More

Anwar Al-Awlaki's Death: Is America Any Safer?

First Posted: 09/30/11 02:28 PM ET Updated: 11/30/11 05:12 AM ET

Awlaki

WASHINGTON -- The killing of American-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen has brought cheers from lawmakers and terrorism experts, but it remains an open question whether his demise will make the United States safer from future terrorist attacks.

"This is huge," said Jane Harman, a former chair of the House homeland security subcommittee on intelligence who now heads a foreign policy think tank. "He was terrorist number one" in the wake of Osama bin Laden's killing by U.S. Navy SEALS in May. "Awlaki had more ability to inspire and train U.S. homegrown terrorists than anyone else."

Michael Hayden, a former director of the CIA and the National Security Agency, said the elimination of the Internet imam, whose greatest influence was in recruiting Westerners to his extremist cause, is "a very important step. But remember Awlaki was always bigger in our eyes -- with good reason -- than he was" to his group, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

Gregory Johnsen, a Yemen expert at Princeton, agrees that Awlaki loomed larger in the West than in the Arabic-speaking world because of his command of English.

"He's not the number 1, not the number 2, not the number 3 (in AQAP). He's not the chief religious leader, not the head bombmaker, he's not any of these roles. But in terms of being someone who inspired so-called 'lone wolf' terrorists in the West -- someone who speaks English, is very charismatic -- that's where he was a unique figure and he will not be as easily replaced."

Awlaki and fellow American Samir Khan, the editor of an English-language jihadi magazine who was also reportedly killed in the drone strike, are the latest terrorist motivational or operational leaders taken out under President Obama's watch.

Awlaki's elimination was greeted with bipartisan approval on Capitol Hill. Rep. Peter King (N.Y.), the Republican chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, even went so far as to call it "a tremendous tribute to President Obama," saying that in recent years Awlaki "has been more dangerous even than Osama bin Laden had been."

Christopher Boucek, a Yemen expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, disagrees, saying Awlaki is "not more important than bin Laden, not by a long shot. Bin Laden was the founding leader of al Qaeda and head of the global movement. Awlaki was a very powerful orator, increasingly linked to operations according to U.S. officials, but to be clear amid all the congratulatory talk in Washington today, very little has changed in Yemen," which remains a key terrorist sanctuary. "The political and economic and humanitarian crises facing the country are far more dangerous than any one single person."

Awlaki, who was born in New Mexico, had developed over the last two years "from an Internet ideologue to full-blown operational planner," wrote Frank Cilluffo, director of the Homeland Security Policy Institute at George Washington University, in a recent report.

"By no means is it the death knell of AQAP, but it is a significant blow, especially in terms of what he tried to export to the West," Cilluffo told The Huffington Post. "Awlaki was the primary proselytizer and mover and shaker trying to radicalize and recruit Westerners to the al Qaeda cause. With him out of the picture, that bodes well for the United States and national security."

U.S. intelligence officials, who once viewed Awlaki as little more than a propagandist for Islamic extremism, had grown concerned about what seemed to be his increasingly hands-on involvement in several recent terrorist operations:

-- Army Maj. Nidal Hasan carried on an email exchange with Awlaki in which he sought religious counsel about whether it was permissible to kill Americans. He later allegedly killed 13 people in a rampage at Fort Hood in November 2009.

-- Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be "underwear bomber" who tried to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas Day 2009, met with Awlaki a few weeks before his bungled attack, according to Yemeni officials.

--- Faisal Shahzad, the Pakistani-American who pleaded guilty to trying bomb New York's Times Square in May 2010, said he was "inspired" by Awlaki after making contact with the cleric through the Internet.

-- A 2010 plot to conceal bombs inside cargo shipped aboard planes headed to the U.S. is believed to have originated with AQAP and specifically with Awlaki.

-- Wikileaks cables released earlier this year linked Awlaki to a possible fifth team of hijackers who intended to take part in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington.

