More

Palestinian UN Statehood Bid: Mahmoud Abbas Submits Formal Request For Member State Status

AMY TEIBEL and MOHAMMED DARAGHMEH   09/23/11 07:28 PM ET   AP

UNITED NATIONS — The Palestinian leader took his people's quest for independence to the heart of world diplomacy Friday, seeking U.N. recognition of Palestine and sidestepping negotiations that have foundered for nearly two decades under the weight of inflexibility, violence and failure of will.

The bid to win recognition of a state in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem – submitted over the objections of the U.S. – laid bare the deep sense of Palestinian exasperation after 44 years of Israeli occupation.

"The time is now for the Palestinian Spring, the time for independence," Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas declared.

"The time has come to end the suffering and the plight of millions of Palestine refugees in the homeland and the diaspora, to end their displacement and to realize their rights."

After Abbas submitted his formal application, international mediators called on Israel and the Palestinians to return to long-stalled negotiations and reach an agreement no later than next year. The Quartet – the U.S., European Union, U.N. and Russia – urged both parties to draw up an agenda for peace talks within a month and produce comprehensive proposals on territory and security within three months.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the proposal "represents the firm conviction of the international community that a just and lasting peace can only come through negotiations between the parties."

Similar plans have failed to produce a peace agreement, and it was unclear how the two sides could bridge their huge differences and resume talks.

The Quartet statement was radically different from what diplomats had been hoping to draft since it became clear that Abbas would not back down. U.S. and European officials had been trying to craft a statement that would outline parameters of the negotiations, including a reference to borders being based on the 1967 lines and affirm Israel's identity as a Jewish state.

Instead, the Quartet focused on proposing deadlines.

World sympathy for the Palestinian cause was evident from the thunderous applause that greeted Abbas as he mounted the dais in the General Assembly hall to deliver a speech that laid out his grievances against the Israeli occupation and why he felt compelled to take his appeal directly to the U.N.

In a scathing denunciation of Israel's settlement policy, Abbas declared negotiations with Israel "will be meaningless" as long as it continues building on lands the Palestinians claim. He went so far as to warn that his government could collapse if the construction persists.

"This policy is responsible for the continued failure of the successive international attempts to salvage the peace process," said Abbas, who has refused to negotiate until the construction stops. "This settlement policy threatens to also undermine the structure of the Palestinian National Authority and even end its existence."

He ignored any Palestinian culpability for the negotiations stalemate, deadly violence against Israel, and the internal rift that has produced dueling governments in the West Bank and Gaza, as well as Jewish links to the Holy Land. Some members of the Israeli delegation, including Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, walked out of the hall as Abbas went to the podium.

Abbas declared himself willing to immediately return to the bargaining table, but with long-standing conditions: Israel must first stop building on lands the Palestinians claim and agree to negotiate borders based on lines it held before capturing the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem in 1967. Israel rejects those conditions and has defied international pressure to freeze settlement construction. It has staked out bargaining positions that are extremely distant from anything the Palestinians would accept.

"We extend our hands to the Israeli government and the Israeli people for peacemaking," Abbas said. "Let us build the bridges of dialogue instead of checkpoints and walls of separation, and build cooperative relations based on parity and equity between two neighboring states – Palestine and Israel – instead of policies of occupation, settlement, war and eliminating the other.".

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, addressing the General Assembly shortly after Abbas, said his country was "willing to make painful compromises" in its quest for peace.

But while Palestinians "should live in a free state of their own," he said, they should be "ready for compromise" and "start taking Israel's security concerns seriously."

Netanyahu opposes negotiations based on the 1967 borders, saying a return to those frontiers would expose Israel's heartland to rocket fire from the West Bank. He argued that attacks on Israel from lands it occupied in south Lebanon and Gaza showed that territorial compromise would not resolve the conflict.

