iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Appalachia Coal Decline: Industry Faces Steep Challenges

Appalachia Coal Decline

By DYLAN LOVAN   09/27/11 01:09 PM ET  AP

GARRETT, Ky. -- When business screeched to a halt at Jerry Howard's eastern Kentucky mine engineering company two years ago, he decided to call it quits after four decades in the coal industry.

"We were sort of forced out," Howard says of the former company, Walturn, where he was part owner.

Business owners like Howard, politicians and miners in the hilly coalfields of Central Appalachia blame the industry decline on tougher regulation from the Obama administration. They aren't as ready to talk about something a change in administrations cannot fix. The region's thick, easy-to-reach seams of coal are running out, forcing many operators to shift to cheaper and more destructive mining methods that draw heavier environmental regulation.

Coal here is getting harder and costlier to dig – and the region, which includes southern West Virginia, Virginia and Tennessee, is headed for a huge collapse in coal production.

The U.S. Department of Energy projects that in a little more than three years, the amount of coal mined here will be just half of what it was in 2008. That's a significant loss of a signature Appalachian industry, and the jobs that come with it.

"The seams of coal that are left in this area are harder and harder to mine, and they're thinner and thinner and thinner," said Leonard Fleming, a retired Kentucky miner and union leader in Letcher County who worked in the industry for 32 years.

The thinner seams make it less cost-effective for a coal operator to send an army of miners underground, so surface mining with blasting and earth movers has often been the answer.

"I've heard of them getting little seams of coal as small as six inches," Fleming said.

Coal company reports to investors are also candid about the region's steadily declining supply of coal.

Arch Coal, the nation's second-largest coal producer, told investors last year that the region's coal "is in secular decline – faced with depleting reserves and significant regulatory hurdles."

Central Appalachia saw a boom in surface mining over the last decade, helped by industry-friendly regulation under former President Bush. Hiring in eastern Kentucky and southern West Virginia doubled at surface mines over the last decade, yet overall production fell by 25 percent there in all mines under and above ground.

The federal government's projections are dire for a region practically synonymous with coal. The Energy Department's statistical agency, the Energy Information Administration, says production is expected to drop to 112 million tons by 2015, less than half of the 234 million tons mined three years ago.

A collapse of that magnitude would have a devastating effect on the economies in eastern Kentucky and southern West Virginia, which produce about 90 percent of Central Appalachian coal.

There were about 37,000 coal industry employees in Central Appalachia in 2008, accounting for anywhere from 1 to 40 percent of the labor force in individual counties, according to a report by Downstream Strategies, a consulting firm in Morgantown, W.Va., which issued a report on the region's coming decline. The report blames the decline on the region's depleted reserves, environmental regulations as well as competition from regions that have lower operating costs, like the western U.S.

"We are going to see declines in labor and jobs, and it's going to happen rapidly" in West Virginia, said Rory McIlmoil, who helped draft the report. McIlmoil said that state is expected to see a decline of over $100 million in the taxes coal operators pay to mine in the state.

If the loss projections are true, "that's going to have a drastic effect" in eastern Kentucky, said Brad Hall, president of the Southeast Kentucky Chamber of Commerce in Pikeville.

"There's approximately 18,000 to 20,000 miners in Kentucky right now," Hall said. "If those production levels go down ... you can see what effect that would have."

Industry supporters and political leaders from the coalfields have taken aim at the Environmental Protection Agency under Obama, saying its tough stance on a controversial surface mining method known as mountaintop removal is stifling production and eliminating jobs.

In 2009, the year President Obama took office, coal production in eastern Kentucky fell by nearly 19 percent from the year before, from 90 million tons to 73 million.

"I am as afraid of my government as I have ever been," said Rusty Justice, who owns a Pikeville, Ky., engineering and construction business that works with coal operators. "The policies being enacted by my government is going to destroy the economy of my part of the state."

Powerful politicians like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear and West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin have railed against the federal government's enforcement actions against the industry, calling them a "war on coal."

Robert Ukeiley, an environmental lawyer in Berea, Ky., said industry and political leaders ignore the fact that seams in the region are getting harder to reach.

"They'll blame it on Obama and climate change, rather than just acknowledge that geology trumps economics," he said.

In one of the biggest blows to the industry, the EPA earlier this year revoked a water permit for Arch Coal's Spruce No. 1 mine in Logan County, which was to be West Virginia's largest surface mine that uses mountaintop removal. Plans for the Spruce mine included the burial of more than six miles of streams with material blasted and scraped from the mountain tops.

