iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

White House Threatens To Veto TRAIN Act

Barack Obama Clean Air Act

First Posted: 09/21/11 01:45 PM ET Updated: 11/21/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- The White House on Wednesday threatened to veto legislation that would delay the implementation of certain air quality standards by further curbing the Environmental Protection Agency's regulatory power under the Clean Air Act.

"While the Administration strongly supports careful analysis of the economic effects of regulation, the approach taken in H.R. 2401 would slow or undermine important public health protections,” the White House said.

The statement comes weeks after the president angered environmental groups by shelving a proposed tightening of ozone standards.

Now instead of blocking EPA rules, he's threatening to block Congress.

The Transparency in Regulatory Analysis of Impacts on the Nation Act and its dozens of proposed amendments, including one by Ed Whitfield (R-Ky.) to ensure the implementation of EPA's Clean Air Interstate Rule is delayed by a minimum of three years, will come up for a vote on the House floor this week.

Though the legislation is considered unlikely to pass the Senate, the administration is at some pains to be on record as having defended air pollution laws in the wake of the president's ozone decision, and has pledged previously to defend the authority of the Clean Air Act. Wednesday's statement serves to underscore that pledge.

"If the President is presented with H.R. 2401, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill," the White House said.

Read the full statement from the White House below.

The Administration strongly opposes H.R. 2401, which would block two landmark public health regulations under the Clean Air Act (CAA) and require the preparation of costly, unnecessary, and redundant reports. While the Administration strongly supports careful analysis of the economic effects of regulation, the approach taken in H.R. 2401 would slow or undermine important public health protections.

Since its enactment in 1970 and subsequent amendment in 1990, both times with strong bipartisan support, the CAA has improved the Nation's air quality and protected the health of this country’s citizens. Forty years of success have demonstrated that strong environmental protections and strong economic growth go hand in hand. H.R. 2401 would undermine this progress by blocking EPA's ability to move forward with two long overdue CAA rules – the Mercury and Air Toxics Standard and the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule – to reduce harmful air pollution that threatens public health, especially the health of the most vulnerable populations, including children and seniors.

Each year, these rules would avoid tens of thousands of premature deaths, prevent tens of thousands of heart attacks and thousands of hospital visits for respiratory and cardiovascular disease, and alleviate hundreds of thousands of childhood asthma attacks and other respiratory illnesses. EPA estimates that these two rules alone will yield hundreds of billions of dollars in net benefits each year. H.R. 2401 would block these rules and indefinitely delay these public health and economic benefits.

If the President is presented with H.R. 2401, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- The White House on Wednesday threatened to veto legislation that would delay the implementation of certain air quality standards by further curbing the Environmental Protection Agency's ...
WASHINGTON -- The White House on Wednesday threatened to veto legislation that would delay the implementation of certain air quality standards by further curbing the Environmental Protection Agency's ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 185
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
02:00 PM on 10/08/2011
Who will be Steve Jobs for Electric Cars now? RIP and Thank you!

We need the Manhattan project for the Electric Cars in our broken society and we need it right now - who can lead the world into the future?

http://sufiy.blogspot.com/2011/10/who-will-be-steve-jobs-for-electric.html#
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
08:25 PM on 09/22/2011
Promises, promises.

There. Doubled down.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:43 PM on 09/22/2011
It's my understanding that Obama's shelving of ozone standards is illegal and will lead to the early deaths of 12,000 Americans. Thats quadruple the amount of people killed on 9/11. Instead of making empty threats on a bill that wont even make it out of the Senate, how about he does the right thing. Would Obama personally kill 12,000 people with a butcher knife? I doubt it. He should meditate on that.
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
08:23 AM on 09/22/2011
A McClatchy article at http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/09/21/124856/house-gop-bill-would-roll-back.html notes:

[bq]
Under the 1970 Clean Air Act, the EPA sets standards for major air pollutants based only on what's necessary to protect public health with an "adequate margin of safety." Once the level of unhealthy air is set, the agency takes cost into account in determining what methods industries can use and how long they'll have to reduce the pollution.

The amendment by Rep. Bob Latta, R-Ohio, would require the EPA to consider feasibility and cost when setting the amount of pollution in the air that's acceptable. This change would negate a unanimous 2001 Supreme Court ruling that the Clean Air Act doesn't allow the EPA to take costs into account when it's setting air standards.

