More

China Space Station: Tiangong-1 Experimental Module Launched

CHRISTOPHER BODEEN   09/29/11 11:57 AM ET   AP

BEIJING — China launched an experimental module to lay the groundwork for a future space station on Thursday, underscoring its ambitions to become a major space power over the coming decade.

The box car-sized Tiangong-1 module was shot into space from the Jiuquan launch center on the edge of the Gobi Desert aboard a Long March 2FT1 rocket.

It is to move into an orbit 217 miles (350 kilometers) above the Earth and conduct surveys of Chinese farmland using special cameras, along with experiments involving growing crystals in zero gravity.

China then plans to launch an unmanned Shenzhou 8 spacecraft to practice remote-controlled docking maneuvers with the module, possibly within the next few weeks. Two more missions, at least one of them manned, are to meet up with it next year for further practice, with astronauts staying for up to one month.

The 8.5-ton module, whose name translates as "Heavenly Palace-1," is to stay aloft for two years, after which two other experimental modules are to be launched for additional tests before the actual station is launched in three sections between 2020 and 2022.

"This is a significant test. We've never done such a thing before," Lu Jinrong, the launch center's chief engineer, was quoted as saying by the official Xinhua News Agency.

The space station, which is yet to be formally named, is the most ambitious project in China's exploration of space, which also calls for landing on the moon, possibly with astronauts.

In terms of technology, the launch of the Tiangong-1 places China about where the U.S. was in the 1960s during the Gemini program. While it is planning fewer launches than the U.S. carried out, the Chinese program progresses farther than the U.S. did with each launch it undertakes, said Joan Johnson-Freese, a space expert at the U.S. Naval War College in Rhode Island.

"China has the advantage, 40-plus years later, of not having to start at the bottom of the learning curve on its human spaceflight program," Johnson-Freese said.

China's authoritarian, centralized political system also offers the advantage of freedom from political wrangles over funding and clearly defines the program's long-term goals within Soviet-style five-year plans.

China launched its first manned flight in 2003, joining Russia and the United States as the only countries to launch humans into orbit and generating huge amounts of national pride for the Communist government.

However, habitual secrecy and the space program's close links with the military have inhibited cooperation with other nations' space programs – including the International Space Station.

At about 60 tons when completed, the Chinese station will be considerably smaller than the 16-nation ISS, which is expected to continue operating through 2028.

China applied repeatedly to join the ISS, but was rebuffed largely on objections from the U.S., prompting it to adopt a go-it-alone strategy.

While the program has proceeded with no apparent major problems, the launch of the Tiangong-1 module was delayed for one year for technical reasons, and then rescheduled again after a Long March 2C rocket similar to the Long March 2F failed to reach orbit in August. The incident with the rocket was investigated and problems were reportedly resolved.

Although experts see no explicit military function for the Chinese space station, the country's other space-based military programs, including the destruction of a defunct Chinese satellite with a rocket in 2007, have caused alarm overseas.

"It is a nation doing its own thing saying, 'OK, we can do what you did for our own country separate from cooperation, on Chinese terms,'" said Charles Vick, an expert on the Chinese space program with Globalsecurity.org, which tracks military and security news.

Numerous challenges lie ahead, including the attempt to dock remotely – U.S. astronauts handled the maneuver from aboard their spacecraft. The Long March 5 rocket that is being prepared to launch the 20-ton modules for the actual space station also remains untested.

Still, Beijing is expected to press ahead whatever the difficulties as long as it continues to result in international prestige, domestic credibility, technological advancement, and economic spin-offs, Johnson-Freese and Vick said.

"Basically, they will get what they want regardless of how long or what it takes for the authoritarian state to accomplish the assigned tasks," Vick said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

BEIJING — China launched an experimental module to lay the groundwork for a future space station on Thursday, underscoring its ambitions to become a major space power over the coming decade. Th...
BEIJING — China launched an experimental module to lay the groundwork for a future space station on Thursday, underscoring its ambitions to become a major space power over the coming decade. Th...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,707
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (54 total)
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
06:38 PM on 10/01/2011
Manned space flight is becoming increasingly less effective in terms of its return on investment. Particularly when considering exploration beyond earth's/moon's proximity. The cost of outfitting an exploratory module which must sustain life, is quite significantly more than non-manned modules. As robotics advances, this becomes increasingly the case.

Manned exploration beyond the moon increases life-sustaing technology costs exponentially. From what I've read, I would guesstimate that a manned flight to mars, as opposed to non-manned, would cost on a level of 50 to 100 times more.

