iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Administration Solar Loans: Energy Department Approves 2 Guarantees Worth More Than $1 Billion

Obama Administration Solar Loans

MATTHEW DALY   09/28/11 08:59 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The Energy Department on Wednesday approved two loan guarantees worth more than $1 billion for solar energy projects in Nevada and Arizona, two days before the expiration date of a program that has become a rallying cry for Republican critics of the Obama administration's green energy program.

Energy Secretary Steven Chu said the department has completed a $737 million loan guarantee to Tonopah Solar Energy for a 110 megawatt solar tower on federal land near Tonopah, Nev., and a $337 million guarantee for Mesquite Solar 1 to develop a 150 megawatt solar plant near Phoenix.

The loans were approved under the same program that paid for a $528 million loan to Solyndra Inc., a California solar panel maker that went bankrupt after receiving the money and laid off 1,100 workers. Solyndra is under investigation by the FBI and is the focal point of House hearings on the program.

SolarReserve LLC, of Santa Monica, Calif., the parent company for Tonopah, is privately held. The Energy Department said its rules prevented it from discussing the company's financial information. Sempra Energy of San Diego, which owns Mesquite, is publicly held.

Energy Department spokesman Damien LaVera said the two projects had extensive reviews that included scrutiny of the parent companies' finances.

Chu said the Nevada project would produce enough electricity to power more than 43,000 homes, while the Arizona project would power nearly 31,000 homes. The two projects will create about 900 construction jobs and at least 52 permanent jobs, Chu said.

"If we want to be a player in the global clean energy race, we must continue to invest in innovative technologies that enable commercial-scale deployment of clean, renewable power like solar," Chu said in a statement.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., is a strong supporter of the Nevada project, which he says will help his state's economy recover. Former Gov. Jim Gibbons, a Republican, also supported the project.

The loan approvals came just two days before a renewable energy loan program approved under the 2009 economic stimulus law is set to expire. At least seven projects worth more than $5 billion are pending.

Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., chairman of a House energy subcommittee that is investigating Solyndra, said the impending deadline was no reason to complete loans before they are ready.

"Solyndra was the product of a bad bet rushed out the door, and taxpayers are now on the hook," he said. "We cannot afford DOE rushing out more Solyndras in these final hours."

A government watchdog group said the Solyndra bankruptcy shows the need for greater oversight of all the department's loan guarantee programs.

"It is time for a full audit of their activities, their management and their results," said Tom Schatz, president of Citizens Against Government Waste, Washington-based advocacy group.

"Candidly, it might be time for the federal government to rethink the whole idea of loan programs," Schatz added, calling the government's track record on loan guarantees "lousy."

Too often, the government either backs risky or failing ventures, resulting in a loss of taxpayer money, or subsidizes companies and industries that are mature and profitable and don't need the money, such as the oil and gas industry, Schatz said.

Scott Crider, a spokesman for Sempra Generation, a Sempra Energy subsidiary that is developing the Arizona project, said its loan guarantee was far less risky than the Solyndra loan. Most importantly, the project has a 20-year agreement with Pacific Gas & Electric Co. to buy power supplied by the solar plant, he said.

The purchase agreement is a key element of the project and will "provide assurance that there are sufficient revenues in place to support the loan guarantee," Crider said.

A similar agreement is in place in Nevada. NV Energy, the state's largest electric utility, has agreed to purchase power from the Tonopah tower, which will connect to NV Energy's power grid. The Interior Department approved the project, known as Crescent Dunes, last year.

Solyndra, of Fremont, Calif., was the first company to receive a loan guarantee under a stimulus-law program to encourage green energy and was frequently touted by the Obama administration as a model. Since then, the company's implosion and revelations that officials hurried review of the loan in time for a September 2009 groundbreaking has become an embarrassment for Obama as he tries to sell his job-creation program.

___

Follow Matthew Daly's energy coverage at http://twitter.com/MatthewDalyWDC

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — The Energy Department on Wednesday approved two loan guarantees worth more than $1 billion for solar energy projects in Nevada and Arizona, two days before the expiration date of a ...
WASHINGTON — The Energy Department on Wednesday approved two loan guarantees worth more than $1 billion for solar energy projects in Nevada and Arizona, two days before the expiration date of a ...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 164
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
08:44 PM on 09/30/2011
Good. We need many more projects like this.

