iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Women Recovering From Recession At Significantly Slower Pace Than Men, New Study Shows


First Posted: 10/03/11 06:13 PM ET Updated: 10/03/11 06:42 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Although the recession initially hit men hard, it's women who have been struggling the most to get back on their feet, according to a report released Monday.

Men lost more jobs than women did in the Great Recession, but their unemployment levels have been steadily decreasing over the past year, the study shows. Women, on the other hand, are facing a stalemate and regaining very few jobs, resulting in a significantly higher percentage of women who continue to have deep concerns about their economic security.

"Women seem to have remained in the recession a year and a half after its end, and in the year since the survey was completed, women have failed to share the same gain afforded by the weak job recovery," the report says.

The report, conducted by the Institute for Women's Policy Research, surveyed 2,746 American adults 18 years and older from September to November 2010. It was "statistically adjusted" to accurately represent the U.S. adult population.

The economic recession has frequently been dubbed a "mancession" to refer to the fact that men were hit especially hard by the downfall. Men have lost 6.2 million jobs since 2007, and women have lost 2.6 million, according to the report. However, men have regained 27 percent of those jobs. Women have recovered just 9 percent of jobs lost, meaning that men are recovering nearly three times faster.

As women's unemployment levels continue to flatline, 65 percent of women worry about saving money for the future, compared to just 45 percent of men, the report shows.

The report suggests the recession has slammed single mothers the hardest, with 16 percent reportedly "experiencing hunger" in the previous year and 35 percent using food stamps. Furthermore, only 43 percent of women believe they would have enough savings to cover two months of income if laid off, compared to 61 percent of men. Twenty-eight percent of women have not gone to the doctor in the past year because of the cost -- up 7 percent from 2007 -- and 16 percent have not taken a child to the doctor due to costs -- up 4 percent from 2007.

Carol Wayman, director of federal policy for the Corporation for Enterprise Development, said there may be hope for women in Obama's American Jobs Act, citing the bill's ability to "add new resources to the real job creators -- new businesses under one-year old and usually unincorporated."

"Due to high levels of unemployment among women, especially young women, self-employment can increase much needed income," she said, suggesting that new entrepreneurs "are likely to be much more reflective of gender racial diversity."

Still, the road to recovery for women may not reveal itself anytime in the near future. Women's policy experts have found the Obama's proposal is insufficient in battling stagnant unemployment levels for women in particular.

Heidi Hartman, president of IWPR, told HuffPost that the $400 billion in Obama's job creation plan "is less than what we need," and called for at least double the amount.

Terry O'Neill, president of the National Organization for Women, said it is "absolutely astonishing that we have come to this point."

“We don’t have a deficit crisis in this country. And anyone who says we do has a political axe to grind and is not telling the truth to the American people," O'Neill said in a panel addressing women and the economy last Wednesday. "We have a deficit problem that needs to be fixed and it can be fixed over the long term. The crisis that we have in this country is a jobs crisis."

Although O'Neill expressed support for the legislation when it was announced, NOW currently does not endorse the American Jobs Act.

The organization does, however, hope Congress will enact a bill with additional "progressive amendments" proposed by Rep. Jan Shakowsky's (D-Ill.), which would create 2.2 million jobs in various sectors, including health and child care.

Both Hartman and O'Neill called for more job creation focus in the fields of health care and education -- industries in which women predominate.

"There's a lot more we should do," Hartman said. "Women are still in recession. The recovery has not yet begun."


FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Although the recession initially hit men hard, it's women who have been struggling the most to get back on their feet, according to a report released Monday. Men lost more jobs than ...
WASHINGTON -- Although the recession initially hit men hard, it's women who have been struggling the most to get back on their feet, according to a report released Monday. Men lost more jobs than ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 60
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heroine addict
habitual goddess worship
10:39 AM on 10/04/2011
The recession is NOT over.

The "recovery" is a myth extrapolated from cherry picking statistics.

By using the term you are participating in the whitewash.