The West Virginia Coal Association, an industry group, said the rare act of revoking the permit "casts a dark shadow over all federal regulatory permit actions related to the coal industry in West Virginia and elsewhere." The group said the action eliminated hundreds of potential jobs.

Coal operators have also decried the regulations.

A top eastern Kentucky coal producer, Tampa, Fla.-based TECO Energy, said in its 2010 annual report that compliance with EPA standards are "projected to be very costly" and could make its "reserves no longer economic to develop."

Several coal operators and company executives, including officials from St. Louis-based Arch and TECO, were asked to comment for this story, but they declined to be interviewed by the AP.

Experts say a sign of the region's declining reserve base of coal is the steady drop in production despite the increase in hiring over the last decade. They say it's taking more labor to mine the same or less amount of coal.

Even with more workers, production dropped in Central Appalachia's underground and surface mines to 196 million tons in 2009 from 261 million in 2000 – a 25 percent decline.

"Now that tells you something, because it's not been declining in other parts of the country in that way. It tells you something about the economics of coal mining here," said Jason Bailey, a researcher at the Mountain Association for Community and Economic Development in Berea.

The Energy Information Administration said in a 2011 outlook statement that the region's coal is "extensively mined" and its higher-cost coal will slowly be "supplanted by lower cost coal from other supply regions."

Wyoming's Powder River Basin, produced about 417 million tons in 2009, more than twice the output of Central Appalachia that year.

Justice said when he was just getting into the business, an old veteran of the mines gave him some words to live by.

"He said, `The number one rule in mining is you mine the best and then what's left is the best,'" Justice said. "They've been mining coal here in the valley for about 100 years. And the first day the first guy mined the best lump of coal he could find – that was the easiest to get."

__

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

GARRETT, Ky. -- When business screeched to a halt at Jerry Howard's eastern Kentucky mine engineering company two years ago, he decided to call it quits after four decades in the coal industry. "We w...
GARRETT, Ky. -- When business screeched to a halt at Jerry Howard's eastern Kentucky mine engineering company two years ago, he decided to call it quits after four decades in the coal industry. "We w...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 72
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:44 AM on 09/29/2011
Mountain top removal requires a smaller work force than traditional coal mining, so even if the EPA gives a green light to mountain top removal, that will not guarantee jobs. In addition, coal companies might find it cheaper to hire undocumented immigrants or guest workers than to hire local miners. After all, this would bring more profit to the bottom line.

Furthermore, mountain top removal produces tons of toxic chemicals which enter local water supplies. If there is a Texas style drought in Appalachia, and wild fires break out around toxic waste dumps, what will happen?

Of course, politicians on both sides of the aisle love to blame Obama for all the problems in Appalchia, but really they need to look into the mirror and blame themselves. I do have a constructive solution. They need to check into the blog spot Californians for Clean Energy and Jobs. They need to follow that blog extensively. They may find a lot of clean energy alternatives that are much better than King coal.
07:43 PM on 09/29/2011
A single section underground mine would require 33 to 36 employees, where as a single spread of equipment for a surface mine would require 32 to 34 employees.

I really don't think hiring undocumented workers would work, and here's why, coal miners have to attend a training class which in West Virginia is 40 hours for a surface miner and 80 hours for a underground miner. Once the class is completed the worker is given a test, and if he/she passes they are given an apprintence card which is good for one year, within that year the worker has to work at least six months. After six months of working they are then require to take another test for their permament miners card. So I really think hiring undocumented workers is out of the question.
07:50 PM on 09/29/2011
Tons of toxic chemicals? Toxic waste dumps? Please. The only thing I can say is we've had several droughts in Appalachia throughout the years and were still here.

Why would we blame Obama? Could it be that during the campaign he said, "he would bankrupt the coal industry" and Biden said, "no new power plants"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JordanPerry
Resist.
06:13 PM on 09/28/2011
Stop now. Mountain Top Removal is wrong. Dirty coal is wrong. I respect the history of coal mining. These people worked hard in their day. Many died. Some died fighting for union rights we all benefit from. But we're destroying mountains, streams, ecosystems, and lives - human and wildlife - in pursuit of this dying fuel resource. Surely at some point the long term implications become clear? Maybe when long term means tomorrow..literally. Just Stop MTR Now!
08:52 PM on 09/28/2011
Tell the property owner that their mountain is being destroyed, 99% of the property owners who lease their land want it left as flat as possible, however mining laws require the land to be reclaimed to comply with AOC (Approximte Original Contour) regs.

