iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Irvine 11 Verdict: Muslim Students Guilty Of Disrupting Speech

Irvine 11 Guilty

First Posted: 09/23/11 05:49 PM ET Updated: 09/24/11 12:50 AM ET

By AMY TAXIN, The Associated Press

SANTA ANA, Calif. (AP) -- A California jury found 10 Muslim students guilty Friday of disrupting the Israeli ambassador's university speech about U.S.-Israel relations, a case that stoked a debate about free speech.

The jury also convicted the students of conspiring to disrupt Ambassador Michael Oren's speech in February 2010 at the University of California, Irvine. They were charged with misdemeanor counts after standing up, one by one, and shouting prepared statements such as "propagating murder is not an expression of free speech."

The students will return back to court Friday in Orange County where they could be sentenced, said defense attorney Dan Stormer. He declined to comment until after the afternoon hearing. Prosecutors said they will comment on the case later.

About 150 people, including relatives and supporters of the students and Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas, attended the verdict. Some community members gasped and started crying when the verdict was read and about a dozen of them walked out.

The students showed little reaction but later huddled with their attorneys and shared hugs with family and friends.

Shakeel Syed of the Islamic Shura Council of Southern California said he was shocked.

"This is yet another reaffirmation that Islamophobia is intensely and extensively alive and thriving in Orange County," he said. "I believe this will be used as precedent now to suppress speech and dissent throughout the country. This is the beginning of the death of democracy."

UC Irvine said in a statement that it supports free speech.

"We nurture a campus climate that promotes robust debate and welcomes different points of view," said Rex Bossert, a university spokesman.

Prosecutors said the students broke the law by interrupting Oren's speech on U.S.-Israel relations and cutting short the program, despite calls to behave from campus officials. Defense attorneys argued the students had a right to protest.

Nearly 200 people packed the courtroom to hear closing arguments at the trial that some community members called a waste of taxpayers' money and an effort to single out the defendants because they are Muslim.

Prosecutor Dan Wagner told jurors the students acted as censors to block the free flow of ideas and infringed upon the rights of 700 people who had gone to the Irvine campus to hear Oren.

Wagner showed video footage of university officials pleading with students to behave, but they kept interrupting the lecture. Wagner also showed emails sent among members of UC Irvine's Muslim Student Union planning the disruption and calculating who was willing to get arrested.

Defense attorneys countered there were no hard rules for the speech, and the students might have been discourteous but didn't break the law.

Lawyer Reem Salahi, who represents two of the defendants, said the demonstration was modeled after a series of protests at UC Irvine and elsewhere in which students shouted at lecturers but weren't arrested.

She said the students never intended to halt Oren's speech entirely but wanted to express their views on the Israeli government's actions in Gaza.

During the case, attorneys showed dueling pie charts breaking down how much time the students demonstrated, how long their supporters cheered and how much time Oren spoke. The evidence was intended to show whether the meeting suffered a significant disruption.

Attorneys for the students – who attended UC Irvine and nearby University of California, Riverside – argued before the trial that charges should never have been filed and that the issue was already handled on campus.

In 2010, the students were cited, released and disciplined at UC Irvine, which revoked the Muslim Student Union's charter for a quarter and placed it on two years of probation.

Earlier this year, Rackauckas filed criminal charges against 11 students, prompting an outcry from the American Civil Liberties Union and a host of Jewish, Muslim and campus groups. Charges against one defendant later were dropped.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By AMY TAXIN, The Associated Press SANTA ANA, Calif. (AP) -- A California jury found 10 Muslim students guilty Friday of disrupting the Israeli ambassador's university speech about U.S.-Israel rela...
By AMY TAXIN, The Associated Press SANTA ANA, Calif. (AP) -- A California jury found 10 Muslim students guilty Friday of disrupting the Israeli ambassador's university speech about U.S.-Israel rela...
Filed by Josh Fleet  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,353
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (17 total)
03:33 PM on 10/29/2011
Disorderly conduct is not found within the confines of free speech! There's a time and a place....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scheherazade Brown
09:27 AM on 10/16/2011
Come on now people, we all know that there is a definite difference between freedom of speech and plain rudeness. There is a place and time for both.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tracy Kline
03:40 PM on 10/03/2011
I don't think their comments make them criminal in any way. They shouldn't be arrested, or at least shouldn't be charged. Preparing to interrupt someone's speech in a hostile way doesn't make them criminal, just uncivilized and jerks.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Atif Ahmed Choudhury
J.D. Candidate, William and Mary College of Law
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alkh3myst
Of course you can pay me in gum!
08:43 AM on 09/28/2011
Well, there you have it. The First Amendment applies to all Americans...EXCEPT Muslims.
12:51 PM on 09/27/2011
A Tale of Two Hecklers: The message being, it is okay to heckle the POTUS. But heckle the Israeli ambassador and we will get you where it hurts.

Irvine 11 hecklers: “They were very cooperative, they rose, they spoke and they began to leave their seats,” Lawhon said.
(http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/02/11-students-arrested-for-disrupting-israeli-ambassadors-speech-at-uc-irvine-.html)

Crazy Christian heckler: "The man positioned himself up in front of the stage and started shouting loudly right after Obama started talking. The heckler proclaimed that "Jesus Christ is God" and a Christian God. ... and Obama is the anti-christ".
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/26/obama-heckled-los-angeles_n_982470.html)
06:50 PM on 09/26/2011
The case should be appealed.