It's time we demand that journalists stop using the word.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
01:18 AM on 10/04/2011
Has anyone contrasted comments on Canadian politics and American politics? Canadian comments on Canadian stories are more indepth. There are fewer of them and the comments for the most part come from intelligent people. That's why I like reading them and responding. I can see why some networkers get their badges. They make a lot of cheap remarks and have a following of people like themselves. Now that isn't all of the moderators but keep track of them by recording friends and followers. The higher the numbers the dumber their remarks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
02:51 AM on 10/04/2011
What does this post have to do with this article. Flagged for being irrelevant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
09:00 AM on 10/04/2011
Got your attention eh? That's my point about these badges. You go around reading articles and flagging non related entries and I can tell you there are a lot of them.
Let me ask you this. Are you a boy scout? Is that your purpose? To collect badges?
The actions of some people on this site is not to convey proper communication and you have further proven that point by trying to strike down my observation. I find you abusive to my observation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justanoldhippie
sarcasm, intended
11:54 PM on 10/03/2011
Can't we just call it what it is? A GREAT DEPRESSION!
llyd wlsh
chem, nuke, bio hazard
10:55 PM on 10/03/2011
WHO'S RECOVERING FROM THIS RECESSION????
10:45 PM on 10/03/2011
Man is still running it...
10:41 PM on 10/03/2011
Not true and you know it, recovery from the recession is the same weather you are male or female.
llyd wlsh
chem, nuke, bio hazard
10:56 PM on 10/03/2011
is it cloudy up their?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rysagr
whip me beat me just don't bore me to death
09:39 PM on 10/03/2011
world ends tomorrow. women and children hardest hit
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ligligl
feelthy liberal! ...and not just a pretty face!
09:36 PM on 10/03/2011
Nobody is recovering anything, Jackass...
Logicnotfaith
Ret. Lt Col. USAF, now college prof in Austin TX
09:10 PM on 10/03/2011
So let me get this straight, per the article: 6.2 M men lost their jobs, 27% got them back, leaving 4.5 M men still unemployed

Women lost 2.6 M jobs and got 9% of them back, leaving 2.3 M women unemployed.

So twice as many men are unemployed than women, but the focus should be on job creation for women?

More feminist victim-hood spin
photo
Henk
I like your Christ, I don't like your Christians..
09:23 PM on 10/03/2011
Your mind works in mysterious ways. Its says a lot about you that you see "feminist victim-hood" in the article.
Logicnotfaith
Ret. Lt Col. USAF, now college prof in Austin TX
11:38 PM on 10/03/2011
"Still, the road to recovery for women may not reveal itself anytime in the near future. Women's policy experts have found the Obama's proposal is insufficient in battling stagnant unemployment levels for women in particular."

Yeah right, to he!! with 4.5 million unemployed men, Obama should focus on the 2.3 million unemployed women...
llyd wlsh
chem, nuke, bio hazard
10:57 PM on 10/03/2011
a woman can do ANY JOB a man can
Logicnotfaith
Ret. Lt Col. USAF, now college prof in Austin TX
11:58 PM on 10/03/2011
For most jobs perhaps, but not those that require a healthy dose of testosterone...
Hate to burst your bubble but there are jobs that require significant physical strength that the "average" woman just doesn't have...its called human biology...
12:37 PM on 10/30/2011
If you believe that then why have any reference to men or women, or which jobs are being created? If all people can do all jobs, then just work on getting more jobs and ignore whether a person has a penis or a vagina.

But, I don't think you actually believe what you're writing.
08:53 PM on 10/03/2011
It is tough for women, especially when other women in hiring positions gang up and shut them out. In my wife's last two situations she had had to get by women senior partners and all women hiring committees and both times she has been stonewalled...not because of her resume or skillset...she is a Stanford Law grad with 24 years of experience, but we are starting to believe this phenomenon is because of a "hen party" mentality where the women in charge of the hiring decisions simply decide there are are already enough women in the organization already...so bug off!

