More

Thousands Of Students Enter California Schools Without Vaccinations

School Vaccination

By SHEILA V KUMAR and SHAYA TAYEFE MOHAJER   09/26/11 04:24 AM ET   AP

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Last year's class of California kindergartners had a record high percentage of parents who used a personal belief exemption to avoid immunization requirements, a development that concerns state health officials.

More than 11,000 kindergartners missed at least one vaccine in 2010 because their parents decided to forgo inoculation. At nearly 2.5 percent of the state's 470,000 kindergartners, that's California's highest rate of declined vaccines since at least 1978, the year before the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine was required.

The percentage is more than double that in certain parts of the state, particularly in more affluent coastal communities in Northern California.

The public debate over childhood vaccinations has been growing throughout California, where last year a deadly spike in whooping cough cases killed 10 babies and sickened more than 9,100 people. The outbreak prompted a state law that requires middle and high school students to get whooping cough booster shots before going back to school this year.

The percentage of parents who sign vaccine exemptions based on personal beliefs has been rising steadily since 2004. The increase coincides with rising use of the Internet for information, said John Talarico, chief of the immunization branch for the California Department of Public Health.

"We really think a lot of it is due to honest, valid concern that parents do the best thing for their child coupled with misinformation that gets out through various forms of communication," he said.

He said state health officials want to study the personal-belief exemptions to better understand trends and behaviors. For now, he is hoping the trend will begin to slow, especially with media coverage of last year's whooping cough deaths.

Just last week, state health officials said the number of reported measles cases in California had reached a 10-year high of 28. Of those, 22 people were either unvaccinated or their vaccination status was unknown.

"When people can see disease around them, it generally drives them to think about the benefit the vaccine can give their children versus whatever else they hear," he said.

Vaccine statistics for this year's kindergartners will not be available until 2012.

Parents can file two types of vaccine exemptions – a medical exemption or a personal belief exemption. The medical exemption is rarer and typically is reserved for children who cannot be vaccinated because of auto-immune disorders or allergies. It requires a doctor's signature.

For a personal belief exemption, parents are not required to supply any information to explain their decision.

Doctors and medical experts say vaccines are a reliable means of preventing illness with little risk of injury, but some parents don't buy into the safety of immunizations. They cite concerns about vaccines making their children susceptible to autism or diabetes.

In a comprehensive safety review of vaccines issued last month, the Institute of Medicine found there is no link between vaccines and autism or diabetes. The institute, part of the National Academy of Sciences, found that serious side effects of vaccines are rare and can include fever-caused seizures and occasional brain inflammation.

The increasing number of kindergartners entering school without immunizations poses a risk to others, especially children who have legitimate medical exemptions that prevent them from getting their shots, said Linda Davis-Alldritt, a school nurse consultant at the California Department of Education.

"Disease prevention is really a very important thing," she said. "These are diseases that can be very serious, and it can cause death and it can cause long lasting illnesses."

Parents receive information from schools and the Department of Education about the importance of inoculation and the dangers of unvaccinated children spreading infectious diseases to the rest of the community.

Overall immunity of a population to illness typically is achieved when 90 percent of the population is properly immunized. But Talarico, California's top immunization officer, said that can be misleading because unvaccinated children tend to cluster in pockets where like-minded parents decide to forgo immunizations.

"When we see these clusters, that represents the possibility of transmission of disease more quickly and in a more sustained fashion," he said.

A cluster of unimmunized children in San Diego led to an outbreak of measles in 2008 that infected 12 children. Nine of them had not been inoculated because of their parents' objections, while three others were too young to be immunized.

In some schools, as many as 30 percent of kindergartners are vulnerable to at least one vaccine-preventable communicable disease, according to data from the state Department of Public Health. The majority of schools have 100 percent immunization rates.

Certain areas of California have higher exemption rates than others. In Marin, Sonoma and Santa Cruz counties, more than 6 percent of incoming kindergartners in 2010 had parents file a personal belief exemption. By comparison, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Fresno counties had rates below 2 percent.

Barbara Lowe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center in Vienna, Va., said parents sometimes decide to file the personal belief exemption form because they cannot find a doctor who will sign a medical exemption form.

"We've had families whose children have had reactions to vaccines, and some of them have become injured or even died. They want to make an independent, informed decision for their other children, and they can't find doctors who will write medical exemptions," she said.

She said the mission of her nonprofit is to prevent vaccine-related injuries or death through public education. It does not take a position on whether parents should have their children vaccinated, but it does defend a parent's right to opt out of a vaccine.

Some parents base their decision on what they hear from others or see on the Internet, rather than in consultation with a medical expert, said Catherine Flores Martin, director at the California Immunization Coalition, a Sacramento nonprofit that receives some of its funding from vaccine manufacturers.