Talks for all intents and purposes broke down nearly three years ago after Israel went to war in Gaza, followed by the elections that propelled Netanyahu to power for a second time. A last round of talks was launched a year ago, with the ambitious aim of producing a framework accord for a peace deal. It ended three weeks later after an Israeli settlement construction slowdown expired.

The statehood bid would not deliver any immediate changes on the ground. Israel would remain an occupying force in the West Bank and east Jerusalem and continue to restrict access to Gaza, ruled by Hamas militants.

Even so, thousands of jubilant, flag-waving Palestinians, watching on outdoor screens across the West Bank, cheered their president as he made his historic speech. In Nablus, the crowd roared ecstatically when Abbas, known as Abu Mazen, told the General Assembly that he had submitted the request for full U.N. membership.

"We are here celebrating because Abu Mazen is making us a state. We want to have our own state, like any other country," said Reem al-Masri, a 30-year-old teacher who lost a brother and two cousins in fighting with Israel during the second Palestinian uprising a decade ago.

Abbas, who has never enjoyed the popular adulation accorded his predecessor, Yasser Arafat, has seen his popularity soar, allowing him to gain ground against his Hamas rivals.

U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon referred the Palestinian request to the Security Council. The U.S. and Israel have been pressuring council members to either vote against the plan or abstain. The support of nine of the council's 15 members is needed to pass, but even if the Palestinians line up that backing, the U.S. has promised to veto.

The Security Council will meet on Monday to take up the matter.

The Palestinians have said that in the absence of a positive outcome in the council, they will turn to the General Assembly, which would be expected to approve a status upgrade from permanent observer to nonmember observer state.

While more modest, this option would be valuable to the Palestinians because of the implicit recognition that negotiations would be based on lines Israel held before capturing the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza in 1967. It would also give the Palestinians access to international judicial bodies such as the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court, where Israel fears it would be targeted unfairly.

The threat of renewed violence persisted in spite of Abbas' vow – perceived by Israeli security officials as genuine – to prevent it. A 35-year-old Palestinian was killed Friday in gunfire that erupted after Jewish settlers destroyed trees in a Palestinian grove and Israeli soldiers moved in.

It was not clear how serious Abbas was about his threat to dissolve the Palestinian Authority, born of the landmark accords Israel and the Palestinians signed in the 1990s. Dissolution would put 150,000 Palestinians out of work and cause chaos. Israel, which is skeptical of such talk, would be saddled with the welfare and policing of 2.5 million Palestinian subjects.

___

Associated Press writers Tarek el-Tablawy at the United Nations and Dalia Nammari and Diaa Hadid in the West Bank contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

UNITED NATIONS — The Palestinian leader took his people's quest for independence to the heart of world diplomacy Friday, seeking U.N. recognition of Palestine and sidestepping negotiations that ...
UNITED NATIONS — The Palestinian leader took his people's quest for independence to the heart of world diplomacy Friday, seeking U.N. recognition of Palestine and sidestepping negotiations that ...
Filed by Mark Hanrahan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,239
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (38 total)
photo
TAIsabel
Suffer no fools.
12:03 PM on 09/28/2011
In the same time that it takes to write a post, you could be writing the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton to stop Israel and not veto the UN resolution for a Palestinian state. I already did. Make a difference.
06:21 PM on 09/26/2011
Abbas request is very simple and reasonable. The fact that the US and Israeli governments object to it speaks volumes about their seriousness of pursing peace in the region. As those of us who get our news from non-US MSM sources have figured out long ago, it is Israel that does not want peace and Israel owns the US government.
kokobin
Against stupidity the gods contend in vain
10:19 AM on 09/25/2011
Palestine is a recognised state since 1948.
All that the Palestinian Arab Semites are asking for is full membership and not the observer status they currently enjoy.
Full membership gives enhanced rights and privileges, including the right to bring complaints before the International Criminal Court, which has jurisdiction to try cases of crimes of aggression the Hebrew Semites fear.
01:20 AM on 09/25/2011
Palestinians lived in Jordan for the most part so they should apply to get statehood by taking a part of that much larger country. Like applying to college. If you do not get into one apply to another simultaneously.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nwo2012
Sue me, I boycott products from the settlements
03:57 AM on 09/25/2011
No.
photo
piul05
Can I have a biscuit yet?
09:44 AM on 09/25/2011
Inane.
05:50 PM on 09/24/2011
Palestine is only asking for what Israel has demanded for itself for over 60 years. The very
same thing that UN resolution 181 recognized for Israel and Palestine, sovereignt­y.
Now lets all be embarrasse­d once again while our so called president tries to deny them
that right and show the world once again who he really works for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Heso
05:39 PM on 09/24/2011
This is a transcript of a debate in UK Parliament in 1947 about Palestine and partition plan:

