iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

No Child Left Behind Reform: Will Obama's Waiver Plan Really Diminish 'Teaching To The Test'?

First Posted: 09/23/2011 5:30 pm Updated: 03/09/2012 2:27 pm

Standing among governors, teachers, superintendents and students in the White House's East Room Friday morning, President Barack Obama asserted his administration's reforms to the federal No Child Left Behind act would minimize the need for educators to "teach to the test."

"Is John Becker here?" Obama asked, referring to a fourth-grade charter-school teacher. "John teaches at one of the highest-performing middle schools in D.C., and now with these changes we're making he's going to be able to focus on teaching his fourth-graders math in a way that improves their performance instead of just teaching to a test."

But that promise, which echoes a campaign pledge Obama made in a 2008 speech, might not square with the new NCLB waiver requirements he outlined.

Obama used the White House speech to announce that he and U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan would roll back certain accountability requirements of NCLB, a decade-old bipartisan education law that has been up for re-authorization since 2007. The law requires states to test their students regularly and disaggregate the resulting data. As Obama noted, many have criticized the law for its focus on high-stakes testing.

Obama's rollback comes in the form of a waiver package: States that seek relief from NCLB's provisions -- including the 100 percent proficiency requirement in reading and math by 2014, increasingly harsh sanctions against schools deemed as "failing" or the strictly dictated use of federal education money -- will have to adapt certain administration-mandated reforms. Those reforms include "college- and career-ready standards," targeted intervention in low-performing schools and new teacher and principal evaluations -- that include student test score data.

"Congress has not been able to fix these flaws so far," Obama said in his speech. "I've urged Congress for a while now, let's get a bipartisan effort, let's fix this. Congress hasn't been able to do it. So I will." Most states are expected to apply for waivers, with superintendents from Idaho, Minnesota and Wisconsin explicitly stating their commitment to do so on Friday. The first batch of applications is due Nov. 14.

The waiver package sparked a debate on the Education Department's policymaking limits, with Republican members of Congress calling the move a federal overreach. It has also led to conversations about the use of student testing data to evaluate teachers.

The Obama administration has long targeted data-inclusive teacher evaluations, setting them as a priority for the Race to the Top competition and its NCLB reauthorization blueprint. Union rules, they argue, grade all teachers based on seniority instead of ability or effectiveness. The Obama administration is careful to define ability as determined by "multiple measures," one of which is testing data.

Obama's -- and the Education Department's -- claim that NCLB will diminish teaching to the test because it will allow states to develop their own school accountability systems that measure students' growth, instead of the raw proficiency scores.

At the same time, though, the reforms encourage the reliance on tests by including them in teacher evaluations.

While American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten lauded the waiver package, she said she was disappointed with the teacher evaluation component.

"Evaluation needs to be more teaching-focused, not more testing-focused," Weingarten wrote in a statement. "Successful school districts in the United States and in the top-performing nations understand that teacher evaluation systems should be based on continuous improvement and support, not on simply sorting, and it's a missed opportunity not to follow their lead."

Mike Hladio, an eighth grade English Language Arts teacher in a suburb of Pittsburgh, noted Obama's mismatch regarding rhetoric and policy on testing.

"I don't think it's consistent," he said. "So much of education policy, we say one thing and we typically do something else. We say that we're preparing kids for a 21st-century economy. There is so much value placed on problem-solving, working collaboratively, creativity. None of those things are measured by bubble tests."

Hladio said he uses the second halves of April and May each year for test preparation and administration.

"We're saying, throw all the creativity we taught you out the window for these two weeks," he said. To Hladio, Obama's waiver package "feels like throwing things against the wall to see what sticks, especially in an election year."

But Becker, the teacher who stood behind Obama during his speech, doesn't see it that way.

"I don't think that it's really a mismatch," said Becker, who teaches at D.C. Prep. "It's just a matter of making the targets correct."

Either way, Becker said he enjoyed a pre-speech Blue Room conversation with Obama, Duncan and superintendents.

"These guys were big politicians and they treated me just like I was one of their own," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

 
 