Though Awlaki has never been charged in a U.S. court, the Obama administration added him to its
"capture-or-kill" list in January 2010 for his alleged role in the Fort Hood shooting and the Christmas Day plot.

Johnsen, the Yemen expert, isn't convinced Awlaki was responsible for those attacks.

"It's not at all clear to me whether Awlaki is someone who pushed these lone wolves over the edge, or whether he spoke to their already-held beliefs," he said. "The argument is that if you kill him, you make America safer. I'm just not sure that's true."

Cilluffo said the killing of Awlaki could trigger more attacks in the short-term. He noted that many other senior al Qaeda leaders -- including bin Laden's personal secretary, Nasir al Wahayshi; bombmaker Ibrahim Hassan Asiri, also a former personal secretary to Bin Laden; and released Guantanamo detainee Said al-Shihri -- all remain at large and eager to launch new attacks on the West.

Additional reporting by Joshua Hersh.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The killing of American-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen has brought cheers from lawmakers and terrorism experts, but it remains an open question whether his demise will make the Uni...
WASHINGTON -- The killing of American-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen has brought cheers from lawmakers and terrorism experts, but it remains an open question whether his demise will make the Uni...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 394
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
02:16 PM on 10/12/2011
Since this action most likely stopped many potential terrorists from being influenced by Al-Awlaki and turning into actual terrorists, his death is more than justified.
Ziegler21WP
My bio is not micro
05:09 PM on 10/09/2011
Disrupt and hope to dismantle-the same approach we have always taken towards organized crime.
I have not lost one mintue of sleep over this killing. Will it make us safer? Yes, more than a little and less than complete safety. And that is how it works..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bagocheese
Look out Jimmy..he's gaining on ya
12:26 PM on 10/04/2011
Safer? Maybe, maybe not. But I for one feel a great deal better that this guy was turned into mincemeat.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:51 PM on 10/02/2011
Jane Harmon, another American who should be tried for treason.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hvsmrspct
Rational faith and animosity towards oppression
05:11 PM on 10/02/2011
i would like to know the criteria of themoderaters in choosing to or not to post a comment. i wrote several replies yesterday and they hav not been posted. never disrespectful, never hateful...never calling to wrong action...so why not post it? perhaps due to disagreements?