http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1947/dec/11/Palestine

It is rich with information, but i would like to quote this very small paragraph, because it has always been said by pro Israelis that Arabs hate Israelis because they are Jews, and that this is a religious problem not a political problem.

"In justice to our Arab friends I think it is useful to recapitulate one or two points, and particularly the point to which I have already referred in connection with the Jewish settlements in the bazaars on the north coast of Africa—namely, that the Arabs in Palestine and elsewhere have always lived at peace with the indigenous Jews. The quarrel is with the European. It is not the fact that the European who happens to come in is a Jew that the Arab dislikes, but the idea that he is going to be kicked out of his country and dominated by a foreign invader."

I must remind the House that the Arabs are the only group of nations who really offered sanctuary to the Jews. They have excepted Palestine, I agree, but the Arab nations themselves have always said that they will join with others in solving the problem of displaced persons, particularly the Jews, and will accept them in all the Arab territories with the exception of Palestine..."

It is long, but worth it.
06:50 PM on 09/24/2011
Excellent
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nwo2012
Sue me, I boycott products from the settlements
03:58 AM on 09/25/2011
+1
01:48 PM on 09/24/2011
Godspeed to Free Palestine. The US leadership should hang their heads in shame at their utter, craven servitude and sycophancy to this Likudnik aberration. Meretricious does not even fully describe their lack of principle and the complete absence of any moral frame of reference in this matter. Venality, avarice and ambition now appear to hold complete sway in Tel Aviv on the Potomac.
01:15 PM on 09/25/2011
Since teh Arab countries are so rich with their oil why did they make zero effort to help their brethren the Palestinians? Instaed they tell Israel to divide up its tiny country and approve of THAT solution and applaud it. They want Israel to take care of their own cousins.
photo
negogato
Strengthen the Nation with Equal Education.
01:11 PM on 09/24/2011
A grove of trees that was about to bear fruit was destroyed. Trees are a provocation in the holy land. Ask a farmer in the USA what this means.

Here is a fuler AP account that is referenced in the article. It gives the name of the man shot dead.


Also hanging heavy in the air was the threat of renewed violence over frustrated Palestinian aspirations, in spite of Abbas' vow -- perceived by Israeli security officials as genuine -- to prevent Palestinian violence. The death on Friday of 35-year-old Issathe m Badram, in gunfire that erupted after rampaging Jewish settlers destroyed trees in a Palestinian grove, was the type of incident that both Palestinians and Israelis had feared would spark widespread violence. There were three other incidents of small-scale unrest, but most of the West Bank was quiet.
photo
piul05
Can I have a biscuit yet?
09:52 AM on 09/25/2011
"MIAAAAAAAAAUUUUU!
Eu sou um negro gato de arrepiar
E essa minha vida
É mesmo de amargar
Só mesmo de um telhado
Aos outros desacato
Eu sou um Negro Gato!
Eu sou um Negro Gato!...

Minha triste história
Vou lhes contar
E depois de ouví-la
Sei que vão chorar
Há tempos eu não sei
O que é um bom prato
Eu sou um Negro Gato!
Eu sou um Negro Gato!...

Sete vidas tenho para viver
Sete chances tenho para vencer
Mas se não comer
Acabo num buraco
Eu sou um Negro Gato!
Eu sou um Negro Gato!...

