iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Solar Power Shines In San Antonio As Texas Green Movement Gains Momentum

First Posted: 09/27/2011 11:40 am Updated: 11/26/2011 4:12 am

Al Ritter's power bill was pretty high this month. But not as high as it might have been.

Ritter, a retired Air Force electrical engineer, lives in San Antonio -- a city hit hard by the great Texas drought of 2011, the worst in the state's history. Temperatures have regularly topped 100 this summer, and the earth is baking. In the Ritters' front yard, the cedar elm, starved for water, is losing its leaves several months ahead of schedule.

Like everyone else in town, Al and his wife have had the air conditioning working overtime.

"I expected I would've had a bill that was over $300 for the month for electric power," Ritter told The Huffington Post.

Instead, he said, his most recent bill came to $252 -- a savings he attributes to the array of 24 solar panels the Ritters had installed on their roof in August.

The Ritters aren't the only ones going solar in San Antonio. In the past year, more than 150 homes have been outfitted with solar panels, and over 1,000 people have applied to a local nonprofit program that connects homeowners with companies that perform solar installations.

That program, known as Solar San Antonio, was founded by Bill Sinkin -- a former salesman, a community leader, a violinist with the San Antonio symphony and an early champion of racial integration in Texas. Sinkin celebrated his 98th birthday this year, and among the San Antonio business community he is regarded as something of an apostle for solar power.

"Back in 1999, my father started this organization," said Bill's son Lanny, who serves as executive director for Solar San Antonio. "He basically pioneered the whole solar thing here, because very few people in San Antonio knew anything about solar."

That has changed. In 2009, a survey by the Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory found that almost 40 percent of the city was interested in using solar power. In a city of 1.3 million, that's about 400,000 potential solar customers.

The solar surge in San Antonio is only one part of the Lone Star State's powerful green movement. While Texas may be best known as a state rich in fossil fuels, some of the most ambitious renewable-energy work in the country is happening there. Texas generates more electricity from wind power than any other state, and the federal government has invested millions in local geothermal energy research.

And solar power, according to those involved, is the state's next big growth industry.

"We might be an oil state and a natural gas state, but we're going solar," said Shelby Ruff, vice president of residential sales at the Texas-based contractor Solar Community. "Solar power's the most abundant thing on earth, and oil and gas are finite."

'EVERYBODY'S FOR IT'

Before Bill Sinkin was the chairman of Solar San Antonio -- before he decided to spread the good word about solar power to a city almost entirely indifferent to it -- he was taking on other little-loved causes.

In the late '40s and early '50s, Sinkin served as chair of the San Antonio Housing Authority, where his push to expand public housing for poor families got him on the mayor's bad side. Later, in 1967, he bought control of the Texas State Bank and made it clear that TSB would be an institution that served, and employed, both blacks and whites -- a principled stance that cost him some customers.

And it was at the Texas State Bank where, in 1982, Sinkin and his colleagues installed a solar system on the roof, largely to see whether it would work.

"We were not highly trained people," Sinkin told The Huffington Post. They knew that solar power was environmentally friendly and that it might save them some money. Beyond that, it was something of an experiment.

Today -- more or less as a result of Sinkin's enthusiasm for solar -- homeowners are finding their way to Solar San Antonio through word of mouth.

As demand grows for photovoltaic panels and sun-powered water heaters, solar companies are expanding their local operations and bringing jobs to the area.

A 14-megawatt solar farm went online in November, and plans are underway for a massive 400-megawatt plant, one that could power 80,000 homes.

Such a facility would be more than four times as large as the biggest solar plant currently in existence, and while it's only in the proposal stages right now, it's expected to be a major employer once it gets off the ground.

Sinkin's advocacy efforts -- the lunches and seminars he held for years to educate San Antonians about the possibilities of solar -- are what got this all underway. Local institutions have lined up behind him, from the mayor's office to the Chamber of Commerce to CPS Energy, San Antonio's municipally-owned utility, which has put solar at the center of its agenda.