  • Comments
  • 274
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kimpeach
Progressive Independent and proud of it!
09:36 PM on 10/17/2011
Race to the Top requires students scores to be used in teachers' evaluation, but Obama's speeches claims that teachers won't be judged by students' scores. Clearly, Obama doesn't know his own policies and many teachers will continue to teach to the test.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ganapati Edu
From negative to positive.
09:14 PM on 09/26/2011
""These guys were big politicians and they treated me just like I was one of their own," he said."
So he was star struck, and sided with them because they made him feel good.
04:42 PM on 09/26/2011
The president said "with these changes we're making he's going to be able to focus on teaching his fourth-graders math in a way that improves their performance instead of just teaching to a test." How many different ways are there to teach math? 4th grade? Maybe they should be looking at changing how the test is formatted. I mean, are they having trouble passing the existing ones?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
methodman
10:07 PM on 09/25/2011
This discussion needs to develop cheap toys so that kids are able to make for free. Much complexity demands you practice a card trick only to make the idea useable for something it wasn't intended. Penn and Teller need to design a magic book for teachers with important hard to teach concepts designed by having students practice and make their own magic tricks and even a strange card deck.
10:44 AM on 09/25/2011
If a state opts out of NCLB, then they must have an alternative way of measuring how well a school is doing. So, you are replacing one test with another. The stakes will still be high and teachers will still be teaching to the test.
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
01:45 AM on 09/26/2011
you're probably correct about what actually will happen, but it's not necessarily a foregone conclusion. although it also has flaws, structured observation by education experts would probably be a more valid measure than standardized testing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rini1946
07:04 AM on 09/25/2011
I do not agree with testing also. But with that being said the reason for the testing was our kids were getting out of high school not knowing how to read. I am not sure of a better way to make sure the kid are getting a good education. I know that some teacher would not be able to pass a test. Many year ago I went with a girl that was in a better school than mine and was studing to be a english teacher and I had to help her with her home work. At that time the college I was going to I was in the dumb english class. And as you can see from my writing and spelling I belonged there but she ended up going on to be a teacher I went on to be an accountant (I was great in math.
04:42 AM on 09/25/2011
I firmly believe that standardized testing is good for the schools: for teachers.

There are too many incompetent teachers in our system. we need a standardized test first to test these teachers. How about 8th grade math test to start with...I am sure 30 of the teacher will fail 8th grade math test. We should fire every teacher who fails 8th grade math test.
a person should not put his/her foot inside a school and call himself/herself a teacher if they cannot pass 8th grade math test (irrespective of which grade they teach or which subject they teach)
10:47 AM on 09/25/2011
From the looks of it, you would not pass an eighth grade English test.
02:28 PM on 09/25/2011
740 in GRE verbal and 636 in TOEFL 5.5/6 in TWE
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nmeemn
Sum, ergo cogito.
01:33 AM on 09/28/2011
This person isn't teaching.

As a teacher, I agree with him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ganapati Edu
From negative to positive.
09:19 PM on 09/26/2011
You shouldn't be able to comment on the incompetence of teachers with that kind of spelling and grammar.
05:27 PM on 09/24/2011
As long as there are high stakes tests, there will be teaching to the test and cheating, whenever possible.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MontanaBanana
I've had it trying to reason with the GOP
01:44 PM on 09/24/2011
I understand why the GOP want to get rid of the Dept. of Ed. You see, it's so much easier to not have any standards and to just home school children so they can me force-fed the GOP propaganda. If the next generation can't think for themselves, don't question authority, and believe everything mommy and daddy tells them, then the GOP can ge assured of every election. Afterall, there is a Santa Claus, all Democrats are on welfare and lazy, fear all Democrats, and if you work hard, you'll be a millionaire. NOT! I don't know how many generations will have to "work hard" before they realize many millionaires didn't work hard for their money. They had OTHERS work hard to make them rich, OR they inherited their money. Very few people make thier millions by themself! We all should be working together to make money for everyone....not just the few.
05:30 PM on 09/24/2011
In the so-called golden days of education, you know, in the days before we "dumbed America down" and everyone was literate...you fondly recall those days and so do I, the McGuffy readers, etc. Well, in those days there were no standards, nor were there any when the Framers of our Constitution were being educated. Indeed, I have to agree, standards and national tests do not, and never have, served us well. We should soundly reject this in favor of local control over our school districts, again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ganapati Edu
From negative to positive.
09:21 PM on 09/26/2011
I'm sorry to say that the ratio of non-readers to readers was greater back then than it is now.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Cougar90210
That's me in the corner . . . losing my religion
11:39 AM on 09/24/2011
Assessments in education can serve a number of purposes, and they can take a number of forms. Any teacher knows that assessing his/her students' performance on multiple tasks and in various settings provides more meaningful and useful data to help guide instruction. Formal, teacher-made tests can also provide useful information, but any exemplary teacher knows that multiple assessments are necessary to provide the kind of information needed to meet student academic needs.

The major problem programs like NCLB have created is an unhealthy over-reliance on standardized tests that provide classroom teachers virtually no meaningful information they can use to inform instruction. These tests come at the end of a school year, and the information generated is usually just a scale score. Neither teachers nor parents are privy to detailed information about specific areas of need or excellence that these tests might identify. These tests have one purpose only: to rank, sort, and classify students, teachers, and schools. Their only "value" is to politicians and pundits who use the results to justify the schools' funding level, or to criticize schools for failing to provide a good return on taxpayer investment.

