WL40442CD8FFF5BDEC
03:35 PM on 09/21/2011
Banks don't lend on reserves, they lend on balance sheet capacity so by removing Treasury duration from the market through Operation Twist (switching short-term securities for longer ones), and with Treasury and Mortgage rates at all-time lows, this will do very little if nothing but cause another portfolio rebalancing effect which will push investors out onto the risk curve buying other riskier assets like corporate or junk bonds thereby narrowing spreads relative to the benchmark 10 yr. Treasury or to buy equities or commodities (which could have a negative effect like last time) since the 10 year is so highly prices b/c the FED is removing supply from the market thereby elevating the price of Treasuries, bringing down interest rates and making it more profitable for investors to seek returns in other assets. This also decreases our interest rates so the gvmt can borrow more cheaply.
03:35 PM on 09/21/2011
When you devalue a currency, capital consumption is usually the result as investors fear their money will be worth less and therefore consume capital like commodities, real estate, equities, other emerging markets etc. to offset the devaluation and possible inflation effects. Operation Twist will have little effect since banks rely on collateral to fund their daily operations as well as money market funds which have since had record redemptions, since the fear of a banking crisis looms in Europe, and with unknown bank exposure since they are interconnected, lending has dried up. The FED has effectively removed the only collateral that is left in the system that is used for funding: US Treasuries, which have negative rates now b/c of less supply, and being highly liquidity, while allowing banks to hold zero capital against those Treasuries b/c of regulations. And by reducing the supply, the money from the Primary Dealers has no real way to work its way down to the broader economy b/c of less supply of Treasury collateral that is used to secure funding in the interbank markets, and therefore credit creation and leverage contracts along with the economy.
03:35 PM on 09/21/2011
Banks rely on leverage to level up their assets through repo or issuing commercial paper, and also rely on short term financing to fund daily operations which can be extremely risky as we saw in 08 when investors refused to lend or roll-over existing debt, and when credit dried up and banks failed, and the economy tanked, leverage and credit that was supporting the economic system and growth was no longer available to support the system and therefore the economy contracted. When that happens, credit creation comes to a halt, a credit crunch, and the economy must shrink as interbank lending freezes or is too expensive, and the economy can no longer support the leverage, jobs, economic activity and credit creation that allowed it to grow as much as it had during the past 30 bubble years, enabled through leverage and asset price/household equity: false wealth that disguised low wages and true wealth production/creation: a misallocation of resources as we now see.
03:35 PM on 09/21/2011
AAA MBS are no longer considered safe collateral, only high quality securities such as Treasuries, and by removing Treasuries, it will make it harder for banks and others to secure financing through the fear banks still harbor with each other b/c of still toxic debt that is not marked-to-market on banks’ balance sheets, and which everyone knows is worth much less than it is priced at, so some may be insolvent, and so the FED must continue pumping money into the Primary Dealer banking network, which are the only banks that deal directly with the FED, to repair their toxic, over levered balance sheets, and with the hope that they will be encouraged to extend funding to other banks and then those banks can provide productive investment to small businesses and consumers, and they can only do that by creating more credit through more liquidity/leverage since Primary Dealers have been parking their money at the FED while buying Treasuries because they are considered riskless by Basel banking standards, no capital is needed to put aside against Treasury sovereign securities, because they are considered "risk-free" on a risk-adjusted basis , but which collateral is now being bought up by the FED.
03:34 PM on 09/21/2011
Banks can lever against Treasuries or high quality collateral to receive daily funding or to boost their balance sheets, but they still continue to want to invest in risk-free securities where they borrow at 0% and make a spread of 3% in Treasuries, and to hold onto them since if the banks were to lend to the real economy, then the Basel rules of risk-adjusted basis would require those banks to hold more capital that they don’t have aside since those loans are considered riskier than sovereign debt, which requires no capital to be placed aside b/c it is considered highly liquid.
03:34 PM on 09/21/2011
Banks use the economy as a methodology to allow the maximum use of leverage, and through regulatory arbitrage, which allows banks to hold no capital against sovereign debt, kind of like all the AAA MBS leverage and collateral that was used before 08, that has caused a misallocation of resources which is now evident in the economy as less innovation and the production of real goods has instead gone into real estate, finance and other fields of that nature, and has caused a production and labor deficiency, where economic growth was based on false asset price inflation, debt and leverage, which was unsustainable. Without the banking system expanding and keeping the interbank system from collapsing, and the subsequent economy as well, banks need to continue to lever b/c the economy has grown on the back of this leverage and the collateral that is used to secure funding from it.
03:34 PM on 09/21/2011
Less bank lending and less credit growth, which our economy is dependent on, will therefore cause a contraction in the real economy, which will require us to live within our means b/c the last 10 years has pulled demand forward b/c of easy money policies, debt accumulation, low lending standards, predatory lending and securitization. Everyone from the banks, refusing to lend to only qualified banks/borrowers, and household balance sheets that continue to de-lever, credit has become tight as that is a major factor what has caused a major collapse in the economy through the use of leverage and credit creation that sustained our economy, but which was inevitably unsustainable and now we see once the mask was unveiled that we have been living off of debt with stagnant wages the whole time: An illusion that is much deeper than that but that’s all for now.