Um dia lá no morro pobre de mim
Queriam minha pele para tamborim
Apavorado desapareci no mato
Eu sou um Negro Gato!
Eu sou um Negro Gato!..."

Sorry; couldn' resist... :-)
kokobin
Against stupidity the gods contend in vain
10:43 AM on 09/25/2011
It must mean something meaningful and enthralling.
But I have no clue whatsoever.
photo
negogato
Strengthen the Nation with Equal Education.
12:35 PM on 09/25/2011
Fala! Obrigado.
MPB

Luiz Melodia made it famous forever and more recently it was recorded again by the great Marisa Monte.
I do believe it is Marisa Monte version that you are quote here.

And you are the first to say so.
12:50 PM on 09/24/2011
Read Bill Clinton's in Foreign Policy. thecableforeignpolicy.com
It is entitled, "Netanyahu killed the peace process."
12:21 AM on 09/25/2011
"the reluctance of the Netanyahu administration to accept the terms of the Camp David deal and a demographic shift in Israel that is making the Israeli public less amenable to peace." Is it the new brainwashed generation ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigfrog
Eat more beans
10:18 AM on 09/24/2011
I have met and worked with many americans in my life and almost all have had an open and positive attitude, with a strong sense of right and wrong. From reading the comments on this post I have found no reason to alter my view.
Most people in the world can clearly see that there is something very wrong with state of affairs regarding Israel and the palestinians. Most people in the world do not understand america's stance on the whole affair.
What I want to know is have I only been meeting a small minority of free thinking americans with the rest of the american population being brainwashed into following the government line OR has there been a total breakdown of democracy in America where the government simply does whatever it wants without regard for the opinions of its population.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
looneydoone
not a "cookie"
08:29 PM on 09/26/2011
It's the pentecostal, evangelical xtians that profess to "love Israel", and that Israel "must never be abandoned by the US"..they go on about how gawd "will curse whomever turns their back on Israel" blh, blah, blah. They watch Fox *news*, and the many tax exempt xtian broadcast hucksters selling the same message. They, as a group are not well traveled, and serve as useful idiots for the Zionist factions to whom they contribute millions in "charity" to fund the growth of settlements in the occupied territory
photo
db44
From My Perspective
09:39 AM on 09/24/2011
It is time for Israel and the Palestinians to agree to a 12 month deadline to resolve the issues or otherwise submit to an independent 3rd party to impose a settlement. Many people are simply tired of watching this circus go around in circles.
11:52 AM on 09/24/2011
It doesn't matter how tired you are of "watching" this. It is the Israelis and the Palestinians that will live with the consequences so WE will be the one to resolve this. Not imposed by someone else.
06:52 PM on 09/24/2011
Resolved in favour of Israel with the unquestioning backing of America. They can all kill themselves off as far as I am concerned, what I am sick of is my tax dollars going to support the killing
07:33 PM on 09/24/2011
No, it's only the Israelis that are not finished gobbling up the West-bank.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gingershot
One man, one vote, from the river to the sea
09:37 AM on 09/24/2011
Look at the effects of this Palestinian declaration so far - as anticipated the Israel Lobby is being dramatically outed for it's international humiliation of Obama and it's control over the American electoral process and foreign policy.

Now Tom Friedman has outed the Lobby (even though he's part of it) to Americans in the NYT - this crosses every red-line the Israeli Lobby has

Our MJ Rosenthal has a devastating piece highlighting Thomas Friedman's 'permission' to openly criticize the Israeli Lobby's grip on America.
Sad to say the only reason Friedman is taking such a drastic step is because he is so worried that Israel is heading for 'One State Land' and dissolution of the Israeli state itself

I think this is a Must Read article - hopefully it will be up in a few days at HP
==

'If Tom Friedman can say it, you can too'

Even Israel's most ardent supporters now say its Israel Lobby skews the political landscape and damages both the US and Israel.