"Parents have access to so much information on the Internet and I think a parent, even when they're really well educated, will have a hard time sifting through the credible resources versus the anecdotal stories," she said. "You can find whatever you want on the Internet to support your belief."

___

Tayefe Mohajer reported from Los Angeles.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 368
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:45 AM on 10/25/2011
One in ten children have asthma (immune dysfunction), allergies are epidemic (immune dysfunction), juvenile diabetes is escalating (immune dysfunction)--I recently learned of a young friend disabled by this condition, learning disabilities are affecting more than 1 in 10 (autism alone is 20 times more common than paralytic polio in epidemic years), depression, bi-polar, obesity -- maybe instead of flipping out over some children getting less than 100 percent of the 30 plus doses of vaccines "recommended" but probably still getting double the vaccinations we got as kids, maybe we should be demanding the long overdue health comparison of the never-vaccinated with vaccinated populations so we can possibly make better decisions on how to protect our children's health and act under a closer state of informed consent as required by international law.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
10:54 PM on 09/29/2011
All those parents who think vaccination is the worse of two evils need to visit their local 19th century graveyard and look at how many children's graves are in them. Some stones even list the cause, and it is almost always now preventable disease.

My mother even fought to have me inocculated for smallpox, even though the disease had been "eradicated". I am surely glad for that.
11:38 PM on 09/28/2011
Vaccines are a victim of their own success. If the terrible, terrible scourges that they have largely prevented were still endemic, we wouldn't have all this ill-informed, ill-advised pushback. Now, irony of irony, some of the very diseases that vaccines have all but wiped out are coming back, because of the selfishness and scientific illiteracy of some parents.

It's very interesting that some of the worst outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases happen in 'alternative' schools, in which the parents tend to believe the anti-vaccine cranks because their message fits so neatly with their favored narrative of Big Pharma, government malfeasance, and so on ad nauseum. Unfortunately, as ye sow, so shall ye reap.
04:54 AM on 10/24/2011
Hello. I'm curious about the derivation of your user name. Will you explain?
07:27 AM on 10/24/2011
I was trying to think of a palindrome (a word or phrase that reads the same either way, such as "rats live on no evil star"), but didn't come up with one; then I dropped the "e" first time I typed it, and it stuck.

It's not like an aerodrome with lots of little Sarah Palins taking off, or at least I didn't intend it to be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
insidious
Socialist Progressive Liberal Independent Feminist
01:23 AM on 09/28/2011
I wonder, if Conservatives are so worried about a woman's health risk involving abortion that they pass all these bureaucratic laws making it more difficult, I mean "safe", to receive one (thus unduly burdening a woman on making a medical decision)...What is their perspective on the percentage of childhood death rates involving unvaccinated children? I haven't seen any laws passed "saving" a child from a preventable disease by making it harder for parents to get waivers. In essence, laws forcing women to carry a pregnancy to term to "save" a fetus seems to TRUMP passing laws forcing parents to "save" a child with a vaccine...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kinogod
word farmer
11:17 AM on 09/27/2011
My 13 year old daughter has eaten a plant based diet all of her life. She has never been vaccinated and she has been exposed to all the outbreaks. She has never had ear aches, flu, all the other childhood illnesses. I find it interesting how freedom for some is a scarlet letter around my neck because I do not believe in western medicines addiction to medications and surgery. You go your way, I'll go mine as long as we don't live in a Gestapo state ruled by force.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SirReal1
06:57 PM on 09/27/2011
I'm glad your daughter has been fortunate and healthy, but I have to ask you; How do you make the claim that she's been exposed to "ALL" the outbreaks?

Hepatitus (A & B), Rotavirus, Tetanus, Haemophilus influenzae type b., pneumococcus, Polio, Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Chickenpox, Diphtheria, Pertussis, Human Papillomavirus, Meningococcal? You've had her subjected to ALL of these?

I sincerely hope that when your daughter is old enough, she doesn't feel the need to travel to any foreign Country where they will not let her in without having had all her vaccines. That's a heck of a strain on the system to try to "cram" all those in, in a few months. More than that, I hope that she continues to STAY healthy for the rest of her life. She is indeed one of the VERY FEW fortunate ones who apparently has a very healthy immune system.

Lucky for you, but not a good basis for advising others.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Taximom5
09:26 AM on 10/24/2011
SirReal1: "I sincerely hope that when your daughter is old enough, she doesn't feel the need to travel to any foreign Country where they will not let her in without having had all her vaccines." NOT TRUE.

This is fear-mongering at its worst--using an outright lie to frighten someone into vaccinating their child.

There is NO country on this planet where they will not "let in" an unvaccinated person. I DO travel all over the world--often with my children--and immigration officials do not check vaccination status, anywhere, because there is NO requirement in any country that one must be vaccinated against anything to enter that country.