This is just a working theory...but my opinion is that grade school/high school style sexual politics definitely come into play in these situations and it is unfortunate for women who are just trying to get back into the market place and then be thwarted by those of their own sex. Not that there should be any advantage, but I suggest something else is going on here. A bizarre sort of reverse sexism, where the hiring committee fears reprisal if they add another woman. Sorry if this sounds weird, this is our experience in the past few months.
10:45 PM on 10/03/2011
Calicanuck nature always correct itself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
02:58 AM on 10/04/2011
Is your wife now unemployed? Or just trying to move up?
12:53 PM on 10/04/2011
Unemployed...
08:17 PM on 10/03/2011
I'd love to see a break-down of the stats used that included additional info, age and race for example. "Women" is a broad category. It is so broad that any conclusions based on such a study may miss important differences among segments of women. For example, woman in group AA, between the ages of 25 and 35, may in fact be hiring in at a faster rate than women of similar ages in groups BB or CC. In fact, women in group AA , between 25 and 35, may be returning to the workforce in greater numbers than some or all men, but that fact is hidden because women in groups BB and CC are pulling down the return to workforce numbers for all women. If corrective actions are to taken, and remedies to be applied, we need to identify those in need of those corrective actions and remedies. Grouping all women together, as the subject study appears to have done, does not provide the needed information for targeting barriers to employment for women. The study however, is a good departure point for a more in-depth study.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
03:14 AM on 10/04/2011
Most of the raw numbers needed to figure that out are available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics on a monthly basis.

Here are some quick numbers form looking at the monthly Employment Situation report comparing unemployment rates last year (August 2010) to this year (August 2011):

Men 20 to 24: Unemployment rate down 0.8% (now 16.5%)
Women 20 to 24: Unemployment rate up 0.5% (now 12.8%)

Men 25 to 34: Unemp. rate down 0.7% (now 9.8%)
Women 25 to 34: Unemp. rate even (now 7.2%)

Men 35 to 44: unemp rate down 0.1% (now 8.1%)
Women 35 to 44: Unemp rate even (now 6.8%)

Men 45 to 54: Unemp rate down 1.6% (now 7.4%)
Women 45 to 54: Unemp rate down 0.4% (now 6.8%)

Men 55+: Unemp. rate down 1.5% (now 7.0%)
Women 55+: Unemp rate up 0.2% (now 7.1%)

Overall, women's unemployment rate has decreased 0.1% over the past year, men's unemployment rate has decreased 0.9% over the past year.
07:03 AM on 10/04/2011
And yet there are still 30% more unemployed men.
07:43 PM on 10/03/2011
Duhhhhh Ya think?
07:30 PM on 10/03/2011
Men lost 3 times more jobs than women and are being hired back 3 times faster than women. You are likely to have more qualified men applying, since there is a much larger percentage of them unemployed.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
efffox
The truth is NOT halfway between right and wrong
07:09 PM on 10/03/2011
The whole world would be a better place if women were in charge. Not just any woman will do though - Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann have proven that - but smart, liberal women. And I'm confident that they're smart enough to understand how the Republicans are working overtime to take away their rights. Obama signed the "Lily Ledbetter" equal pay bill has promoted many issues important to women - health, education, domestic violence, etc. I'd like to be fair and balanced and mention what Republicans have done for women - but nothing whatsoever comes to mind!!! Oh well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
06:57 PM on 10/03/2011
I wrote this in August based on BLS data:

While more men lost jobs in the recession, fewer women are returning to work.

I concluded:

"Over five million men lost jobs from 2007 to the bottom of the recession in late 2009. Over two million women lost jobs during that time frame.

88% of the people who have returned to work are men!

But over one million men have returned to work (1,357,000 men according to the the July BLS numbers) whereas only 179,000 women have returned to work. That means that 88% of the people who have returned to work are men, not women."

http://mollysmiddleamerica.blogspot.com/2011/08/men-losing-more-jobs-in-recession.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
02:43 AM on 10/04/2011
As new jobs numbers will be released Friday, I will update this number then.