Rather than being concerned with teaching to the test, we need to turn that notion on its head and focus on creating assessments that provide meaningful measures of what is being taught. Teaching and assessing should be complimentary rather than adversarial functions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CabCurious
let's be honest
12:59 PM on 09/24/2011
It isn't NCLB's fault. It's the implementation of by by States and Cities, which puts all the pressure on classrooms instead of on system coherence. There is nothing inherently wrong with assessments, if what you're assessing is worthwhile (which is usually the case in lower grades).

Nobody is forcing anybody to "teach to the test" with NCLB.

And giving out waivers to states is basically to give out waivers to districts, so they can stop worrying about so much pressure TO EDUCATE THE AT-RISK STUDENTS THEY USED TO HIDE IN AGGREGATE DATA.

No teacher should delude themselves into thinking these waivers will take the pressure off, especially in failing school systems.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Cougar90210
That's me in the corner . . . losing my religion
03:53 PM on 09/24/2011
I don't think you're following my argument. And NCLB absolutely creates a pressure for teachers to "teach to the test." Of course, there is nothing wrong with teaching to the test, IF the test actually assesses what should be taught. There is a major disconnect there, however, and too much of the instructional time that could be used in more meaningful activities for students is wasted on building "test taking skills and strategies."

Also, you don't say anything about my contention that MEANINGFUL assessment is absolutely necessary. The problem is that these so-called assessments (standardized multiple-choice tests created by whichever educational mega-corporation gets the state's contract) are TOTALLY USELESS for teachers, and I defy anyone to prove me wrong on that one.

Btw, I am not a teacher (retired elementary principal - 17 years), but I kind of know what I'm talking about. Nothing I am suggesting in any way absolves teachers and principals of responsibility for helping ALL of their students reach established standards and goals, just as long as the PROFESSIONALS are allowed to act as professionals and receive meaningful feedback and data to help them do the job they are tasked with.
05:33 PM on 09/24/2011
Oh, I beg to differ. When you set the stakes high and wholly dependent upon test scores, you do "force" teachers to teach to the test, and with the test in mind. And, if you have weighted down each grade level and curricular area with a burdensome number of standards that must be covered and can only be covered at breakneck speed, you have no time to do other than "teach to the test."
05:54 PM on 09/26/2011
Actually, there's EVERYTHING wrong with NCLB. When it was first passed I read the provisions and it was clear even then that the bill was designed to ensure that 99.9% of schools would be rated as "failing" by 2014. It requires that ALL students reach grade-level proficiency by 2014. That includes special ed students, English language learners, disadvantaged students, behavioral disability students, etc. Schools with ALL of their students meeting grade level requirements with the exception of one of the isolated sub-groups, such as special ed, will be categorized as failing.

Obama's changes won't change that dynamic unless they halt the penalties for having one or more tiny subgroups able to determine the rating of the entire school. All I see is cosmetic changes around the edges. And if student test scores are to be even PART of teacher evaluations, then the teachers who work hardest to teach the most disadvantaged students are the ones who'll be penalized, while those who teach in high-income districts can coast along, comparatively, on the scores of students whose backgrounds predispose them to high achievement.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Cougar90210
That's me in the corner . . . losing my religion
07:19 PM on 09/26/2011
I wouldn't argue with a thing you just said. I would only add that one of my major concerns with the concept of "performance based pay" for teachers is that it would eventually destroy any notion of collegiality and collaboration within and among schools. Education is already too influenced by society's overweening love affair with competition, and this kind of thinking already has schools and teachers competing with one another for limited funds, grants, the best students, etc. So, if and when a teacher's paycheck is predicated upon how well his or her students perform on some test, what possible motivation will exist to encourage teachers to help one another, or to work with at-risk children, when doing so would probably result in lost personal income? There won't be any motivation at all, as far as I can see.

This is an ill-conceived concept, pushed by those who have no experience in education, and who don't understand that schools are not like private sector businesses, and that trying to run them as such is misguided at best. I don't think Arne Duncan is a "bad player," as such (not a Michelle Rhee), but Obama could have/should have named someone with more professional chops than his basketball buddy. Someone like a Linda Darling-Hammond would be roughly the equivalent of an Elizabeth Warren, imo - smart, professional, experienced, caring, unbeholden to corporate/political power brokers - and she would have been an awesome Secy of Ed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sidnee
you need faith, trust and a little pixie dust
11:27 AM on 09/24/2011
Teaching to the test is NEVER the best way to educate children. If it were true--I'd never teach social studies or much science since there aren't that many questions about them on the test. Why do PE since there aren't ANY PE questions on the test, either. Doesnt' make sense and it angers me when I hear an administrator say "Well, 50% of hte questions center on number sense and only 10% on probability, so you konw where your focus is." My focus is on teaching the STATE STANDARDS not on teaching so a child can master the test questions. A child should have a well rounded education, not one dictated by a test.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bessielil
trying to organize hummingbirds
10:52 AM on 09/24/2011
One test fits all is the worst idea ever and teaching to the test has broken the heart of many a creative teacher.