one such example is when i replied to the mention that though it didn't make us safer it makes "them" to which i said that the unlawful, unconstitutional, illegal assassination by our government upon its non-combatant, clergy, citizens who have never been formally charged with a single crime makes me nervous for our own fait as individuals and as a nation.
photo
halfpricefaustian
Voted for Obama. Waiting for Godot.
12:33 PM on 10/02/2011
If you read the examples listed in this article carefully and think about them, they are actually quite thin. He talked to Nadal Hasan before he went on base at Fort Hood and killed people? Oh, my. He spoke with the underwear bomber? String him up! Cat Stephens said it was probably ok to kill Salman Rushdie. Why not send a drone to take him out?
This supposed "linkage" is starting to sound less like command-and-control and more like seven degrees of Kevin Bacon.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:53 PM on 10/02/2011
Hear, hear.  Linkage is a long way from proof.  Jane Harmon, who was quoted in the article, had "linkage" to Inraeli shenanigans and wasn't even indicted much less assassinated.
11:41 AM on 10/04/2011
Do you say the same for Os8ma? he did not k1ll anyone with own hands but he spoke and encourage others to do it. So what's your point? Did you want to wait for him k1Ll someone with own hands before he is considered guilty? Seriously people.
05:59 PM on 10/01/2011
Slowly picking apart Al Qaeda but surely. This was a good death, well deserved.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hvsmrspct
Rational faith and animosity towards oppression
07:37 PM on 10/01/2011
1.) accused by his government of being al-qaidah but he never made such a claim and denied it himself.
2.) assassination by his own government without a single formal charge being brought against him...despite his being a citizen of our nation.
3.) deserved for what? Saying it is alright for Muslims of foreign nations to defend themselves against invading forces? Believing his government was acting tyrannically around the world? Telling people they don't have to succumb to democratic or western rules? - what exactly did he do to deserve to be targeted for a drone attack by his own nation?
4.) be ery careful when you answer this last question because maybe when you are a bit wiser you too will speak out against a wrong done by our nation...will their assassinating you then be good as well since you felt the freedom to exercise your first amendment rights?
11:53 AM on 10/02/2011
The facts are he was instrumental in the Ft Hood/Maj Nidal's massacre, giving advice and the green light to kill soldiers. As for being a bit wiser, I hope you will become, once you are faced with the facts that Al Qaeda's goal is the death of EVERY American, regardless of our individual political leanings. You are an apologist and a bleeding heart for Muslim causes, but you are an American (I am assuming?) and a target; right out of Al-Awlaki's lips. In closing, I do not believe "my country right or wrong" but again, this was well deserved, a good death. Semper fi!
photo
SpookyAnnya
RN for higher teachers' salaries
10:25 PM on 10/06/2011
# 1 Lie Preached it to his followers and on his website...#2 Lie joining Al-Qaeda is Treason(all rights even right to live is lost)
Ziegler21WP
My bio is not micro
05:11 PM on 10/09/2011
I'm a liberal Democrat. I doubt we agree on much but we agree on this.
05:44 PM on 10/12/2011
I also happen to be liberal and vote Democrat :), but opinions and beliefs are like a pallet of colors, they encompass the entire spectrum..
03:36 PM on 10/01/2011
Maybe not but it sure makes them more nervous.
03:26 PM on 10/01/2011
The idiot who wrote this article would probably ask " does it make your child safer?" when a neighbor who is a known pedophile gets arrested. People like these are disgusting.
06:16 PM on 10/01/2011
The pedophile does not become a martyr. I think that's a big difference. The question whether Awlaki will inspire more terrorism dead that he did alive is an open one. The question whether America is safer with him a dead martyr rather than a living propagandist, is an open one. So open that only time will tell.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hvsmrspct
Rational faith and animosity towards oppression
07:07 PM on 10/02/2011
I think that you raised an excellent point unintentionally. A dead martyr instead of a living propagandist. A.) he was killed due to his beliefs and stands and so perhaps he will be a martyr though he did not die as a combatant. B.) he was a propagandist at worst, does this justify our government targeting a u.s. Civilian for a drone attack?
So the question of whether Americans are safer, the answer should be a resounding no, on the contrary we are in a more perilous situation. Not due to Muslims being inspired by his death, instead, it is due to our government's illegal behavior being accepted. It removes a layer of protection from "we the people" when our government can accuse us of anti-government propaganda, label us as extremists and then kill us without charge or trial...only to have our fellow citizens applaud. Far from safer...we are now in a far more dangerous situation.

Again, I suggest to everyone, read and re-read animal farm, it is very important in these days of a "war on terror".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:56 PM on 10/02/2011
Exactly.  And another issue is that everyone, including the Georgia Yankee, has a past.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
02:41 PM on 10/01/2011
Ridiculous headline; of course America is safer. Simply look at all the terrorists Al-Awlaki inspired and assisted.
photo
halfpricefaustian
Voted for Obama. Waiting for Godot.
12:38 PM on 10/02/2011
Inspired? Possibly. Assisted? No evidence.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
01:53 PM on 10/02/2011
Read the 9/11 report to see the ways Awlaki assisted the hijackers. Read the newspaper articles to see the multitude of ways Al-Awlaki trained and recruited al-qaeda members and also planned attacks.
Ziegler21WP
My bio is not micro
05:14 PM on 10/09/2011
I don't think you have read the excellent investigative reporting. Evidence, aplenty.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:57 PM on 10/02/2011
So, does that mean that Iraq would be safer if Donald Rumsfeld was liquidated?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
11:28 PM on 10/02/2011
If you want to go all the way back; Iraq would be safer if Bush I had gone all the way when he had the chance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
02:25 PM on 10/01/2011
The best thing would be to ask Bush and Tony Blair to give an estimate as to how many more death of Al Qaeda and innocent world population would make the world safe from Al Qaeda attacks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:23 PM on 10/01/2011
HaleemK:

“Yes but Iraq and Saddam had nothing to do with Alqaeda and 9/11.
=======

Al Qaeda and 9/11 are only one part of this war.