John Walke, an attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council, wrote in a blog that the change would force the EPA "to set unprotective air quality standards for smog and soot and lead pollution that are at odds with health science, based on cost complaints by polluting industries."

House passage of the TRAIN Act is considered certain.
[eq]

This is a preemptive strike: Enough particulates in the air will reduce the efficiency of solar energy. Enough sulfur dioxide yields acid rain which will hasten the mechanical decay of wind turbines.

The Republicans are ruthless: They won't even forebear from using chemical weapons against the American people.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
05:39 AM on 09/22/2011
Promises, promises.

See?

That's how to double down.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CollectiveNotIndividual
02:47 AM on 09/22/2011
I support green energy but not solar energy. If every home produced its own energy via roof mounted solar panels this would go against several of our enlightene­d liberal beliefs:

1. We are against individual ownership. Only the government should own stuff...no­t us individual­s. Today the electrical power is semi-gover­nment owned (utility companies) but roof mounted solar panels would be owned by individual­s.

2. We want all power to be "centraliz­ed". For example...­we want most decisions made in Washington­...less so by states....­even less by local government­...and we really don't want individual­s making any decisions at all. Why allow individual­s to create their own energy?

3. We want authoritar­ian government control of the people. Roof mounted solar panels would eliminate our ability to disconnect their power supply if they refuse to relinquish themselves to the collectiv­e.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
iLoveOldNY
What Would George Carlin do?
03:29 AM on 09/22/2011
"Trees cause more pollution than automobiles."

~ Ronald Reagan
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:46 PM on 09/22/2011
Straw man: A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_fallacy
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CollectiveNotIndividual
08:27 PM on 09/22/2011
Satire: The use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Finn
01:36 AM on 09/22/2011
Did you ever notice how President Obama acts like a tough guy when he's campaigning, but as a President, he's just caves in or does nothing? Just sayin'.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
buc
06:47 AM on 09/22/2011
Yep you got him pegged right...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pixeloid
Reality has a liberal bias.
10:40 PM on 09/21/2011
I'd really like to believe that this time, Obama actually will try to protect humanity and the world from the Teapublicans and their corporate masters. Just once, I'd like to hear him say "NO" to these "people".
10:50 PM on 09/21/2011
You are so fired
photo
Dahveed
step softly & speak easy
10:11 PM on 09/21/2011
Obama, this is good. Now, are you ready to veto that outrageous Keystone pipeline?!?!!
g9
conservation ,Your grandchildrens future
07:48 PM on 09/21/2011
THE BIG .......LIE........
" Reducing industry,s regulation on air quality creats jobs."...LIE....LIE....LIE
If your repasentative in congress tell you this ....
THEY...ARE...LYING...
CALL them on it
...it only creates more profits...
,but reduces the LIFE expectancy of your GRANDCHILDREN
10:52 PM on 09/21/2011
Not my grand children. Your grand children. Mine are protected with the antidote that I bought with the profits
g9
conservation ,Your grandchildrens future
07:42 PM on 09/21/2011
Like the advertisement in the wash. d.c. subway station showing the new airfilters ( a picture of children breathing thru a inhalator)....THE CLEAN AIR ACT will help keep our children healthy....
CLEAN AIR
CLEAN WATER
belong to everyone of you.................
.it belongs to me & my grandchildren...
.By giving this away to industry............
IT WILL NOT CREATE JOBS..............
.IT WILL CREATE MORE PROFITS...
10:53 PM on 09/21/2011
Ok we will make sure you don't get any of the profits
photo
jetjocki
Somewhere in the middle
07:36 PM on 09/21/2011
I just love these environmental fanatics. Seems they almost always make the same accusation: “If you dare oppose anything I want you want to poison your grand children……..”

To start with H.R 2401 does nothing to prevent the EPA from creating or enforcing any environmental regulations. However, it does require that the FULL impact of any proposed regulation be studied prior to enactment.

Might try reading it for yourself and see what it actually says.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr2401ih/pdf/BILLS-112hr2401ih.pdf

In my opinion it does nothing but require a comprehensive cost/benefit analysis before enacting regulation.