From the article, the eight grade teacher says it best: We say that we're preparing kids for a 21st-century economy. There is so much value placed on problem-solving, working collaboratively, creativity. None of those things are measured by bubble tests."

No Child Left Behind destroys the whole idea of a meritocracy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CabCurious
let's be honest
01:05 PM on 09/24/2011
The 8th grade teacher and those who teach high school do not fully understand the problems and standards at lower levels. And people making wild claims that critical thinking and problem solving arent being assessed, they really do not know what they are talking about.

WAY before kids get to 8th grade, the failures are already set in stone.

Standards in early grades are about basic skills and critical thinking. They have to answer basic comprehension questions, write short responses, and solve problems using core math skills. And like it or not, we need to teach our kids how to take tests (mostly because our struggling students feel a LOT more anxiety than any of the teachers do and those kids thrive with structure, with order).

I am not saying we should just "teach to the test," but understand this.

Assessments are measuring SOMETHING. At early levels, that SOMETHING are basic skills which we are supposed to be teaching regardless of assessments. If the standards are fair and important, than the entire argument is petty. Any good school will do well even if they never have a test prep unit. Struggling kids, however, can use additional support with those core skills.

The left has completely twisted NCLB into something it is not.
11:45 PM on 09/24/2011
My 4th graders take a standardized test. They have to write a 5 paragraph essay for said standardized test. The problem is that the standardized test doesn't fit them too well, being urban and ELL kids.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marigold1960
01:44 AM on 09/25/2011
I am not a teacher or any kind of education administrator. I am curious about testing such as the Iowa Basic Skills Tests that were required when I was a student in the 1960's and 1970's. Do they still require such testing? Aren't those tests relevant in measuring a child's 'grasp' of the concepts being taught? I agree that problems with such things as reading and critical thinking can hinder a child's potential success later in school. If I remember correctly we took the tests in second grade, fourth grade..and maybe even in sixth grade. If we were having problems with certain portions we were put into classes that would better match our skills and give teachers the opportunity to bring the 'slower' students up to speed. As a result of this testing those many years ago, I can still remember being told at the time that Iowa ranked very high in basic skills as compared to the rest of the country....so, are there any efforts to do this type of testing in the lower grades to make sure our students are prepared for the high school/college classes that will be required of them?
09:16 AM on 09/24/2011
Now isn,t it amazing the republicans in congress and the ones running for the presidency and the tea partiers and people who back them have their favorite talking point federal government is to big all Obama is doing is creating more big goevernment and now when he comes with an education policy that will put control back in the states and schools and out of government here they come no,no the federal has to have control when will they make up their mind.What is happening is millions of kids being taught to the test are aceing it but are failing the grade and are being passed on to the next grade to ace the test and fail the grade on through high school and then have to later get a ged.
09:14 AM on 09/24/2011
Has anyone considered that video games and the excessive number of cable channels might have more to do with the failure of schools than the teacher unions? Most parents don't know where the local library is located much less have a library card.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
centsable
are u smarter than a republicant..
10:57 AM on 09/24/2011
Education should always start with the parents...always.
photo
drwtsn
Could I please get an upgrade to a macro-bio?
09:52 AM on 09/25/2011
Unless the parents are members of the Tea Party. Unfortunately, they are usually the ones that think education should start and end with the parents. God forbid their children should learn any real science or be exposed to a differing opinion somewhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sidnee
you need faith, trust and a little pixie dust
11:32 AM on 09/24/2011
Well, when I bring up that fact, all I hear from people (who have never set foot in a school lately) "Well there will always be bad parents so you just have to deal". Or something ot that effect. How can I teach a child well if he/she arrives late everyday, or doesn't even show up? How do I teach a child well who is constantly hungry, worried about their home life, or who cries for hours in the office because no one has come to pick them up and we can't get ahold of anyone on the Emergency Card? What about the parent who refuses to meet with you for a conference? I had one tell me, :My job is to feed her, bather her, get her here on time. Your job is to teach her." This mom won't read with her, or help her with her homework. Those kids are in trouble BEFORE they even set foot in a school.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mauibob
I am a recovering Liberal. I apologize for my past
09:13 AM on 09/24/2011
If its Obamas plan, then it will fail.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
centsable
are u smarter than a republicant..
10:59 AM on 09/24/2011
But don't you teabaggers want the states to have more say, and that "get the feds out of our lives" should make you all want to drink the tea.