More

Facebook Law Limiting Missouri Teachers Friending Students Repealed, Goes To Governor

Facebook Law

DAVID A. LIEB   09/23/11 08:07 PM ET   AP

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Missouri lawmakers voted overwhelmingly Friday to repeal part of a contentious new law that had prohibited teachers from chatting privately with students over Internet sites such as Facebook.

If the repeal is signed by Gov. Jay Nixon, school districts instead would have to develop their own policies on the use of electronic media between employees and students.

But Nixon was noncommittal Friday when asked if he would sign the new measure, saying he wanted to talk with teachers and local school boards before making a decision.

A judge placed Missouri's law on hold shortly before it was to take effect Aug. 28, declaring that "the breadth of the prohibition is staggering" and the law "would have a chilling effect" on free-speech rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution.

Shortly after the judge's order, Nixon added the online communications law to the agenda of a special session that began Sept. 6. Nixon's written message to lawmakers specifically limited them to repealing the law, but lawmakers decided to also make districts develop their own policies. That's part of the reason why Nixon is pausing before signing the bill.

"It would appear that they've gone in a broader focus than what my intent was when we brought folks to town" for a special session, Nixon said.

The Missouri Constitution gives the governor the authority to determine which matters lawmakers can consider during extraordinary sessions. But lawmakers contend that does not mean the governor can limit how legislators act on those matters – for example, by restricting them only to repealing a section of law instead of amending it.

Lawmakers removed the original law's most publicly controversial provision, which barred teachers from using websites that allow "exclusive access" with current students or former students who are 18 or younger, such as occurs with private messages on Facebook. But the repeal went a step further by also requiring public school districts to adopt policies by March 1 on employee-student communications, including "the use of electronic media," in order "to prevent improper communications."

The House passed the legislation to repeal and replace the law by a 139-2 vote. The Senate passed it 33-0 earlier this month.

"When we make errors we need to fix them, and that's what we're doing here today," said Rep. Chris Kelly, a Democrat from Columbia.

The latest measure has the support of many of support of Missouri's main education groups, including the Missouri State Teachers Association which had challenged the original law in court.

"It puts things back into the hands of the school districts. We're appreciative of that," said Todd Fuller, a spokesman for the teachers association.

The ban had been included in a broader law enacted earlier this year that sought to stop school personnel who have sexually abused students from quietly resigning and getting hired by other districts. That law requires schools to share information with other districts about teachers who have sexually abused students and allows lawsuits in cases where districts fail to disclose such information and teachers later abuse someone else. Those provisions of the law were not challenged in court and were not part of the repeal considered during the special session.

There was little debate about the ban when it passed this spring. But afterward, confusion and concerns began to surface among some teachers about whether they could be barred from using Facebook. Other teachers feared the law also could have had implications for online courses, which may be configured to allow limited access only by teachers and students.

"It became easy to call this a Facebook bill, but it was bigger than that," Fuller said. "It was more, `We're using a form of social media in the classroom right now that we're not sure if we can continue to use.'"

The only two House members to vote against the repeal Friday were Republican Jay Barnes of Jefferson City and Democrat Mike Colona of St. Louis. Both are attorneys. And both suggested that local school districts could end up adopting policies that still infringe on free speech, essentially multiplying the lawsuits that could be filed.