Human life is not endangered by surface coal mining, and wildlife if flurishing on abandon mine sites. Deer, elk, turkey, bear, coyote, rabbit, squrrill, ducks and orther wildlife are thriving where they were seldom seen before.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JordanPerry
Resist.
09:49 PM on 09/28/2011
Walt, you sound like you propose to speak for all landowners and citizens. Your position is absurd, so I won't engage you at the level you propose to stoop to. However, I'm certainly encouraged you have such strong opinions. I've met trolls without such conviction before, and they generally all end up quite despondent after a while. I speak for all those who have witnessed the trurth, and that truth is that coal kills, mountain top removal is a barbaric end of times energy solution, and the states engaged in coal mining will be healthier and happier when the coal barons are gone.
10:10 PM on 09/28/2011
Just as you try to speak for all those against mining. Remember, I live in Appalachia and I talk the land owner where surface mining is taking place on a daily basis, don't take me wrong some people don't want their land mined and I respect their decision.

You seem to be a typical environmentalist, repeating what you've been told, afraid to do any research for yourself. If surface mining was really hamful to one health you would think the miners would fall ill before anyone else wouldn't you, while that is not the case. When a person only relies on one side he/she will never know the truth.

If you had you way and all coal mining was banned how would you propose to replace coal as a energy source? How would we make steel without coal? What about all of the other products that contain by products of coal?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raleigh Latham
Save our Wolrd
12:31 PM on 09/28/2011
HOORAY! Save Blair Mountain from those who would destroy all!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forester
Overeducated woods worker.
12:29 PM on 09/28/2011
Obama put those coal seams too deep on purpose!
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
11:10 AM on 09/28/2011
Of course the state governments knew that the coal wouldn't last forever and over the decades of the coal boom they have been reinvesting a portion of the profits into other industries to build up the state's economy, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Davidc Smith
Montani Sempre Liberi
11:03 AM on 09/28/2011
Mr. Peabody's coal train may have ten more years of rape, rob and pillage left before burning coal is lawed out of existence, and the world shifts its modes of generating energy. The headwinds, both economic,political,geologic, climatic, etc are all blowing against it, and all the WV friends of Coal bumper stickers aren't going to matter in Peroria Ill as they say.
09:21 PM on 09/28/2011
Question. Do you really believe that ten years from now that wind, solar, nuclear, hydro and biomass energy will have advanced far enough to replace nearly 50% of the nations energy?
10:44 PM on 09/27/2011
Capitalism is dependant on energy, and is entering its death throws as we run out of oil and coal. The words jobs and growth have consumed everything and we are left with a polluted cancer ridden world governed by corporate lobbyists and shareholders.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forester
Overeducated woods worker.
12:40 PM on 09/28/2011
The real question is, can we remain a capitalism and practice sustainability? The premise of constant growth has to be challenged. Sustainability is only possible with government controls which has other negative effects to innovation and entrepreneurship. It is THE human problem to solve, and fast.
09:08 PM on 09/27/2011
Maybe we should just buy coal from China. Most Americans don't care how polluted the other side of the world is as long as we can save money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:45 AM on 09/28/2011
Except that China doesn't have enough either and has started to import huge amounts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
07:02 PM on 09/27/2011
"In one of the biggest blows to the industry, the EPA earlier this year revoked a water permit for Arch Coal's Spruce No. 1 mine...Plans for the Spruce mine included the burial of more than six miles of streams with material blasted and scraped from the mountain tops."

"The West Virginia Coal Association, an industry group, said the rare act of revoking the permit "casts a dark shadow over all federal regulatory permit actions related to the coal industry in West Virginia and elsewhere."

REALLY? They expected to just BURY 6 miles of streams with debris and the 'regulations' are the problem here? Who would even have the nerve to propose such a plan?

This culture is insane.
07:28 PM on 09/27/2011
The environmentalist definition of the word stream is very different from what most think of. Environmentalist considers a stream starting at the top of the hill/mountain where they only carry water during a rain event. Some of these streams they contend are being covered up are actually less than six inches wide and a couple of inches deep.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jwredd
08:29 AM on 09/28/2011
"SOME of these streams they contend are being covered up are actually less than six inches wide and a couple of inches deep."
....and all the rest??