Also federal incentives for residential solar.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:10 AM on 09/30/2011
Not a single word by the FluffPo about the Pelosi connection. That speaks volumes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OcotilloKid
Conservatives work..liberals are the entertainment
03:19 PM on 09/30/2011
The Fluffpo has never, ever printed anything critical of Comrade Peloski.
12:25 AM on 09/30/2011
Go ahead Obama... you are giving fuel to the fire..pun. THe huge fail of 500 million and are following that up with another taxpayer funded plan with solar and a political/Pelosi tie tells me you are over confident. Your need to repay and recapture the money is very transparent. In this time wasting our money will make us bitter and angry. Obama has underestimated the anger.
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
11:00 PM on 09/29/2011
Note to conservatives: Coal generating plants aren't free (cost is about the same as these solar projects) and neither is the coal which is burned as long as the plant is operational. Additionally, while coal fired plants emit enormous CO2, solar fields do not.
photo
SteveC 1979
Just...don't.
03:57 PM on 09/30/2011
In addition to the CO2, they also emit NOX, SOX, mercury, etc. We also need to get the fuel from somewhere which means we have to either mine for it here (destroying our own land) or buy it from abroad (not good for our own economy). Then you have to transport it - also bad for the environment to some extent. So for those reasons, I hope solar continues to grow. It is not a perfect solution right now, but with a few more years of technological innovation and public acceptance, I think it could be a major facet of this country's future generation portfolio and that is a good thing in my opinion. Zero emissions, zero fuel cost, low maintenance. Not a bad deal.
07:39 PM on 09/29/2011
Why? Remember what he said when he visited Solandra. This is America's future. Now I know without a doubt he was put into office to destroy America. Solandra's furture is bankruptcy. Is this what he is telling us? Bankruptcy is America's future and he will do everything in his power to see that this happens. If this is racist thinking then I am the #1 racist. If this is America's new definition of racism then I proudly take the honor as the #1 racist in the universe.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:32 PM on 09/29/2011
And we have been spending more than a billion dollars a day in Iraq and
Afghanistan since 2002 and that has never worried you?
09:20 AM on 09/30/2011
It doesn't bother Obama or he would have stopped the war.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:11 PM on 09/29/2011
WHAT?
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
05:05 PM on 09/29/2011
And here is just one example of the yearly mad dash to spend the tax payers money before the end of the fiscal year.

It must be simply coincidence that $Billions are being shoveled to companies that are large contributors to the democrats.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:27 PM on 09/29/2011
How much money have we spent to subsidize oil corporations? How much money have we spent, and are spending each day, to protect our oil interests in the Middle East? It's my understanding that we spend more than a billion dollars a day in Afghanistan and Iraq alone. I suppose you consider this a good use of our tax dollars but many people do not.

Germany has shown that the development of renewable energy electrical sources is sustainable and lucrative at the same time. They used the Kyoto Protocol information about the link between greenhouse gases and climate change to establish an economy based upon renewable energy. They have neither the budget deficit nor debt to China that we have.

Before criticizing the Democrats, remember it was Reagan who took the solar panels off of the White House, and Bush/Cheney who gave us two invasions and an unstable Middle East. We will be paying for the mistakes of these two administrations for many years.
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
08:08 PM on 09/29/2011
...' It's my understand­ing that we spend more than a billion dollars a day in Afghanista­n and Iraq alone. I suppose you consider this a good use of our tax dollars but many people do not....'

Wow..I don't see how you can make assumptions on what Ifavor. Actually I am with you on this.

I also think obama is a typical politician or maybe a tad more corrupt than most because the media and the democrats have given him so much cover. After all, Obama and the democrats could have changed all of the above but campaigning and giving billions away to his cronies is more important than what is best for the country.
09:29 AM on 09/30/2011
The heII Germany doesn't have a debt problem. They are the ones who are going to bail out all of Europe from Collapsing. All but a handful of Democrats didn't vote for the Iraq war. Democrats started warning us of Iraq's WMD's in 1998. Two full years before Bush took office. Democrats stated that Iraq had WMD's and if all else fails, we must invade Iraq and get rid of Saddam. Quit trying to re-write history Watch the clip.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSwSDvgw5Uc
03:52 PM on 09/29/2011
I think alternative energy should receive more subsidies than mature technologies but the discussion about giveaways to "big oil" or funding alternatives with subsidies to big oil need to be informed with a little fact. This is from EIA July of this year.

Electricit­­y subsidies in FY10, % total subsidy:

Coal 10%
Natural Gas/Petrol­eum Liquids 5.5%
Nuclear 21%
Renewables 55.3%
T&D 8.2%

Subsidies: direct expenditur­­es, tax expenditur­­es, R&D, loans and loan guarantees­­, electricit­­y programs in targeted regions eg TVA and the federal power marketing administra­­tions (hydro)

FY2010, all subsidies

Coal $1.3 billion
Natural gas/ petroleum liquids $2.8 B
Nuclear $2.5 B
Renewables $14.7B
Smart Grid $.9 B
Conservati­­on $6.6B
End use $8.2 B (LIHEAP, other)

You could say 2010 is skewed because of the stimulus. Here is 2007

Coal $3.9 B
Natural gas/pet liquids $2 B
Nuclear $1.7B
Renewables $5.1 B
Smart grid $1 B
Conservati­­on .4B
End use $3.6 B