"We just traded one big unconstitutional ball of wax for 529 little balls of wax," Barnes said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Missouri lawmakers voted overwhelmingly Friday to repeal part of a contentious new law that had prohibited teachers from chatting privately with students over Internet site...
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Missouri lawmakers voted overwhelmingly Friday to repeal part of a contentious new law that had prohibited teachers from chatting privately with students over Internet site...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 84
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:50 AM on 09/26/2011
Personal Injury
Facebook is for us and our friends. And in my view, there should not be any law guiding us who to be friends with or not. However, a watch is necessary for everyone but then still it should not overkill our social freedom.
04:07 AM on 09/25/2011
I think it's ridiculous for that kind of law to even be introduced. Many teachers I know have students on their Facebook friends lists, and nothing inappropriate is going on. If a parent is paying attention and actually raising their child, and is involved in their life, then they would know who is on their child's Facebook and what is being said. If they would stop leaving the raising of their children to the teachers and the school districts, and do their jobs, then they would have less to complain about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick SketchCat Wilson
So it goes.
09:29 AM on 09/24/2011
So Nixon will talk to the teacher's and local school boards, when do the undereducated kids get their two cents? After high school when they can vote? Easy targets.
08:47 AM on 09/26/2011
The teachers should be helpful in keeping this law from coming to fruition. My husband's system just tried to pass a similar policy until all the teachers who are using technology to teach made them aware of just how much gets done online - teacher websites, links to important documents, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drmindhealer
Clinician, Educator, Artist, Healer
09:01 AM on 09/24/2011
We definitely don't need a law telling us who to friend and not to friend on Facebook. Most states at least have policies in place that provide a stance on this as do school districts and individual schools. Adding a state law to the mix is overkill and hopefully any other state will see this and think twice!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
istvan13
The world needs more thinkers.
08:42 AM on 09/24/2011
Yet another far reaching Republican law that the majority of the people don't want. Has anyone kept track of all the laws blocked by the courts, recall elections, or on ballots for removal just this year? This is unprecedented and says something much larger about the push back on Republican backed legislation and the Republican party than the MSM cares to talk about.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HotheadPaisen
Longform bio awaiting the Donald's approval.
09:09 AM on 09/24/2011
but but but...they say they want SMALLER government.
It's like they live in Opposite-land.
Everything they say, they DO the opposite.
10:54 AM on 09/24/2011
It also says something about the composition of elements of the judiciary.
photo
DavidBlackburn
Recovering Republican since 1995.
06:23 AM on 09/24/2011
Did adults just get the Internet in Missouri? Don't they realize that is how kids (and some adults) like to communicate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:35 AM on 09/24/2011
This is the rule in New Berlin, Wisconsin as well. I don't know if it as an actual statute or just school board policy.
12:24 PM on 09/25/2011
Policy or not, it's not a smart thing to do, professionally. I don't think it warrants a law like in MO, but that is the LEAST of New Berlin's problems right now. I feel bad for their teachers. I don't know how relations with their school board got so bad, but the resulting teacher handbook has some very disrespectful elements. I'm glad I work in a district that appreciates its teachers and encourages cooperative dialogue between teachers and school board.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mary Blickhahn
Mary Quite Contrary
01:34 AM on 09/24/2011
How about the parents,students and teachers make their own choices. Social media is just a social outlet. Whats next they can't go to the same church, see each other at the same store, ooh what if they live in the same neighborhood. I can buy separation of church and state, but separation of student and teacher beyond the classroom they spend 8 hours a day in....seems nuts. How many kids or teachers even want to spend their free time on facebook with each other? Come on people we do not need to be nannied!
12:50 PM on 09/24/2011
You have a point.
photo
Justtheobvious
Solidarity 99%!
12:36 AM on 09/24/2011
When the BIG government GOP has to hire millions of police to enforce their new state regulations, we will no longer wonder what it was like to live in Germany in the 1930s.
photo
yoyodyne666
is it friday yet?
01:46 AM on 09/24/2011
Wahahahahhhooooo I can't wait. Let the book burnings begin.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
12:33 AM on 09/24/2011
So now, basically, a government employee will have unfettered access to your kids. Parents beware, your son/daughter just joined STASI...
03:04 AM on 09/24/2011
Well, teachers have had unfettered access to children ever since teaching became a profession.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Romeover
Civilization is for weaklings.
07:38 AM on 09/24/2011
What? You let your kids use the Internet? You might as well just let them hang out on the street corner at midnight. Bad parent!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Meldy1
Nurse,(I don't work anymore!)&Pianist
12:00 AM on 09/24/2011
What a typical backward republican thinking,this is the 21st sane civilize century.....we are moving forward.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nohopepope2187
Honest † Impartial † Enlightening † Centrist
12:21 PM on 09/24/2011
The direction we're moving is a matter of perspective, and we may not be headed in the same direction our technology is...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Meldy1
Nurse,(I don't work anymore!)&Pianist
04:18 PM on 09/24/2011
@nohopepope2187,you are so pessimstic and negative.We'll see how it goes when we cross that bridge.......and we can only hope for success,and that is America the great optimistic,otherwise we could not land in the moon either with all the garbage thrown to the late president Kennedy but we landed safe and sound......and with supremacy!ALLER!!!(c'mon).
09:50 PM on 09/23/2011
As the way it should be, it is in the hands of the districts. Facebook could be a good tool in some classes and it could be a problem, but the school should make that decision.
12:51 PM on 09/24/2011
I disagree.
08:21 PM on 09/24/2011
That's ok, but if my niece, nephew or my child was in school and I was a teacher would that be against the law if I had them on facebook?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Kopacko
09:19 PM on 09/23/2011
Common sense breaks out in this instance. Unfortunately, it suffered a setback right from the beginning when this law was first passed and even further back when the bill was introduced.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
riverkwai1
Proud to be an American, everyday.
09:10 PM on 09/23/2011
This law had good intentions but went too far with it's language and doesn't provide enough leeway to allow Facebook to be used for legit educational purposes.
Honeejr
Really?
08:13 PM on 09/23/2011
Facebook/Internet isn't the only thing to be worried about. Better throw in cell phones too. And I agree with most here if something appropriate was going on then it will go on regardless of Facebook. But if schools do thorough background checks on who they hire, train their teachers on sexual misconduct and what is inappropriate and what is not and deal with red flags immediately then it will be alright. Teens will have crushes on teachers, young kids will have crushes on teachers. There is a fine line between teacher student relationship and other behavior.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
12:34 AM on 09/24/2011
Will parents be privy to all such communications?
Honeejr
Really?
12:46 AM on 09/24/2011
By alright I mean that this behavior will be lessened. Not that communication is approved.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Romeover
Civilization is for weaklings.
07:40 AM on 09/24/2011
No parent should ever let their children use a phone, let alone have a cell phone. Children must never be unsupervised or independent in any way.