Humanity has the right to free speech and the right to protest, and the students were exercising theirs. If laws infringe on human rights and freedoms, they too must be protested until they are laws no more.
photo
Aussieposter
And so it begins
06:33 PM on 09/26/2011
Seriously? Heckling a politician at a public meeting is against the law?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
End All Empire
12:17 PM on 10/03/2011
As long as he is an Israeli. Makes you wonder if there is a citizenship that is held higher than US citizenship IN THE USA! Israel has too much control in our politics!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bokhattak
Novelist, Muslim, Nerd.
04:30 PM on 09/26/2011
As a former member (while in my college days) of Muslim student associations, I would say that these people acted horribly and disrespectfully to the speaker. I don't know his history or involvement in potential crimes against the Palestinian people, if any... but angry accusations of genocide tend not to solve anything.

I saw a potential opportunity to actively sit down in a discussion with a high-ranking member of the Israeli government and pursue open dialog. Instead, they chose to act like hooligans in what was a private facility of the university... where they would be subject to the rules of conduct of that organization and potentially face disciplinary action for their misdeeds.

If they believe this man to be a criminal and a representative of a criminal government, they have the constitutional right to stand outside the school - on public lands - to shout whatever they would like to. Altogether, though, this does nothing but create more enmity between the two groups... adding fuel to the fire.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nwo2012
Sue me, I boycott products from the settlements
02:56 PM on 09/29/2011
Apologists of israeli terror don't deserve respect. They don't deserve a podium. He should have been run out of town on a rail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bokhattak
Novelist, Muslim, Nerd.
03:20 PM on 09/29/2011
Thank you for so clearly demonstrating my point. If apologists of Israeli terror do not deserve to be heard, then we must also ignore the please of apologists of Palestini terrorism. Both sides have erred tremendously - there is nothing to be gained by exclusion, struggle and anger. The only viable futute for both the Israeli and Palestini would be to forgive (not forget) the past and move forward in a new light of cooperation.
12:46 PM on 10/21/2011
In this country you can't just run people on of town on a rail. It's called Law. He has the right to speak. Don't like the speech, Don't attend.
03:37 PM on 09/26/2011
I use to support these students....until I realized the discrimination each middle eastern country has towards different cultural and religious minorities in their country. If any of them tried to say anything there voice wouldn't be heard.
Anyways, both sides are being shot at, both sides want something, both sides need to work it out.
10:51 PM on 09/26/2011
I don't see what other countries have to do with our First Amendment. Is it perfectly okay for the US Government to do anything it wants, as long as it can point to some other country and say, "They're worse than us?" Are we changing our national motto to "America: Not As Bad As North Korea?"
06:17 PM on 09/27/2011
Don't you think the Israeli speakers had every right to speak? Doesn't that fall under an amendment?
I do think it's very stupid to charge them....But the disruption was a childish act.
06:19 PM on 09/27/2011
and besides like you said this is our country ....take the issue out of America. You want to disrupt something go book a ticket to Israel and do that on their ground. There are no fights, no bombs being blown up here in America between Palestinians and Jews.
03:02 PM on 09/26/2011
the soft on crime policy against islamobigotry will have to end soon.

http://expose2.wordpress.com
01:07 PM on 09/26/2011
They got up, said what they wanted to say and left. How is that a crime deserving of a prison sentence.... Of course anything against |$rae| is allowed in the U$..... right
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gui Montag
Former Palestinian Supporter
02:24 PM on 09/26/2011
"They got up, said what they wanted to say and left"

No. Wrong. That isn't what happened. Watch the tape if you're still having trouble.
01:05 PM on 09/26/2011
Remember the group of young Jewish Voice for Peace activists who protested Israeli policy during Netanyahu’s speech in NOLA last November? You might recall that the young protesters were forcibly removed from the auditorium but faced no legal sanctions. (You may also recall that they were hailed as heroes by many Jewish editorial writers.)

As it turns out, eleven young Muslim students who staged a similar protest at UC Irvine during a speech by Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren last February are facing possible prison sentences. The Orange County DA announced today it is charging the students with “conspiring to disrupt a meeting” and “disrupting a meeting.” If convicted they face a sentence ranging from community service/fine to up to six months in jail.

http://rabbibrant.com/2011/02/07/young-jewish-and-proud-vs-the-irvine-11-a-tale-of-two-protests/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KGP
01:03 PM on 09/26/2011
Also, at least these guys didn't get tased. I think we all know what incident I'm referring to.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KGP
12:10 PM on 09/26/2011
So if there were two similar incidences perpetrated by people of the same race but punishments were doled out unevenly would that be some sort of discrimination? It seems like their main point is "This same thing happened to another race/religion but they were not punished and because we are it's an act of prejudice."

I think maybe the discrepancy in punishment may be due to different policies, areas, situations, circumstances,etc. I do believe there is a strong undercurrent of Islamophobia in the U.S. but I don't think this is a case of that.

These students are in college. Being in college requires a certain amount of decorum, tact, and respect for other people. Just because one disagrees with an issue and wishes to voice that disagreement doesn't mean one should throw those aforementioned things out the window. Who is going to take you seriously if you're shouting at some guy on a podium? Nobody who actually matters, nobody who can help them make a difference in their fight.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
VictoryBlue
Motorcycle rider, Legalization supporter, Texan
12:33 PM on 09/26/2011
Who is going to take you seriously if you're shouting at some guy on a podium? Nobody who actually matters, nobody who can help them make a difference in their fight.

Tea Party. Any questions?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KGP
01:06 PM on 09/26/2011
I'm sorry, I don't understand your response. (Not even joking here, I legitimately don't know what you're getting at)
10:11 AM on 09/27/2011
Are you trying to equate the Tea Party with those radical muslim students, motorcycle rider? Your full of it if you are. The Tea Part folks are respectful even when they disagree. Go try and sell your innuendos somewhere else.