If people want to make a real difference­, accurate informatio­n is important. If we don't start with technicall­y grounded facts and data we will always end up advocating pathways that lead us down rabbit warrens like the hydrogen highway or Futuregen. I prefer a more technicall­­y grounded, fact based look at the issues so we can come up with clean energy and climate solutions that match reality.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:33 PM on 09/29/2011
Thanks for compiling this list. When we factor in the military expenditures in protecting the oilfields and pipeline and interest we have to pay on the monies we borrowed the money given to oil corporations gets a whole lot larger. Our government also gives a lot of money to countries to convince them that they should allow our corporations to extract and export their oil. Of course that doesn't mean that the corporations have to sell the oil to us.
11:47 PM on 09/29/2011
It is hard to apportion our military to these activities but I agree that much of our military expenditures go to protect supply chains but those supply chains will likely just shift as we protect rare earth minerals that we need for alot of our electronics and renewable technologies that we are developing. The national oil companies have become much more self sufficient and are now contracting directly with service companies, don't need the super major oil companies, who essentially outsourced their technology development to service companies years ago, a bad business decision. The super majors have been forced into more difficult geographic and geologic provinces to find and produce oil. You are right, they don't have to sell to us, oil just goes into a world market. I have seen alot of posts saying we should shift our huge subsidies from oil to alternatives. I was just pointing out that those subsidies that are easily shifted -- I dare say supply chain protection is not -- are not that substantial. I was not surprised by the list. The entire report is interesting. Another thing that is not surprising is that much of the renewables subsidies goes to corn ethanol, one of the real travesties hidden in those numbers.
09:32 AM on 09/30/2011
It's not how much or what you subsidize. Obama commited a criminal act in granting this loan in return for campaign cash. And he did it against everyones advice that this company would fail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbirdalum
02:46 PM on 09/29/2011
I'm all for solar energy projects, but, I'm still for point-of-use solar. How many homes could be equipped with solar power at $30 to $50 thousand per home with over 700 million? I know these projects are a plus for alternative energy, but, I could see the money better spent as I said on point-of-use projects. Just Saying.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:36 PM on 09/29/2011
Solar panels for homes and small businesses are definitely the best fit. If we used the billion dollars a day we spend on Afghanistan and Iraq on solar panels, we could install a panel on about two million homes. If the money was used to provide low interest loans to homeowners and small businesses the number of panels would even go higher.

An additional benefit for point-of-use solar would be the reduced use on our overused and outgrown grid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hunter W
Bring more than your standardized leftist mantras.
09:58 PM on 09/29/2011
Unfortunately there are only a handful of places in the country to make solar viable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbirdalum
10:53 PM on 09/29/2011
Free2BeMe, Thank you for your insight as well, Fanned and Faved, my friend.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
02:20 PM on 09/29/2011
Corruption and scandals are taking place with billions of dollars going out to big corporations and the democrats have their heads in the sand.

See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.
02:56 PM on 09/29/2011
Cronyism...Nancy Pelosi's brother-in-law is involved in one of the companies receiving
$737 million dollar loan.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/crony-capitalism-737-million-green-jobs-loan-given-nancy-pelosis-brother-law_594593.html
photo
CivilDebate10
Low Info People = Statism's Best Friends
02:12 PM on 09/29/2011
Lets see, so far the "green jobs created" this week run at $19 million per job earlier this week and today about $16 million per job. Let's give Obama credit and assume that he'll figure out how to create a job for $15 million each. Ok, we need more than 10 Million jobs to get back to low unemployment, let's just use 10 million for ease of calculating... ok..... 10,000,000.00 x $15,000,000.00 = $150,000,000,000,000.00 (what's after Quadrillion, Septillion?) WOW a Trillion used to be considered a lot but the Dems and Obama have taken wild irresponsible "job spending" to new heights.
photo
CivilDebate10
Low Info People = Statism's Best Friends
01:28 PM on 09/29/2011
The Feds just gave Nancy Pelosi's brother in law's company a $700+ Million loan for solar energy. I'm sure that was just a coincidence......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:41 PM on 09/29/2011
They don't event try to hide the corruption anymore.
BaliHai84
Right is the opposite of wrong. .
11:21 PM on 10/02/2011
It is mind boggling, isn't it? How they just steal right in front of our faces.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:43 PM on 09/29/2011
and not a peep about it here on huffpo....
photo
CivilDebate10
Low Info People = Statism's Best Friends
01:27 PM on 09/29/2011
$1,000,000­,000.00 for 52 permanent jobs, or $19,230,76­9.23 per job.. yeah,, that sounds like an Obama type jobs plan. Here's an incredibly obvious idea: free up exploratio­n in just 1/4th of the places you're stopping it and it wouldn't cost a penny and you'd create 1000's of jobs. Of course all the brain trust in the WH can't do that... no ,,, that doesn't give them control.

Also, interesting news today.... the Feds just gave a $700+ Million loan to Nancy Pelosi's brother in law.... I'm sure that's just a coincidence though... right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:39 PM on 09/29/2011
But you're perfectly happy spending more than a billion dollars a day in Afghanistan and Iraq?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lambdin1
What's this?
01:20 PM on 09/29/2011
Now for the chattering nay-sayers known as the Republican/Tea Pary! I'd bet they'd holler if hung with a new rope.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbirdalum
02:32 PM on 09/29/2011
They would holler if they were hung like a horse. Just Saying.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:14 PM on 09/29/2011
Then YOU pay for these thieves of taxpayer dollars.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jesternhell
thanks to all that fan, fav, and reply
12:38 PM on 09/29/2011
what is the going tax rate on solar?