Even at the height of the h1n1 panic (which was carefully orchestrated by the pharmaceutical industry in order to sell vaccines and Tamiflu), there was no requirement.
08:24 PM on 09/27/2011
You'll find that the "scarlet letter around your neck" is utterly nothing compared to untreated scarlet fever should this come unbidden to your family.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just-a-Guy
10:54 AM on 09/27/2011
To anyone I may have offended yesterday on this topic, apologies

I certainly understand the opposing viewpoint to mine on this. People don't want their kid around unvaccinat­ed kids. I get it.

I still don't trust the vaccinatio­ns, what is in them or the people who have approved them for mass consumptio­n.

And for people to say "pass a law" or "make them wear a sign around their necks" or "they must be homeschooled" or "their parents are monsters/criminals"....

Well...we just disagree.

You can't force me to inject my kid with anything. Peace.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Mccormick
09:35 PM on 09/27/2011
and you, therefore, cannot force people like myself to allow your unvaccinated child to attend school
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just-a-Guy
12:36 PM on 09/28/2011
Perhaps you should file an injunction?

Or just pull your kid from school and homeschool them.

My kid has every right to attend school. And the government has NO right to demand that he be injected with some government-approved substance.
10:37 AM on 09/28/2011
And will you pay the funeral costs of a child who catches one of these diseases and dies thanks to your selfishness. My best friend adopted a HIV positive child and people like you make me incandescent with rage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just-a-Guy
12:38 PM on 09/28/2011
The feeling is mutual. I can assure you...
tccat4
We all have a right to our opinion, like it or not
05:29 AM on 09/27/2011
Who ends up paying? the child? other children? who covers the hospital cost when parents can't afford the shots? Taxpayers? This isn't head lice were talking about, were lucky to have the inoculations offered to us. If you don't want your child vaccinated, move to a country where the life expentency is only a few years. My children were vaccinated and all grew up healthy. Sometimes reading too much on the internet can make a person have ignorant conclusions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kinogod
word farmer
12:14 PM on 09/27/2011
Trust in western medicine to your eventual detriment. Stop eating animals and processed food. Do Americans need to eat 1 million animals an hour? It is sickening. Vaccinate if you can't eat healthy sure. Healthy au t an iceberg lettuce salad with sprayed tomatoes baled potato and some form of meat that must putrify inside you to be digested.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
insidious
Socialist Progressive Liberal Independent Feminist
01:28 AM on 09/28/2011
If I'm not mistaken, listeria can be found in all kinds of fruit and/or vegetables...like cantaloupe. It's not just processed animals that cause/spread diseases. The food industry is where some more government oversight should be done.
11:39 PM on 09/28/2011
Are you suggesting that if you eat healthy, you won't get, say, measles?
03:08 AM on 09/27/2011
Privacy laws prevent the class mothers from finding out who is not innoculated! I am not a person whose first thought is lawyer but if my great grandchild's health were put in jeapordy by these people, I'd be hiring one. My daughter was among the first to get polio shots and then sugar cubes. I remember the horrible traumas of the polio epidemic in the 40s. My friend lost her sister at 6 from diptheria. Measles causes more than red spots and fevers.
11:42 PM on 09/28/2011
Parents today are too young to remember this, and are therefore prone to believing all kinds of nonsense they read on the internet about how evil vaccines are. Those diseases were truly terrible, and terrifying -- by contrast, vaccines are, without a doubt, very safe by any reasonable standard, and remarkably effective. It amazes me that this is even an issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
11:01 PM on 09/29/2011
I grew up in the 70's, and remember seeing older folks with braces from polio. Why would we EVER want this to return?
02:40 AM on 09/27/2011
I agree that children must be vaccinated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnyonkle
Big Deal.
02:18 AM on 09/27/2011
Just have your kids, play in the mud, swim in filthy water, drink out of the garden hose, don't wash hands after going to the bathroom, (unless you get some on you) pick scapes, bite each other, quit wearing helmets and they will be immune to everything, natures way of keeping the system strong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
11:02 PM on 09/29/2011
Yet infant mortality is directly inversely proportionate to vaccination efforts. How do you explain that?
01:27 AM on 09/27/2011
Drug manufacturers removed the mercury from vaccines, now they need to find something other than the aluminum they replaced it with, for our safety!
12:50 AM on 09/27/2011
Simple- parents not legal their country dont require shots.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reality-2011
12:47 AM on 09/27/2011
(continued from below or above) We do not begin to know anywhere near the 1,250,000 (5x250,000) people we would need to know to match their probability number. On thing I do know for sure is that the official number is an approximation for each separate time you experience anything that puts you at risk for getting Guillain Barre. In other words each time you get the flu, or get a flu shot, or tetanus shot your odds increase. And they do not explain this. If you theoretically got the flu or shots 100 times your odds are now 1 in 2500 not 1 in 250,000 of getting Guillain Barre. I think that giving all the shots at once is done more for the doctors convenience than the patients.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SirReal1
09:51 AM on 09/27/2011
By the rationale you're using, I knew a guy who went parachuting. On his first jump he had a fatal malfunction and his chute failed to deploy. He crashed to earth and died.