The most appalling aspect of the Obama administration's inept handling of the upcoming UN vote on Palestinian statehood is the REASON for the administration's bumbling. Its moves are dictated by fear of offending Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, his lobby and, especially, the campaign donors who take direction from that lobby


http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/09/2011921103657427605.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftLeaner
Solution: Public Financing
10:28 AM on 09/24/2011
Everything you say is true , but everyone in power is afraid to say so.

BBC tells it like it is--- our so called news media ignores the facts Completely
kokobin
Against stupidity the gods contend in vain
12:42 AM on 09/26/2011
BBC tells it like it is--- our so called news media ignores the facts
******
Al Jazeera, RT.com also have the guts.
10:59 AM on 09/24/2011
It should not be called the Israeli Lobby, but the Zionist Lobby. The state of Israel is the creation of the Zionists.
01:07 AM on 09/25/2011
Will the stste of Palestine be the creation of the Palestinians? Zionists are people who love Israel but Israel was created after the British had occupied it and they were living there for generations, per the belief it was granted to them in ther bible. Abraham and Rachel, were buried there and are Jewish ancestors..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aleks Hunter
Keep your greedy Mitt off our country!
09:12 AM on 09/24/2011
The good news is that Obama and Netanyahu agree to a two state solution.

The bad news is that the two states are the USA and Israel.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gingershot
One man, one vote, from the river to the sea
06:45 PM on 09/24/2011
aaaahhhhh - choice!
01:10 AM on 09/25/2011
But why not make that state in Jordan where the Palestinins still live and always have and is much larger than Israel. The Israelis build becuase tehy need more homes to live in, not for hostility or to enrage.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aleks Hunter
Keep your greedy Mitt off our country!
09:02 AM on 09/25/2011
"But why not make that state in Jordan where the Palestinin­s still live and always have and is much larger than Israel."

Why should they have to move? They have lived there for generations, for centuries. When you force one ethnicity into one confined area, is that not a forced ghetto? Where have we seen that before?

"The Israelis build becuase tehy need more homes to live in, not for hostility or to enrage."

Then why nopt build withing the broders of Israel? Would you build a house on someone else's land? Would you knock down their house to do so? Would you build a house in an area where you know the neighbors all despise you because you do both of the above?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NYC123
09:06 AM on 09/24/2011
Huff subscriber’s comment:
“We have no duty to anyone to be fair or balanced. Our international policy should be to promote the interests of the United States. This country is of no value to us. If the entire thing was turned into a sheet of green glass tomorrow, I'd yawn.”

My reply!
The Gold Rule when implemented in one’s life, be it yours or mine, and to a larger extent the governments of the world – refreshes a stale life of inhumanity towards each other, that is never ending. “War and Fear” are always “the prime cuts of the day” on the table being served to the masses 24/7!

In our hearts we know “the above” to be fact. Greed, and self interest at the expense of others is the “Anti Golden Rule” practiced and spearheaded by a small percentage of people that run world affairs! And they are in every country, spewing their venomous doctrines of hate and divide – that suffocate, by design and purpose, from everyone on the planet the “divineness” that is within reach in man(kind)!
06:55 PM on 09/24/2011
"If the entire thing was turned into a sheet of green glass tomorrow"

As long as YOU prosper nothing else matters. Death to America I say, it is in the intewrests of everyone who is not American
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
09:01 AM on 09/24/2011
'This time we should reach for what's best within ourselves. If we do, when we come back here next year, we can have an agreement that will lead to a new member of the United Nations -- an independent, sovereign state of Palestine, living in peace with Israel. ' -- Obama's speech before the General Assembly, September 23, 2010

This guy has flip flopped on so many issues important to the American people, I don't know how he has the nerve to walk up to the podium and open his mouth. I sadly voted for him and now hope he will be a one termer. It's beginning to look like W or Palin would be less of an embarrassment.
10:33 AM on 09/24/2011
So..., so far all of them are an embarassment - only some are less of an one?!