"All of the political and economic leadership of the city is on the same page," Lanny Sinkin told the Huffington Post. "Everybody's for it."

It seems fair to say that the elder Sinkin's experiment has been a success.

"I'm very proud of what's happening," Bill said. "There's nothing like it in the country."

'READ BETWEEN THE LINES'

The city of San Antonio may be united in its desire for solar power, but beyond the city limits, the consensus is less clear.

"We don't have state support," said Lanny Sinkin. "We have seen some very good legislation that would have really propelled Texas to the forefront on solar simply just not make it out of the legislative session."

One possible reason for the lack of momentum at the state level, he says, is that Texas has faced a major budget shortfall in recent years, and legislators have been occupied with sorting it out.

But, he says, "I wouldn't be surprised if in the back rooms, the oil and gas and coal lobbies are making their voices heard and are not that anxious to see solar expand rapidly."

Energy is a big tent in Texas, and while the state is home to both robust fossil-fuel concerns and ambitious renewable projects, that doesn't mean the old industries and the new are completely in conflict.

Among oil and gas companies, the opposition to green energy is "not monolithic," according to Russel Smith, executive director of the Texas Renewable Energy Industries Association. Some oil companies, Smith said, are interested in collaborating with sustainable-energy groups.

But sometimes, he said, "you can read between the lines of what happens" when a renewable bill fails in the state legislature -- such as when State Representative Drew Darby's proposal to create a statewide rebate for solar projects stalled out in committee this past spring.

"You start to figure there's a hand back there," said Smith.

Still, despite the push-and-pull of different energy interests -- and the mixed record of governor and Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry, who has done much for the state's wind-power industry but for whom, as Lanny Sinkin puts it, "solar is not a big item" -- the Texas green movement is not expected to reverse course, as long as passions remain strong at the municipal level.

"Renewable energy is in its infancy, but I do think the sky is the limit," said Richard Perez, president and CEO of the Greater San Antonio Chamber of Commerce.

San Antonio's city fathers, including Mayor Julian Castro, see a strong link between green energy and economic growth, said Perez.

Five green businesses -- including an LED lighting company and an electric refrigerated-vehicle manufacturer -- are poised to partner with CPS, the city's utility company, and create more than 200 jobs for the city within the next few years.

"I am very, very confident of our success," said Perez.

As for Al Ritter, who had panels installed on his house this summer, solar power hasn't proven a cure-all: the savings from his roof array only come out to about two dollars a day.

"This is more environmentally good than it is otherwise good," he said. "Nobody's getting rich on this, that's for sure."

Still, from a conservation standpoint, he said, "it's probably the best thing I've ever done."

And from what Ritter hears, the number of solar-curious San Antonians is growing all the time.

"Most of the builders in town are offering a solar option," he said. "Everybody's got work lined up like they can't believe."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 435
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
01:45 PM on 09/29/2011
Construct Your Own Inexpensive Indoor Grow Lamp
It's almost the end of the normal growing season in the northern latitudes of the U.S. as well as those same latitudes in other parts of the world. So, why not move your outdoor vegetable and herb garden indoors.
http://www.articlesbase.com/gardening-articles/construct-your-own-inexpensive-indoor-grow-lamp-2599778.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snoopjohnny
04:36 PM on 09/28/2011
I doubt more than 10-20% even understand the "mechanics" of solar or other alternative energy sources. We know we must reduce our dependence on fossil fuels, but don't understand effectiveness of alternatives relative to growing energy needs. Supposedly forward-thinking organizations like Solyndra are simply marketing the same systems, which are fine, but limited. Lets get behind alternative energy, but that alone is not enough.....Sure, there are lobbyists and corporate resistance but fossil fuels are also just far more effective than existing alternatives. Fossil fuels are not sustainable, "smart" or green, but so much cheaper (in the short run) that replacing them in some huge markets becomes an insurmountable investment, even for companies willing to change. Redesigning cities, transportation and architecture for reduced energy consumption is crucial. But for alternatives to rise to current expectations, we need an advance in battery technology, or collecting/storage break-though that multiplies their capacity. That would be a real step forward in tackling our massive fossil fuel dependency.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
05:14 PM on 09/28/2011
If we stop subsidizing suburban sprawl, we could end 40% of our imported oil needs.

