More

Md. Professor Shares Nobel Prize In Physics

Nobel Prize

ALEX DOMINGUEZ   10/ 4/11 07:45 PM ET   AP

BALTIMORE — The discovery that earned Adam Riess the Nobel Prize came at another momentous time for the Johns Hopkins physicist.

Riess recalled Tuesday that the surprising finding that the expansion of the universe was accelerating instead of slowing occurred as he was about to get married to his wife, Nancy. The observations caused flurries of emails between researchers during his wedding weekend in 1998.

One flurry came as Riess and his new wife returned to their Berkeley, Calif., apartment from the wedding to prepare for their honeymoon.

"And I get right behind the computer to respond to this set of email to tell people why I thought the evidence was good enough and she looks up and goes `Adam, serioiusly? On our honeymoon?' And I said `This one's really important,'" Riess said Tuesday, drawing laughter from his colleagues as his wife looked on.

"And she rolled her eyes like `Oh, I'm going to get to hear this for 20 years' And I was like `I mean it,' and that actually was a critical email at that time."

Riess was one of three scientists awarded the 2011 Nobel Prize in physics for the discovery that has led to research into dark energy, an enigmatic force believed to be responsible for the accelerating expansion.

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awarded the prize to Riess, an astronomy and physics professor at the university, fellow American Saul Perlmutter and U.S.-Australian citizen Brian Schmidt. Perlmutter heads the Supernova Cosmology Project at the University of California, Berkeley. Schmidt is the head of the High-z Supernova Search Team at the Australian National University in Weston Creek, Australia.

Riess and Schmidt worked on one of two competing research teams in the 1990s and Perlmutter on the other. The teams analyzed exploding stars known as supernovas, selecting a certain type of a known brightness to determine their distance from Earth. Instead of finding the expansion of the universe was slowing, as expected, they were surprised to find they were racing away from each other at increasing speed.

Riess, who was at the University of California at Berkeley at the time, said in a conference call earlier Tuesday that he and other researchers initially thought the findings must have been wrong. But, he said, they couldn't find an error.

When asked about the recent announcement that scientists in Europe had found neutrinos traveling faster than the speed of light, which also runs against current thinking, he cautioned against dismissing unusual results.

"As a lot of my colleagues say when they hear about a strange result, they go `Oh, that's wrong' and usually `How do you know?' then `Well, most things that are weird turn out to be wrong'. And that's true but you don't want to completely close your ears and eyes to seeing weird things because a lot of the most interesting things we see at some point were the weird things," Riess said.

Riess is the second Johns Hopkins scientist to win a Nobel Prize recently. Carol Greider shared the 2009 prize in medicine for her work helping solving the mystery of how chromosomes protect themselves from degrading when cells divide.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DC

BALTIMORE — The discovery that earned Adam Riess the Nobel Prize came at another momentous time for the Johns Hopkins physicist. Riess recalled Tuesday that the surprising finding that the expa...
BALTIMORE — The discovery that earned Adam Riess the Nobel Prize came at another momentous time for the Johns Hopkins physicist. Riess recalled Tuesday that the surprising finding that the expa...
Filed by Michael Grass  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Progress2342
Liberal, Atheist Science Teacher
04:35 PM on 10/04/2011
Somewhere old Al is smiling ... he was right after all. At least provisionally so; who knows what they'll find tomorrow, if they keep looking?

Perhaps the most important takeaway here is yet another demonstration of the scientific method's ability to change its assumptions in the face of evidence that contradicts them.

(Compare, inevitably, with "we alone possess eternal truth; we are never wrong, have never been wrong, will never be wrong, because supernatural invisible beings told us so; and if reality conflicts with our beliefs, disregard reality.")
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dh Barr
Bringing Clues to the Clueless
07:54 PM on 10/04/2011
When I was studying Astrophysics back in the '80s, the overwhelming SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS was that expansion must be slowing due to gravity. The alternative view was that there was no slowing because the force of gravity at those distances was just too low to stop the universe from expanding forever. Turns out both sides were wrong.

I'll keep this in mind the next time someone tells me how the overwhelming consensus of a bunch of scientists just can't be wrong.
photo
LeftInTheWest
End Prohibition AGAIN!
01:16 PM on 10/04/2011
As humans, we see the necessity of predicting the "Big Crunch" after the "Big Bang" because we are accustomed to birth and then death of every organism we encounter. Anthropomorphism influences our thinking. That is why this dark energy, or whatever it really is, is so puzzling. It actually makes scientists mutter about multiple universes, or multiverses.

Just because our limited senses cannot detect something, does not mean it is not there. We might just be incapable of sensing other dimensions. Some lucky day, we might invent some device that has detection senses that find the smoking gun proof of the really exotic.

We have come a really long way since Galileo first saw the moons of Jupiter. Now we use radio telescopes to view exotic objects billions of light years into deep space. And yet, there are still some who believe in a flat Earth and heaven.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Genep34
stop the nightmare, end the GOP
11:29 AM on 10/04/2011
Great work
07:47 AM on 10/04/2011
41? Wow. Congratulations professor.