It's a classic argument you're making where you point out a small (possible) discrepancy or perceived exaggeration and use it to try and negate the monstrously_obvious and indisputable fact that mountain top removal has drastic effects on the landscape. It's called MOUNTAIN TOP REMOVAL. What do you suppose is the likelihood that you can remove a mountain top and not see any adverse or unintended effects to the surrounding environment?
photo
bad spelling grammar
Help save Big Cats from extinction!
07:01 PM on 09/27/2011
they need to reforest everywhere that the these coal thugs destroyed
07:44 PM on 09/27/2011
FYI planting trees on reclaimed mine site is a requirement of the permit which is approved by State and Federal acencies.
photo
bad spelling grammar
Help save Big Cats from extinction!
07:47 PM on 09/27/2011
glad to hear it, thanks for letting me know
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vexed weasel
08:14 PM on 09/27/2011
You lie!
Coal companies are nearly always granted waivers and instead reclaim the mountain with "topsoil substitute."
The streams they bury are never reclaimed. The local population is left with vile chemical mud in their drinking water.
American citizens are being reduced to slaves to globalism.

Liar.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
hazbro24
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro- HST
06:20 PM on 09/27/2011
"I am as afraid of my government as I have ever been," said Rusty Justice, who owns a Pikeville, Ky., engineering and construction business that works with coal operators"

Weird, spent 100 years digging it all up, and when it's almost gone, it's that Obama's fault. Sounds like "peak coal" to me has come and gone in that area.

Good riddance, when the coals all gone we won't have to hear nonsense about clean coal anymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
07:04 PM on 09/27/2011
by the time it's all gone, globally that is, we're not going to recognize this planet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Milks
Ecologist
02:25 PM on 09/28/2011
When all the coal is gone globally, CO2 levels will be around 1000 ppm, which is the same as in the Paleocene. There was a nice article in the last National Geographic on what the planet was like at the end of the Paleocene (Kunzig, R. 2011. World without ice. National Geographic 220(4):90-109). Quite an interesting read.
07:37 PM on 09/27/2011
You do realize that coal supplies nearly half the energy needed for this country to function. What do you propose we use for energy when coal is banned? Wind and solar currently accout for less than 3% of the energy needs, and wind experts estimate that it will be 25 or 30 years before wind power will be a major player.

I have an idea, let's develop alterative energy sources first and as these other sources are developed slowly cut back on the use of coal.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
hazbro24
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro- HST
07:55 PM on 09/27/2011
"You do realize that coal supplies".........

You got this part of your post right. This article is about coal supplies. Coal supplies RUNNING OUT in Appalachia.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wanderland
Generic white guy
04:51 PM on 09/27/2011
Here's an idea: Reclaim the land raped by the coal industry, and sell the carbon credits.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sooladgaf
05:05 PM on 09/27/2011
Apparently, you don't understand coal mining. the land reclaimed is required to be in better condition then before it was disturbed......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanoX
I'll be your snack-pack baby!
05:15 AM on 09/28/2011
LOL! Apparently you've never lived near or visited a closed coal site.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wanderland
Generic white guy
04:42 PM on 09/28/2011
I think DanoX summed it up well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wanderland
Generic white guy
04:49 PM on 09/27/2011
"The policies being enacted by my government is going to destroy the economy of my part of the state."
----------------------------

I'm sure the irony that the economy of his part of the state is destroying his part of the state is completely lost on him.
04:41 PM on 09/27/2011
So where is all the clean coal? It must be even harder to find...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JordanPerry
Resist.
06:31 PM on 09/28/2011
The unicorns have all the clean coal. Hidden behind the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.
04:31 PM on 09/27/2011
Mountaintop removal is a stink in the nostrils of God. A species that practices practices such a depredation against the natural world deserves extinction. So a war on coal sounds just about right to me. Glad to know Obama has done something right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sooladgaf
05:06 PM on 09/27/2011
and rolling brown outs will then follow.......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
06:57 PM on 09/27/2011
bound to happen sooner or later. how bout we leave the mountain tops in place, don't bury the streams and just deal with what's coming anyhow.
07:40 PM on 09/27/2011
Have you ever visited a mountaintop removeal site?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JordanPerry
Resist.
06:37 PM on 09/28/2011
I have Walt. I have pictures if you'd like. I met a man whos lived on the boundary of an MTR site in defiance of the coal company for years. Why? His family has lived there since the 1700's and they have a family cemetary there. They want him out. He wants them out. Seeing the mine site was like looking into a casket. People die from coal dust. Adults. Kids. The ecosystem they scrape off into the streams is called "overburden". It's another "collateral damage" kind of phrase. It actually means "every living thing." And that's what it's like. And its not some "legacy" industry key to the area. They laid off all the workers long ago. This horror benefits a few, at the expense of the many. Yes, Walt, I've been there.