There is no reason to zone for 1 acre lots near cities or 10 acre lots in the suburbs.

High Density development would preserve open space and be 10 times as energy efficient.
photo
4eva
.-.. --- ...- . --..-- / -. --- - / .... .- - .
12:20 AM on 09/29/2011
Thank you
... even medium density development like that found in inner ring suburbs settled in the 20's thru 40's would make a huge difference.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:33 PM on 09/28/2011
We don't need new battery tech,

we do need plug in hybrids for commuting to cut our gasoline use by 90%.

Then: rooftop solar, offshore wind and waste bio char bio fuels (FT too).

in combination,

Can provide all the fuels, chemicals, energy we need, more than now, forever, 24/7 using the waste bio fuels in existing gas turbines, safe, clean, carbon, land and water negative, ready now to grow by doubling every year or so as it has been, to replace fossil and nukes within 7-15 years. Cheaper or soon to be cheaper than fossil and nukes. No wars for oil.

http://solarcellcentral.com/companies_page.html first solar 2.5$ per Wp installed.

http://solar.gwu.edu/Research/EnergyPolicy_Zweibel2010.pdf 1-2 cents KWH

http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/10/solar-power-graphs-to-make-you-smile/

Energy source amounts: http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/23/solar-power-intro-3-key-solar-power-points-top-solar-power-news/

http://www.sunelec.com/ 75 cents per Wp.
1-2$/Wp http://www.ecobusinesslinks.com/solar_panels.htm

http://www.wind-works.org/articles/EnergyBalanceofWindTurbines.html 3 months

http://cleantechnica.com/2011/03/18/offshore-wind-energy-cheaper-than-nuclear-energy-eu-climate-chief-says/

http://www.plancanada.com/biochar_basics.pdf
2$ per watt bio chart.