Manned deep space exploration has an elegant and inspiring feeling to it, but in reality will be quite difficult to achieve... unless one is willing to increase the risk of not returning. Until we find the "wormhole", manned deep space travel is a very long way off.
03:20 PM on 10/01/2011
Space is our future NASA should've never been but completely regardless of economy.
03:46 PM on 10/01/2011
*cut
11:28 AM on 10/01/2011
We need a destination in space. A station should be a stopping point on the way to another station. Mining asteroids would be beneficial for developement in space. We need manufacturing and research and developement in space or on the moon. lifting everything from earth is not efficent or economically feasible. One manufacturing facility on the moon could build more equipment there for establishing other facilities, on asteroids or other moons in the solar system.
Step by step is the way to go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gilbert Albright
08:29 AM on 10/01/2011
The Chinese will discover what the USA and others have come to realize. Space Stations are huge money pit. Will someone please tell how the US has benefited from having a space station?
There have been no significant scientific discoveries made. The only relevant data it provides is that of the effect on long term weightlessness on the human body. The whole thing is a colossal waste of money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StansDad
Guy who eats food
02:27 PM on 10/01/2011
The level of scientific research that goes on in the ISS is well above what you can comprehend I assure you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:54 AM on 10/01/2011
I think CNN pointed out that along with the images and graphics shown
on Chinese TV, was the tune of America the Beautiful !

Will those tv executive's be around long, banished or worse ?
10:40 PM on 09/30/2011
statesmen don't care about their country. If they did, none of their leaders from Nixon up to now would have been elected. Now the idiots will select Perry. what a "winner"... Mark another X in the loss column americans.
07:03 PM on 09/30/2011
100-Year Business Plan

A Chinese firm recently announced plans to revive an abandoned IBM site near the Hudson in New York, advertising 100 or so new jobs for the start-up phase. They have announced plans to hire hundreds more in the next few years.

I think they'll going to make some solar power products.

I'm pleased that so many new jobs will be created, and I wish the firm luck. But what surprised me was a comment in one news story that the company actually has a 100-year business plan.

If true, that certainly suggests intention to stick around and to succeed. Maybe it's all PR. Like anyone would tell me. But I like the idea of a 100-year business plan no matter how impractical it may be.

Welcome and thanks for investing where one of the most prestigious American companies just gave up and left town.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kart
05:33 PM on 09/30/2011
just watch 1421 and the life of general Seng He.... they were very advanced then.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zutroy
05:26 PM on 09/30/2011
A few months ago, I was arguing with someone here underneath an article about the Chinese advancing rapidly in their space program. The person suggested to me that because Chinese products at their local store were of low quality, that must mean the Chinese won't be able to succeed with their space program over in China.

I explained over and over again how narrow-minded it was to judge a whole country based on the products that country happened to make available in the area near that person, and the person didn't seem to get it. The person seemed to think China would just implode because the narrow spectrum of products (products obviously unrelated to the technology in the space program) available to that person wasn't up to a particular standard.

Gee... I wonder if that person is still promoting that same argument now.
03:26 PM on 09/30/2011
Confucius say : He who build space station get high on life
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Smith1820
03:19 PM on 09/30/2011
Nixon should have stayed home.
11:55 AM on 09/30/2011
I can not believe what I am reading on this post. The last thing we want is for private industry to take over NASA's mission. One of NASA's jobs is to make sure that new technologies are introduced to private industry to insure that America is number one in technology. Private industry has no desire to give away their technology to their competitors.

As for China getting into space, remember, whoever rules space rules the Earth. And yes, military weapons will be placed in space. They already have been.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramkshrestha
Lumbini-Kapilvastu Day Movement
11:36 AM on 09/30/2011
China is in the third position in space science after Russia and USA.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Jamie Kowalski
Composer
11:43 PM on 09/30/2011
You mean chronologically, right?
11:12 AM on 09/30/2011
It seems like some of the proponents of manned space travel are making a halfhearted attempt to get ye olde space race gravy train thing going again, which is actually rather silly since the global elite who control NASA and the rest of the aerospace/industrial complex are busy demolishing the whole concept of the nation-state.
It is very true that competition can indeed be an effective method of manipulation and mind control but the trendy motivator of choice nowadays is terror. Most people will go along with anything if you make them afraid. So if you want us to support spending trillions of dollars on “deep space exploration” you're gonna have to come up with a credible boogie man. So far, we're not impressed. How about this: Tell everybody that Iran is conspiring with aliens from an al-Qaeda ruled planet in the Alpha Centauri system to crash a huge asteroid into the heartland of America. A lot of NASA's dupes would fall for that one, hook, line, and sinker. After all, you've played them for suckers before. Kids that grew up on Star Trek and Star Wars will believe almost anything as long as it is endorsed by their infallible NASA Gods. Wasn't Nazi Wehner Von Braun just a wonderful human being? Would Walt Disney lie?
But the true believers in the NASA gospel aren't the problem—you've got to scare the rest of the sheeple.
10:44 AM on 09/30/2011
美国 这个“神奇”的国家,不仅政府想法独特,人民想法也很让人感到可笑。
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Smith1820
03:18 PM on 09/30/2011
Totally agree, all the lead paint must be terrible for the people locked up inside.
08:17 PM on 09/30/2011
确实啊