Therefore, the odds of dying in a parachuting accident are 1 to 1, regardless of what the statisticians tell us.

See how that works?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reality-2011
12:46 AM on 09/27/2011
Shots do serve an important purpose but they may not be telling us the correct odds of having a bad reaction to them. I think that getting one shot at a time is very safe but getting several at once can confuse your immune system and potentially cause serious problems. Two years ago my brother and I were told we needed to take 5 shots before going on a church mission to Brazil. I questioned the safety of getting all shots at one appointment. We were told the odds were 1 in 250,000 of having a problem like getting Gillian Barre syndrome. It is a response where the body gets confused and the autoimmune system attacks it's nerves. We took the shots and 2 weeks later my brother had full blown Guillain Barre syndrome. The body attacks the mylin sheath and it is very painful and the person can't move the muscles that have been attacked. The official position is that getting them all at once is not a problem. but there seems to be a real problem with their math. We know 3 people from our old church with only 300 members who have come down with Guillain Barre! That would make the odds 1 out of 100 instead of 1 out of 250.000. My brother has found 2 other people, not including the 3 from our church that also have it. (continued below or above)
photo
Grimmsd
Independent
04:03 PM on 09/27/2011
It sounds more like something in your church is causing the Guillian-Barre syndrome. Your entire church didn't go with you to get the 5 shots, did they?

Every member of the US military receives multiple shots at once, a lot more than 5, in basic training. If 1% or even 1/10th of a percent were getting seriously ill from it then people would notice. It's just not happening.

It's bad logic like this that makes people think that vaccinations are not safe. Really it's the lack of vaccinations that is unsafe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reality-2011
08:47 PM on 09/27/2011
These are different people getting shots or the ful(the flu is the most common way of getting it) at COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TIMES of their lives. I am talking about 2 different churches and years apart. Two of them did not go to either church my brother and I attended. One got it from the flu while in college, she got over it in about 3 months. My brother got it two years ago at at age 61 and he has not completely recovered yet. He still has to take nerve medicine for the palms of his hands and the soles of his feet. i realize that I have greatly over simplified the problem and the figures. For instance my brother was told that it was most likely the tetanus shot that gave it to him. All shots and the flu have different odds of giving it to you. The 1 in 250,000 number came from the doctor. He did not specify which or possibly all shots combined that were the odds he gave us. But think about this - what are the odds of my brother knowing 5 different people who all got it at different times and in in different ways in different locations???? I do NOT advocate avoiding vaccinations, I just disagree with the present way they are given all at once.
08:18 PM on 09/27/2011
Did you invite CDC to investigate the cluster in your church? If your data are correct, there may be something specific to your church, etc., that can be pinpointed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reality-2011
08:55 PM on 09/27/2011
Read my most recent comment above. My brother is the ONLY one who got it in our church from the shots for this trip. The others either got it from the flu at different times in their lives or from shots taken some place besides the church. There IS NO COMMON DENOMINATOR.
09:44 PM on 09/27/2011
Thanks for the clarification. Then maybe your church attracts parishioners with immune deficiency! Seriously though, the statistics are difficult. I know one person with terrible guillain barre syndrome out of my closest 10,000 friends. This doesn't give the probability at 0.01%. Uncertainty comes not only from the small numbers (1 in this case), but also I chose the dataset with the case in it already; further, it's not certain that she got this from the flu shot or some other trigger.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bdoug25000
Bio? Nope, Mostly mechanical
11:57 PM on 09/26/2011
We had a child die of whooping cough at the hospital I work at. I was directly involved in her care. I hope I never see anything like it again. I think people who decline to have their children vaccinated should be required to watch a video of a child dying of this horrifying disease. And each unvaccinated child should be required to wear a sign anytime they are out in public that declares that they are unvaccinated- the state can even pay for the sign. I have read some of these studies that make these ludicrious proclamations of the dangers of vaccination. Who makes this stuff up? Islamic jihadists? Chinese secret agents? Whoever it is, they are killing our children just as sure as if they used a bomb.
photo
Hitchslap2
Half lies and the rest isn't true...
01:50 AM on 09/27/2011
Conversely, people who are required to be vaccinated should be given ample, truthful information about the dangers and side-effects of these drugs.
03:55 AM on 09/27/2011
People are in fact given "ample, truthful information about the dangers and side-effects of these drugs." For you to spread this falsehood implies that you are either, as the old saying goes, ignorant or evil. Which is it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
see-ellen2001
09:28 PM on 09/27/2011
Blonde Hollywood b actresses.