http://biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/2009/01/30/kit-lurgi-to-develop-pyrolysis-gasification-pilot-plant-with-goal-of-249-renewable-diesel/ 2.50/gallon
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snoopjohnny
01:38 AM on 09/29/2011
With hybrids instrumental in reducing fuel use by 90%, you'd think improved battery technology would come in handy. Still, if half these numbers are in the ballpark, we're headed for a bright alternative energy future, by anyone's standards. The jobs it will generate alone will change economies significantly....In fact, if any area of alternative energy is "doubling every year or so, as it has been", we're making progress I'd like to see reported more thoroughly.....real soon. Regardless, I'm all for it, especially the no wars part.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
02:36 PM on 09/28/2011
I like to remark about robotic solar and battery factories... as a solution for unlimited install jobs. But I also have to encourage consideration of the close cycle as an unlimited clean energy choice because (the proper reactor design) is meltdown proof. Yes, I am saying that whenever you here about nuclear, you should not consider what you have been led to think about it as true. It is true, however, that the LWR, the kind all the world uses today is exactly as what you might think... inherently unsafe. They need to be decommissioned in fafor of such already molten fuel types as LFTR or perhaps the IFR, both of which was proven NOT to be unsafe. This means that if there was any incident, these types would simply shut down on their own.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
02:14 PM on 09/28/2011
It doesn't surprise me that it is happening in San Antonio. A larger percentage of intelligent, progressive thinkers live there, then in most other areas of Texas. For instance, where ever GWB and Rick Perry are living, the intelligence percentage drops dramatically. It is still falling...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
02:29 PM on 09/28/2011
We need to raise awareness of the solution... which is industrialism. Machines will make batteries and solar arrays (hopefully not just "conventional" solar panels) which inturn create more jobs and overtake the trap of fossil fueled depletion.
We don't have time... anymore... to complain about other people's IQ or favorite party. We all know that republicans tend to be anti-science, but it wasn't always like that, which means I have to agree... "It is still falling".
Now we have to try to get through to them that science and oil got us into the best age, we can't stpo the wheel now, and thus we must develop the next and even better energy foundation (before declining oil gets too expensive).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
03:21 PM on 09/28/2011
That is exactly how I see it. Now is the time to move, to begin a smooth transition. We should begin replacing our patched up electric grid with a new smart grid today. We need to invest in research and development for tomorrow.
Fanned for caring
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Veverka
09:25 AM on 09/28/2011
Would like to suggest we start calling solar power by its real name, infarred sunlight conversion. True solar power takes sun light and uses it to create work or support a chemical process. A flower uses sunlight and is solar powered. Solar power industry only use a narrow part of the sun light band, infrared radition. Phosphorescent paints are solar powered. Solar panels use the heat from the sun to boil water the turns a generator but don't use sunlight to make electricity the heat mades it. Poitnt is by using the correct term we allow for an understanding that we are only using a small fractionof the sun's power. This is why solar cell efficience is poor. Should note that plants don't use the infarred arera of the light spectrum. Therefore solar power is yet to be invented. And until then will remain expensive to build and use.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sylvia wadlington
Kindle Writer
10:36 AM on 09/28/2011
The more people use solar the more the industry will grow and people will become invested in making it cheaper so they can make greater profits. That's how business works. I remember when gas was .29 a gallon. Fossil fuels started out cheap and as the price grew to an unstustainable level we also had to pay for environmental pollution, so people started looking for something new. Solar fuel is an expensive start up, but it ends most of the pollution and the never ending cost of energy. Once you pay for the hardware, the energy is free. People like knowing that they don't pay forever and can have blue skies too. Most of the people who don't like solar are making big money off fossil fuels and willing to spend big money to keep things that way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Veverka
03:38 PM on 09/28/2011
OK. I use fossil fuel in my car thats it. I got so caught up with the attack on solar cell I fogot to say it was the reason they are inefficent. If solar cell could use the entire spectum the cost could go down faster and solar would be more efficent.

Pulp fiction says there was a 100 mile per gallion carborator made in Florida in the 60s and some auto company bought it. If I was the CEO of an oiul company the last thing I wouild want to see is a high MPG carborator on the market. Think that would be for solar cells too. Terrible when you can't trust your own gov. I'm sure its not true.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Marc Driftmeyer
Mechanical Engineer and Computer Scientist
01:17 PM on 09/28/2011
Infrared.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aacme
My micro-bio is on a strict need-to-know basis.
08:42 AM on 09/28/2011
But, he says, "I wouldn't be surprised if in the back rooms, the oil and gas and coal lobbies are making their voices heard and are not that anxious to see solar expand rapidly."

Yeah. I wouldn't be surprised by that either.
01:55 PM on 09/28/2011
They don't need lobbies to make a case questioning large government funding of such initiatiatives at a time when every $$ the government spends these days needs to be optimized for job creation. Solar spending is not doing much for jobs. It's really not even a debatable position at this point. Below article is suggesting the new energy loans create jobs at $23 million per job per the DOE's own figures.

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/586155/201109271759/DOE-Mulls-Loans-For-Green-Projects-At-23-Mil-Per-Job.aspx?src=IBDDAE
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
02:14 PM on 09/28/2011
Solar would provide more jobs if only it was made in robotic factories, since it is diffuse. That cheapness would allow 500,000 sq mi of install jobs... Oil is declining because we need to put more energy into its extraction. I would not think it is possible to make jobs if that costed 23,000,000 per job, thus that link must be made up by politicians wanting to "set up" the RE industry for a great fall. They are only setting ourselves up for that same great fall... into fossil fueled depletion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gurinder Dhillon
Federal Reserve is as Federal as Federal Express
07:53 AM on 09/28/2011
If Rick Perry thinks it makes sense for Texas to invest in wind energy and not at all into solar energy, then I think he needs to be mentally evaluated, Texas because of its size and climate, and amount of arable land solar farms would be an ideal investment in Texas, remember its not about temperature its about sunlight.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aacme
My micro-bio is on a strict need-to-know basis.
08:43 AM on 09/28/2011
He must not have any cronies in solar.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
02:16 PM on 09/28/2011
Surprising to think he would even consider any RE.
photo
FireThemAll2012
I'm also the 53%
07:48 AM on 09/28/2011
As demand grows for photovoltaic panels and sun-powered water heaters, solar companies are expanding their local operations and bringing jobs to the area.