Sure seems like a good idea to know what all of the impacts of a proposed regulation are likely to be before they are enacted. I'm real tired of the "pass it now we'll figure out what's in it later" approach.
HellerHighwater
World centrist, "Far-left" American
10:54 PM on 09/21/2011
You can only call them fanatics if you're unaware of the enormity of the problem and the spit into the hurricane the EPA is enabled to make.

http://www.greenbiz.com/news/2010/10/05/humans-caused-66-trillion-environmental-damage-2008
photo
jetjocki
Somewhere in the middle
12:10 AM on 09/22/2011
I stand on my implication of fanaticism.

The failure to accurately asses the cost/benefit of many environmental proposals has resulted in enormous waste of limited public and private resources.

It is one thing to accurately identify a problem and systematically devise an effective solution using combinations of regulatory control, public awareness, private participation and scarce public resources.

It is an entirely different matter to pursue a desired outcome in total disregard to questions of effectiveness, internal and external costs and direct human cost.

The later, expressed in total intolerance and insistence that something must be done without any regard to accuracy of identification, viability of a solution or the cost is irrational.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:58 AM on 09/22/2011
These people need to get out from beind their desks and head out to the countries that are the problems. China,India and pretty much all of Africa. Stupid regulation just pushes more businesses out of this country. The communists are laughing all the way to their play books they drew up in the 1970's.
El Justiciero
HP mods have NO sense of humor, obviously
06:25 PM on 09/22/2011
Or perhaps we're LETTING them destroy their environments to give us the competitive edge when their economies are eventually crippled by massive healthcare costs, environmental degradation, exhausted resources, and massive clean-up costs. . . .
photo
Mollyj
Not Pistol Annie, it's shotgun Mollyj
07:33 PM on 09/21/2011
yup! Sure two can play this game! the GOP (obstructionist) won't let any bill pass! Your turn Mr. President, VETO everything or any idea that come from them (aka Charles and David Koch robots)

This is underming our government = treason = a ground to declare MARTIAL LAW!
INSTALL MARTIAL LAW NOW! As Commander in Chief you can!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:47 PM on 09/21/2011
Seriously???
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bdoug25000
Bio? Nope, Mostly mechanical
08:07 PM on 09/21/2011
Go play in the street, little Molly
photo
Mollyj
Not Pistol Annie, it's shotgun Mollyj
08:21 PM on 09/21/2011
__only if somebody give me your head on a platter, Then I'll play with it on the street!
07:06 PM on 09/21/2011
LEAVE IT TO THESE SORRY REPUBLICANS AND WE WOULD WIND UP BREATHING CARBON DIOXIDE AND SWIMMING IN OIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
10:55 PM on 09/21/2011
Swimming in oil? Somehow that doesnt seem so bad. I think I'd like to give it a try.
El Justiciero
HP mods have NO sense of humor, obviously
06:27 PM on 09/22/2011
Try the Gulf of Mexico or the right river in Alabama.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:01 AM on 09/22/2011
Get out and see the world. The USA is clean compared China,India..
El Justiciero
HP mods have NO sense of humor, obviously
06:28 PM on 09/22/2011
That's our measure? So long as someone else is worse, we're in the clear?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:15 PM on 09/21/2011
you can start by banning the highly polluting to both water and air horizontal drilling/high volume fracking for natural gas/oil.....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:49 PM on 09/21/2011
what energy does your computer or laptop run on when you comment? or you peddling as you type.....grow up
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:02 PM on 09/21/2011
actually wind energy....stop listening to hannyrushglenn all the time....you are brainwashed....
El Justiciero
HP mods have NO sense of humor, obviously
06:29 PM on 09/22/2011
Mine runs on coal but I really wish my representatives were supportive of finding clean alternatives. They seem opposed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
07:58 PM on 09/21/2011
Let's eliminate all fossil fuel energy this eliminates 300 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. But if we eliminate agriculture and land fills we would eliminate about 420 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent pollution.

Well we won't be able to go anywhere anyway.

http://205.254.135.24/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/methane.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:46 PM on 09/21/2011
how about the hundreds of millions of tons of mercury, carcinogens, and other toxic chemicals produced by fossil fuels....that doesn't cough cough bother you ?