Saddam's heroes were Stalin and Mohammed. He played both sides of the street--whatever was to his personal advantage on a given day.

Any superpower that allowed someone like that to gain control over Middle East oil would have been derelict in its duty.

He shared many goals with bin Laden and hated the West just as much, but would not share his leadership position with anyone.

After the Hussein family was gone, we should have been gone too--with a warning that we would be back if Saddam's successors try what he tried.
02:09 PM on 10/01/2011
You comment is simply pathetic! Your comment reflects the same background as hat of Stalin and Hitler, you justify the killing of many innocent people based on the sins of one man. Your way of thinking is identical to that of any terrorists. You can write the same sentences by being part of AQ and get away with murder. You way of thinking is really inhumane.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:34 PM on 10/01/2011
Thanks. I like you a lot, too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill Sampson
Truth is the most valuable thing we have!
06:38 PM on 10/01/2011
Well put!
03:39 PM on 10/01/2011
Bush the father had Saddam effectively grounded and he posed no threat to the US.
photo
Damn Damien
Naturally!
05:17 PM on 10/01/2011
Haleem,

I decided to revive my old blog (http://dam­nbulletin.­blogspot.c­om/) with a couple of posts today, one about Imam Rauf's views on Sharia.

It would be a pleasure if you left comments or contribute­d to it. Please let me know what you think about it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:31 PM on 10/01/2011
More people here agree with you than with me.
01:12 PM on 10/01/2011
One less terrorist the better, and no his no rights because we are war, which of you people failed to understand. Wars gives the governments the license to kill the nation-states' enemies. A lot of you better start understanding that little fact. Citizen or no citizen is totally irrelevant during the time of war.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:00 PM on 10/02/2011
We are at war?  When was declared?  Does Congress know?  The president?  If we were at war, the government might have the license to kill the nation-states' enemies, but we are not at ward.  You better start understanding that little fact.
08:59 PM on 10/02/2011
September 14, 2001

President Bush declares a national emergency.
The Senate adopts a resolution authorizing the use of U.S. armed forces against those responsible for the attacks. Maybe you get your facts--for a change. We are at war--who38.
01:09 PM on 10/01/2011
Awlaki's death may not be the end of el quida, nor will it make the US or the rest of the world any safer from others who think they have the duty to kill innocent people to make a point, but Awlaki was eliminated and good riddance to him , and we should eliminate who ever replaces him thinking, he is the new leader of any of these islamic movements , I hope we can eliminate him as well or incarcerate them for life, any one who actually thinks that by killing in the name of Allah, they will be rewarded in the house up in the sky with the 72 virgins is by definition at best not altogether sane in the head.
photo
halfpricefaustian
Voted for Obama. Waiting for Godot.
12:47 PM on 10/02/2011
What if they believed that after they die, they get to decide if their wife could come into heaven, that they would be given a planet to rule? You should be careful with that kind of stuff.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:01 PM on 10/02/2011
Well, if we do eliminate his replacement, I hope we do it quietly and without any US citizen profiting from that death.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hvsmrspct
Rational faith and animosity towards oppression
12:24 PM on 10/01/2011
I will sum this up very briefly - we are told to be afraid of people who think differently than we do, who believe differently, who live differently. We are told they want to hurt and kill us so be afraid.
Then we are told the government will protect us if we are willing to give up just a few of our basic rights.
Then, when we do, and forget, the government assassinates people to make us feel better about losing our rights, to make us "feel" safer...and we celebrate.
Then the government targets it's own citizens after labeling them threats and those who are not targeted feel relieved that the government is protecting them from their fellow citizens.

Animal farm needsbto be mandatory reading for u.s. Citizens!