That sentence right there tells the whole story about green energy. Let demand determine its success, not half billion dollar loans that fall flat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aacme
My micro-bio is on a strict need-to-know basis.
08:46 AM on 09/28/2011
Oil, gas, nuclear, coal, all have got massive subsidies even when the dominate industries. Why not a little help for an industry which has suffered active resistance, from the fossil fuel companies, and through lobbying, the government?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sylvia wadlington
Kindle Writer
10:39 AM on 09/28/2011
Fanned and faved.
01:57 PM on 09/28/2011
Because right now government spending needs to be optimized for job creation. We can't afford to spend $6.5 billion and create less than 300 jobs. People need jobs, not unaffordable solar panels.

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/586155/201109271759/DOE-Mulls-Loans-For-Green-Projects-At-23-Mil-Per-Job.aspx?src=IBDDAE
12:09 PM on 09/28/2011
I am all for that--let each form of energy generation stand on its own!
Wait a minute---oil has already received 5x the money put into solar (during it's developement stage) and still gets more "breaks" in one form or another----not to mention a military that spends a good part of it's budget making the world safe for oil producers........and does not pay for increased medical costs due to it's pollution.............can anyone really count the true cost of oil??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
02:22 PM on 09/28/2011
I couldn't agree more!
06:25 AM on 09/28/2011
Poor Al Ritter: "I expected I would've had a bill that was over $300 for the month for electric power," Ritter told The Huffington Post. Instead, he said, his most recent bill came to $252 -- a savings he attributes to the array of 24 solar panels the Ritters had installed on their roof in August.

Like all people in TX, Ritter is used to wasting cheap carbon energy - his home wastes about 7200 Kw per month just trying to cool the 100 degree air. He built an a $30,000 PV Array on his roof, without insulating and air sealing his home. Now he gets about $60 off his energy bill each month.

If someone honest had sold him the solar panels, they would have required a home energy audit first, and that independent auditor could have explained that energy efficiency measures could have saved half his energy bill for 1/10th the cost (over 20 years), so for about $10,000 he could have saved $150/month.

$150/month X 12 = $1,800 / year on $10,000 -- >R.O.I. = 18% / year (FOREVER!)
$60/month X 12 = only $720 / year on $30,000 --> R.O.I. Just 2% / year (For 20-30 years)

Solar isn't a bad idea, but without first reducing you energy waste, it just doesn't work.

If Solar Installers keep doing this kind of bad business, they will kill their own industry as people wake up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aacme
My micro-bio is on a strict need-to-know basis.
08:51 AM on 09/28/2011
Agreed. Even gas companies, etc, are going that route now. In any new industry there are hucksters. The problem is that we should have got through that period in the 70's.
I don't know what kind of system he has, but unless it is a small, token system, it should provide a lot more than 20% of his power needs. Maybe it's a small system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sylvia wadlington
Kindle Writer
10:44 AM on 09/28/2011
Fanned and faved. It's not just solar installers, when my grand daughter bought her first house she had to replace the heating unit and the installers tested the house for heat leaks and plugged them up as part of their installation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paris215
Be the change you want to see
05:59 AM on 09/28/2011
Eeeek I can almost feel our hard earned Federal US tax dollars (allotted for 'green' programs) going down the Texas drain.. please no!! Seriously, I will hold my government accountable for any back door deals, 'cronyism', and wasteful spending and so should you. Keep your eyes open.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aacme
My micro-bio is on a strict need-to-know basis.
08:56 AM on 09/28/2011
I wish you were as vigilant with oil subsidies. And weren't such a hypocrite.
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
12:55 PM on 09/28/2011
What oil subsidies?
12:11 PM on 09/28/2011
gov. is responcible for idiots and thieves?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mumi009
"The truth will set you free"
05:56 AM on 09/28/2011
Renewable energy is the future. The alternative is to continue to be dependent on foreign suppliers or tear up one's own country in the search for shale oil, pollute the pristine arctic ocean and pollute groundwater by fracking.

There are many viable alternative sources of renewable energy. Of course, the standard answers are photovoltaic and wind technologies. There is also hydrokinetic, mini-turbines in running water.

Fossil fuel-based energy will only become more expensive, especially if one believes that peak oil has already been reached.

Power generation will be a heterogenous network of smaller sources.

An interesting and promising technology is to use solar power to crack water into hydrogen and oxygen and combine the hydrogen and carbon dioxide to create methane, ie natural gas, that can be stored or used in fuel cells or even in internal combustion engines.

Of course, the cheapest and most environmentally friendly watt is the "nega-watt", the energy we don't use. Improved building construction and landscaping, better insulation in current buildings, led lighting, turning devices off and just having fewer things that require electric power wil all contribute.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
04:50 AM on 09/28/2011
http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml

here is a list that includes some of the most dangerous and deadly people in America. Now note I said SOME OF. not that all rich people are bad. Thats like saying all poor or working people are bad. But this is the Hit List of the top offenders in destroying America. I think anyone with a brain can easily spot the worst anti Amiercan ones.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjwrites
04:31 AM on 09/28/2011
Solar: the next Gold Rush.

Talking book?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jflorish
12:43 AM on 09/28/2011
He is saving $50 a month. That shouldn't take long to pay off the 25K that solar costs.
01:02 AM on 09/28/2011
maybe he got tired of putting the money in big oil
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim NLN
Hillary-Frank 2016
09:17 AM on 09/28/2011
Texas has the most coal fired electric plants and more are still being built. Oil/Coal, it is all BAD!
02:03 PM on 09/28/2011
It's as if everyone has been brainwashed into thinking there are only two choices.
photo
Sorenson
Time for a Revolt of No Confidence
12:43 AM on 09/28/2011
The only way we're going to see solar really take off is if we have a massive Manhatten Project-like effort to crank up cost-efficiency as quickly as possible. Considering that we managed to go from knowing jack squat to nuking Japan in the space of six years and 27 billion dollars after inflation, I'd say it'd be well worth the effort given the game changer the first MP turned out to be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snoopjohnny
03:41 AM on 09/28/2011
Yeah....something like that. I'm all for alternative energy. And not in the sense that Mit Romney or Shell Oil claims. I really am...But the numbers are daunting. The amount of power we're profoundly addicted to is available only with the effectiveness of fossil fuels. Nothing else comes close.....yet. It's well worth chipping away with solar, wind, etc. And if..... or hopefully when someone develops a battery that really kicks butt, one that's affordable, we'll be closer. More existing solar, wind, etc in use at that time may be of great value...if that's where the advance comes from. A major jump in collecting technology could be a game-changer, too. This is what Solyndra should've been doing. Or GM...for the past 20-30 years. We can't abandon the effort, but must make more ground in reducing our dependence. Too bad that's not popular with energy addicts.....like us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aacme
My micro-bio is on a strict need-to-know basis.
09:46 AM on 09/28/2011
It's what Exxon should have been doing, instead of funding the Global Warming is a Hoax hoax. They were supposed to be an energy company, leading the charge into the energy sources of the future. Capitalism, the Unseen Hand, is supposed to innovate, not try to stop the stop the world at a point at which they control it. Fossil fuel companies have ironically fossilized to the point that they are the problem. That is the great fallacy of Capitalism, that once a Capitalist entity gains power, it uses that power, not to innovate, which is how it gained that power, but to fight innovation to protect its power.
The first baby step in the solution is to quit subsidizing fossil fuels.